Re: What to do about packaging beta, or rc as alternate installable

2014-01-21 Thread Adam Williamson
On Tue, 2014-01-21 at 19:33 -0500, Neal Becker wrote: > One of the packages I maintain is mercurial. Frequently (e.g., now), there > is a rc version available for test. It will probably break some other package > that depends on it. > > I am thinking of a model like google uses for chrome. I co

Re: What to do about packaging beta, or rc as alternate installable

2014-01-21 Thread Christopher Meng
On Jan 22, 2014 10:03 AM, "Mauricio Tavares" wrote: > Still, it makes sense to have a place to beta test either the > package or the packaging (how to create a proper package?) itself. It's hard to say how to create a proper package testing in one slot of pkgdb. Also it may be a burden when

Re: What to do about packaging beta, or rc as alternate installable

2014-01-21 Thread Adam Williamson
On Tue, 2014-01-21 at 21:03 -0500, Mauricio Tavares wrote: > On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 8:58 PM, Christopher Meng wrote: > > Seriously, it's harmful to provide unstable packages to users. > > > Still, it makes sense to have a place to beta test either the > package or the packaging (how to crea

Re: What to do about packaging beta, or rc as alternate installable

2014-01-21 Thread Mauricio Tavares
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 8:58 PM, Christopher Meng wrote: > Seriously, it's harmful to provide unstable packages to users. > Still, it makes sense to have a place to beta test either the package or the packaging (how to create a proper package?) itself. > And I don't think Fedora has a long

Re: What to do about packaging beta, or rc as alternate installable

2014-01-21 Thread Christopher Meng
Seriously, it's harmful to provide unstable packages to users. And I don't think Fedora has a long term support. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: Fedora Server PRD Draft and call for participation

2014-01-21 Thread David Timothy Strauss
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 1:02 PM, Mauricio Tavares wrote: > Fedora: > o bleeding edge, where new stuff comes Cutting edge. Let's not ride the metaphor overly far [1]. We do actually test a fair bit before releasing Fedora or package updates. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bleeding_edge_technol

Re: What to do about packaging beta, or rc as alternate installable

2014-01-21 Thread Josh Boyer
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 7:33 PM, Neal Becker wrote: > One of the packages I maintain is mercurial. Frequently (e.g., now), there > is a rc version available for test. It will probably break some other package > that depends on it. > > I am thinking of a model like google uses for chrome. I coul

What to do about packaging beta, or rc as alternate installable

2014-01-21 Thread Neal Becker
One of the packages I maintain is mercurial. Frequently (e.g., now), there is a rc version available for test. It will probably break some other package that depends on it. I am thinking of a model like google uses for chrome. I could install any of: google-chrome-{stable,beta,unstable} I don

Schedule for Wednesday's FESCo Meeting (2014-01-22)

2014-01-21 Thread Kevin Fenzi
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting Wednesday at 18:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2014-01-22 18:00 UTC' Links to all tickets below

Re: Announce: fedostree/rpm-ostree v2014.3

2014-01-21 Thread Dennis Jacobfeuerborn
On 21.01.2014 20:07, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 07:40:00AM +0100, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote: Interesting. I've downloaded the VM Image and tried to understand the setup. Apparently there exist sort of two root trees / and /sysroot in the system with some links targeting

Re: Announce: fedostree/rpm-ostree v2014.3

2014-01-21 Thread Dennis Jacobfeuerborn
On 21.01.2014 08:30, Colin Walters wrote: Hi Dennis, On Tue, 2014-01-21 at 07:40 +0100, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote: Interesting. I've downloaded the VM Image and tried to understand the setup. Some bits are documented here https://people.gnome.org/~walters/ostree/doc/layout.html Apparentl

Re: Security update process without CVEs

2014-01-21 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Tue, 21 Jan 2014 17:38:54 -0500 Dan Scott wrote: > Okay, then I'll remove the conflicting information from > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_update_HOWTO that says: "If you > feel that community testing is unnecessary for your update, you can > choose to push it straight to the stable fe

Re: Security update process without CVEs

2014-01-21 Thread Dan Scott
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 4:32 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Tue, 21 Jan 2014 16:26:19 -0500 > Dan Scott wrote: > >> Hi: >> >> A few hours ago I submitted requests to push perl-MARC-XML directly to >> stable (by filling out the "fedpkg update" request with type=security >> and request=stable) > > You

Re: Re: Re: F20: Puppet depchain pulls in Java

2014-01-21 Thread Michael Stahnke
On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 5:55 AM, Mo Morsi wrote: > On 01/18/2014 01:40 AM, Michael Stahnke wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 6:53 PM, Rahul Sundaram > wrote: > > Hi > > > On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 9:43 PM, Mo Morsi wrote: > > Yes as others have mentioned puppet requires ruby(release) which

Re: Security update process without CVEs

2014-01-21 Thread Dan Scott
Eric: On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 4:31 PM, Eric H. Christensen wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA512 > > On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 04:26:19PM -0500, Dan Scott wrote: >> I tried following >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Security_Tracking_Bugs?rd=Security/TrackingBugs >> but it app

Re: Security update process without CVEs

2014-01-21 Thread Eric H. Christensen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 04:31:10PM -0500, Eric H. Christensen wrote: > On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 04:26:19PM -0500, Dan Scott wrote: > > I tried following > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Security_Tracking_Bugs?rd=Security/TrackingBugs > > but it appe

Re: Orphaned packages up for grabs

2014-01-21 Thread Mauricio Tavares
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 8:54 PM, Casper wrote: > Mauricio Tavares a écrit : >> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 1:07 AM, Casper wrote: >> > Kevin Fenzi a écrit : >> >> Greetings. >> >> >> >> The following packages have been orphaned due to their former >> >> maintainer removing themselves from the package

Retiring my gnome-shell search providers

2014-01-21 Thread Ralph Bean
Hello, A while ago, I wrote a trio of gnome-shell search providers: https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/gnome-shell-search-fedora-packages https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/gnome-shell-search-github-repositories https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/gnome-shell-search-pinboard They o

Re: Best Practices for Django App Packaging

2014-01-21 Thread John . Florian
> From: mru...@matthias-runge.de > To: > Date: 01/21/2014 15:38 > Subject: Re: Best Practices for Django App Packaging > Sent by: devel-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org > > On 01/21/2014 05:22 PM, john.flor...@dart.biz wrote: > > >> [1] > >> http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/python-django-horizo

Re: Security update process without CVEs

2014-01-21 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Tue, 21 Jan 2014 16:26:19 -0500 Dan Scott wrote: > Hi: > > A few hours ago I submitted requests to push perl-MARC-XML directly to > stable (by filling out the "fedpkg update" request with type=security > and request=stable) You cannot push any update directly to stable. Security updates ha

Re: Unannounced soname bump: libdbi?

2014-01-21 Thread Tom Callaway
On 01/21/2014 03:53 PM, Ville Skyttä wrote: > Hi, > > Looks like yet another unannounced soname bump has occurred in > Rawhide, this time libdbi. If there was an announcement, I haven't > noticed it, and neither apparently have maintainers of dependent > packages, and they haven't been addressed b

Re: Security update process without CVEs

2014-01-21 Thread Eric H. Christensen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 04:26:19PM -0500, Dan Scott wrote: > I tried following > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Security_Tracking_Bugs?rd=Security/TrackingBugs > but it appears to depend on waiting on a CVE, which upstream did not > yet have... but u

Security update process without CVEs

2014-01-21 Thread Dan Scott
Hi: A few hours ago I submitted requests to push perl-MARC-XML directly to stable (by filling out the "fedpkg update" request with type=security and request=stable) I tried following https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Security_Tracking_Bugs?rd=Security/TrackingBugs but it appears to depend on waiting

Re: Environment and Stacks PRD

2014-01-21 Thread Bill Nottingham
Marcela Mašláňová (mmasl...@redhat.com) said: > Environment and Stacks Working Group approved the first version of > PRD. Feel free to comment what is missing or what should be altered. > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Env_and_Stacks/Product_Requirements_Document I don't see anything necessari

Re: Fedora Server PRD Draft and call for participation

2014-01-21 Thread Mauricio Tavares
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 3:42 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Stephen Gallagher (sgall...@redhat.com) said: >> The first deliverable that the Fedora Server Working Group was tasked >> with was the production of a Product Requirements Document. This >> document is intended to provide a high-level view

Unannounced soname bump: libdbi?

2014-01-21 Thread Ville Skyttä
Hi, Looks like yet another unannounced soname bump has occurred in Rawhide, this time libdbi. If there was an announcement, I haven't noticed it, and neither apparently have maintainers of dependent packages, and they haven't been addressed by anyone else either except for rrdtool which is current

Re: Fedora Server PRD Draft and call for participation

2014-01-21 Thread Bill Nottingham
Stephen Gallagher (sgall...@redhat.com) said: > The first deliverable that the Fedora Server Working Group was tasked > with was the production of a Product Requirements Document. This > document is intended to provide a high-level view of the goals and > primary deliverables of the Fedora Server

Re: Best Practices for Django App Packaging

2014-01-21 Thread Matthias Runge
On 01/21/2014 05:22 PM, john.flor...@dart.biz wrote: >> [1] >> http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/python-django-horizon.git/tree/ >> openstack-dashboard.conf >> [2] >> http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/python-django-horizon.git/tree/ >> openstack-dashboard-httpd-2.4.conf >> [3] >> http://pkgs.fed

[perl-Text-Reform] Fix bogus date in changelog

2014-01-21 Thread Paul Howarth
commit dab9364ebbb11e6e8966ec97e3f16cc1e58970df Author: Paul Howarth Date: Tue Jan 21 19:40:13 2014 + Fix bogus date in changelog perl-Text-Reform.spec |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/perl-Text-Reform.spec b/perl-Text-Reform.spec index 2e2e

Re: SELinux RPM scriplet issue annoucement

2014-01-21 Thread Luke Macken
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 05:01:24PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Mon, 2014-01-20 at 17:00 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Mon, 2014-01-20 at 15:35 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: > > > On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 09:48:28AM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > > I'd suggest this test should be a

Re: Best Practices for Django App Packaging

2014-01-21 Thread Stephen Gallagher
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 01/21/2014 02:12 PM, john.flor...@dart.biz wrote: >> From: sgall...@redhat.com To: Development discussions related to >> Fedora > >> Date: 01/21/2014 13:24 Subject: Re: Best Practices for Django App >> Packaging Sent by: devel-boun...@lists.fedorap

Re: Go packaging guidelines?

2014-01-21 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 09:14:21AM -0500, Daniel J Walsh wrote: > # rpm -ql libselinux-devel | grep go > /usr/share/gocode/src/selinux > /usr/share/gocode/src/selinux/selinux.go > > Is the correct way for C libraries that we ship to provide go bindings? libguestfs has shipped go bindings in Fedor

Re: Best Practices for Django App Packaging

2014-01-21 Thread John . Florian
> From: sgall...@redhat.com > To: Development discussions related to Fedora > Date: 01/21/2014 13:24 > Subject: Re: Best Practices for Django App Packaging > Sent by: devel-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 01/21/2014 11:22 AM, john.flor.

Re: Announce: fedostree/rpm-ostree v2014.3

2014-01-21 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 07:40:00AM +0100, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote: > Interesting. I've downloaded the VM Image and tried to understand > the setup. Apparently there exist sort of two root trees / and > /sysroot in the system with some links targeting the /sysroot tree. > What I'm wondering abou

Re: Environment and Stacks PRD

2014-01-21 Thread Stephen Gallagher
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 01/20/2014 08:33 AM, Marcela Mašláňová wrote: > Environment and Stacks Working Group approved the first version of > PRD. Feel free to comment what is missing or what should be > altered. > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Env_and_Stacks/Product_Re

Broken dependencies: perl-Language-Expr

2014-01-21 Thread buildsys
perl-Language-Expr has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2) On i386: perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2) On armhfp: perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.

Broken dependencies: perl-qpid_proton

2014-01-21 Thread buildsys
perl-qpid_proton has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-qpid_proton-0.6-1.fc21.x86_64 requires perl(qpid_proton) perl-qpid_proton-0.6-1.fc21.x86_64 requires perl(qpid::proton::ExceptionHandling) On i386: perl-qpid_proton-0.6-1.fc21.i686 requires perl

Broken dependencies: mojomojo

2014-01-21 Thread buildsys
mojomojo has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: mojomojo-1.10-1.fc20.noarch requires perl(HTML::FormFu::Element::reCAPTCHA) On i386: mojomojo-1.10-1.fc20.noarch requires perl(HTML::FormFu::Element::reCAPTCHA) On armhfp: mojomojo-1.10-1.fc20.noarch requir

Broken dependencies: perl-Catalyst-Controller-HTML-FormFu

2014-01-21 Thread buildsys
perl-Catalyst-Controller-HTML-FormFu has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-Catalyst-Controller-HTML-FormFu-0.09004-4.fc20.noarch requires perl(HTML::FormFu::MultiForm) On i386: perl-Catalyst-Controller-HTML-FormFu-0.09004-4.fc20.noarch requires perl(HTML:

Re: Phab: setting projects when creating a ticket

2014-01-21 Thread Tim Flink
On Tue, 21 Jan 2014 09:08:01 -0500 (EST) Kamil Paral wrote: > I just tried to create a ticket in Phab. I understand that the > Project field is similar to Component field that we used in Trac. > (It's a bit unfortunate that a project can't be further separated > into components). However, there's

Re: Best Practices for Django App Packaging

2014-01-21 Thread Stephen Gallagher
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 01/21/2014 11:22 AM, john.flor...@dart.biz wrote: >> On 01/21/2014 03:45 PM, john.flor...@dart.biz wrote: >>> While I've been packaging Python apps for Fedora for a long >>> time, I'm a complete novice to Django. I've just completed my >>> first ap

[pkgdb] perl-Lingua-Stem-Snowball ownership changed

2014-01-21 Thread Fedora PackageDB
Package perl-Lingua-Stem-Snowball in Fedora EPEL 6 is now owned by lkundrak To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Lingua-Stem-Snowball -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de.

Re: .spec file Source0 magic for github release source tarballs?

2014-01-21 Thread Alec Leamas
You could file a issue at the FPC trac, preferably with a proposal for new GL. That said, I notice that we use what "works for me", despite any GL so maybe it doesn't matter. Dunno. --alec On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 6:41 PM, Kaleb KEITHLEY wrote: > On 01/21/2014 12:39 PM, Richard Shaw wrote: > >

Re: .spec file Source0 magic for github release source tarballs?

2014-01-21 Thread Richard Shaw
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 11:25 AM, Alec Leamas wrote: > Actually, the GL are pretty clear here: the source should be referenced > using the full commit, nothing else. There is some reasoning why. The tag > should got to Version: (as long its 'sane'). > > Besides that this is the existing GL, ther

Re: .spec file Source0 magic for github release source tarballs?

2014-01-21 Thread Kaleb KEITHLEY
On 01/21/2014 12:39 PM, Richard Shaw wrote: On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 11:25 AM, Alec Leamas mailto:leamas.a...@gmail.com>> wrote: Actually, the GL are pretty clear here: the source should be referenced using the full commit, nothing else. There is some reasoning why. The tag should got

Re: .spec file Source0 magic for github release source tarballs?

2014-01-21 Thread Alec Leamas
Actually, the GL are pretty clear here: the source should be referenced using the full commit, nothing else. There is some reasoning why. The tag should got to Version: (as long its 'sane'). Besides that this is the existing GL, there is also a subtle difference in git-archive (which supposedly r

[perl-Font-TTF] 1.04 bump

2014-01-21 Thread Petr Šabata
commit 4efddf58f5641f3bf777fffc8602a0ce2195e2d2 Author: Petr Šabata Date: Tue Jan 21 18:25:07 2014 +0100 1.04 bump .gitignore |1 + perl-Font-TTF.spec | 22 +- sources|2 +- 3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) --- diff --git

File Font-TTF-1.04.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by psabata

2014-01-21 Thread Petr Šabata
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Font-TTF: ae3349a2259429c9327e183d8564d34a Font-TTF-1.04.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/lis

Re: .spec file Source0 magic for github release source tarballs?

2014-01-21 Thread Richard Shaw
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 11:06 AM, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > On 01/21/2014 06:01 PM, Kaleb KEITHLEY wrote: > > > > Take, for example, https://github.com/nfs-ganesha/nfs-ganesha/releases, > where there's a button for "Source code > > (tar.gz)" pointing at > https://github.com/nfs-ganesha/nfs-ganesha/

Swig and -Werror=format-security

2014-01-21 Thread Darryl L. Pierce
Is anybody addressing the output of Swig WRT this problem? Our project (Qpid) generates language bindings using Swig during the build process. Our build is now failing on F21. For example: /builddir/build/BUILD/qpid-0.24/cpp/bindings/qpid/ruby/rubyRUBY_wrap.cxx:2237:38:error: format not a string

Re: .spec file Source0 magic for github release source tarballs?

2014-01-21 Thread Tom Callaway
On 01/21/2014 12:09 PM, Richard Shaw wrote: > Interesting... However, if you're working with an actual release tag, I > would think Peter's method would be much better. I agree, but practice has shown that few projects on github are using release tags. ~tom == ¸.·´¯`·.´¯`·.¸¸.·´¯`·.¸><(((º> OSA

Re: .spec file Source0 magic for github release source tarballs?

2014-01-21 Thread Peter Lemenkov
2014/1/21 Kaleb KEITHLEY : > > Take, for example, https://github.com/nfs-ganesha/nfs-ganesha/releases, > where there's a button for "Source code (tar.gz)" pointing at > https://github.com/nfs-ganesha/nfs-ganesha/archive/V2.0.0.tar.gz I'm using a different scheme (there are few at GitHub): https:/

Re: .spec file Source0 magic for github release source tarballs?

2014-01-21 Thread Miroslav Suchý
On 01/21/2014 06:01 PM, Kaleb KEITHLEY wrote: > > Take, for example, https://github.com/nfs-ganesha/nfs-ganesha/releases, where > there's a button for "Source code > (tar.gz)" pointing at > https://github.com/nfs-ganesha/nfs-ganesha/archive/V2.0.0.tar.gz > > Note V2.0.0.tar.gz versus nfs-ganesh

.spec file Source0 magic for github release source tarballs?

2014-01-21 Thread Kaleb KEITHLEY
Take, for example, https://github.com/nfs-ganesha/nfs-ganesha/releases, where there's a button for "Source code (tar.gz)" pointing at https://github.com/nfs-ganesha/nfs-ganesha/archive/V2.0.0.tar.gz Note V2.0.0.tar.gz versus nfs-ganesha-2.0.0.tar.gz. If I click on that link the downloaded fi

[perl-ExtUtils-Depends] Created tag perl-ExtUtils-Depends-0.306-1.el7

2014-01-21 Thread Paul Howarth
The lightweight tag 'perl-ExtUtils-Depends-0.306-1.el7' was created pointing to: eb64f0f... Update to 0.306 -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl

Re: Best Practices for Django App Packaging

2014-01-21 Thread John . Florian
> On 01/21/2014 03:45 PM, john.flor...@dart.biz wrote: > > While I've been packaging Python apps for Fedora for a long time, I'm a > > complete novice to Django. I've just completed my first app (using the > > built-in development server) and now want to get it packaged. Thus far > > I've foll

[perl-ExtUtils-Depends/epel7] (2 commits) ...Update to 0.306

2014-01-21 Thread Paul Howarth
Summary of changes: 553df2d... Update to 0.305 (*) eb64f0f... Update to 0.306 (*) (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org ht

Re: Taskotron wiki page

2014-01-21 Thread Tim Flink
On Tue, 21 Jan 2014 10:23:40 -0500 (EST) Martin Krizek wrote: > > > > As a general note, I'm not fully happy when the source code lives > > somewhere else than the issues do. It confuses people. But if we > > want to keep easy-to-browse-and-fork functionality (bitbucket) and > > full-featured-

Re: NetworkManager Bridges in Fedora

2014-01-21 Thread Dan Williams
On Mon, 2014-01-20 at 23:18 -0500, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > My old notes at > https://wikis.uit.tufts.edu/confluence/display/TUSKpub/Configure+Pair+Bonding,+VLANs,+and+Bridges+for+KVM+Hypervisor > were pretty good. > > If you want stable KVM bridging, pair bonding, jumbo frames, or > consistent

LibRaw soname bump

2014-01-21 Thread Jon Ciesla
The latest LibRaw is landing momentarily. The soname has changed so I'll be rebuilding evas-generic-loaders, libkdcraw, oyranos and shotwell. If I missed anything I'll fix that up as well. Thanks, J -- http://cecinestpasunefromage.wordpress.com/

Re: NetworkManager Bridges in Fedora

2014-01-21 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 01:30:31PM +0100, Harald Hoyer wrote: > On 01/16/2014 08:09 PM, Dan Williams wrote: > > On Thu, 2014-01-16 at 13:53 -0500, Steve Dickson wrote: > >> Hello, > >> > >> Has anybody had any luck with getting bridges > >> consistently up in running in either F19 or F20? > >> I kn

Re: Your packages in EPEL-7

2014-01-21 Thread Lubomir Rintel
These don't have an epel7 branch yet. Please let me know if you intend to request the branch for the package you maintain. perl-DBD-CSV (devel:psabata, EL-6:steve) perl-MIME-Lite (devel:psabata, EL-6:stevetraylen) perl-MLDBM (devel:steve, EL-6:spot) perl-SQL-Statement (devel:psabata, EL-6:kanarip)

Re: Taskotron wiki page

2014-01-21 Thread Martin Krizek
- Original Message - > From: "Kamil Paral" > To: "Fedora QA Development" , "Josef > Skladanka" > Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2014 4:00:33 PM > Subject: Re: Taskotron wiki page > > > I also updated > > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/Tools > > > > with the list of our current proj

[perl-Lingua-EN-Sentence] Initial import

2014-01-21 Thread corsepiu
commit abc17401e5c68bea6f310bec7a452252f9f1115d Author: Ralf Corsépius Date: Tue Jan 21 16:28:47 2014 +0100 Initial import .gitignore |1 + perl-Lingua-EN-Sentence.spec | 52 ++ sources |1 + 3 files

Re: Best Practices for Django App Packaging

2014-01-21 Thread Matthias Runge
On 01/21/2014 03:45 PM, john.flor...@dart.biz wrote: > While I've been packaging Python apps for Fedora for a long time, I'm a > complete novice to Django. I've just completed my first app (using the > built-in development server) and now want to get it packaged. Thus far > I've followed my norma

Re: SELinux RPM scriplet issue annoucement

2014-01-21 Thread Matthias Clasen
On Mon, 2014-01-20 at 23:18 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Tue, 2014-01-21 at 01:01 -0600, Ian Pilcher wrote: > > On 01/20/2014 11:48 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > The bug currently under discussion was caused by a change that came in > > > inadvertently, not intentionally, and was actually

[perl-Module-Build-Tiny] Created tag perl-Module-Build-Tiny-0.028-1.el7

2014-01-21 Thread Paul Howarth
The lightweight tag 'perl-Module-Build-Tiny-0.028-1.el7' was created pointing to: 8bc552f... Update to 0.028 -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/pe

Re: recode - source url question

2014-01-21 Thread Alec Leamas
See [1], in particular the section on %version --alec [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SourceURL#Github On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 3:47 PM, Zoltan Kota wrote: > Hi, > > The author of recode moved the source tarballs to Github. There he > provides release tags, see below: > > https:/

Summary/Minutes from today's Env-and-Stacks WG Meeting (2014-01-21)

2014-01-21 Thread Tadej Janež
= #fedora-meeting: Env and Stacks (2014-01-21) = Meeting started by tjanez at 13:03:19 UTC. The full logs are available at http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2014-01-21/env-and-stacks.2014-01-21-

[perl-Module-Build-Tiny/epel7] (6 commits) ...Update to 0.028

2014-01-21 Thread Paul Howarth
Summary of changes: 3b28241... Update to 0.025 (*) bfee890... Perl 5.18 rebuild (*) b52c75d... - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_20_Mass (*) 931c6a5... Update to 0.026 (*) a5dd1a7... Update to 0.027 (*) 8bc552f... Update to 0.028 (*) (*) This commit already existed i

recode - source url question

2014-01-21 Thread Zoltan Kota
Hi, The author of recode moved the source tarballs to Github. There he provides release tags, see below: https://github.com/pinard/Recode/releases What 'Source tag' should I use in the recode.spec file for version 3.6 tarball? Zoltan -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://

Best Practices for Django App Packaging

2014-01-21 Thread John . Florian
While I've been packaging Python apps for Fedora for a long time, I'm a complete novice to Django. I've just completed my first app (using the built-in development server) and now want to get it packaged. Thus far I've followed my normal model of using setuptools so that everything very clean

Re: Go packaging guidelines?

2014-01-21 Thread Daniel J Walsh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 01/14/2014 02:18 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 12:06:09PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: >> A couple of questions and comments. I think overall, the approach >> works. # Packaging Libraries This does not mention libraries which

Re: RPMbuild mystery parameters "--with" and "--without"

2014-01-21 Thread Alec Leamas
Well, lpf ( in package lpf) is about this: it downloads, builds and installs a target package from sources. As of now, there are no user-defined options; no usecase so far. Wouldn't be hard to add if need be. On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 2:31 PM, Christopher Meng wrote: > I first thought it was ju

Re: RPMbuild mystery parameters "--with" and "--without"

2014-01-21 Thread Christopher Meng
I first thought it was just kind of something like what gentoo packages do in their ebuilds, but then I also found that it's useless sometimes as described by Richard. Hereby comes a question, do we have any plans of let users install packages from sources(crazy of course...) with bcond defined al

Re: RFC: what to do with ums when the X server is not suid root ?

2014-01-21 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Tue, 21.01.14 09:26, Hans de Goede (hdego...@redhat.com) wrote: > Probably. TBH I'm not that interested in the binary drivers I know the nvidia > one > is actually quite decent and it has a lot of users. So I don't want to break > them, > but beyond that my interest stops. I assume they are s

Re: RFC: what to do with ums when the X server is not suid root ?

2014-01-21 Thread Gerd Hoffmann
On Mo, 2014-01-20 at 15:58 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 02:18:22PM +, Matthew Garrett wrote: > > We can probably kill -cirrus. > > qemu? (I know that people "should" be using QXL, but cirrus is still > the default in plain qemu, and IMHO simpler and more secure.

Re: NetworkManager Bridges in Fedora

2014-01-21 Thread Lorenzo Dalrio
I have a half-working setup: I use a bridge on my home server to connect via vpn like if i was at home, but i am unable to create a tap device with NetworkManager. I have bridge0 and em1 managed by NetworkManager and an ifcfg-tap0 file to bring up tap0 before openvpn start. 2014/1/16 Steve Dickso

Re: RFC: what to do with ums when the X server is not suid root ?

2014-01-21 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 01/20/2014 07:19 PM, Andrew Lutomirski wrote: On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 7:48 AM, Hans de Goede wrote: Hi, On 01/20/2014 03:18 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote: On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 10:08:01AM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote: So now it is time to start looking into some of the corner cases, o

Re: RFC: what to do with ums when the X server is not suid root ?

2014-01-21 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 01/20/2014 05:09 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote: On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 04:48:55PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote: Hi, On 01/20/2014 03:18 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote: -mga is probably also still relevant in some small number of cases. Don't we've a kms driver for those? Or you mean for mga car

Re: NetworkManager Bridges in Fedora

2014-01-21 Thread Tomasz Torcz
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 11:18:18PM -0500, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > My old notes at > https://wikis.uit.tufts.edu/confluence/display/TUSKpub/Configure+Pair+Bonding,+VLANs,+and+Bridges+for+KVM+Hypervisor > were pretty good. > > If you want stable KVM bridging, pair bonding, jumbo frames, or > cons

dnf-0.4.12

2014-01-21 Thread Ales Kozumplik
Hi, We're releasing 0.4.12 today. See all the information at the usual places: blog [1], release notes [2] and f20 update [3]. Ales [1] http://dnf.baseurl.org/2014/01/21/dnf-0-4-12-released/ [2] http://akozumpl.github.io/dnf/release_notes.html#id23 [3] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/