Hi Sérgio,
On 02/14/2014 02:28 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
sorry I don't have time to follow fedora.next tread / discussion , btw I
also have a big idea for fedora.stable , pretty simple idea, to a fedora
releases more stable like one fedora 20.1
There used to be such an effort (look up Fedora Uni
On Sex, 2014-02-14 at 02:11 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > I also don't know when F21 is branched , but should be soon ,
> >
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases#Development still in TBA (to be
> > announced)
>
> Fedora 21 is actually being delayed for an unknown amo
On 02/13/2014 07:50 PM, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
Le Jeu 13 février 2014 19:40, Rahul Sundaram a écrit :
Hi
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 12:56 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
A party who is molesting me with ads and tries to spy on me, hardly is
my
friend.
That certainly goes way too far. We have ass
On 02/13/2014 07:21 PM, DJ Delorie wrote:
A party who is molesting me with ads and tries to spy on me, hardly
is my friend.
Those are strong words, and based mostly on here-say. Even the Fedora
installer "molests you with ads" for various non-default packages.
Should we ban the installer? O
On Fri, 2014-02-14 at 09:27 +0530, Parag N(पराग़) wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 5:18 AM, Adam Williamson
> wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-02-13 at 09:26 +0530, Parag N(पराग़) wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> >From the yesterday's pkgs git commit logs I see 3-4
>
Hi all,
On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 5:18 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-02-13 at 09:26 +0530, Parag N(पराग़) wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> >From the yesterday's pkgs git commit logs I see 3-4 people built
> > few packages for libicu soname bump. I am not sure why a single person
> > can't carry
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 8:29 PM, Eric Smith wrote:
>
> On Feb 13, 2014 4:29 PM, "Sandro Mani" wrote:
> > On 14.02.2014 00:12, Eric Smith wrote:
> >> but several people suggested that it would be better to wait for OCE
> (downstream) to be rebased on the new OpenCASCADE release, and the OCE
> pac
On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 02:09:29 +0100,
Kevin Kofler wrote:
This is a particular case because Firefox is our default browser on almost
all our spins (only the KDE spin defaults to Konqueror+KWebKitPart). Given
that, IMHO, it is completely unacceptable for Firefox to show ads (that
aren't part
On Feb 13, 2014 4:29 PM, "Sandro Mani" wrote:
> On 14.02.2014 00:12, Eric Smith wrote:
>> but several people suggested that it would be better to wait for OCE
(downstream) to be rebased on the new OpenCASCADE release, and the OCE
package to be moved from RPM Fusion into Fedora.
> Christopher ment
Colin Walters wrote:
> Right, it's a lame workaround for a lack of higher order structure
> beyond "set of packages".
For live images, the spin kickstarts could just drop that preset file
directly into the file system. For installers, it'd need some magic in
Anaconda though (unless we do away wi
Sérgio Basto wrote:
> I also don't know when F21 is branched , but should be soon ,
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases#Development still in TBA (to be
> announced)
Fedora 21 is actually being delayed for an unknown amount of time because
people want to completely change how Fedora works
Kai Engert wrote:
> Are we allowed to ship software in Fedora that dynamically loads
> advertisements from the web and shows them to users?
Not sure, but it's really not a nice thing for software to do.
> Is the Fedora community willing to accept Mozilla's desire to show
> advertisements in Firef
On Thu, 2014-02-13 at 09:26 +0530, Parag N(पराग़) wrote:
> Hi,
>
>From the yesterday's pkgs git commit logs I see 3-4 people built
> few packages for libicu soname bump. I am not sure why a single person
> can't carry such a few package rebuilds for libicu soname bump.
>
>Whoever (people n
On 14.02.2014 00:12, Eric Smith wrote:
I wrote:
> but several people suggested that it would be better to wait for OCE
(downstream) to be rebased on the new OpenCASCADE release, and the OCE
package to be moved from RPM Fusion into Fedora.
I see that OCE 0.15 was released yesterday, and is n
I wrote:
> but several people suggested that it would be better to wait for OCE
(downstream) to be rebased on the new OpenCASCADE release, and the OCE
package to be moved from RPM Fusion into Fedora.
I see that OCE 0.15 was released yesterday, and is now based on the
upstream OpenCASCADE 6.7.0, wh
On Feb 12, 2014 4:54 PM, "Christopher Meng" wrote:
>
> 2014-2-12 PM6:32于 "Sandro Mani" 写道：
>
> > By the way, concerning OpenCASCADE, this would also open up the
possibility for packaging Code-Aster and Salome for Fedora. I once started
looking at packaging them, but stalled of since it's quite an
Hi,
On Qui, 2014-02-13 at 00:48 -0300, Carlos Morel-Riquelme wrote:
> now i don't now if i can update to fedora 21 branched when this is out
I also don't know when F21 is branched , but should be soon ,
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases#Development still in TBA (to be
announced)
btw als
On Thu, 2014-02-13 at 13:44 -0600, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Feb 2014 17:39:40 +0100
> Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> > > Based on these arguments, I'd like to propose to move this file to
> > > the fedora-release package (or elsewhere, if you can suggest better
> > > place).
> >
> >
> > I agr
On 13 February 2014 18:50, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
>
> Le Jeu 13 février 2014 19:40, Rahul Sundaram a écrit :
>> Hi
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 12:56 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>>
>>> A party who is molesting me with ads and tries to spy on me, hardly is
>>> my
>>> friend.
>>
>>
>> That certain
What do I do about this?
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6526911
[While building and running tests]:
CC ../build/flintxx/test/t-traits
CC ../build/flintxx/test/t-fmpzxx
virtual memory exhausted: Cannot allocate memory
make[1]: *** [../build/flintxx/test/t-fmpzxx] E
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Config-IniFiles:
c34156374d3842289e537aaafa7b937f Config-IniFiles-2.83.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.o
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/525
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/525/0001-Ticket-525-Replication-retry-time-attributes-cannot-.patch
--
Mark Reynolds
389 Development Team
Red Hat, Inc
mreyno...@redhat.com
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 14:11:38 -0500,
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 1:50 PM, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
How can they give any assurance? Unless the targets of those ads are
hosted by mozilla...
Maybe that is exactly what they are going to do? They haven't published all
of
On Thu, 2014-02-06 at 17:44 +0100, Ales Kozumplik wrote:
> dnf-0.4.13 is out [1], [2]. F20 version will follow shortly. We ship
> Delta RPM support, bash completion and keepcache again in this version.
>
> Remember to come meet the team at DevConf.cz this weekend.
Sorry I missed you guys at DevC
commit 474fae091668db88b29b3bcf9a9a730d2c8e7f0a
Author: Paul Howarth
Date: Thu Feb 13 20:05:01 2014 +
Update to 0.08
- New upstream release 0.08:
- Switched packaging to just EUMM, as MBT wants the .xs file in a
different
place
- Switch to ExtUtils::MakeMaker
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Class-Load-XS:
c4d992d7023fa3015322916850ee95d9 Class-Load-XS-0.08.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/m
On 2-6-14 17:44:11 Ales Kozumplik wrote:
> We ship
> Delta RPM support
What a pleasant surprise on a slow network to see drpm-s rebuilt in
the background while downloading others.
Thank you.
--
Garry T. Williams
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.
Summary of changes:
936e6be... Perl 5.18 rebuild (*)
65d60a8... - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_20_Mass (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mail
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 13 Feb 2014 17:39:40 +0100
Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 2:53 PM, Václav Pavlín
> wrote:
>
> > Package systemd ships file 90-default.preset [1] (full path:
> > /usr/lib/systemd/system-preset/90-default.preset) which contai
Hi
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 1:50 PM, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
>
> How can they give any assurance? Unless the targets of those ads are
> hosted by mozilla...
Maybe that is exactly what they are going to do? They haven't published all
of their plans yet and when they do, we can very well verify t
On Thu, 2014-02-13 at 11:03 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> in the shape of a long short rectangle
sometimes, I wonder what goes on in my brain.
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net
--
On Thu, 2014-02-13 at 13:21 -0500, DJ Delorie wrote:
> > A party who is molesting me with ads and tries to spy on me, hardly
> > is my friend.
>
> Those are strong words, and based mostly on here-say. Even the Fedora
> installer "molests you with ads" for various non-default packages.
Those aren
On Thu, 2014-02-13 at 17:39 +0100, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> Le Jeu 13 février 2014 15:47, Nikos Roussos a écrit :
> > On Thu, 2014-02-13 at 15:28 +0100, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> >> Le Mer 12 février 2014 17:20, Nikos Roussos a écrit :
> >>
> >> > The "New Tab" feature will provide quick access to p
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 09:24:30AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Well, if the products want to diverge on what to start/enable, we could
> do this I suppose. It's been suggested that we look at having a
> fedora-release for each product (with deps on those things the product
> advertises as part of t
On Thu, 2014-02-13 at 10:23 -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 16:47:38 +0200,
>Nikos Roussos wrote:
> >On Thu, 2014-02-13 at 15:28 +0100, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> >> Le Mer 12 février 2014 17:20, Nikos Roussos a écrit :
> >>
> >> > The "New Tab" feature will provide quick
On Qui, 2014-02-13 at 12:56 -0600, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Sat, 2014-02-01 at 15:03 +0100, poma wrote:
> > With a companion libraries. ;)
> >
> > ↗ libmbim-1.6.0
> > ↗ libqmi-1.8.0
> > ↗ ModemManager-1.2.0
> >
> >
> > poma
> >
> >
> > Oh Danny boy, the pipes, the pipes are calling
> > From g
On Sat, 2014-02-01 at 15:03 +0100, poma wrote:
> With a companion libraries. ;)
>
> ↗ libmbim-1.6.0
> ↗ libqmi-1.8.0
> ↗ ModemManager-1.2.0
>
>
> poma
>
>
> Oh Danny boy, the pipes, the pipes are calling
> From glen to glen, and down the mountain side
> The summer's gone, and all the flowers a
Le Jeu 13 février 2014 19:40, Rahul Sundaram a écrit :
> Hi
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 12:56 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>
>> A party who is molesting me with ads and tries to spy on me, hardly is
>> my
>> friend.
>
>
> That certainly goes way too far. We have assurance from Mozilla that
> there
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 8:53 AM, Václav Pavlín
wrote:
Currently this file is part of systemd package which doesn't seem to
be
right. It contains default values specific for distribution, is not
part
of systemd upstream repository and is maintained downstream.
Right, it's a lame workarou
On 02/12/2014 10:54 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On 02/07/2014 04:06 AM, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
Dear all,
Unless there are objections, I will be updating the python-sphinx
documentation generator in Rawhide to the latest 1.2.1 release.
For the convenience of maintainers of affected
Hi
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 12:56 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> A party who is molesting me with ads and tries to spy on me, hardly is my
> friend.
That certainly goes way too far. We have assurance from Mozilla that there
is no spying or tracking going on here and we have yet to see what form o
> A party who is molesting me with ads and tries to spy on me, hardly
> is my friend.
Those are strong words, and based mostly on here-say. Even the Fedora
installer "molests you with ads" for various non-default packages.
Should we ban the installer? Of course not.
There are specific issues t
On 02/13/2014 05:41 PM, DJ Delorie wrote:
Why do we care about using the Firefox trademark? We should just
rename the package. Debian do that and it hasn't hurt them.
Debian has different core values than Fedora does. The relevent
Fedora value is this one:
Friends
We believe succes
On 02/13/2014 05:04 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 03:36:00PM +0100, Kai Engert wrote:
Question (2)
Is the Fedora community willing to accept Mozilla's desire to show
advertisements in Firefox?
Sub-question (2b):
Why do we care about using the Firefox trademark?
I don'
On Thu, 13.02.14 17:40, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek (zbys...@in.waw.pl) wrote:
> > > Based on these arguments, I'd like to propose to move this file to
> > > the fedora-release package (or elsewhere, if you can suggest better
> > > place). This package is specific to Fedora distribution as well an
> Why do we care about using the Firefox trademark? We should just
> rename the package. Debian do that and it hasn't hurt them.
Debian has different core values than Fedora does. The relevent
Fedora value is this one:
Friends
We believe success comes from a strong community, made of peo
Le Jeu 13 février 2014 15:47, Nikos Roussos a écrit :
> On Thu, 2014-02-13 at 15:28 +0100, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
>> Le Mer 12 février 2014 17:20, Nikos Roussos a écrit :
>>
>> > The "New Tab" feature will provide quick access to popular sites in
>> the
>> > users location, without any collection
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 09:24:30AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Feb 2014 14:53:13 +0100
> Václav Pavlín wrote:
>
> > Hi,
>
> ...snip...
>
> > Based on these arguments, I'd like to propose to move this file to
> > the fedora-release package (or elsewhere, if you can suggest better
> >
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 2:53 PM, Václav Pavlín wrote:
> Package systemd ships file 90-default.preset [1] (full path:
> /usr/lib/systemd/system-preset/90-default.preset) which contains rules for
> command 'systemctl preset NAME'.
>
> Based on these arguments, I'd like to propose to move this fil
Kaleb KEITHLEY wrote:
> Is there anything that can be done to wrap up this package review so
> that we can move forward?
Given sufficient non-responsiveness, sounds like there has been...
Remove the reviewer, so someone else can step in.
-- rex
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.
On Thu, 13 Feb 2014 14:53:13 +0100
Václav Pavlín wrote:
> Hi,
...snip...
> Based on these arguments, I'd like to propose to move this file to
> the fedora-release package (or elsewhere, if you can suggest better
> place). This package is specific to Fedora distribution as well and
> contains Fe
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 16:47:38 +0200,
Nikos Roussos wrote:
On Thu, 2014-02-13 at 15:28 +0100, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
Le Mer 12 février 2014 17:20, Nikos Roussos a écrit :
> The "New Tab" feature will provide quick access to popular sites in the
> users location, without any collection of p
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 16:04:01 +,
"Richard W.M. Jones" wrote:
Sub-question (2b):
Why do we care about using the Firefox trademark? We should just
rename the package. Debian do that and it hasn't hurt them. It makes
the software more free because we don't have to beg someone to be abl
On Thu, 13 Feb 2014 08:04:15 -0800
Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 10:54:14AM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > Quite a lot of packages rely on Sphinx, so I
> > think we may even want to deal with this in a side-tag.
> >
> >
> My understanding from Dennis is that creating and
On February 13, 2014 6:04:01 PM EET, "Richard W.M. Jones"
wrote:
>On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 03:36:00PM +0100, Kai Engert wrote:
>> Question (2)
>>
>> Is the Fedora community willing to accept Mozilla's desire to show
>> advertisements in Firefox?
>
>Sub-question (2b):
>
>Why do we care about usin
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 10:54:14AM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> Quite a lot of packages rely on Sphinx, so I
> think we may even want to deal with this in a side-tag.
>
>
My understanding from Dennis is that creating and then merging side tags in
koji is not a trivial thing (I can't remember
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 03:36:00PM +0100, Kai Engert wrote:
> Question (2)
>
> Is the Fedora community willing to accept Mozilla's desire to show
> advertisements in Firefox?
Sub-question (2b):
Why do we care about using the Firefox trademark? We should just
rename the package. Debian do that
On Thu, 2014-02-13 at 15:28 +0100, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> Le Mer 12 février 2014 17:20, Nikos Roussos a écrit :
>
> > The "New Tab" feature will provide quick access to popular sites in the
> > users location, without any collection of personal data (except of
> > course from checking the locati
On 02/13/2014 12:33 PM, Martin Stransky wrote:
From the original post at [1]:
"Directory Tiles will instead suggest pre-packaged content for
first-time users. Some of these tile placements will be from the
Mozilla ecosystem, some will be popular websites in a given geographic
location, and so
Le Mer 12 février 2014 17:20, Nikos Roussos a écrit :
> The "New Tab" feature will provide quick access to popular sites in the
> users location, without any collection of personal data (except of
> course from checking the location of his IP). At lease this is the
> current design by Mozilla.
A
Hi,
The gluster community has been trying to get its
glusterfs-openstack-swift package reviewed since August (2013).
See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1003089
I realize that reviewers are often unpaid volunteers working on their
own time. On the flip side, the package owner, who
Hi,
With current changes in Fedora regarding Fedora.next and productization
of Fedora distribution I would like to suggest following change.
Package systemd ships file 90-default.preset [1] (full path:
/usr/lib/systemd/system-preset/90-default.preset) which contains rules
for command 'system
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 4:49 AM, Nils Philippsen wrote:
> sorry for stepping on your toes -- it was late in the evening and there
> were three packages blocking my build, I simply overlooked that harfbuzz
> was rebuilt already (I checked the others in koji and no builds were
> underway).
No probl
Hi,
On Wed, 2014-02-12 at 20:19 -0800, Dan Mashal wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 7:56 PM, Parag N(पराग़) wrote:
> > Hi,
> >From the yesterday's pkgs git commit logs I see 3-4 people built few
> > packages for libicu soname bump. I am not sure why a single person can't
> > carry such a few pa
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1064778
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
From the original post at [1]:
"Directory Tiles will instead suggest pre-packaged content for
first-time users. Some of these tile placements will be from the
Mozilla ecosystem, some will be popular websites in a given geographic
location, and some will be sponsored content from hand-picked
Hi,
On 02/07/2014 10:06 AM, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
> openlmi-networking-0:0.2.1-1.fc20.src
> openlmi-networking-0:0.2.2-2.fc20.src
> openlmi-providers-0:0.4.1-2.fc20.src
> openlmi-providers-0:0.4.2-2.fc20.src
> openlmi-scripts-0:0.2.4a-3.fc20.src
> openlmi-scripts-0:0.2.6-5.fc20.src
> openl
Petr Pisar writes:
> On 2014-02-12, Michael Scherer wrote:
>> Le mercredi 12 février 2014 à 07:11 -0500, Matthew Miller a écrit :
>>> On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 12:08:20PM +, Petr Pisar wrote:
>>> > > Are there any existing packages that already do that?
>>> > vim advertises ICCF to make a dona
68 matches
Mail list logo
