Hi,
I would like to finally fix this bug in Fedora:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=985610
Basically, our libev package diverges from upstream in two ways:
1. we install the header files in /usr/include/libev/ whereas upstream
installs them in /usr/include/
2. we ship a pk
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 01:31:32PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-11-18 at 00:44 +0100, Mattias Ellert wrote:
> > sön 2013-11-17 klockan 22:12 +0100 skrev Sandro Mani:
> > > Upgrading from xflr5-6.09.05-4.fc21.x86_64 to xflr5-6.09.05-5.fc21.x86_64
> > > however fails with
> > > Trans
Hey peoples,
Some of you guys and gals might know me already, been working in the industry
and using Linux since the late 90s. Came from IBM and now I work at Red Hat on
the Professional Services team. A road warrior, implementing, migrating and
mentoring; RHDS, IdM and Satellite for customers
On Mon, 2013-11-18 at 22:46 +0100, drago01 wrote:
> Well in theory gnome-shell should work fine on GLES ... how does it fail?
> (It is untested but it does not have any direct GL code, it uses cogl
> which has an GLES2 backend).
GLES versus GL is one half of the problem, GLX versus EGL is the oth
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 01:41:22PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> byobu is the only
> one which appears to _only_ contain an applications file, but I've no
> idea what byobu is or whether that's sane.
>
IIRC, byobu is not an X1 window manager. It's more like an enhancement or
pre-configuration of
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 4:46 PM, drago01 wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 10:11 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 8:18 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
>>> On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 10:04 AM, Richard W.M. Jones
>>> wrote:
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 09:26:36AM +0100, valent.turko...@gmai
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 10:11 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 8:18 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 10:04 AM, Richard W.M. Jones
>> wrote:
>>> On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 09:26:36AM +0100, valent.turko...@gmail.com wrote:
So I have three options to suggest to
On Mon, 2013-11-18 at 08:06 -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-11-18 at 11:23 +0800, Christopher Meng wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Yesterday I reviewed a package notion, which is a new window
> > manager(new to fedorian), it installs desktop file to
> > /usr/share/xsession.
> >
> > Interestin
On Mon, 2013-11-18 at 00:44 +0100, Mattias Ellert wrote:
> sön 2013-11-17 klockan 22:12 +0100 skrev Sandro Mani:
> > Upgrading from xflr5-6.09.05-4.fc21.x86_64 to xflr5-6.09.05-5.fc21.x86_64
> > however fails with
> > Transaction check error:
> > file /usr/share/applications/xflr5.desktop from
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 8:18 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 10:04 AM, Richard W.M. Jones
> wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 09:26:36AM +0100, valent.turko...@gmail.com wrote:
>>> So I have three options to suggest to my friend:
>>> - Latest Fedora or Mint but with Vesa driv
On 11/18/2013 06:23 AM, Christopher Meng wrote:
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 3:00 PM, "Germán A. Racca"
wrote:
Hi Christopher,
I fail to see what is the wrong location in your opinion. Do you think that
a window manager should install its desktop file in /usr/share/xsessions or
in /usr/share/applic
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 08:54:01AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
<...snip...>
> athmane:BADSOURCE:hydra-7.5.tar.gz:hydra
Fixed in Rawhide (upstream did minor fixes without bumping tarball's V-R)
<...snip...>
-- Athmane
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 08:54:01AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> rjones:BADURL:libguestfs-1.25.8.tar.gz:libguestfs
> rjones:BADURL:libpng-1.6.3.tar.xz:mingw-libpng
> rjones:BADURL:nsis-2.46-src.tar.bz2:mingw-nsis
> rjones:BADURL:mikmatch-1.0.6.tar.gz:ocaml-mikmatch
> rjones:BADURL:perl4caml-0.9.5.tar
On 2013-11-18 17:15, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Mon, 18 Nov 2013 17:08:56 +0100
Alec Leamas wrote:
On 2013-11-18 16:54, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
Here's attached another run of my sources/patches url checker.
Please fix any packages you are responsible for in rawhide, and
other branches as other changes
On Mon, 18 Nov 2013 09:12:56 -0700
Jerry James wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 8:54 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > jjames:BADSOURCE:networkx_reference.pdf:python-networkx
> > jjames:BADSOURCE:networkx_tutorial.pdf:python-networkx
> > jjames:BADSOURCE:networkx-documentation.zip:python-networkx
>
>
On Mon, 18 Nov 2013 17:08:56 +0100
Alec Leamas wrote:
> On 2013-11-18 16:54, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > Here's attached another run of my sources/patches url checker.
> > Please fix any packages you are responsible for in rawhide, and
> > other branches as other changes permit.
> >
> [cut]
> > leamas
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1030919
--- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar ---
This requires TAP::SimpleOutput >= 0.002
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=5w0Suau7Lr&a=cc_unsubs
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 8:54 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> jjames:BADSOURCE:networkx_reference.pdf:python-networkx
> jjames:BADSOURCE:networkx_tutorial.pdf:python-networkx
> jjames:BADSOURCE:networkx-documentation.zip:python-networkx
I can't reproduce this. I just did a fresh download from upstream o
On 2013-11-18 16:54, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
Here's attached another run of my sources/patches url checker.
Please fix any packages you are responsible for in rawhide, and other branches
as other changes permit.
[cut]
leamas:BADURL:lpf-0-d18db6d.tar.gz:lpf
[cut]
Hm... That url is
Source0:
On Nov 15, 2013 4:09 AM, "Stanislav Ochotnicky"
wrote:
>
> Quoting Jaroslav Reznik (2013-11-15 12:28:11)
> > * (optional) Mass-change spec files that have "Requires: java" to
"Requires:
> > java-headless"
> >
> > Other developers:
> > * Modify spec files to have "Requires: java-headless" instead o
On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 11:20 PM, Stanislav Ochotnicky
wrote:
> I believe OpenJDK maintainers will agree that automatically detecting if java
> or
> java-headless is supposed to be required is not really feasible. There's too
> many variables at play.
Then how are we maintainers supposed to dete
On 11/13/2013 02:52 PM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> So please, have a look at it, play with it, break it (no seriously, do, but
> don't
> forget to report how you did it afterward) and if you have any problem/RFE
> feel
> free to note them at:
>
> https://github.com/fedora-infr
- Original Message -
> From: "Nicolas Mailhot"
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>
> Sent: Saturday, November 16, 2013 2:51:08 AM
> Subject: Re: F21 System Wide Change: Headless Java
>
>
> Le Sam 16 novembre 2013 10:13, Richard W.M. Jones a écrit :
>
> > Wouldn't it
commit 526535e9b614841db4d661851af6f16e2e4d5926
Author: Tom Callaway
Date: Mon Nov 18 10:41:40 2013 -0500
add another explicit Requires: perl(Return::Value)
perl-Email-Send.spec |7 ++-
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Email-Send.spec b/perl-E
commit 5f8494d2cc726a42caed7028534e901dbaa59b25
Author: Tom Callaway
Date: Mon Nov 18 10:40:46 2013 -0500
add another explicit Requires: perl(Return::Value)
perl-Email-Send.spec |7 ++-
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Email-Send.spec b/perl-E
commit 41fdde9f8aa7047fc4906910278d84c5d2abfe4d
Author: Tom Callaway
Date: Mon Nov 18 10:41:21 2013 -0500
add another explicit Requires: perl(Return::Value)
perl-Email-Send.spec |7 ++-
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Email-Send.spec b/perl-E
commit 3a12793ee969a2734e0bed2a019c122f0170498d
Author: Tom Callaway
Date: Mon Nov 18 10:40:17 2013 -0500
add another explicit Requires: perl(Return::Value)
perl-Email-Send.spec |7 ++-
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Email-Send.spec b/perl-E
Change in ownership over the last 168 hours
===
1 packages were orphaned
workrave [EL-6,devel,f18,f19,f20] was orphaned by tmraz
Program that assists in the recovery and prevention of RSI
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkg
On Mon, 18 Nov 2013 07:20:34 +0100
Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
...snip...
> How about this:
> * I file bug for every package that BRs java
> * We'll give maintainers two weeks (or maybe a month) to look at
> the bug and possibly fix their packages.
> * If they don't take any action
This review takes into account the recommendations of previous review:
* Create a Agreement class in brooker
* mv init/status/schedule/create in that new class
* mv createDefaultReplMgr into the brooker replica class with the
function create_repl_manager()
* Handling of error condition wit
Compose started at Mon Nov 18 08:15:02 UTC 2013
Broken deps for i386
--
[OpenEXR_CTL]
OpenEXR_CTL-1.0.1-16.fc20.i686 requires libImath.so.6
OpenEXR_CTL-1.0.1-16.fc20.i686 requires libIlmThread.so.6
OpenEXR_CTL-1.0.1-16
Compose started at Mon Nov 18 09:15:03 UTC 2013
Broken deps for armhfp
--
[avro]
avro-mapred-1.7.5-1.fc20.noarch requires hadoop-mapreduce
avro-mapred-1.7.5-1.fc20.noarch requires hadoop-client
[blueman]
blueman-1.23-7
On Mon, 2013-11-18 at 11:23 +0800, Christopher Meng wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Yesterday I reviewed a package notion, which is a new window
> manager(new to fedorian), it installs desktop file to
> /usr/share/xsession.
>
> Interesting, when I looking into more "window manager" in Fedora, I found
> that:
>
On 18.11.2013 09:48, Panu Matilainen wrote:
On 11/18/2013 10:27 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
On 11/18/2013 12:44 AM, Mattias Ellert wrote:
sön 2013-11-17 klockan 22:12 +0100 skrev Sandro Mani:
Upgrading from xflr5-6.09.05-4.fc21.x86_64 to
xflr5-6.09.05-5.fc21.x86_64 however fails with
Transactio
On Po, 2013-11-18 at 07:20 +0100, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
> I'd expect out of ~800 packages that BR java only very few are going to be
> affected by java-headless change (i.e. they'd have to revert the change). I'd
> estimate maybe 30 broken packages and some we know wouldn't work so we would
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 2:38 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Um. What? Apart from the rude top-posting, I don't see how any of the
> screed above relates to the discussion Olav and I were having at all.
This thread is rapidly becoming the 'crap, we don't know where to put
this' dumping ground' ;)
-
On 11/14/2013 07:45 PM, Manuel Faux wrote:
Sounds logically for me now, as also the web UI requires you to
check at least on chroot. In this case the help page of copr-cli seems
quite confusing to me, since all the arguments except name are in square
brackets, which normally is used for optional
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842126
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|---
On 11/18/2013 10:27 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
On 11/18/2013 12:44 AM, Mattias Ellert wrote:
sön 2013-11-17 klockan 22:12 +0100 skrev Sandro Mani:
Upgrading from xflr5-6.09.05-4.fc21.x86_64 to
xflr5-6.09.05-5.fc21.x86_64 however fails with
Transaction check error:
file /usr/share/applicatio
On 11/18/2013 12:44 AM, Mattias Ellert wrote:
sön 2013-11-17 klockan 22:12 +0100 skrev Sandro Mani:
Upgrading from xflr5-6.09.05-4.fc21.x86_64 to xflr5-6.09.05-5.fc21.x86_64
however fails with
Transaction check error:
file /usr/share/applications/xflr5.desktop from install of
xflr5-6.09.0
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 3:00 PM, "Germán A. Racca"
wrote:
> Hi Christopher,
>
> I fail to see what is the wrong location in your opinion. Do you think that
> a window manager should install its desktop file in /usr/share/xsessions or
> in /usr/share/applications?
Hi,
From the GNOME sysadmin guid
Quoting Ville Skyttä (2013-11-15 18:30:33)
> On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 3:22 PM, Stanislav Ochotnicky
> wrote:
> >> http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/jing-trang.git/commit/?id=6d46e64fe0f365a947c7095adaf65e8cc2c90d5b
> >
> > Ugh. Why did you have to do that?
>
> Huh, wow, that's not at all the resp
42 matches
Mail list logo
