On 10/25/2013 11:55 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2013-10-25 at 17:41 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
I'd love to hear better suggestions the main problem seems to be "it's
so busy no one goes there anymore".
There is a rather obvious gaping logical flaw in that one ;)
Not quite. Complai
On 10/26/2013 02:14 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Sat, 2013-10-26 at 02:11 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
Adam says that devel is relevant to "*developers* (or rather, packagers)".
Yet there is the "packaging" list, too. Quote from Oct 16th:
"I don't know whether this belongs to the packaging o
On 10/25/2013 04:48 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 04:02:23PM +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
The people who've pointed out the confusion about which list to choose
when haven't drunk away their memory and could join here, but that will be
fruitless if an instance such as FESCo
On Sat, 2013-10-26 at 02:11 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> Adam says that devel is relevant to "*developers* (or rather, packagers)".
> Yet there is the "packaging" list, too. Quote from Oct 16th:
> "I don't know whether this belongs to the packaging or devel list,"
Now to me, THAT seems like a
On Fri, 25 Oct 2013 16:02:44 -0600, Pete Travis wrote:
> > On Fri, 25 Oct 2013 13:54:27 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> >
> > > I'm sure the docs team talks about stuff in Rawhide occasionally too;
> >
> > Unlike "devel", the docs list is related to Documentation only, isn't it?
> >
> > Could you
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 11:41 PM, Matthew Miller
wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 10:41:12AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> > mailman topics/keywords features to sort into meaningful sub-categories. I
>> > understand that hyperkitty will make this nice and easy, but it's also not
>> > really ver
On Oct 25, 2013 3:09 PM, "Michael Schwendt" wrote:
>
> On Fri, 25 Oct 2013 13:54:27 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> > I'm sure the docs team talks about stuff in Rawhide occasionally too;
>
> Unlike "devel", the docs list is related to Documentation only, isn't it?
>
> Could you imagine turning
On Fri, 2013-10-25 at 17:41 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> I'd love to hear better suggestions the main problem seems to be "it's
> so busy no one goes there anymore".
There is a rather obvious gaping logical flaw in that one ;)
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twit
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 10:41:12AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > mailman topics/keywords features to sort into meaningful sub-categories. I
> > understand that hyperkitty will make this nice and easy, but it's also not
> > really very hard just as email. Note that you can subscribe to just cert
On Fri, 2013-10-25 at 23:08 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Oct 2013 13:54:27 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> > I'm sure the docs team talks about stuff in Rawhide occasionally too;
>
> Unlike "devel", the docs list is related to Documentation only, isn't it?
>
> Could you imagine
On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 5:07 AM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> Work in Fedora 21 Timeframe
> * Proposal owners:
> ** Discussing changes in Python packaging guidelines with Fedora community and
> FPC
> ** Helping upstreams with porting to Python 3
Note, there's an upstream mailing list that pe
I sent a message about this yesterday to the Cloud SIG mailing list, but
neglected to send to the wider community. Also, I just listed people without
introductions, and although I think all of these names should be familiar to
many of us, that seems like a nice thing. So:
I'm pleased to annouce th
On Fri, 25 Oct 2013 13:54:27 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> I'm sure the docs team talks about stuff in Rawhide occasionally too;
Unlike "devel", the docs list is related to Documentation only, isn't it?
Could you imagine turning "devel" into a less general list?
Is "devel" the catch-all for an
On 10/25/2013 01:36 PM, Jan Rusnacko wrote:
Hello Roberto and Thierry,
as I promised, I am sending you a proof-of-concept code that demonstrates, how
we can mock DS in unit tests for library function (see attachment). You can run
tests just by executing py.test in tests directory.
Only 3 files
On Fri, 2013-10-25 at 21:43 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Oct 2013 10:40:28 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> > Ever since I've joined,
> > which is ohgod nearly five years ago now, the split has seemed
> > reasonably clear and non-controversial, and I really can't recall anyone
> >
On Fri, 25 Oct 2013 10:40:28 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Ever since I've joined,
> which is ohgod nearly five years ago now, the split has seemed
> reasonably clear and non-controversial, and I really can't recall anyone
> being particularly confused about it, so perhaps this is a problem whic
Broken upgrade path report for tags f20-updates-testing -> f21:
PackageKit:
f20-updates-testing > f21 (PackageKit-0.8.12-1.fc20
PackageKit-0.8.11-3.fc21)
ReviewBoard:
f20-updates-testing > f21 (ReviewBoard-1.7.16-2.fc20
ReviewBoard-1.7.16-1.fc21)
aisleriot:
f20-updates-testing > f21
The following Fedora EPEL 5 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
551
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-5630/bugzilla-3.2.10-5.el5
65
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2013-11276/ssmtp-2.61-21.el5
41
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDO
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
551
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-5620/bugzilla-3.4.14-2.el6
65
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2013-11274/ssmtp-2.61-21.el6
26
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDO
On Fri, 2013-10-25 at 10:48 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 04:02:23PM +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > The people who've pointed out the confusion about which list to choose
> > when haven't drunk away their memory and could join here, but that will be
> > fruitless if an
On Fri, 2013-10-25 at 16:02 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> The split and intended usage has been questioned by several community
> members for many years, even already when the lists where still on Red
> Hat's servers.
>
> Locating such comments with a search engine isn't easy.
> https://lists
On Fri, 2013-10-25 at 11:24 +0300, Ville Skyttä wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 2:07 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> > The koji builders are usually faster than your system anyway
>
> Maybe, if building only a specific arch (e.g. koji build
> --arch-override=x86_64). The arm builders tend to be
On 10/25/2013 04:12 PM, Darryl L. Pierce wrote:
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 07:40:59AM +0200, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 11:34:23AM -0400, Darryl L. Pierce wrote:
I have a package review (BZ#1022584:Review Request: qpid-qmf - The QPID
Management Framework). I pulled
The lightweight tag 'perl-Text-Diff-HTML-0.07-1.fc21' was created pointing to:
cc10542... Update to 0.07
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-de
The lightweight tag 'perl-Text-Diff-HTML-0.07-1.fc20' was created pointing to:
cc10542... Update to 0.07
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-de
On Tue, 22 Oct 2013 16:17:14 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> I would think that if we are in a situation where people who do development
> don't subscribe to the devel list because of 'energy' reasons
> (disillusionment, feelings of either a) pointlessness b) fait-accompli,
> etc.), then just movi
I'd like to introduce to you Environment and Stack group. From our first
round of emails it looks like we will work on interpreted languages,
databases, software collections... We'd like to setup good environment
for developers and admins and give other groups good environment for
their work.
O
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 10:58:02PM +0800, Christopher Meng wrote:
> I also have plenty of packages:
>
> Re-review request of mlmmj: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=995933
Nabbed! :)
--
Darryl L. Pierce
http://mcpierce.fedorapeople.org/
"What do you care what people think, Mr. Feyn
commit c189a753f8924b43f912fcde2525c768e4164e96
Author: Paul Howarth
Date: Fri Oct 25 16:01:59 2013 +0100
Update to 1.669004
- New upstream release 1.669004
- Tweaked widow handling to avoid a nasty edge case
- Specify all dependencies
- Replace provides filter with a
I also have plenty of packages:
Re-review request of mlmmj: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=995933
herbstluftwm - A manual tiling window manager:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1001407
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/ma
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 04:02:23PM +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> The people who've pointed out the confusion about which list to choose
> when haven't drunk away their memory and could join here, but that will be
> fruitless if an instance such as FESCo decides otherwise.
So, here's what I'd li
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 07:40:59AM +0200, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 11:34:23AM -0400, Darryl L. Pierce wrote:
> > I have a package review (BZ#1022584:Review Request: qpid-qmf - The QPID
> > Management Framework). I pulled the subpackages from qpid-cpp relating
> >
On Thu, 24 Oct 2013 18:23:49 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-10-21 at 18:08 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
>
> > The intended usage of "test" list has always been a problem. Once in a
> > while, somebody points that out, but there's nobody (no leadership) to
> > work on a change acti
On 10/25/2013 03:19 PM, Nikolaos Milas wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I would like to use a recent version of Netdisco on CentOS 5 but I see
> that EPEL still has:
>
>netdisco-1.1-1.el5.noarch.rpm
>
> which is quite old.
>
> In the past I had upgraded from Netdisco 1.0 to 1.1 using the above
> package
Hello,
I would like to use a recent version of Netdisco on CentOS 5 but I see
that EPEL still has:
netdisco-1.1-1.el5.noarch.rpm
which is quite old.
In the past I had upgraded from Netdisco 1.0 to 1.1 using the above
package, but I had serious problems with it (I would conclude that the
commit 5e20537859185e91df105615066366f610656aaf
Author: Jitka Plesnikova
Date: Fri Oct 25 15:15:58 2013 +0200
1.96 bump
.gitignore|1 +
perl-Archive-Tar.spec | 10 ++
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
---
diff --git
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 04:41:09PM -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
> > One other detail: the intel driver currently has both UMS support for
> > the i810 chipset, and KMS support for everything newer. To be
> > consistent with the above changes I'll be dropping the i810 support,
> > which will then fal
Yes, I think so
The policy is to config pkexec to run something as root
The rule is to make the group get permission without having to enter a
root/admin password
Tim
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 2:08 PM, Peter Lemenkov wrote:
> 2013/10/25 tim.laurid...@gmail.com :
> > It is some time ago it was fi
On 25 October 2013 11:22, Peter Lemenkov wrote:
> Hello All!
>
> I 'm trying to write a polkit rule which allows every member of a
> particular group ("ejabberd") to run a specific script
> ("/sbin/ejabberdctl" or "/usr/sbin/ejabberdctl"). Other users should
> not be even able to run it. This soun
Compose started at Fri Oct 25 09:15:03 UTC 2013
Broken deps for armhfp
--
[blueman]
blueman-1.23-7.fc20.armv7hl requires obex-data-server >= 0:0.4.3
blueman-1.23-7.fc20.armv7hl requires gvfs-obexftp
[bwm-ng]
bwm-ng-0.6
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/24/2013 08:15 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-10-17 at 08:55 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
>> Matthew Miller wrote:
>>
>>> Back in May, the systemd package was changed to enable journal
>>> persistancy by default, by creating /var/log/journ
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
tl;dr The Server Working Group has been formed and will be meeting on
Wednesday. See the == Logistical Information == section below for details.
== General Announcement ==
As most of you are aware, the Fedora Project is embarking upon a new
ventur
2013/10/25 tim.laurid...@gmail.com :
> It is some time ago it was fighting with polkit, but as far is I remember
> you have to
> make a .policy file to get pkexec to work right
>
> Like this one I use in yumex.
> https://github.com/timlau/yumex/blob/master/misc/dk.yumex.backend.policy.in
>
> It sh
On 10/25/2013 12:07 PM, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote:
W dniu 22.10.2013 17:26, Ralf Corsepius pisze:
Also, automake-based projects receive the versions bundled with
automake, when running automake rsp. autoreconf.
*IF* they run autoreconf. I am working on getting software built for
AArch64 for ov
It is some time ago it was fighting with polkit, but as far is I remember
you have to
make a .policy file to get pkexec to work right
Like this one I use in yumex.
https://github.com/timlau/yumex/blob/master/misc/dk.yumex.backend.policy.in
It should be installed in /usr/share/polkit-1/actions/
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 6:52 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-10-24 at 19:56 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
>
>> It is up to each WG to determine their product requirements. That
>> includes which architectures and target users they are trying to
>> produce a product for.
>>
>> > We've done a
W dniu 22.10.2013 17:26, Ralf Corsepius pisze:
> Also, automake-based projects receive the versions bundled with
> automake, when running automake rsp. autoreconf.
*IF* they run autoreconf. I am working on getting software built for
AArch64 for over a year now. Main issue is all those projects wh
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 09:28:53AM -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> plplot has an OCaml interface, but I see:
>
> plplot-ocaml.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath
> /usr/lib64/ocaml/stublibs/dllplplot_stubs.so ['/usr/lib64/ocaml',
> '/builddir/build/BUILD/plplot-5.9.9/fedora/src']
> plplot-oca
On 10/15/2013 09:13 PM, Rolf Fokkens wrote:
On 10/14/2013 10:08 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
Is there a write-up somewhere documenting what strategies are
implemented by bcache to keep the SSD and the hard disk contents in
sync even in the event of a sudden power loss?
This is good place to start:
On 10/25/2013 11:38 AM, Roberto Polli wrote:
On Friday 25 October 2013 11:18:53 thierry bordaz wrote:
lib389/brooker.py:795: python variable naming convention: I would get
stick
with the "_" instead of camelCase and change whenever possible.
If you prefer to use '_' also for local variable, I
Hello All!
I 'm trying to write a polkit rule which allows every member of a
particular group ("ejabberd") to run a specific script
("/sbin/ejabberdctl" or "/usr/sbin/ejabberdctl"). Other users should
not be even able to run it. This sounds simple, so I quickly wrote
this:
http://peter.fedorapeop
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 2:07 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> The koji builders are usually faster than your system anyway
Maybe, if building only a specific arch (e.g. koji build
--arch-override=x86_64). The arm builders tend to be quite slow in the
first place, and I don't think it helps that for
My comments (a github like platform for comment could be really useful)
> https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47568/0002-Ticket-47568-Renam
> e-DSAdmin-class.patch
line: comment
lib389/__init__.py:1: the module is lib389, not dirsrv
lib389/brooker.py:795: python variable naming convent
On 25.10.2013 03:00, Haïkel Guémar wrote:
Le 25/10/2013 01:53, Adam Williamson a écrit :
On Tue, 2013-10-15 at 17:35 +0200, Sandro Mani wrote:
Hi,
Needing a calendar server for the company, I've ended up packaging the
groupware server SOGo [1], which is a neat MS Exchange alternative.
SRPM
On 2013-10-25 01:13, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Sat, 2013-10-12 at 11:51 +0200, Alec Leamas wrote:
On 10/12/2013 09:55 AM, Till Maas wrote:
On Tue, Oct 01, 2013 at 07:50:45PM +0200, Till Maas wrote:
cx18-firmware -- Firmware for Conexant cx23418-based video capture
devices
libcrystalhd -- Broa
>> >that you can do successfully complete a graphical DVD default package
>> >install with 512MB of RAM, or a text network default package install. I
>> >believe a text install may even work in 384MB, though I don't absolutely
>> >remember, and you may have to pass the parameter that disable's
>> >
56 matches
Mail list logo
