- Original Message -
> Document Link: http://goo.gl/0IzNgK
> *this is a Google Documents link
I think it would have more of a chance to get discussed if you
added the contents of your document in the body of a mail, rather than
on Google Docs. It would make it easier for people to reply t
On Mon, 2013-11-25 at 10:27 -0500, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
> - Original Message -
> > That's why I said I wouldn't make libev-devel conflict with
> > libevent-devel.
> >
> > I said I would put the event.h header from libev into a
> > libev-libevent-devel subpacke, and only this one would
Hi,
On Tue, 2013-11-19 at 15:30 +0800, Mathieu Bridon wrote:
> My plan is to do the following in Rawhide (the future Fedora 21) :
>
> * Move the headers back to /usr/include, as upstream intended
> * Put the event.h header into a libev-libevent-devel subpackage, and
> make it Conflicts: l
Hi Michael,
On Wed, 2013-11-20 at 12:17 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Nov 2013 11:24:34 +0800, Mathieu Bridon wrote:
> > I'm really just trying to fix all this mess here, so what do you think
> > would be the better solution?
>
> To follow:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging
Jan Kratochvil wrote:
> There were multiple Bugs suggesting the same, they are linked together for
> example from this one from 2005. But it all got WONTFIXed:
> Debug info RPMs do not "require" exact maching binary rpm
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=151598
The problem with those d
Till Maas wrote:
> It is possible, but I have to agree that github is more
> convenient/efficient than the workflow you describe.
Huh? The "export patches, attach to issue tracker" workflow allows me to
work with a normal local clone. The GitHub pull request workflow forces me
to create a fork o
On Mon, 2013-11-25 at 11:17 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
> Greetings testers and pinch hitters!
>
> Please see the current listing of Unapproved Critical Path Updates, test and
> give feedback, preferably in advance of tomorrow's freeze window closes.
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/critp
W dniu 25.11.2013 18:16, Pavel Alexeev pisze:
> How groovy will be in Fedora? Is it mean it also will be retired soon?
No, there are no plans of retiring groovy. (Groovy can be either with
Ant or Gradle. Fedora uses the first option.)
--
Mikolaj Izdebski
IRC: mizdebsk
--
devel mailing list
de
Greetings testers and pinch hitters!
Please see the current listing of Unapproved Critical Path Updates, test and
give feedback, preferably in advance of tomorrow's freeze window closes.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/critpath?unapproved=True
Karma feedback guidelines apply, in partic
On Mon, 2013-11-25 at 11:24 -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 11/25/2013 03:07 AM, Matthias Runge wrote:
> > Hey,
> >
> > recently, I saw a few requests to update python-django to
> > Django-1.6, the corresponding bug is [1].
> >
> > As ther
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 07:27:47AM -0500, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote:
>
> So to get back to your question:
> - I'd like the WG to think about how we could support building extension
> packages for multiple interpreters of dynamic languages - e.g.
> Python+PyPy+Jython, Ruby+JRuby+Rubinius (this will p
Compose started at Mon Nov 25 08:15:02 UTC 2013
Broken deps for i386
--
[MagicPoint]
MagicPoint-1.13a-10.fc21.i686 requires libgif.so.4
[OpenEXR_CTL]
OpenEXR_CTL-1.0.1-16.fc20.i686 requires libImath.so.6
OpenEXR_CTL-1.
On Sun, 24 Nov 2013 16:50:51 +0100, Sandro Mani wrote:
> A nice solution to ensure consistency could be to have each
> debuginfo package require the exact version of the base package
> installed. Since the debuginfo package however cannot know which
> base (sub)package it should depend on, I wonder
Il 25/11/2013 18:16, Pavel Alexeev ha scritto:
25.11.2013 20:32, punto...@libero.it пишет:
Il 25/11/2013 17:02, Pavel Alexeev ha scritto:
Hi,
25.11.2013 17:31, punto...@libero.it wrote:
Il 25/11/2013 13:55, Pavel Alexeev ha scritto:
hi
Hi.
I'm as groovy user want see it in Fedora. And now tr
25.11.2013 20:32, punto...@libero.it пишет:
> Il 25/11/2013 17:02, Pavel Alexeev ha scritto:
>> Hi,
>>
>> 25.11.2013 17:31, punto...@libero.it wrote:
>>> Il 25/11/2013 13:55, Pavel Alexeev ha scritto:
>>> hi
Hi.
I'm as groovy user want see it in Fedora. And now try build it.
Have you
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 05:27:34PM +0100, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 08:28:59AM -0700, Pete Travis wrote:
> >
> > Enough people have asked this sort of question that Chris Roberts and I
> > started hacking on a Guide to address it. Suggestions, criticisms, or
> > contributions a
On 25 November 2013 06:58, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Personally, I use VMs.
I think the majority of developers do this. I have f19, f20, and
rawhide VMs with multiple versions of the images I use nearly every
day. For rawhide, it's a huge win to be able to go back to a working
version without a fu
Il 25/11/2013 17:02, Pavel Alexeev ha scritto:
Hi,
25.11.2013 17:31, punto...@libero.it wrote:
Il 25/11/2013 13:55, Pavel Alexeev ha scritto:
hi
Hi.
I'm as groovy user want see it in Fedora. And now try build it.
Have you tried update to gradle 1.9?
no
Have it same conflicts?
yes,
see
org.
Hello all,
My employer, ONELAN, have been using Fedora as a baseline Linux system for our
products for a while now, and I've just hit a situation where no-one's
packaging gstreamer1-python, but we're going to start depending on it.
Rather than just keep my packaging work to myself, I'm voluntee
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 08:28:59AM -0700, Pete Travis wrote:
>
> Enough people have asked this sort of question that Chris Roberts and I
> started hacking on a Guide to address it. Suggestions, criticisms, or
> contributions are equally welcome.
>
> [1] https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/docs/mult
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/25/2013 03:07 AM, Matthias Runge wrote:
> Hey,
>
> recently, I saw a few requests to update python-django to
> Django-1.6, the corresponding bug is [1].
>
> As there are quite a few changes, I'd expect this update to be
> harmful, at least - py
Hi,
25.11.2013 17:31, punto...@libero.it wrote:
> Il 25/11/2013 13:55, Pavel Alexeev ha scritto:
> hi
>> Hi.
>> I'm as groovy user want see it in Fedora. And now try build it.
>> Have you tried update to gradle 1.9?
> no
>> Have it same conflicts?
>>
> yes,
> see
> org.codehaus.groovy:groovy-all:1
Change in ownership over the last 168 hours
===
2 packages were orphaned
obexftp [f18,f19] was orphaned by rathann
Tool to access devices via the OBEX protocol
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/obexftp
obexfs
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/24/2013 11:33 PM, Tim Landscheidt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> IIRC fedora-review suggested to test packages on all sup-
> ported Fedora releases. So, with a larger hard disk, I want
> to install Fedora 19, 20 (soon) and Rawhide and throw in
> (recent) Deb
On Mon, 25 Nov 2013 11:15:43 +0100
Marek Goldmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Tomorrow is F20 Final change deadline happening (according to
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/20/Schedule).
>
> If I still have a few packages in updates-testing - will these be
> added to the final compose later? Or t
The gpsd package in rawhide has been updated to 3.10 and the libgps
soname has changed. The following packages need to be rebuilt. I don't
expect any problems, but please let me know if something does break.
foxtrotgps-1.1.1-6.fc20
gpsdrive-2.11-20.fc20
kde-workspace-4.11.3-4.fc21
marble-4.11.95-1
Il 25/11/2013 14:31, punto...@libero.it ha scritto:
Il 25/11/2013 13:55, Pavel Alexeev ha scritto:
hi
Hi.
I'm as groovy user want see it in Fedora. And now try build it.
Have you tried update to gradle 1.9?
no
Have it same conflicts?
yes,
see
https://github.com/gradle/gradle/blob/REL_1.9/gr
Il 25/11/2013 13:55, Pavel Alexeev ha scritto:
hi
Hi.
I'm as groovy user want see it in Fedora. And now try build it.
Have you tried update to gradle 1.9?
no
Have it same conflicts?
yes,
see
org.codehaus.groovy:groovy-all:1.8.x (not available, not importable in
fedora) ship asm3 classes
org
perl-Prima has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Prima-1.37-1.fc21.x86_64 requires libungif.so.4()(64bit)
On i386:
perl-Prima-1.37-1.fc21.i686 requires libungif.so.4
On armhfp:
perl-Prima-1.37-1.fc21.armv7hl requires libungif.so.4
Please resolve this
perl-Language-Expr has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
On i386:
perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
On armhfp:
perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.
Compose started at Mon Nov 25 09:15:03 UTC 2013
Broken deps for armhfp
--
[avro]
avro-mapred-1.7.5-1.fc20.noarch requires hadoop-mapreduce
avro-mapred-1.7.5-1.fc20.noarch requires hadoop-client
[blueman]
blueman-1.23-7
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1031266
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
Hi Pavel,
Please take a look at the java-devel archives, where it was discussed:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/java-devel/2013-October/004972.html
--Marek
On 25.11.2013 13:55, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
Hi.
I'm as groovy user want see it in Fedora. And now try build it.
Have yo
commit a5495f552429a5e8ea0417329b2e6cb7acbfde6a
Author: Petr Písař
Date: Mon Nov 25 13:55:55 2013 +0100
1.111014 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-CPAN-Mini.spec | 15 +++
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/
commit 756992c1295dae25d92683e3e16211e956d123fe
Author: Petr Písař
Date: Mon Nov 25 13:23:49 2013 +0100
Correct changelog entry
perl-CPAN-Mini.spec |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-CPAN-Mini.spec b/perl-CPAN-Mini.spec
index 7cafee2..50826fc
Hi.
I'm as groovy user want see it in Fedora. And now try build it.
Have you tried update to gradle 1.9? Have it same conflicts?
12.11.2013 19:58, punto...@libero.it wrote:
> hi
> i decide to remove gradle form Fedora
> there are too many problems actually for maintain this package
> incompatible
On Mon, 2013-11-25 at 12:58 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> # repoquery --whatrequires python-tag
> sonata-0:1.6.2.1-10.fc20.x86_64
>
> That's a front-end for MPD (package "mpd" at RPM Fusion), which uses
> python-tag (tagpy) for its tag editor. Somebody will need to test
> whether
> it still w
> * PRD (mmaslano, 16:19:29)
>* LINK: http://piratepad.net/PwUiH4MEPR (abadger1999, 17:04:53)
>* ACTION: everyone to send one general thing they want the WG to
> enable and one specific thing they'd personally want to work on to
> the mailing list this week (abadger1999, 17:37
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1030914
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
On Mon, 25 Nov 2013 22:35:39 +1100, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-11-25 at 12:03 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > It fails for both Rawhide and F20 in koji's mock, because it tries to
> > download "distribute" (a fork of "setuptools"):
> >
> > [...]
> > + python setup.py build
> > Downloadi
- Original Message -
>
>
> - Original Message -
> > Hello Jiri,
> >
> > On Mon, 25 Nov 2013, Jiri Vanek wrote:
> > > Although it is more then nice to have giflib 5 in rawhide, I would
> > > encourage you to untag[1] it from rawhide, and prepare doubled packages
> > > in koji
- Original Message -
> Hello Jiri,
>
> On Mon, 25 Nov 2013, Jiri Vanek wrote:
> > Although it is more then nice to have giflib 5 in rawhide, I would
> > encourage you to untag[1] it from rawhide, and prepare doubled packages
> > in koji to give dependent packages time to rebuilt:
>
>
On Mon, 2013-11-25 at 12:03 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> It fails for both Rawhide and F20 in koji's mock, because it tries to
> download "distribute" (a fork of "setuptools"):
>
> [...]
> + python setup.py build
> Downloading
> http://pypi.python.org/packages/source/d/distribute/distribute-0.
Hello Jiri,
On Mon, 25 Nov 2013, Jiri Vanek wrote:
> Although it is more then nice to have giflib 5 in rawhide, I would
> encourage you to untag[1] it from rawhide, and prepare doubled packages
> in koji to give dependent packages time to rebuilt:
the new giflib is untagged now. I am sorry for
Hi!
Although it is more then nice to have giflib 5 in rawhide, I would encourage
you to untag[1] it from rawhide, and prepare doubled packages in koji to give
dependent packages time to rebuilt:
1) Find a provenpackager / releng member to work on rebuilding all the
packages quickly (in
On Mon, 25 Nov 2013 15:30:50 +1100, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Python-tag is broken in F19/20/rawhide. It failed to build during the
> boost 1.54 rebuild for some reason and is therefore in FTBFS for
> rawhide. I checked out the SCM and rebuilt it in mock, both for F20 and
> rawhide, quite succ
On Sat, 23 Nov 2013 16:52:38 -0500, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
> Can we have an event.h file that conditionally (or maybe even
> unconditionally) #includes the appropriate header file from either
> package? Both packages can then use the same event.h file without
> conflicts.
It would also boil down to
Hi,
Tomorrow is F20 Final change deadline happening (according to
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/20/Schedule).
If I still have a few packages in updates-testing - will these be added
to the final compose later? Or these packages should be in stable by the
time of Final change deadlin
On Mon, 25 Nov 2013 06:33:03 +, Tim Landscheidt wrote:
> So what are Fedora developers /actually/ using? Creating a
> separate GRUB partition and "chainloader"/"configfile"?
Chainloading (via 40_custom) is what I'm still doing with GRUB2, and it
works with different bootloaders, too (unlike
Hey,
recently, I saw a few requests to update python-django to Django-1.6,
the corresponding bug is [1].
As there are quite a few changes, I'd expect this update to be harmful,
at least
- python-django-openstack-auth
- openstack-dashboard
will break, and won't even build any more (because they a
50 matches
Mail list logo
