--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
On 9 November 2013 21:47, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Nov 2013 12:28:46 -0500 (EST), Christian Schaller wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> The core principle of the installer is that it operates on an application
>> level and not a package level. The current way it determines if something is
>> an appli
Am 10.11.2013 01:35, schrieb Les Howell:
> On Sat, 2013-11-09 at 22:47 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
>> On Thu, 7 Nov 2013 12:28:46 -0500 (EST), Christian Schaller wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>> The core principle of the installer is that it operates on an application
>>> level and not a package level.
On Sat, 2013-11-09 at 22:47 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Nov 2013 12:28:46 -0500 (EST), Christian Schaller wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> > The core principle of the installer is that it operates on an application
> > level and not a package level. The current way it determines if something
>
On Sat, 9 Nov 2013 23:04:17 +0100
"punto...@libero.it" wrote:
> Il 09/11/2013 15:25, Manuel Faux ha scritto:
> > I'm trying to build NetBeans 7.4 under Fedora, which requires an
> > OSGi 5 specification. NetBeans originally ships the OSGi Alliance's
> > specification, whose license is not compati
Il 09/11/2013 15:25, Manuel Faux ha scritto:
I'm trying to build NetBeans 7.4 under Fedora, which requires an OSGi 5
specification. NetBeans originally ships the OSGi Alliance's
specification, whose license is not compatible with Fedora, as far as I
know (http://www.osgi.org/Download/Release5?inf
On Thu, 7 Nov 2013 12:28:46 -0500 (EST), Christian Schaller wrote:
> Hi,
> The core principle of the installer is that it operates on an application
> level and not a package level. The current way it determines if something is
> an application
> is by looking for a .desktop file. So in theory
Matthias Clasen wrote:
> No, we want to move to a forum where the working group members have a
> chance to discuss things without being drowned out by 100+ mails/day
> from you. The other working groups are doing the same on their
> respective mailing lists.
And of course the "problem" is the pers
Bastien Nocera wrote:
> - Original Message -
>
>> But they hardcode the terminal application to gnome-terminal, which is
>> unacceptable!
>
> Just don't use GNOME? More seriously, this is the bug with the
> instructions on how to write the "terminal chooser" patch for glib:
> https://bug
Hi
On Sat, Nov 9, 2013 at 3:36 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
>
> I did discuss the idea with my manager (Denise Dumas, Director of Platform
> Engineering) to make sure she would support me in spending time developing
> it. She has promised (including to everyone at Flock) to provide resources
> wher
On Thu, Nov 07, 2013 at 11:16:08PM +0100, Juan Orti Alcaine wrote:
> I cannot login with the user 'fedora'. I'm connected to the console (it is
> a CloudStack cloud), and have tried all combinations of ec2-user/fedora
> /passwords/without-passwords.
Oh hey. I missed that this was in CloudStack --
On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 02:45:46PM -0500, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> I don't really have a problem in believing that but it would be useful to
> know in more detail how the initial proposals came to be (who were
> involved? what problems are we trying to solve? what are failures of the
> current mod
[Apologies for late replies to a long, wandering thread. I've been at a
confernece and am just catching up.]
On Thu, Nov 07, 2013 at 08:47:44AM -0600, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> Where's the benefit of creating a handful of workgroups that now
> have some sort of power over the distribution? Afte
On Fri, Nov 08, 2013 at 03:21:04PM -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> Hey, I read your minutes, and discussed some of my thoughts on this with
> my workstation wg peers. Basically, I think that defining a 'base' as a
> particular set of packages (minimal install, or some variant thereof)
> does not re
On Thu, Nov 07, 2013 at 04:55:32PM +0100, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote:
> I have recently joined the Red Hat Security Technologies Team,
> and will help co-maintain the gnutls and nettle packages.
Hi, and welcome. Glad to have you on board and contributing to Fedora!
--
Matthew Miller ☁☁☁ Fed
On Thu, Nov 07, 2013 at 01:54:40PM +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> let me introduce Copr:
This seems like a good message to go to
devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org, especially with all the traffic here
these days. Maybe you could resend, or else wait a little while until you
feel like it's a l
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 2:17 PM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> For bonus points, we ought to tell "file" and "rpmlint" about the new bytecode
> format for .pyc files.
rpmlint 1.5 already "knows" the 3.4 bytecode magic value, but an old
one. Fixed/updated in git:
https://sourceforge.net/p/rpmlint/code/c
On Thu, Nov 07, 2013 at 11:16:08PM +0100, Juan Orti Alcaine wrote:
> I cannot login with the user 'fedora'. I'm connected to the console (it is a
> CloudStack cloud), and have tried all combinations of ec2-user/fedora
> /passwords/without-passwords.
You've solved it, but for reference virt-sysp
On Sat, 9 Nov 2013 13:21:34 -0500
Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 08, 2013 at 04:16:49PM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > So it does! My mistake.
> > Though I do hesitate to not run it past FESCo first. They're
> > intimately involved in several areas, and that is the group that the
> > WG liai
On Fri, Nov 08, 2013 at 04:16:49PM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
> So it does! My mistake.
> Though I do hesitate to not run it past FESCo first. They're
> intimately involved in several areas, and that is the group that the
> WG liaisons ... liaise to. Getting a FESCo ack would probably go a
> long
I'm trying to build NetBeans 7.4 under Fedora, which requires an OSGi 5
specification. NetBeans originally ships the OSGi Alliance's
specification, whose license is not compatible with Fedora, as far as I
know (http://www.osgi.org/Download/Release5?info=nothanks).
Is there any OSGi 5 implementatio
Compose started at Sat Nov 9 09:15:03 UTC 2013
Broken deps for armhfp
--
[blueman]
blueman-1.23-7.fc20.armv7hl requires obex-data-server >= 0:0.4.3
blueman-1.23-7.fc20.armv7hl requires gvfs-obexftp
[bwm-ng]
bwm-ng-0.6
22 matches
Mail list logo
