On Sat, 2013-12-28 at 21:48 +, Richard Fearn wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 28 December 2013 21:29, Brendan Jones wrote:
> > I'm doing some development at the moment and I want the coredumps to be
> > dropped somewhere sane (like the executing directory). How do I do it?
>
> I think you want to do:
>
On 12/28/2013 02:15 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
There's another one yesterday... octave...
This one is a bit weird in that the bump was actually committed early
in december, but a build was only done yesterday.
It seems like the new octave breaks a number of the existing octave*
packages too:
(from
[Sending to the right list this time]
Hi Bruno,
On 28 December 2013 16:43, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#The_.25pretrans_scriptlet
> Notes that you need to use lua in pretrans scriptlets, not shell commands.
Thanks. I've already seen that. It doesn
On 12/28/2013 02:43 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
On 12/28/2013 02:25 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
Sorry for the late notice - but in rebuilding for an updated hdf5 I
hadn't realized that we had never yet built octave-3.8.0 for rawhide. It
is now built and many things need to get rebuilt and there ar
Hi,
On 28 December 2013 21:29, Brendan Jones wrote:
> I'm doing some development at the moment and I want the coredumps to be
> dropped somewhere sane (like the executing directory). How do I do it?
I think you want to do:
$ sudo systemctl stop abrt-ccpp
Before:
$ cat /proc/sys/kernel/core_pa
On 12/28/2013 02:25 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
Sorry for the late notice - but in rebuilding for an updated hdf5 I
hadn't realized that we had never yet built octave-3.8.0 for rawhide. It
is now built and many things need to get rebuilt and there are some
cmake issues as well
https://bugzilla.re
I'm doing some development at the moment and I want the coredumps to be
dropped somewhere sane (like the executing directory). How do I do it?
Cheers
B
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedora
Sorry for the late notice - but in rebuilding for an updated hdf5 I
hadn't realized that we had never yet built octave-3.8.0 for rawhide.
It is now built and many things need to get rebuilt and there are some
cmake issues as well
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047051
I'll see wh
There's another one yesterday... octave...
This one is a bit weird in that the bump was actually committed early
in december, but a build was only done yesterday.
It seems like the new octave breaks a number of the existing octave*
packages too:
(from a scratch build:
http://koji.fedoraprojec
On Sat, 2013-12-28 at 12:21 +, Debarshi Ray wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 05:50:18PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > Sigh. Yes, another of these.
> >
> > On 2013-12-18, tracker was bumped to 0.7.0:
> >
> > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=485698
> >
> > the sonames o
On Sat, Dec 28, 2013 at 13:23:35 +,
Richard Fearn wrote:
Hi all,
I'm trying to change a symlink to a directory but it's not working.
I've reduced the problem down to a simple test case.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#The_.25pretrans_scriptlet
Notes that you need to
On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 07:52:04PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> No. There's a bad one, which is AutoQA. The problem with it is it's more
> or less considered obsolete now as far as new development goes; the devs
> are working on Taskotron to replace it, but I don't believe it's ready
> for test
Hi all,
I'm trying to change a symlink to a directory but it's not working.
I've reduced the problem down to a simple test case.
This package:
http://richardfearn.fedorapeople.org/test/1-1/test.spec
creates the following:
* a directory /usr/share/javadoc/test-1 (named after the package versi
>> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=485698
>>
>> the sonames of libtracker-extract, libtracker-miner and
>> libtracker-sparql were bumped to 0.18.so.0 (from 0.16.so.0) without
>> announcement, and without all dependent packages being successfully
>> rebuilt. At least the followi
On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 05:50:18PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Sigh. Yes, another of these.
>
> On 2013-12-18, tracker was bumped to 0.7.0:
>
> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=485698
>
> the sonames of libtracker-extract, libtracker-miner and
> libtracker-sparql were bum
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 2:39 PM, Dridi Boukelmoune
wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 2:36 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
>> Út 17. prosinec 2013, 14:13:30 CET, Dridi Boukelmoune napsal:
>>>
>>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=python-webcolors
>>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=py
16 matches
Mail list logo