-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
El Fri, 10 Jan 2014 18:31:13 -0700
Tim Flink escribió:
> On Fri, 10 Jan 2014 15:35:59 -0800
> Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 2014-01-10 at 17:33 -0600, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> > > El Fri, 10 Jan 2014 15:26:38 -0800
> > > Adam Williamson escri
On Fri, 10 Jan 2014 15:35:59 -0800
Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-01-10 at 17:33 -0600, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> > El Fri, 10 Jan 2014 15:26:38 -0800
> > Adam Williamson escribió:
> > > On Thu, 2014-01-09 at 11:32 +0100, Maros Zatko wrote:
> > > > Dear guys and ladies,
> > > > So it seems
# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting
# Date: 2014-01-13
# Time: 16:00 UTC
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto)
# Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net
Greetings testers!
It's meeting time again on Monday! There are a couple of topics that
have come up in the past week, a
I just did an update run on the F20 Common Bugs page, and I was pleased
to note the number of prominent issues that has been resolved with
updates since F20 shipped. There are now 13 issues under 'resolved
issues' on Common Bugs, which is pretty good compared historically. Just
wanted to pass along
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 10:22 AM, Aleksandar Kurtakov
wrote:
> > I've just taken sqljet (as a dependency of OmegaT) before reading this.
> Which
> > build problem svnkit has? It's another BR for OmegaT.
>
>
> So svnkit was fine for java usage but not for being used in
> eclipse-subclipse.
thaks
On Fri, 2014-01-10 at 17:33 -0600, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> El Fri, 10 Jan 2014 15:26:38 -0800
> Adam Williamson escribió:
> > On Thu, 2014-01-09 at 11:32 +0100, Maros Zatko wrote:
> > > Dear guys and ladies,
> > > So it seems like livecd-creator is silently disabling selinux.
> > > Proof: vim $(wh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
El Fri, 10 Jan 2014 15:26:38 -0800
Adam Williamson escribió:
> On Thu, 2014-01-09 at 11:32 +0100, Maros Zatko wrote:
> > Dear guys and ladies,
> > So it seems like livecd-creator is silently disabling selinux.
> > Proof: vim $(which livecd-creator) ;
On Thu, 2014-01-09 at 11:32 +0100, Maros Zatko wrote:
> Dear guys and ladies,
> So it seems like livecd-creator is silently disabling selinux.
> Proof: vim $(which livecd-creator) ; line 150
> Fact, that it's re-enabled afterwards doesn't ease silent disablement of
> security feature.
>
> I'd love
On Thu, 2014-01-09 at 14:30 +0100, Harald Hoyer wrote:
> On 01/02/2014 11:32 PM, Jean François Martinez wrote:
> > I have a nice booter setup and a nice _main_ Linux installation. Last thing
> > I would want is a distribution I am _testing_, that is Fedora 20 forces on
> > me it will be my main
Hi, I've been going through the process of becoming a package
maintainer, and thought it would be a good time to introduce myself. My
name is Matt Robinson and I'm currently working at Rutgers University. I
build a lot of RPMs there (and use mock and koji as well), and with a
recent switch to F
Le vendredi 10 janvier 2014 à 13:54 -0700, Jerry James a écrit :
> On Dec. 5, 2013, I sent private email to Mark Chappell (tremble) about
> a change I need to the normaliz package in order to update to a more
> recent version of polymake.
>
>
> On Dec. 11, 2013, I
> opened https://bugzilla.redhat
On Dec. 5, 2013, I sent private email to Mark Chappell (tremble) about a
change I need to the normaliz package in order to update to a more recent
version of polymake.
On Dec. 11, 2013, I opened
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1040627 to ask for the same
change.
On Dec. 19, 2013, I ap
On Jan 10, 2014, at 8:04 AM, Przemek Klosowski
wrote:
> On 01/09/2014 07:23 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>> Am 09.01.2014 22:16, schrieb Przemek Klosowski:
>>> I think you can still brick the system with careless yum erases: for
>>> instance, deleting grub
>> how would this delete the bootloader i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The first deliverable that the Fedora Server Working Group was tasked
with was the production of a Product Requirements Document. This
document is intended to provide a high-level view of the goals and
primary deliverables of the Fedora Server distribu
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 11:44 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> On 01/09/2014 09:52 PM, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 11:43 AM, Hans de Goede
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>>
>>> On 01/09/2014 12:09 AM, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 2:58 PM
Am 10.01.2014 20:55, schrieb Matthew Miller:
> On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 11:41:03AM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
>>> By the way, currently the protected list seems to be 'yum, systemd
>>> and running kernel'. I don't have a system to try it on, so I just
>>> hope that one can't delete their depend
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 11:41:03AM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > By the way, currently the protected list seems to be 'yum, systemd
> > and running kernel'. I don't have a system to try it on, so I just
> > hope that one can't delete their dependencies either (glibc? what
> > else?).
> No, you
On Fri, 2013-12-20 at 07:12 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> This thread is no longer productive and is closed.
>
> I urge everyone to re-read our code of conduct:
> http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Sorry, missed that.
If I can address the topic a bit, since someone seemed interested in my
On Fri, 2013-12-20 at 10:49 +0100, Michael Scherer wrote:
> Le mercredi 18 décembre 2013 à 21:40 +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" a
> écrit :
> > On mið 18.des 2013 21:20, Reindl Harald wrote:
> > > who do you think you are to claim whatever people are "outside the
> > > community"?
> >
> > Individ
Hi,
On 01/09/2014 09:52 PM, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 11:43 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 01/09/2014 12:09 AM, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 2:58 PM, Peter Hutterer
wrote:
On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 01:14:08PM -0800, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
/usr
On Thu, 2014-01-09 at 16:16 -0500, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
> On 01/09/2014 01:58 PM, Ian Malone wrote:
> > Latest installed is almost exactly not what you want, I've had plenty
> > (where plenty in this case is probably >5) of cases where a kernel
> > update broke something, in quite a few of thos
On Sat, 2014-01-11 at 00:49 +0900, Mamoru TASAKA wrote:
> Chuck Anderson wrote, at 01/10/2014 11:56 PM +9:00:
> > On Thu, Jan 09, 2014 at 10:42:33AM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> >> On Thu, 2014-01-09 at 10:13 -0500, Chuck Anderson wrote:
> >>> This appears to have also broken Fedora 19 updates-t
On Thu, Jan 09, 2014 at 07:58:44PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> So the question becomes, what is it appropriate for a distribution to do
> in this situation? My personal opinion is that what's appropriate for a
> distribution to do is also, happily, what's easiest for a distribution
> to do: pun
Hi, I have this review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1051254
Its python-patsy, to use R like formula language in Python
I will review other package in return.
Thanks, Sergio
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Mainly focused on next steps for the BR cleanup followed by a discussion
about containers and moving over towards definition of Base again.
Meeting ended Fri Jan 10 16:53:34 2014 UTC. Information about MeetBot at
http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot .
Minutes:
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora
Am 10.01.2014 16:49, schrieb Dridi Boukelmoune:
> I actually remember a comparison matrix of OpenSolaris forks, some of
> them chose /rpm5?/ for package management, but I can't find a link.
>
> I do understand why people would want such features built-in, but it
> seems a bit short-sighted. And
Chuck Anderson wrote, at 01/10/2014 11:56 PM +9:00:
On Thu, Jan 09, 2014 at 10:42:33AM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2014-01-09 at 10:13 -0500, Chuck Anderson wrote:
This appears to have also broken Fedora 19 updates-testing, which is
even less acceptable than breaking rawhide.
Eh, I'
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 2:50 PM, Dridi Boukelmoune
wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 1:04 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>> Bill Nottingham wrote:
>>
>>> Matthew Miller (mat...@fedoraproject.org) said:
I'm a little lost in the thread, but do you mean that yum's protected
packages functionality
tor 2014-01-09 klockan 20:30 -0800 skrev Andrew Lutomirski:
> It would be nice, at least, if there was a clean way for these stacks
> to be tracked and, if needed, uninstalled. Some of these things
> install into /usr, which is a giant mess. (Pip, the one I use the
> most, doesn't do that IIRC,
On 01/09/2014 07:23 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 09.01.2014 22:16, schrieb Przemek Klosowski:
By the way, currently the protected list seems to be 'yum, systemd and running
kernel'.
I don't have a system to try it on
what about the machine you sitting in front of?
without -y flag yum asks if y
Am 10.01.2014 15:56, schrieb Chuck Anderson:
> On Thu, Jan 09, 2014 at 10:42:33AM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> On Thu, 2014-01-09 at 10:13 -0500, Chuck Anderson wrote:
>>> This appears to have also broken Fedora 19 updates-testing, which is
>>> even less acceptable than breaking rawhide.
>>
>>
On Thu, Jan 09, 2014 at 10:42:33AM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-01-09 at 10:13 -0500, Chuck Anderson wrote:
> > This appears to have also broken Fedora 19 updates-testing, which is
> > even less acceptable than breaking rawhide.
>
> Eh, I'd suggest not. updates-testing is actually
I'm sorry, but you're forgetting one major thing.
Sure there are lots of developers that ignore best practices. There is
nothing new. But there is also a lot of users that do understand best
practices and do want the apps packaged in a clean way.
The apps are not packaged because the developers
As of freetype 2.5.1, freetype's upstream has moved all header files
from /usr/include/freetype/freetype2/ and /usr/include/ft2build.h to
/usr/include/freetype2/.
I plane to push freetype 2.5.2 to master at the end of the next week
(#1034065).
If your packages use freetype as documented then you
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 1:04 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Bill Nottingham wrote:
>
>> Matthew Miller (mat...@fedoraproject.org) said:
>>> I'm a little lost in the thread, but do you mean that yum's protected
>>> packages functionality is undocumented? If that is what you mean, check
>>> the man page.
Apologies for the late announcement for the meeting today, i've been
away the past 2 weeks and work has accumulated quite a bit and i just
didn't get to send it out before. Not much of an agenda for today anyway.
Agenda:
- Buildreq cleanup updates and further discussion/actions
- Inter WG top
On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 18:22:18 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> The 'satyr' package in Rawhide was bumped from 0.12 to 0.13 yesterday.
> This bumps the library's soname from libsatyr.so.2 to libsatyr.so.3 .
> This was not announced on devel@, as it is supposed to be (or the person
> doing the bump
- Original Message -
> From: "Ismael Olea"
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>
> Sent: Friday, January 10, 2014 11:17:17 AM
> Subject: Re: Orphaning few java packages
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 9:29 AM, Aleksandar Kurtakov < akurt...@redhat.com >
> wrote:
>
>
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 9:29 AM, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote:
>
> * sqljet - dependency of svnkit which was dependency(disabled now due to
> build problems with svnkit) of eclipse-subclipse
I've just taken sqljet (as a dependency of OmegaT) before reading this.
Which build problem svnkit has? It's
And I forgot one:
* eclipse-cmakeed - haven't seen upstream release in quite sometime, seems the
project is not really active anymore
Alexander Kurtakov
Red Hat Eclipse team
- Original Message -
> From: "Aleksandar Kurtakov"
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>
> Sent:
I'm just about to orphan few packages due to not using them and not having time
to properly maintain them:
* eclipse-subclipse - pretty active upstream but as I don't use it updates are
delayed and I haven't tried it in months
* sqljet - dependency of svnkit which was dependency(disabled now due
41 matches
Mail list logo
