On Fri, 25 Oct 2013 01:07:15 +0200, Adam Williamson wrote:
> generate the SRPM and do 'koji build --scratch fXX blah.src.rpm' , where
You would have to rpmbuild -bs *.spec first to get blash.src.rpm.
It is done all by: fedpkg build --scratch --srpm
The problem is that it uploads the whole multi-M
On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 4:32 AM, Nobrakal wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Sorry for the double-post, but I think it's necessary.
>
> Recently, some Working Groups has been created [1]. In the most of
> case (except in the Server WG with Truong Anh. Tuan), we don't have
> any representant of the ambassador gr
On Sun, 27 Oct 2013 20:23:22 +0100, Alec Leamas wrote:
> [...] my idea was just that some kind of reminder if no-one
> takes the ball , however that is defined (comment from sponsor, assigned
> to sponsor, ...) within some time.
That wouldn't be helpful. There would only be a notification about
On 10/27/2013 07:43 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Sun, 27 Oct 2013 13:43:57 +0100, Alec Leamas wrote:
Or, email not all FE-NEEDSPONSOR tickets but only those which are
deemed too old to be OK.
When would that be?
A recurring problem in the review queue is "long response time". That is,
it t
On Sun, 27 Oct 2013 13:43:57 +0100, Alec Leamas wrote:
> Or, email not all FE-NEEDSPONSOR tickets but only those which are
> deemed too old to be OK.
When would that be?
A recurring problem in the review queue is "long response time". That is,
it takes several weeks (or even longer) till the
In which places have you searched already?
$HOME/.bashrc
$HOME/.bash_profile
/etc/bashrc
/etc/profile
/etc/profile.d/*
Is it the same for a fresh user account?
Is it the same for "root"?
Logging in from a VT as root resp. newly created user test I get
[root@oldrawhide]# echo $PATH
/usr/local/s
On Sun, 27 Oct 2013 14:59:33 +0100
Michael Schwendt wrote:
> /home/sandro/.local/bin in the PATH is not the default.
> Or is it new for Rawhide?
This in in F20 for me as user:
~$ echo $PATH
.../home/frank/.local/bin:/home/frank/bin
so the bit with the name seems to be branched at least
--
R
Compose started at Sun Oct 27 08:15:02 UTC 2013
Broken deps for i386
--
[OpenEXR_CTL]
OpenEXR_CTL-1.0.1-16.fc20.i686 requires libImath.so.6
OpenEXR_CTL-1.0.1-16.fc20.i686 requires libIlmThread.so.6
OpenEXR_CTL-1.0.1-16
On Sun, 27 Oct 2013 02:00:17 +0200, Sandro Mani wrote:
>
> > your first post is unclear because you speak about two setups
> > to get rid of all this UsrMove fragments make a strict config
> >
> >
>
> Ah yes, I could have expressed it better. My problem is the following:
>
> [sandro@oldrawhide]
On Sun, 2013-10-27 at 14:46 +0100, Nobrakal wrote:
> 2013/10/27, Ankur Sinha :
> > On Sun, 2013-10-27 at 12:27 +0100, Nobrakal wrote:
> >> In my mind, Ambassadors are more near of users than developers or
> >> marketing team. Ambassadors organize all the events, submit new
> >> idea... It is really
2013/10/27, Ankur Sinha :
> On Sun, 2013-10-27 at 12:27 +0100, Nobrakal wrote:
>> In my mind, Ambassadors are more near of users than developers or
>> marketing team. Ambassadors organize all the events, submit new
>> idea... It is really important to have at least an ambassador in WG
>
> I don't t
On 10/27/2013 12:46 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Sun, 27 Oct 2013 01:54:44 + (UTC), Ben Boeckel wrote:
I also wouldn't mind seeing a list of FE-NEEDSPONSOR bugs be emailed to
devel@ (similar to the ownership change email). Open reviews might be
nice as well, but maybe just FE-NEEDSPONSOR
Compose started at Sun Oct 27 09:15:02 UTC 2013
Broken deps for armhfp
--
[blueman]
blueman-1.23-7.fc20.armv7hl requires obex-data-server >= 0:0.4.3
blueman-1.23-7.fc20.armv7hl requires gvfs-obexftp
[bwm-ng]
bwm-ng-0.6
On Sun, 27 Oct 2013 12:34:01 +0100
Nobrakal wrote:
> In my mind, Ambassadors are more near of users than developers or
> marketing team. Ambassadors organize all the events, submit new
> idea... It is really important to have at least an ambassador in WG
>
> Alexandre
It is also important to ha
On Sun, 27 Oct 2013 01:54:44 + (UTC), Ben Boeckel wrote:
> Well, there is FE-NEEDSPONSOR. Could we add a checkbox to this page[1]
> for needing a sponsor? A new packager might not know about
> FE-NEEDSPONSOR and getting it right up front would help, I'd think.
> [1]https://bugzilla.redhat.com
2013/10/27, Frank Murphy :
> On Sun, 27 Oct 2013 19:05:37 +0800
> Christopher Meng wrote:
>
>> It seems that most of members from the new formed groups are
>> working for Red Hat. Well it's helpful to strengthen our technical
>> base but are there any plots for other people?
Well, if I believe th
Hi,
I think that coordinators and Fesco tried to integrate as much as possible
community members.
But truth is that most people who self-nominated were RH employees, so i'd
rather say that RH employees even had an handicap.
As for the Cloud WG -i can't speak for other WG-, we wish that non-voting
It seems that most of members from the new formed groups are working for
Red Hat. Well it's helpful to strengthen our technical base but are there
any plots for other people?
Thanks.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora
2013/10/27, H. Guémar :
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for your concern on that topic, off course, fedora.next would be an
> half-assed
> initiative if we forget communication and community mgmt. And i'm pretty
> sure that
> everyone here agrees with you on that point.
>
> As for myself, I also intend to represe
Hi all,
Do I get this right? Except for the better management with multiple
GPU's would that mean we can in future also have multiseat on a single
multihead GPU logind style (also seen here
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66501 ) ?
btw. would anyone mind have a look at
https://bugzill
Hi,
Thanks for your concern on that topic, off course, fedora.next would be an
half-assed
initiative if we forget communication and community mgmt. And i'm pretty
sure that
everyone here agrees with you on that point.
As for myself, I also intend to represent "users" inside the Cloud WG, so
i'll
Hi all,
Sorry for the double-post, but I think it's necessary.
Recently, some Working Groups has been created [1]. In the most of
case (except in the Server WG with Truong Anh. Tuan), we don't have
any representant of the ambassador group.
I exaggerate, because some developers are ambassadors (li
22 matches
Mail list logo
