Re: Non-%doc files in %{_defaultdocdir}?

John Morris wrote: > > > On 02/09/2014 05:20 PM, Rex Dieter wrote: >> John Morris wrote: >> >>> My goal for the forthcoming LinuxCNC release is readiness for inclusion >>> in both Fedora and Debian. >>> >>> Right now, a "sample-configs" directory is installed into >>> ${prefix}/share/doc/linuxc

Re: Review swaps: misc debian packaging stuff

On Sun, Feb 09, 2014 at 07:07:01PM +0100, Sandro Mani wrote: > Hi, > > Some more debian packaging stuff, useful when building certain > packages with pbuilder: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1063044 - dh-autoreconf > - debhelper add-on to call autoreconf and clean up after the bu

Re: Non-%doc files in %{_defaultdocdir}?

On 02/09/2014 05:20 PM, Rex Dieter wrote: > John Morris wrote: > >> My goal for the forthcoming LinuxCNC release is readiness for inclusion >> in both Fedora and Debian. >> >> Right now, a "sample-configs" directory is installed into >> ${prefix}/share/doc/linuxcnc/examples. >> >> This is a typi

Re: Review swaps: misc debian packaging stuff

On 10.02.2014 00:58, Christopher Meng wrote: I've marked your dput review as duplicate as I closed my dput review bug months ago. You can package dput-ng. Dput is nearly dead now. Missed that. Thanks. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailm

Re: Review swaps: misc debian packaging stuff

I've marked your dput review as duplicate as I closed my dput review bug months ago. You can package dput-ng. Dput is nearly dead now. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-o

Re: Review Swap

Thanks. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: Non-%doc files in %{_defaultdocdir}?

John Morris wrote: > My goal for the forthcoming LinuxCNC release is readiness for inclusion > in both Fedora and Debian. > > Right now, a "sample-configs" directory is installed into > ${prefix}/share/doc/linuxcnc/examples. > > This is a typical pattern, at first glance, but it turns out that t

Re: Review swaps: misc debian packaging stuff

On 09.02.2014 19:07, Sandro Mani wrote: Hi, Some more debian packaging stuff, useful when building certain packages with pbuilder: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1063043 - cdbs - Common build system for Debian packages https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1063044 - dh-au

Re: Bullet soname update

On 02/04/2014 09:46 PM, Rich Mattes wrote: Hi all, I'm planning on updating the Bullet library to version 2.82 in rawhide this weekend. It involves a bump to the soname, and according to repoquery the following packages are affected: $ repoquery --disablerepo=* --enablerepo=rawhide --source

Re: LinuxCNC RTAI kernel

On 09.02.2014 21:21, John Morris wrote: On 02/09/2014 01:53 PM, Sandro Mani wrote: OpenCASCADE should be in fedora soonish actually, see [1]. Woo hoo, news to me! You made my day. (I'm actually one of the OpenCASCADE & FreeCAD maintainers in RPMFusion.) There is work on a very promising CAM

Re: LinuxCNC RTAI kernel

On 02/09/2014 01:53 PM, Sandro Mani wrote: > > OpenCASCADE should be in fedora soonish actually, see [1]. Woo hoo, news to me! You made my day. (I'm actually one of the OpenCASCADE & FreeCAD maintainers in RPMFusion.) There is work on a very promising CAM module for FreeCAD that could fill tha

Re: LinuxCNC RTAI kernel

On Sun, 2014-02-09 at 20:53 +0100, Sandro Mani wrote: > On 09.02.2014 20:40, John Morris wrote: > > [...] > > > > As for the industrial side of the market, FOSS has potentially viable > > competitors among two of CAD/CAM/CNC, FreeCAD and LinuxCNC (no CAM). > > Fedora cannot ship FreeCAD because of

Re: LinuxCNC RTAI kernel

On 09.02.2014 20:40, John Morris wrote: [...] As for the industrial side of the market, FOSS has potentially viable competitors among two of CAD/CAM/CNC, FreeCAD and LinuxCNC (no CAM). Fedora cannot ship FreeCAD because of a license problem with the required OpenCASCADE [3], even though Debian

Re: LinuxCNC RTAI kernel

On 02/09/2014 11:56 AM, Sandro Mani wrote: [...liberal snipping...] > > Thanks for the detailed reply. It comes to mind that a F19 feature was > packaging tools for 3D printing, see [1]. Back in October 2012 there was > also a small discussion on devel [2] concerning 3D printing and > potential

Review swaps: misc debian packaging stuff

Hi, Some more debian packaging stuff, useful when building certain packages with pbuilder: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1063043 - cdbs - Common build system for Debian packages https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1063044 - dh-autoreconf - debhelper add-on to call autor

Re: LinuxCNC RTAI kernel

On 09.02.2014 18:28, John Morris wrote: On 02/09/2014 06:27 AM, Sandro Mani wrote: On 09.02.2014 09:16, John Morris wrote: My goal for the forthcoming LinuxCNC release is readiness for inclusion in both Fedora and Debian. Wow exciting, thanks! How are you planning to deal with the realtime k

[Test-Announce] 2014-02-10 @ 16:00 UTC - Fedora QA Meeting - cancel?

Hi, folks! Sorry for forgetting to send this out earlier. Just like last week, we have a meeting slot on Monday, but I'm not aware of any major topics that need discussion - is there anything I'm missing? This week the WGs should be moving into more detailed discussion of their work, so we may wan

Re: LinuxCNC RTAI kernel

On 02/09/2014 06:27 AM, Sandro Mani wrote: > > On 09.02.2014 09:16, John Morris wrote: >> My goal for the forthcoming LinuxCNC release is readiness for inclusion >> in both Fedora and Debian. >> > Wow exciting, thanks! How are you planning to deal with the realtime > kernel requirement, or is tha

Re: Non-%doc files in %{_defaultdocdir}?

On 02/09/2014 04:15 AM, Miloslav Trmač wrote: > On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 10:40 AM, John Morris > wrote: > > On 02/09/2014 02:32 AM, Miloslav Trmač wrote: > > On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 9:16 AM, John Morris > >

Re: Review Swap

Hello, Christopher. I'll review it. 09.02.2014 17:40, Christopher Meng wrote: > > Hi, > > This is a program which can check your system based on the open public > CVE data, a bit like lynis, is another auditing utility. > > I hope someone can review it: > > cvechecker > > https://bugzilla.redhat.

Review Swap

Hi, This is a program which can check your system based on the open public CVE data, a bit like lynis, is another auditing utility. I hope someone can review it: cvechecker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062808 Thanks. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://

Re: Non-%doc files in %{_defaultdocdir}?

Examples can be put underneath %_datadir/$(PKGNAME)/examples IMO, but %_docdir is not the right place, examples like source code e.g. .c/.cxx can be put as 644 perms in docdir, plain texts like config examples can also be stored at there with 644 perms, too. GUI behavior need to be modified if it

rawhide report: 20140209 changes

Compose started at Sun Feb 9 05:15:07 UTC 2014 Broken deps for i386 -- [3Depict] 3Depict-0.0.15-3.fc21.i686 requires libmgl.so.7.1.0 [R-maanova] R-maanova-1.30.0-2.fc20.i686 requires libRlapack.so R-maanova-1.30.0-2.f

LinuxCNC RTAI kernel (was: Non-%doc files in %{_defaultdocdir}?)

On 09.02.2014 09:16, John Morris wrote: My goal for the forthcoming LinuxCNC release is readiness for inclusion in both Fedora and Debian. Wow exciting, thanks! How are you planning to deal with the realtime kernel requirement, or is that beyond the scope of your work? Sandro -- devel maili

Re: Non-%doc files in %{_defaultdocdir}?

On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 10:16 AM, John Morris wrote: > I think it's clear that these files belong in ${sysconfdir}/linuxcnc/examples If they're not actual configuration files, I don't think they should be in /etc. /usr/share/linuxcnc/examples would sound appropriate to me, or alternatively install

Fedora.next update @ devconf slides

My slides are at http://mattdm.org/fedora/next2014/. I'm going to post the video as soon as it's available, and also I promise a post here with annotations for further discussion, at least as soon as conference fatigue wears off -- but before I forget everything. Also, there's an etherpad at http

Re: Changing the default picks in the software center

On Sun, Feb 09, 2014 at 09:53:03AM +0100, Richard Hughes wrote: > So I'm basically asking, do other desktops *want* to change the list > of featured apps? The only prerequisite is that the application needs Sounds interesting to me. I also wonder if some of the non-desktop SIGs and subprojects lik

Re: Non-%doc files in %{_defaultdocdir}?

On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 10:40 AM, John Morris wrote: > On 02/09/2014 02:32 AM, Miloslav Trmač wrote: > > On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 9:16 AM, John Morris > > wrote: > > > > Right now, a "sample-configs" directory is installed into > > ${prefix}/share/doc/linuxcnc/examp

Re: rawhide report: 20140208 changes

On Sat, Feb 08, 2014 at 06:55:18PM +, Fedora Rawhide Report wrote: [. . .] > > [koji] > koji-vm-1.8.0-2.fc20.noarch requires python-virtinst There's an F19 bug here for this: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=958499 koji-vm should not be using python-virtinst code F

Re: Non-%doc files in %{_defaultdocdir}?

On 02/09/2014 02:32 AM, Miloslav Trmač wrote: > On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 9:16 AM, John Morris > wrote: > > Right now, a "sample-configs" directory is installed into > ${prefix}/share/doc/linuxcnc/examples. > > This is a typical pattern, at first glance, but it

Re: Non-%doc files in %{_defaultdocdir}?

On Sun, 09 Feb 2014 02:16:43 -0600, John Morris wrote: > My goal for the forthcoming LinuxCNC release is readiness for inclusion > in both Fedora and Debian. > > Right now, a "sample-configs" directory is installed into > ${prefix}/share/doc/linuxcnc/examples. > > This is a typical pattern, at f

Changing the default picks in the software center

Hi, I've been talking to a few people at DevConf here in Brno. One thing people kept asking was how we chose the "picked" apps in the software center we show on the overview panel. At the moment there's a list of applications we consider worth featuring on the front page, or a random rotation, whi

Broken dependencies: perl-PDL

perl-PDL has broken dependencies in the epel-7 tree: On x86_64: perl-PDL-2.7.0-2.el7.1.x86_64 requires perl(Prima::MsgBox) On ppc64: perl-PDL-2.7.0-2.el7.1.ppc64 requires perl(Prima::MsgBox) perl-PDL-2.7.0-2.el7.1.ppc64 requires perl(PDL::Slatec) Please resolve this as soo

Broken dependencies: w3c-markup-validator

w3c-markup-validator has broken dependencies in the epel-7 tree: On x86_64: w3c-markup-validator-1.3-4.el7.noarch requires perl(HTML::Template) On ppc64: w3c-markup-validator-1.3-4.el7.noarch requires perl(SGML::Parser::OpenSP) >= 0:0.991 w3c-markup-validator-1.3-4.el7.no

Broken dependencies: dspam

dspam has broken dependencies in the epel-7 tree: On x86_64: dspam-3.10.2-9.el7.x86_64 requires perl(Mail::MboxParser) On ppc64: dspam-3.10.2-9.el7.ppc64 requires perl(Mail::MboxParser) On x86_64: dspam-web-3.10.2-9.el7.x86_64 requires perl(GD::Graph::lines3d) dspa

Re: Non-%doc files in %{_defaultdocdir}?

On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 9:16 AM, John Morris wrote: > Right now, a "sample-configs" directory is installed into > ${prefix}/share/doc/linuxcnc/examples. > > This is a typical pattern, at first glance, but it turns out that the > GUIs actually present these as base configurations to users, and do b

Non-%doc files in %{_defaultdocdir}?

My goal for the forthcoming LinuxCNC release is readiness for inclusion in both Fedora and Debian. Right now, a "sample-configs" directory is installed into ${prefix}/share/doc/linuxcnc/examples. This is a typical pattern, at first glance, but it turns out that the GUIs actually present these as