Hi,
On Fri, 2013-12-20 at 16:28 -0600, Jon wrote:
> To reduce size, complexity, save time.
That's quite vague.
> What do you mean by "*enforcing*", or how would you imagine that happening?
My original email contained a total of 3 sentences, and you didn't reply
to the second sentence, which an
I'm working on this project: http://www.freeipa.org/page/V3/OTP
Users need to be able to create, edit and delete their own tokens. Each
token has an attribute: ipatokenOwner.
I attempted creating this ACL: (target =
"ldap:///ipatokenuniqueid=*,cn=otp,dc=example,dc=com";)(targetfilter =
"(objectCl
> If not, what's the point of this initiative?
To reduce size, complexity, save time.
What do you mean by "*enforcing*", or how would you imagine that happening?
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 4:10 PM, Colin Walters wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-12-12 at 18:50 +0100, Phil Knirsch wrote:
>> Hi everyone.
>>
>> D
On Thu, 2013-12-12 at 18:50 +0100, Phil Knirsch wrote:
> Hi everyone.
>
> During last weeks Base WG discussion about package set and self hosting
> of Base we came to a point where especially the self hosting of Base
> would currently look absurd as we'd require more than 2000 components to
> d
I was reading some of the discussion of feedback directed optimization and link
time optimization for python here:
http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.python.devel/143941
I'm wondering if Fedora should be enabling some of these optimizations?
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.o
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 12:15:39 +0100, Phil Knirsch wrote:
> Right, but shouldn't that then lead to the package building fine but
> the binary packages would miss some requires?
How would it miss requires? foo-devel should Requires: bar-devel (see
the guidelines[1]), so you'll get it, but the pac
On Fri, 20 Dec 2013 06:23:47 -0500 (EST)
Bastien Nocera wrote:
...snip...
> > nm-connection-editor (from network-manager-applet)
>
> This ships a gnome-bluetooth plugin, that used to be shown in the
> Bluetooth wizard and the settings app. From BlueZ 5, and in F20, this
> plugin is completely u
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
607
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-5620/bugzilla-3.4.14-2.el6
121
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2013-11274/ssmtp-2.61-21.el6
63
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDO
The following Fedora EPEL 5 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
607
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-5630/bugzilla-3.2.10-5.el5
121
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2013-11276/ssmtp-2.61-21.el5
97
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDO
Main topic was the discussion of how to proceeded with the BR cleanup idea.
One key point that was brought up that this whole effort obviously
relies on working closely with the maintainers of affected packages.
So the first big step is contacting all of them in order to ask them
whether they
On Fri, 2013-12-13 at 18:42 -0700, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote:
> Invariably when adding a patch to a spec, often I forget some detail,
> whether it be adding the %patchN macro to %prep or `git add`ing the
> patch. It would seem I'm not alone, either. A Google search for e.g.
> "site:https://lists.f
This thread is no longer productive and is closed.
I urge everyone to re-read our code of conduct:
http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 9:03 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 20.12.2013 14:48, schrieb Jóhann B. Guðmundsson:
>> On fös 20.des 2013 13:18, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>> not because it is irrelevant, because your only interest in that context is
>>> trolling against RH
>>
>> Trolling against RH right
Am 20.12.2013 14:48, schrieb Jóhann B. Guðmundsson:
> On fös 20.des 2013 13:18, Reindl Harald wrote:
>> not because it is irrelevant, because your only interest in that context is
>> trolling against RH
>
> Trolling against RH right right that's why I have been complement their arm
> team and
On fös 20.des 2013 13:18, Reindl Harald wrote:
not because it is irrelevant, because your only interest in that context is
trolling against RH
Trolling against RH right right that's why I have been complement their
arm team and how they handle become primary left and right on the internet.
Am 20.12.2013 14:11, schrieb Jóhann B. Guðmundsson:
>
> On fös 20.des 2013 09:49, Michael Scherer wrote:
>> Le mercredi 18 décembre 2013 à 21:40 +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" a
>> écrit :
>>> On mið 18.des 2013 21:20, Reindl Harald wrote:
who do you think you are to claim whatever people a
On fös 20.des 2013 09:49, Michael Scherer wrote:
Le mercredi 18 décembre 2013 à 21:40 +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" a
écrit :
On mið 18.des 2013 21:20, Reindl Harald wrote:
who do you think you are to claim whatever people are "outside the community"?
Individual that tells that truth and she
On 12/19/2013 05:33 PM, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
On Thu, 2013-12-19 at 09:52 -0500, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
Didn't we have a mass rebuild due to a C++ ABI change 1 or 2 years
ago?
Standard C++ does not specify an ABI. Compilers get to handle that
themselves.
We adhere to the Itanium C++ ABI. I
- Original Message -
> On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 5:23 AM, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> > > vfrnav
I didn't know this software, and I didn't know it used gnome-bluetooth.
Even with older versions of gnome-bluetooth it throws:
(vfrnav:1959): GLib-GObject-WARNING **: invalid cast from 'BluetoothC
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 5:23 AM, Bastien Nocera wrote:
>
>
> - Original Message -
> > Yep, it's that time again, folks. I see errors in my daily update
> > indicating an unannounced API/ABI bump.
> >
> > gnome-bluetooth-3.11.3-1.fc21 (built yesterday) seems to have gone from
> > libgnome-
On 12/13/2013 03:34 PM, Ville Skyttä wrote:
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 3:45 PM, Phil Knirsch wrote:
Famous last words: Can't be that hard to write a script that compares 2
builds that they provide the have the same provides and requires and
filelists. :)
Try /usr/bin/rpmdiff first...
Great i
- Original Message -
> Yep, it's that time again, folks. I see errors in my daily update
> indicating an unannounced API/ABI bump.
>
> gnome-bluetooth-3.11.3-1.fc21 (built yesterday) seems to have gone from
> libgnome-bluetooth.so.12 to libgnome-bluetooth.so.13 and dropped
> libgnome-blu
Sorry for the late send out of the agenda, this week has been
"overwhelming" somehow...
Agenda:
- Continue discussion about BR cleanup
o Discuss ideas and concerns brought up on the f-d ML
o Proposal how to automate this
- Happy holiday wishes! :)
Thanks & regards, Phil
--
Philipp Knirsch
On 12/14/2013 03:27 PM, Ben Boeckel wrote:
On Fri, 13 Dec, 2013 at 13:41:55 GMT, Phil Knirsch wrote:
Yea, I suspect both could be combined though in a script that gradually
adds new BRs to a package and then iterates over adding and removing BRs
until it produces equivalent output (not identical
On 12/14/2013 02:25 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2013-12-13 at 14:45 +0100, Phil Knirsch wrote:
Famous last words: Can't be that hard to write a script that compares 2
builds that they provide the have the same provides and requires and
filelists. :)
That's still not really enough; that
On 12/15/2013 11:54 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 12:20:50PM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 12.12.2013 18:50, Phil Knirsch napsal(a):
Initiate build requires cleanup for base related packages in
Fedora working with maintainers and the community. The goal is to
reduce the
Dne 19.12.2013 09:33, Florian Weimer napsal(a):
I think Debian has a working rpmbuild, but it obviously doesn't help if
you aren't allowed to install packages.
I didn't think of that. It has [1].
I am able to request installation of a package somehow, so I'll stick
with that. Thanks a lot
Dne 19.12.2013 01:30, Matthew Miller napsal(a):
Maybe, but I'm not sure it's worth it. RPM is a cpio archive with a
specialized header, and, really, rpmbuild is the best way to do it.
I was thinking about something like that.
Why not prepare the SRPM somewhere else and copy it?
I need to pr
Le mercredi 18 décembre 2013 à 21:40 +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" a
écrit :
> On mið 18.des 2013 21:20, Reindl Harald wrote:
> > who do you think you are to claim whatever people are "outside the
> > community"?
>
> Individual that tells that truth and shed's light how RH operates.
Shed light
My bad.
The kickstart I used for earlier installations did not work any more.
Now it is mandatory to give a "url" statement, while before it was
sufficient to just list all repos.
And then I looked only in the Fedora tree on the local mirror, not
Everything. Time for some vacation I guess...
30 matches
Mail list logo
