On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 5:37 PM, Dave Johansen wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 5:15 PM, Sandro Mani wrote:
>
>>
>> On 19.01.2014 01:06, Dave Johansen wrote:
>>
>> I just updated odb to 2.3.0 in rawhide and the build works just fine on
>> RHEL 6, but failed in koji (
>> http://koji.fedoraproject
Hi
On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 8:20 PM, Andre Robatino wrote:
> I replaced the typo scriplet -> scriptlet in several places in that page,
> including the anchor link. Don't know if that breaks any existing links.
>
Thanks. I just sent out the announcement. Hopefully it makes sense.
Rahul
--
dev
So does alsa, doesn't it? Everyone finds that acceptable. There are tons of
kernel modules on fedora, i don't see why that could be an stopper.
The packages built okay without the optional kernel module (to know,
linux-fusion is the one), if that turns to be obligatory, again, i'd take
alsa packag
Rahul Sundaram gmail.com> writes:
>
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Common_F20_bugs#RPM_scriplets_fail_during_updates
>
> Please review it. Do you want me to send the announcement as well?
I replaced the typo scriplet -> scriptlet in several places in that page,
including the anchor link. Don't
Sorry, left the list out when I sent this before. Here it is for
everyone, with updates...
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 10:59 PM, T.C. Hollingsworth
wrote:
> Sorry, I kind of dropped the ball on this. :-(
>
> On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 8:27 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> I've been looking at more webap
On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 5:15 PM, Sandro Mani wrote:
>
> On 19.01.2014 01:06, Dave Johansen wrote:
>
> I just updated odb to 2.3.0 in rawhide and the build works just fine on
> RHEL 6, but failed in koji (
> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6425496 ). It looks
> like a path chan
On 1-18-14 18:39:55 David wrote:
> What I did. This worked for me.
>
> I set Selinux to permissive
>
> I rebooted (don't know if needed)
Not necessary.
> Yum clean all
>
> Yum update
>
> package-cleanup --dupes (to look for dupes)
>
> package-cleanup --cleandupes to remove the dupes
This wo
On 19.01.2014 01:06, Dave Johansen wrote:
I just updated odb to 2.3.0 in rawhide and the build works just fine
on RHEL 6, but failed in koji (
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6425496 ). It looks
like a path changed or something along those lines that I need to
account for i
I just updated odb to 2.3.0 in rawhide and the build works just fine on
RHEL 6, but failed in koji (
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6425496 ). It looks like
a path changed or something along those lines that I need to account for in
my .spec. Is that the case? Or is there someth
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 1/18/2014 6:23 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Sat, 18 Jan 2014 17:39:07 -0500 Rahul Sundaram
> wrote:
>
>> Hi
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 5:06 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I would think a detailed common bugs entry and then a shor
On Sat, 18 Jan 2014 17:39:07 -0500
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Hi
>
>
> On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 5:06 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > I would think a detailed common bugs entry and then a short
> > announcement pointing to that would be good.
> >
> > Would someone be able to write up the comm
Hi
On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 5:06 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
>
> I would think a detailed common bugs entry and then a short
> announcement pointing to that would be good.
>
> Would someone be able to write up the common bug entry?
>
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Common_F20_bugs#RPM_scriplets_fai
On Sat, 18 Jan 2014 15:47:38 -0500
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Hi
>
> Since updates don't automatically fix the issue created by
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1054350 and users are
> required to run a set of steps as a workaround, shouldn't this be
> announced via the fedora announc
I spoke with the package owner and plan on taking ownership of the el6
branch of llvm. I've modified the current .spec file from rawhide and plan
on building llvm 3.4 for el6. The .spec and source .rpm can be found at:
http://daveisfera.fedorapeople.org/llvm_3.4/llvm.spec
http://daveisfera.fedorape
Hi
Since updates don't automatically fix the issue created by
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1054350 and users are required
to run a set of steps as a workaround, shouldn't this be announced via the
fedora announce list and posted in the Fedora website prominently as well?
Rahul
--
# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting
# Date: 2014-01-20
# Time: 16:00 UTC
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto)
# Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net
Greetings testers!
It's meeting time again on Monday! Once again we have a few things to
discuss even though the .next p
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 07:36:44PM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 05:25:22PM -0500, Martin Langhoff wrote:
> > Alright, I think I know what's happening: yum resolves the dep on ruby
> > by installing jruby AND ruby-mri
> >If I do yum install ruby ; yum install puppet, then t
On 16.01.2014 21:38, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-01-16 at 14:53 -0500, Steve Dickson wrote:
>>
>> On 16/01/14 14:39, Steve Dickson wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 16/01/14 14:09, Dan Williams wrote:
Also, if wouldn't mind passing along the systemd journal output for
NetworkManager, that migh
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 10:40:07PM -0800, Michael Stahnke wrote:
> So should it just require ruby-mri?
That is my vote.
> > ... which is fine. However yum install puppet should be pulling in only
> > one. Not both. I would say almost everybody would expect that to be
> > ruby-mri
> I would say
On 01/18/2014 01:40 AM, Michael Stahnke wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 6:53 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 9:43 PM, Mo Morsi wrote:
>>> Yes as others have mentioned puppet requires ruby(release) which is
>>> satisfied by both ruby-mri and jruby
> So should it j
On 18.01.2014 03:34, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2014-01-17 at 08:57 -0500, Steve Dickson wrote:
On 17/01/14 07:30, Harald Hoyer wrote:
journalctl -b _SYSTEMD_UNIT=NetworkManager.service
better use
# journalctl -b -u NetworkManager
"-u" has the advantage, that you can specify it multiple
On Mon, 13 Jan 2014 16:15:19 +0100
Martin Stransky wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> first $SUBJ is available at:
>
> http://stransky.fedorapeople.org/FirefoxGtk3/
>
> It's just a src.spm and plugin support it not finished (don't browse
> youtube ;-)) but may work as a preview.
>
Aside:
Listening to \v
The original maintainer orphaned it because it depends on kernel module
more and more.
Any thoughts?
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
23 matches
Mail list logo
