Re: icecat or/and firefox?

On Mon, 2014-01-27 at 22:48 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Mon, 2014-01-27 at 11:52 +, Ian Malone wrote: > > On 27 January 2014 05:36, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > > > On 01/27/2014 05:08 AM, Christopher Meng wrote: > > >> > > >> Hi, > > >> > > >> Here is an interesting package icecat[1], which

Re: icecat or/and firefox?

On Mon, 2014-01-27 at 11:52 +, Ian Malone wrote: > On 27 January 2014 05:36, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > > On 01/27/2014 05:08 AM, Christopher Meng wrote: > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> Here is an interesting package icecat[1], which is a "more free" > >> version firefox. > > I'd argue it's *less* free

Re: New version of Copr

On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 5:12 PM, Miroslav Suchy wrote: > Hi, > I just deployed new version of Copr. > > Changes: > * copr-cli has been build for epel6 (no planned build for el5 due > dependency on python-requests) > * you should see less internal server errors. Especially when deleting > tasks

Re: Drawing lessons from fatal SELinux bug #1054350

On Tue, 2014-01-28 at 10:39 +0800, Mathieu Bridon wrote: > On Mon, 2014-01-27 at 15:11 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Mon, 27 Jan 2014 10:18:56 -0500 > > Matthew Miller wrote: > > > > snip > > > > > * possibly adding a "what should users test?" field to the update > > > info. > > > >

Re: Drawing lessons from fatal SELinux bug #1054350

On Mon, 2014-01-27 at 15:11 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Mon, 27 Jan 2014 10:18:56 -0500 > Matthew Miller wrote: > > snip > > > * possibly adding a "what should users test?" field to the update > > info. > > > > I know that there's a "notes" field in the update, but maybe it'd > > h

New version of Copr

Hi, I just deployed new version of Copr. Changes: * copr-cli has been build for epel6 (no planned build for el5 due dependency on python-requests) * you should see less internal server errors. Especially when deleting tasks with multiple srpm * All packages produced by Copr now have as vendor "

Re: Fedora.next: I would like working configurations

On Monday 27 January 2014 14:01:32 Stephen Gallagher wrote: > ... > or some mechanism to interactively configure and deploy a DHCP server. IMO, that's exactly the crux of the matter. Most non-trivial services requires some administrative decisions to configure them properly. Since rpm does not a

Heads up: libxcb (partial) soname bumps in Rawhide

Two of the libraries emitted by libxcb (for XKB and SYNC extension support) have changed soname in 1.10. Sorry about that. Outside of libxcb itself the only packages affected are qt5-qtbase, kde-workspace, sddm, and weston; all have been rebuilt. Thanks to Rex Dieter for helping work around the

Re: Fedora.next: I would like working configurations

On 27.01.2014 22:05, Robert M. Albrecht wrote: > Hi, > > if the server sits in a RFC1918 network (192.168.1.0/16), has a static > IP and a configured gateway and DNS, it might be reasonable to assume, > the dhcpd should operate in this range and set the options for DNS and > gateway accordingly. >

Re: Fedora.next: I would like working configurations

On Jan 27, 2014, at 2:16 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > The reason why these daemons are not ready to run is that when they used to > be ready to run, they caused problems with whatever environment was already > there. We used to ship tools which could do what was thought to be a > reasona

Re: Fedora.next: I would like working configurations

On 27.01.2014 22:01, Robert M. Albrecht wrote: > Hi, > > dhcpd is just an (maybe bad) example. It is good example. See dhcp configuration in your home router - it requires some attention. Then try some Cisco or HP router and its dhcp configuration. This smart devices are not so smart to work for

Re: icecat or/and firefox?

On Mon, 27 Jan 2014 20:41:35 +0100 poma wrote: > On 27.01.2014 20:28, Andrew Lutomirski wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 10:59 AM, poma > > wrote: ...snip... > > I'm skeptical about the whole package-signing thing. skeptical in what way? > > Why don't we > > sign repository metadata and

Re: icecat or/and firefox?

On 27.01.2014 20:28, Andrew Lutomirski wrote: > On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 10:59 AM, poma wrote: >> On 27.01.2014 19:52, Kevin Fenzi wrote: >> >>> copr has no provision currently to sign packages. >>> >>> I think it's on the todo list, but it will not be easy to implement in >>> a secure way. >> >> O

Re: icecat or/and firefox?

On 27.01.2014 20:17, Antonio Trande wrote: > On 01/27/2014 07:56 PM, poma wrote: > >> http://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/sagitter/Icecat/builds/ … >> Package URLs: >> http://sagitter.fedorapeople.org/Icecat/icecat-24.0-1.fc20.src.rpm >> Not Found > >> The requested URL /Icecat/icecat-24.0-1.fc20

Re: Drawing lessons from fatal SELinux bug #1054350

On Mon, 27 Jan 2014 10:18:56 -0500 Matthew Miller wrote: snip > * possibly adding a "what should users test?" field to the update > info. > > I know that there's a "notes" field in the update, but maybe it'd > help to explicitly include testing instructions? > > Each package in the

Re: Fedora.next: I would like working configurations

On 27 January 2014 14:01, Robert M. Albrecht wrote: > Hi, > > dhcpd is just an (maybe bad) example. > > But even dhcpd needs a lot of work. I need to configure ranges, options > (which could like gateqway and dns partly automagically gathered from the > exsting network configuration), ... binding

[perl-Test-Version] Bootstrap build for epel7 done

commit dc1038373c2318e653d59e7442b051f9863befdf Author: Paul Howarth Date: Mon Jan 27 21:13:48 2014 + Bootstrap build for epel7 done perl-Test-Version.spec | 10 -- 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/perl-Test-Version.spec b/perl-Test-Version.s

Re: Fedora.next: I would like working configurations

Hi, He's not suggesting turning services on by default just by installing pacakges (I don't think). I think his request here is similar to our Fedora Server Roles idea where there are special "packages" (possibly meta-packages) that are separate from the simple installed bits. So you might have

Re: Fedora.next: I would like working configurations

Hi, if the server sits in a RFC1918 network (192.168.1.0/16), has a static IP and a configured gateway and DNS, it might be reasonable to assume, the dhcpd should operate in this range and set the options for DNS and gateway accordingly. At least the installation could produce a sample-confi

Re: Fedora.next: I would like working configurations

Hi, dhcpd is just an (maybe bad) example. But even dhcpd needs a lot of work. I need to configure ranges, options (which could like gateqway and dns partly automagically gathered from the exsting network configuration), ... binding dhcpd to bind to enable dynamic updates, ... and double thi

[perl-Test-Mojibake] Bootstrap epel7 build

commit f1bf3e60921e3d9d3972503e735499de5c2778ab Author: Paul Howarth Date: Mon Jan 27 20:26:25 2014 + Bootstrap epel7 build perl-Test-Mojibake.spec | 10 +- 1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/perl-Test-Mojibake.spec b/perl-Test-Mojibake.spec in

Re: Heads up; F22 will require applications to ship appdata to be listed in software center

2014-01-27 Michael Scherer : > Le lundi 27 janvier 2014 à 17:11 +0100, Andreas Tunek a écrit : >> 2014-01-26 Michael Scherer : >> > Le dimanche 26 janvier 2014 à 18:14 +0100, Heiko Adams a écrit : >> >> Am Sonntag, den 26.01.2014, 12:01 -0500 schrieb Rahul Sundaram: >> >> > Hi >> >> > >> >> > >> >>

Re: Fedora.next: I would like working configurations

Most of the services you described do have a "working" configuration but the service is not turned on. You are right though, when you install a Windows CA it's ready to go. In regards to DHCP, the dhcpd.conf file has a commented sample that needs to be edited and then turned on. Is this what yo

Re: Fedora.next: I would like working configurations

Once upon a time, Robert M. Albrecht said: > If I install a Windows-Server with some services like DHCP or file > services, I get a working configuration. Can you be more specific on what you mean by "working configuration"? As far as I know, you still have to configure the service on Windows bef

Re: icecat or/and firefox?

On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 10:59 AM, poma wrote: > On 27.01.2014 19:52, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > >> copr has no provision currently to sign packages. >> >> I think it's on the todo list, but it will not be easy to implement in >> a secure way. > > Ouch! > I'm skeptical about the whole package-signing th

Re: Heads up; F22 will require applications to ship appdata to be listed in software center

On Sun, 2014-01-26 at 13:05 +0100, drago01 wrote: > Installing an application and then not finding it anywhere is > confusing. So we limit it > to visible apps i.e GUI apps. Before people get too angry about this: Software is being designed as a tool to do what's being discussed in this thread, i

Re: icecat or/and firefox?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 01/27/2014 07:56 PM, poma wrote: > > http://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/sagitter/Icecat/builds/ > > Results: > http://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/sagitter/Icecat/ > http://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/sagitter/Icecat/fedo

Re: icecat or/and firefox?

http://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/sagitter/Icecat/builds/ Results: http://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/sagitter/Icecat/ http://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/sagitter/Icecat/fedora-20-x86_64/ http://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/sagitter/Icecat/fedora-20-x86_64/ice

Re: icecat or/and firefox?

On 27.01.2014 19:52, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > copr has no provision currently to sign packages. > > I think it's on the todo list, but it will not be easy to implement in > a secure way. Ouch! poma -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/lis

Re: RFC - Downgrade BlueZ to v4.101 in Fedora 20

On Sat, 2014-01-25 at 17:24 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > From the BlueZ 5.0 release notes: > > > > "Remove internal support for telephony (HFP and HSP) profiles. They > > should be implemented using the new Profile interface preferably by the > > telephony subsystem of ch

Re: Fedora.next: I would like working configurations

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 01/27/2014 01:50 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 19:31:58 +0100, "Robert M. Albrecht" > wrote: >> >> I think this is a real problem. The missing working >> default-configs are a real hassle for replacing small servers in >> Wi

Re: Fedora.next: I would like working configurations

On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 19:31:58 +0100, "Robert M. Albrecht" wrote: I think this is a real problem. The missing working default-configs are a real hassle for replacing small servers in Windows-shops with Linux as the non-expert-Linux-admin has an enormous entry-barrier to get some minumum

Re: icecat or/and firefox?

On Mon, 27 Jan 2014 19:45:48 +0100 poma wrote: > On 27.01.2014 05:08, Christopher Meng wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Here is an interesting package icecat[1], which is a "more free" > > version firefox. > > > > Do we allow this in Fedora now? > > > > Thanks. > > > > [1]--https://bugzilla.redhat.

Re: icecat or/and firefox?

On 27.01.2014 05:08, Christopher Meng wrote: > Hi, > > Here is an interesting package icecat[1], which is a "more free" > version firefox. > > Do we allow this in Fedora now? > > Thanks. > > [1]--https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1048493 http://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/sagitt

Re: Fedora.next: I would like working configurations

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 01/27/2014 01:31 PM, Robert M. Albrecht wrote: > Hi, > > might be totaly out of scope for Fedora.next, but this is what I > would like to get better in Fedora. > > If I install a Windows-Server with some services like DHCP or file > services, I g

Fedora.next: I would like working configurations

Hi, might be totaly out of scope for Fedora.next, but this is what I would like to get better in Fedora. If I install a Windows-Server with some services like DHCP or file services, I get a working configuration. - If I install a Fedora-server with dhcpd, dhcpd doesn't do anything - If I in

Re: icecat or/and firefox?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Icecat package review has NOT the goal to replace Firefox in Fedora. I wish to offer the opportunity to everyone of try a browser like so "a GNU user" would do. - -- Antonio Trande mailto: sagitterATfedoraproject.org http://www.fedoraos.worpress.co

Re: .spec file Source0 magic for github release source tarballs?

On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 4:57 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Fri, 2014-01-24 at 08:13 -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > >> >> Interesting... However, if you're working with an actual release >> >> tag, I would think Peter's method would be much better. >> > >> > It is a good idea to use a specific

[perl-Class-Data-Inheritable] Created tag perl-Class-Data-Inheritable-0.08-0.3.1.el6

The lightweight tag 'perl-Class-Data-Inheritable-0.08-0.3.1.el6' was created pointing to: 5ed815e... Prefix release with "0." for limited-arch EPEL support -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org http

Re: Heads up; F22 will require applications to ship appdata to be listed in software center

Le lundi 27 janvier 2014 à 17:11 +0100, Andreas Tunek a écrit : > 2014-01-26 Michael Scherer : > > Le dimanche 26 janvier 2014 à 18:14 +0100, Heiko Adams a écrit : > >> Am Sonntag, den 26.01.2014, 12:01 -0500 schrieb Rahul Sundaram: > >> > Hi > >> > > >> > > >> > On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 11:57 AM, d

Re: Heads up; F22 will require applications to ship appdata to be listed in software center

2014-01-26 Michael Scherer : > Le dimanche 26 janvier 2014 à 18:14 +0100, Heiko Adams a écrit : >> Am Sonntag, den 26.01.2014, 12:01 -0500 schrieb Rahul Sundaram: >> > Hi >> > >> > >> > On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 11:57 AM, drago01 wrote: >> > >> > No this isn't an issue at all. No one is sayin

Re: I want to turn on a part of the kernel to make SELinux checking more stringent.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 01/24/2014 07:29 PM, Alek Paunov wrote: > On 24.01.2014 21:20, Daniel J Walsh wrote: >>> >> No, we pretty much allow executable stack/memory from user processes now >> and block it for most daemons, except for those that need it. My >> understandi

Re: I want to turn on a part of the kernel to make SELinux checking more stringent.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 01/26/2014 03:49 PM, Andrew Lutomirski wrote: > On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 12:38 PM, Richard W.M. Jones > wrote: >> Slightly OT, but is SELinux stopping programs from executing code at >> address zero? (And how can I stop it doing that?) >> >> JONE

[Owner-change] Fedora packages ownership change

Change in ownership over the last 168 hours === 2 packages were orphaned xom [EL-6] was orphaned by gil XML Pull Parser https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/xom mlton [EL-5] was orphaned by agoode Optimizing

Re: Fedora.next in 2014 -- Big Picture and Themes

On 01/27/2014 01:06 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: No. The Products will be defining an environment and a standard install set. They may have separate initial*installation* repositories if they need to provide different options to Anaconda, but beyond that the intent is for all of the Products t

Re: Drawing lessons from fatal SELinux bug #1054350

On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 11:46:41PM +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote: > Any ideas how to attract more testers? > How to make the updates-testing repo more sexy? * More automated smoke-tests, so that: a) you know the most boring tests have been handled so you can focus on more interesting apsects

Re: Review swap or Sponser request: the_silver_searcher

OK, I created new report[1] to be the reporter of a review request.*1 [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1057991 Dridi, can you please review it, if you can. I know I still need to look for the sponsor, but it is helpful. Thank you in advance, *1 I closed old report as duplicated.

Re: Fedora.next in 2014 -- Big Picture and Themes

On 27 January 2014 13:06, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > On 01/27/2014 05:36 AM, Ian Malone wrote: >> does this mean there will be things unavailable on some 'products' >> that are not on others? > No. > > The Products will be defining an environment and a standard install > set. They may have sepa

Re: Fedora.next in 2014 -- Big Picture and Themes

>On Sat, 2014-01-25 at 12:04 +0100, Alec Leamas wrote: >> After hacking a simple tool which provides a GUI for a repository file >> it's possible to create repository packages complete with desktop and >> appdata file. I have some 5-10 such repository packages under way, my >> plan is to pus

Re: gitflow and branch naming conventions

- Original Message - > From: "Kamil Paral" > To: "Fedora QA Development" > Sent: Friday, January 24, 2014 4:03:40 PM > Subject: gitflow and branch naming conventions > > So, we're going the gitflow way [1][2]. However, when I looked at our > bitbucket repositories today, only the libtask

Re: Fedora.next in 2014 -- Big Picture and Themes

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 01/27/2014 05:36 AM, Ian Malone wrote: > So without, unfortunately, the time to read through reams of stuff > on this and with my user hat on (don't think I've seen any > discussion of this on the users list), if it means how fedora > actually works

[perl-Event-RPC/f20] 1.04 bump

Summary of changes: 1c8dcf3... 1.04 bump (*) (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/l

[Bug 1058004] perl-Event-RPC-1.04 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1058004 --- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar --- This is a bug-fix release suitable for F≥20. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=joL2w39tHx&a=cc_un

[perl-Event-RPC] 1.04 bump

commit 1c8dcf301f21cfd65d3fef96d7b703c86d713de8 Author: Petr Písař Date: Mon Jan 27 13:28:50 2014 +0100 1.04 bump .gitignore |1 + perl-Event-RPC.spec |7 +-- sources |2 +- 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/.gitignore b

Re: .spec file Source0 magic for github release source tarballs?

Indeed, as well as in other places e. g., the iconcache snippets. --alec On 1/27/14, Vít Ondruch wrote: > Dne 21.1.2014 18:01, Kaleb KEITHLEY napsal(a): >> >> Take, for example, >> https://github.com/nfs-ganesha/nfs-ganesha/releases, where there's a >> button for "Source code (tar.gz)" pointing

File Event-RPC-1.04.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by ppisar

A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Event-RPC: d40147fe814a5c5c976a940b68db3029 Event-RPC-1.04.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/l

Re: .spec file Source0 magic for github release source tarballs?

Dne 21.1.2014 18:01, Kaleb KEITHLEY napsal(a): > > Take, for example, > https://github.com/nfs-ganesha/nfs-ganesha/releases, where there's a > button for "Source code (tar.gz)" pointing at > https://github.com/nfs-ganesha/nfs-ganesha/archive/V2.0.0.tar.gz > > Note V2.0.0.tar.gz versus nfs-ganesha-2

[perl-version] Specify all dependencies

commit 8eb59884dd4adae4db89049d91790be2a9f5de37 Author: Petr Písař Date: Mon Jan 27 13:09:12 2014 +0100 Specify all dependencies perl-version.spec |8 +++- 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/perl-version.spec b/perl-version.spec index 868552b..895cf4

Re: Review swap or Sponser request: the_silver_searcher

On 01/27/2014 09:51 AM, Dridi Boukelmoune wrote: > I would have happily reviewed the package but I've been swamped for a > few weeks, and I didn't know how to handle the takeover. > > Also as Christopher mentioned, I'm not a sponsor, so I can't approve > the submission (I'm aware of that). I've st

Broken dependencies: perl-qpid_proton

perl-qpid_proton has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-qpid_proton-0.6-1.fc21.x86_64 requires perl(qpid_proton) perl-qpid_proton-0.6-1.fc21.x86_64 requires perl(qpid::proton::ExceptionHandling) On i386: perl-qpid_proton-0.6-1.fc21.i686 requires perl

Broken dependencies: mojomojo

mojomojo has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: mojomojo-1.10-1.fc20.noarch requires perl(HTML::FormFu::Element::reCAPTCHA) On i386: mojomojo-1.10-1.fc20.noarch requires perl(HTML::FormFu::Element::reCAPTCHA) On armhfp: mojomojo-1.10-1.fc20.noarch requir

Broken dependencies: perl-Language-Expr

perl-Language-Expr has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2) On i386: perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2) On armhfp: perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.

Broken dependencies: perl-Catalyst-Controller-HTML-FormFu

perl-Catalyst-Controller-HTML-FormFu has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-Catalyst-Controller-HTML-FormFu-0.09004-4.fc20.noarch requires perl(HTML::FormFu::MultiForm) On i386: perl-Catalyst-Controller-HTML-FormFu-0.09004-4.fc20.noarch requires perl(HTML:

Re: icecat or/and firefox?

On 27 January 2014 05:36, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On 01/27/2014 05:08 AM, Christopher Meng wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> Here is an interesting package icecat[1], which is a "more free" >> version firefox. I'd argue it's *less* free since it seeks to restrict what you can do: "Finally, we need to change

Re: icecat or/and firefox?

Hello all, I haven't thought about possible replacement plans, in my opinion it's too early to talk about that now. As for the packaging process, the package requires some rework and improvement - it's actually in the process. It takes some time and efforts from a submitter (Antonio Trande), we'll

Re: Fedora.next in 2014 -- Big Picture and Themes

On 23 January 2014 21:57, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Thu, 2014-01-23 at 16:54 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: >> On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 4:49 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: >> > On Thu, 2014-01-23 at 13:48 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: >> > >> >> > To be honest my concerns are more with my user hat on than my

EPEL Fedora 6 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing: Age URL 645 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-5620/bugzilla-3.4.14-2.el6 101 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2013-11865/quassel-0.9.1-1.el6 74 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FE

EPEL Fedora 5 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 5 Security updates need testing: Age URL 645 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-5630/bugzilla-3.2.10-5.el5 135 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2013-11560/fail2ban-0.8.10-4.el5 99 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/

[perl-Tk-Pod] Enable dependency on Text::English

commit 533b1f620cba7391323f2dd7dc460a92c8466a85 Author: Petr Písař Date: Mon Jan 27 10:24:55 2014 +0100 Enable dependency on Text::English perl-Tk-Pod.spec |7 --- 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/perl-Tk-Pod.spec b/perl-Tk-Pod.spec index f1ee681..

Re: Review swap or Sponser request: the_silver_searcher

On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 11:39 AM, Matthias Runge wrote: > On 01/26/2014 09:09 AM, Kenjiro Nakayama wrote: >> Hi, List >> >> Can anyone swap review or take it as sponsor? >> >> [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1008063 >> > > Kenjiro, > > in order to get a package approved, you must b

Re: Source string contextualization

On 27-01-2014 02:08 অপৰাহ্ন, pravin@gmail.com wrote: On 24 January 2014 17:52, Nilamdyuti Goswami > wrote: Hi all, While translating some of the fedora packages we often come across some source strings whose context or meaning is not clear. This

Re: Source string contextualization

On 24 January 2014 17:52, Nilamdyuti Goswami wrote: > Hi all, > > While translating some of the fedora packages we often come across some > source strings whose context or meaning is not clear. This results in wrong > translations which is discovered later while using the actual application. > Th

EPEL epel beta report: 20140127 changes

Compose started at Mon Jan 27 08:15:02 UTC 2014 Broken deps for x86_64 -- ansible-1.4.3-1.el7.noarch requires python-httplib2 bodhi-server-0.9.7-1.el7.noarch requires python-simplemediawiki 1:centerim-4.22.10-14.el7.x8

Re: Fedora.next in 2014 -- Big Picture and Themes

On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 11:20:33AM +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > Hi! > > On 23.01.2014 19:26, Josh Boyer wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 1:03 PM, Thorsten Leemhuis > > wrote: > > The packaging guidelines are very daunting. Automating as much of > > that as possible, either through spec c

Re: perl-Readonly in EL 7

Hi Paul, Whoops, thanks for pointing that out. The thing that confused me is that perl-Readonly and perl-Readonly-XS are missing from rhel-everything-7.0-beta-1-x86_64-dvd.iso . - Ken On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 9:50 AM, Paul Howarth wrote: > Hi Ken, > > > On 24/01/14 16:29, Ken Dreyer wrote: >> >>

perl-Readonly in EL 7

Hi folks, RHEL 7 does not ship perl-Readonly. This package is a dependency for perl-boolean, which is a dependency for perl-MongoDB, so I'd like to have it in EPEL 7. Would one of you mind branching and building it for EPEL 7? I did a scratch-build unmodified from perl-Readonly in Rawhide, and i