On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 2:11 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 06:39:25AM +0800, Christopher Meng wrote:
>> Ticket #350 needs 2 votes on final decision.
>>
>> Please consider.
>>
> What would help is if you could add to the ticket what makes this different
> from the situation o
Hey, folks!
Actually 9.2.3 doesn't built on armv7 (FDO #71573) and I think more
better for new release to get updated mesa stack. Probably mesa 9.2.4
will also has this bug.
What do you say about this idea?
--
Igor Gnatenko
Fedora release 20 (Heisenbug)
Linux 3.11.7-300.fc20.x86_64
--
devel m
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 06:39:25AM +0800, Christopher Meng wrote:
> Ticket #350 needs 2 votes on final decision.
>
> Please consider.
>
What would help is if you could add to the ticket what makes this different
from the situation of rsync bundling zlib or similar. In order to be fair
to package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1030125
Petr Šabata changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 02:14:44PM -0500, James Antill wrote:
>
> = Followups =
>
> (approval and retirement sections already passed)
> #topic #339 software collections in Fedora
> .fpc 339
> https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/339
>
I'm sorry, I don't think I'm going to get to anything new
On Wed, 2013-11-13 at 18:44 -0600, Michael Ekstrand wrote:
> - I don't have any Bluetooth status or display in gnome-shell now. I
> did previously. I do not know what I need to install or tweak to
> get
> it back, or where to report it.
Check if the settings > bluetooth window detects your d
On Wed, 2013-11-13 at 18:44 -0600, Michael Ekstrand wrote:
> I just upgraded my laptop from F19 to F20 Beta, using fedup, and
> encountered 2 noticeable problems with the upgrade process that I'm not
> sure where/how to correctly report:
>
> - Upon update, nm-applet was gone and my gnome-shell sta
I just upgraded my laptop from F19 to F20 Beta, using fedup, and
encountered 2 noticeable problems with the upgrade process that I'm not
sure where/how to correctly report:
- Upon update, nm-applet was gone and my gnome-shell status area had no
network status or control. Installing network-mana
On Wed, 13 Nov 2013 15:50:27 -0700
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Nov 2013 18:30:28 +0100
> drago01 wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > "iw-3.11-1.fc20 successfully untagged from
> > f20-updates-testing-pending by bodhi" ...
> >
> > Messages like this has been annoying like forever ... why do I care
>
On 13.11.2013 22:19, Jeffrey Bastian wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 01:29:34PM -0500, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
>> On 11/12/2013 07:47 AM, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
>>> 2) if you know that some machines change fingerprint and you *trust it*
>>> you
>>> can do:
>>>
>>> ~/.ssh/config:
>>> Host
On Wed, 13 Nov 2013 18:30:28 +0100
drago01 wrote:
> Hi,
>
> "iw-3.11-1.fc20 successfully untagged from f20-updates-testing-pending
> by bodhi" ...
>
> Messages like this has been annoying like forever ... why do I care
> about such messages? I mean as long as nothing went wrong I don't
> really
Ticket #350 needs 2 votes on final decision.
Please consider.
Thanks.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
# F20 Final Blocker Review meeting #1.5
# Date: 2013-11-14
# Time: 17:00 UTC (12:00 EST, 09:00 PST)
# Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net
Despite the fact that we *just had* a Blocker Review Meeting, we get to
have another one tomorrow (2013-11-14) to finish the rest of the
propos
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 01:29:34PM -0500, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
> On 11/12/2013 07:47 AM, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> > 2) if you know that some machines change fingerprint and you *trust it*
> > you
> > can do:
> >
> > ~/.ssh/config:
> > Host 192.168.1.1
> > UserKnownHostsFile /dev/n
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2013-11-13)
===
Meeting started by nirik at 18:00:02 UTC. The full logs are available at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2013-11-13/fesco.2013-11-13-18.00.log.html
.
Meeting summary
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC
meeting Thursday at 2013-11-14 17:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on
irc.freenode.net.
Local time information (via. rktime):
2013-11-14 09:00 Thu US/Pacific PST
2013-11-14 12:00 Thu US/Eastern EST
2013-11-14 1
The following Fedora EPEL 5 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
570
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-5630/bugzilla-3.2.10-5.el5
85
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2013-11276/ssmtp-2.61-21.el5
61
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDO
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
570
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-5620/bugzilla-3.4.14-2.el6
85
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2013-11274/ssmtp-2.61-21.el6
46
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDO
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=993106
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Rose-DB-0.773-1.fc20 |perl-Rose-DB-0.773-1.el6
--- Co
On 11/12/2013 07:47 AM, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
2) if you know that some machines change fingerprint and you *trust
it* you can do:
~/.ssh/config:
Host 192.168.1.1
UserKnownHostsFile /dev/null
It always bugged me that the choice was to either disable or manually
edit an obscure file, so
Hi,
"iw-3.11-1.fc20 successfully untagged from f20-updates-testing-pending
by bodhi" ...
Messages like this has been annoying like forever ... why do I care
about such messages? I mean as long as nothing went wrong I don't
really care (any I am pretty sure many others don't either).
Can we make
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 08:34:28PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
> meeting Wednesday at 18:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net.
>
> To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowt
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 04:57:38PM +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Nov 2013 14:52:27 +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
>
> > The development instance of pkgdb2 is at:
> >
> > http://209.132.184.188/
>
> That page says "Version 1.0.0" at the top and "0.1.0" at the bottom,
> and you r
On Wed, 13 Nov 2013, Tomas Mraz wrote:
I've orphaned workrave and ipsec-tools in all active branches of Fedora
as I do not use them any more.
I will take ipsec-tools, as we use it for our interop tests with
libreswan.
Paul
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedo
I've orphaned workrave and ipsec-tools in all active branches of Fedora
as I do not use them any more.
Feel free to take them. Both upstreams are still active although with
very low activity.
--
Tomas Mraz
No matter how far down the wrong road you've gone, turn back.
In order to implement the first CI test with replication instances, I
reorganised lib389 functions related to replication setup.
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47590/0001-Ticket-47590-CI-tests-add-split-functions-around-rep.patch
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedor
On Wed, 13 Nov 2013 14:52:27 +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> The development instance of pkgdb2 is at:
>
> http://209.132.184.188/
That page says "Version 1.0.0" at the top and "0.1.0" at the bottom,
and you refer to it as pkgdb2.
> - The idea of "owner" of a package disapear. There are on
Hi,
recently, somebody mentioned the desire of having 3D printing tools in
RHEL. I am completly open to the idea of building my Fedora packages for
EPEL as well. However, I haven't done that yet.
Is there any automated tool, that would show me the stack of apckages
that need to be build for E
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 04:05:10PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> Dne 13.11.2013 14:52, Pierre-Yves Chibon napsal(a):
> >So please, have a look at it, play with it, break it (no seriously, do, but
> >don't
> >forget to report how you did it afterward) and if you have any problem/RFE
> >feel
> >free
On Wed, 13 Nov 2013 09:21:12 +0200
Fred New wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 5:34 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
> > meeting Wednesday at 18:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on
> > irc.freenode.net.
> >
> > To convert UTC to your local time
Dne 13.11.2013 14:52, Pierre-Yves Chibon napsal(a):
So please, have a look at it, play with it, break it (no seriously, do, but
don't
forget to report how you did it afterward) and if you have any problem/RFE feel
free to note them at:
https://github.com/fedora-infra/packagedb2/
Do I get i
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 9:23 AM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> - Original Message -
>> On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 9:57 AM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
>> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> > *** Note on performance ***
>> >
>> > Fedora development releases use a kernel with extra debug information
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 03:20:30PM +0100, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 02:52:27PM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> > - The idea of "owner" of a package disapear. There are only maintainers on
> > which
> > one of them appears to be the dedicated "point of contact"
Compose started at Wed Nov 13 08:15:02 UTC 2013
Broken deps for i386
--
[OpenEXR_CTL]
OpenEXR_CTL-1.0.1-16.fc20.i686 requires libImath.so.6
OpenEXR_CTL-1.0.1-16.fc20.i686 requires libIlmThread.so.6
OpenEXR_CTL-1.0.1-16
- Original Message -
> On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 9:57 AM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > *** Note on performance ***
> >
> > Fedora development releases use a kernel with extra debug information to
> > help
> > us understand and resolve issues faster; howeve
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 02:52:27PM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> - The idea of "owner" of a package disapear. There are only maintainers on
> which
> one of them appears to be the dedicated "point of contact" for this package
> (ie:
> the person that gets the bugs in bugzilla).
Why this new
- Original Message -
> On 12 November 2013 19:49, Josh Boyer < jwbo...@fedoraproject.org > wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 9:57 AM, Dennis Gilmore < den...@ausil.us > wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > *** Note on performance ***
> >
> > Fedora development releases us
Dear all,
I have been working for some time on the next version of packagedb/pkgdb [1].
I am at a point where I think it starts to look good, the unit-tests are passing
and I seem to be able to do what I want with it. Thus I thought this would be a
good time to call for testers and collect bug re
perl-POE-Component-Server-XMLRPC has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-POE-Component-Server-XMLRPC-0.05-17.fc20.noarch requires
perl(XMLRPC::Lite)
On i386:
perl-POE-Component-Server-XMLRPC-0.05-17.fc20.noarch requires
perl(XMLRPC::Lite)
On armhfp:
perl-Language-Expr has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
On i386:
perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
On armhfp:
perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.
On 12 November 2013 19:49, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 9:57 AM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > *** Note on performance ***
> >
> > Fedora development releases use a kernel with extra debug information to
> help
> > us understand and resolve issue
On Sun, 10 Nov 2013, Ian Malone wrote:
I think it's perfectly reasonable that there could be a
GUI program can install components and terminal commands. After all we
can start GUI programs from the command line.
I think everyone agrees with this. Indeed, we already have yumex, which is not
g
perl-Language-Expr has broken dependencies in the F-20 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
On i386:
perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
On armhfp:
perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc1
Since F20 is ahead of Rawhide (F21 development) in several packages,
recently I've mailed some package owners about that. It seems not everyone
is aware of the fact that
"No automated daily builds for Rawhide are being done."
and even if there were, git master would need to be up-to-date compar
Hi all,
There is a new tool available for Linux maintainers: Kernel ABI Tracker
(http://upstream-tracker.org/kernel/).
This tool looks for new releases of the Linux kernel, builds them and
tracks API/ABI changes using a set of basic tools: ABI Dumper and ABI
Compliance Checker. The tool is i
In about 3-4 weeks I am going to update objectweb-asm package in rawhide
from version 3.3.1 to 5.0. The new version is generally incompatible
with the current one.
If your packages work with versions 4.0 and above then this change
should be transparent. If you are not sure about that then you ca
Hello, erfa soname has been updated to liberfa.so.1. As nothing (yet)
depends on erfa the change should be painless.
Regards, Sergio
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-
47 matches
Mail list logo
