On Mon, 21 Oct, 2013 at 02:12:04 GMT, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Upstream's CMakeLists.txt does this:
> FIND_PACKAGE(Subversion)
> IF(Subversion_FOUND)
> Subversion_WC_INFO(${PROJECT_SOURCE_DIR} GUAYADEQUE)
> MESSAGE("Current revision is ${GUAYADEQUE_WC_REVISION}")
>
- Original Message -
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 10/24/2013 02:45 AM, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote:
> >> * ticket #1182 F21/F22 System Wide Change: Python 3 as the
> >> Default Implementation -
> >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Python_3_as_Default
> >> (niri
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 8:52 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-10-24 at 19:56 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
>
>> It is up to each WG to determine their product requirements. That
>> includes which architectures and target users they are trying to
>> produce a product for.
>>
>> > We've done a
On Thu, 2013-10-24 at 19:56 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> It is up to each WG to determine their product requirements. That
> includes which architectures and target users they are trying to
> produce a product for.
>
> > We've done a lot of work over the last few cycles to really bump ARM up
> > t
On Tue, 2013-10-22 at 07:01 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 10/21/2013 07:48 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > On Mon, 21 Oct 2013 13:07:25 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> >
> >>> As a first step, I suggest clearing up the intended usage of "devel" list.
> >>> There's too much traffic on that list.
On Mon, 2013-10-21 at 17:34 +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> On 10/21/2013 05:25 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > So, discussing Test Updates for stable dist releases belongs onto which
> > list?
>
> According to some in the QA community ( at least in the past ) any GA
> release test topic
On Mon, 2013-10-21 at 18:08 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> The intended usage of "test" list has always been a problem. Once in a
> while, somebody points that out, but there's nobody (no leadership) to
> work on a change actively. Is it only for Test releases or also for
> Rawhide? Its descript
On Mon, 2013-10-21 at 04:12 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> something. And the tarball they ship is a working copy in an outdated format
> (outdated SVN version). (IMHO, shipping SVN working copies rather than
> exports as tarballs is broken in the first place.)
Very much agree with this; if I was
On Sat, 2013-10-19 at 16:22 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> to step up and do so? Or we add another state sponsors could query for
> this?
I think this would very much be the best option. For instance, a couple
of us have been reviewing the gooey-karma package (like easy-karma, but
with a GUI!):
http
On Sat, 2013-10-19 at 14:01 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
> Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> > Hi folks, and welcome to the Fedora 20 Beta blocker bug news...
>
> can't find any criteria currently that covers application icons (though do
> mention it if such a thing exists)...
>
> At issue here are gtk3 a
Le 25/10/2013 01:53, Adam Williamson a écrit :
On Tue, 2013-10-15 at 17:35 +0200, Sandro Mani wrote:
Hi,
Needing a calendar server for the company, I've ended up packaging the
groupware server SOGo [1], which is a neat MS Exchange alternative. SRPM
of sogo plus deps are here:
FWIW, OwnCloud wo
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 08:55:00AM -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
> Is that folder getting deleted for you somehow?
Um yes. We made this decision in F19. Never mind. :)
--
Matthew Miller ☁☁☁ Fedora Cloud Architect ☁☁☁
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraprojec
On Thu, 2013-10-17 at 08:55 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
> Matthew Miller wrote:
>
> > Back in May, the systemd package was changed to enable journal persistancy
> > by default, by creating /var/log/journal.
>
> that dir should be owned by systemd:
>
> repoquery --whatprovides /var/log/journal
> sys
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 5:29 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-10-04 at 07:49 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>> > We just started to support ARM, I don't think we want to drop it.
>> > I guess those three products are currently most important and
>> > other products like Embedded should g
On Tue, 2013-10-15 at 17:35 +0200, Sandro Mani wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Needing a calendar server for the company, I've ended up packaging the
> groupware server SOGo [1], which is a neat MS Exchange alternative. SRPM
> of sogo plus deps are here:
FWIW, OwnCloud works great as a CalDAV server (doesn't
On Sun, 2013-10-13 at 20:21 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> ... and how do I find out? I checked over all recent messages on
> devel-announce, but it doesn't seem to be mentioned.
>
> Also, automatic obsoleting of builds is a bit of a mixed blessing. On
> the one hand it's useful to obsolete
On Sat, 2013-10-12 at 11:51 +0200, Alec Leamas wrote:
> On 10/12/2013 09:55 AM, Till Maas wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 01, 2013 at 07:50:45PM +0200, Till Maas wrote:
> >
> >> cx18-firmware -- Firmware for Conexant cx23418-based video capture
> >> devices
> >> libcrystalhd -- Broadcom Crystal HD device in
On Thu, 2013-10-24 at 16:07 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> There's only a few times a scratch build isn't practical: if you're
> doing a set of chained builds, you can't use scratch builds, as you
> can't have one scratch build build against another scratch build. In
> this case I use mock: copy
On Thu, 2013-10-10 at 16:31 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> You don't really need to use mock either. Just use 'rpmbuild -ba'
> directly or 'fedpkg local' which is a wrapper.
You don't need to, but there are a few reasons it's superior:
1) Your local environment is almost certainly dirty in
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 02:29:25PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> I really think whatever the New Way Of Doing Things turns out to be, it
> needs to include a minimal network install image much like the current
> netinst.iso, built for all primary arches, as a primary deliverable.
> Whether that's
On Thu, 2013-10-10 at 13:15 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Oct 2013 13:09:23 +0200, I wrote:
>
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1017695
>
> Visited http://bugz.fedoraproject.org/mc and noticed several tickets at
> the bottom are "private", too.
>
> This is a step into
On Mon, 2013-10-07 at 04:03 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 10/07/2013 03:49 AM, Tim Flink wrote:
> > On Sun, 06 Oct 2013 15:09:24 -0500
> > Rex Dieter wrote:
> >
> >> Michael Schwendt wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Sun, 06 Oct 2013 19:11:41 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> >>>
> I now see ... the vers
On Fri, 2013-10-04 at 07:49 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > We just started to support ARM, I don't think we want to drop it.
> > I guess those three products are currently most important and
> > other products like Embedded should go into Spins category. At
> > least for now.
> Yes, we're pro
On Tue, 2013-08-27 at 10:46 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
> For F21, I plan to orphan the following X video drivers:
>
> xorg-x11-drv-apm
> xorg-x11-drv-cirrus
> xorg-x11-drv-geode
> xorg-x11-drv-glint
> xorg-x11-drv-i128
> xorg-x11-drv-i740
> xorg-x11-drv-mach64
> xorg-x11-drv-mga
> xorg-x11-drv-neo
On Thu, 2013-10-03 at 10:44 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 12:35:31 +0100,
>Adam Williamson wrote:
> >
> >that you can do successfully complete a graphical DVD default package
> >install with 512MB of RAM, or a text network default package install. I
> >believe a text
Hey folks! Just wanted to make sure everyone knows that Wayland Test Day
tomorrow has been CANCELLED - the devs don't think it would be valuable
at this point in time, they say they already have a list of stuff that
needs working on and adding more to the pile would not be of much value.
Today is N
The following Fedora EPEL 5 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
550
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-5630/bugzilla-3.2.10-5.el5
65
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2013-11276/ssmtp-2.61-21.el5
41
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDO
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
550
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-5620/bugzilla-3.4.14-2.el6
65
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2013-11274/ssmtp-2.61-21.el6
26
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDO
On Oct 24, 2013, at 11:51 AM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
>
> Please let's not mix the two concepts of "tools" quoted above.
>
> If the proposal is to run something by default on every bootup, it
> must be overwhelmingly safe, not apply heuristics that may break the
> system even more.
Right. If any
On Oct 24, 2013, at 9:40 AM, Jeffrey Bastian wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 10:49:35PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
>> The bottom line question is, would it be useful to have an fsck_gpt
>> run by systemd at either startup or shutdown time?
>
> I have a system that corrupts the backup GPT on e
On Oct 24, 2013, at 8:59 AM, John Reiser wrote:
>
> Such a tool also should diagnose both overlap and unclaimed space,
> and provide some means for repair of these conditions.
> For example in the case of "minor" overlap: repair might be "minimum wins",
> "maximum wins", or arbitrary edit of ext
On Oct 24, 2013, at 2:33 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 10:49:35PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
>> So that's why I ask if it makes sense to have an fsck for GPT disks.
>
> Sounds sensible. The "fsck" would just check the checksums of primary
> & secondary tables, and if
Today at Go/No-Go meeting it was decided to slip Fedora 20 Beta release
by one week due to unresolved blocker bugs, see the blocker tracking app [1].
More details in meeting minutes [2].
As a result, ALL MAJOR MILESTONES, and their dependent tasks, will be
pushed out by one week [3]. The new Fedor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1016186
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #4 from Fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1022678
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #4 from Fedo
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 4:59 PM, John Reiser wrote:
> On 10/24/2013 01:33 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 10:49:35PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
>>> So that's why I ask if it makes sense to have an fsck for GPT disks.
>>
>> Sounds sensible. The "fsck" would just check the
#445: upgradepath is failing rawhide builds due to not being higher version than
other releases
+-
Reporter: tflink | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: Hot issues
Component: tests | Resolution:
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 10:49:35PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
> The bottom line question is, would it be useful to have an fsck_gpt
> run by systemd at either startup or shutdown time?
I have a system that corrupts the backup GPT on every reboot: the CRC32
in the backup GPT is always 0. I run pa
#445: upgradepath is failing rawhide builds due to no rawhide-pending
-+
Reporter: tflink | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: Hot issues
Component: tests | Keywords:
Blocked By: |
plplot has an OCaml interface, but I see:
plplot-ocaml.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath
/usr/lib64/ocaml/stublibs/dllplplot_stubs.so ['/usr/lib64/ocaml',
'/builddir/build/BUILD/plplot-5.9.9/fedora/src']
plplot-ocaml.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath
/usr/lib64/ocaml/stublibs/dll
On Thu, 24 Oct 2013 08:11:08 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> >Several have not been displayed in the review queue, none has been displayed
> >on the needsponsor list, and Bruno uses three different submitter email
> >addresses in bugzilla.
>
> Me Bruno?
No, another Bruno, previously referred to
On 10/24/2013 01:33 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 10:49:35PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
>> So that's why I ask if it makes sense to have an fsck for GPT disks.
>
> Sounds sensible. The "fsck" would just check the checksums of primary
> & secondary tables, and if an error
Quoting Fernando Nasser (2013-10-24 16:06:27)
> Also, will this change be ackported into the Java packages of RHEL_5 and
> RHEL-6?
Doesn't matter. Fedora != RHEL
> Our products use only one spec file, we'll have to add lots of %if
> in our spec files (and we have 300+ of them).
Well then you c
Also, will this change be ackported into the Java packages of RHEL_5 and RHEL-6?
Our products use only one spec file, we'll have to add lots of %if
in our spec files (and we have 300+ of them).
- Original Message -
> From: "Stanislav Ochotnicky"
> To: "Jiri Vanek" , devel@lists.fedora
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/24/2013 02:45 AM, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote:
>> * ticket #1182 F21/F22 System Wide Change: Python 3 as the
>> Default Implementation -
>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Python_3_as_Default
>> (nirik, 18:10:29) * AGREED: Feature is approved,
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 13:17:53 +0200,
Michael Schwendt wrote:
Several have not been displayed in the review queue, none has been displayed
on the needsponsor list, and Bruno uses three different submitter email
addresses in bugzilla.
Me Bruno? I should be just using br...@wolff.to these d
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Path-FindDev:
a11511306156719502d3f4a6e1be4a27 Path-FindDev-0.4.1.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/ma
Compose started at Thu Oct 24 09:15:02 UTC 2013
Broken deps for armhfp
--
[blueman]
blueman-1.23-7.fc20.armv7hl requires obex-data-server >= 0:0.4.3
blueman-1.23-7.fc20.armv7hl requires gvfs-obexftp
[bwm-ng]
bwm-ng-0.6
> > See an example of mindi-busybox, packager from HP still can't get
> > sponsored after 5 years.
> >
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476234
>
> It has had "fedora-review" flag set to '?', which means somebody
> is working on it.
I've cleaned up the tickets and their dependencie
- Original Message -
> Quoting Jiri Vanek (2013-10-21 18:45:46)
> > Hi all!
> >
> > With
> > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/java-1.7.0-openjdk-1.7.0.60-2.4.3.0.fc20
> > beeing stable,
> > would like to make this more visible:
> >
> > The jdk in Fedora, being inspired in Debian, n
Hi,
On 10/13/2013 11:36 AM, Xavier Bachelot wrote:
Hi maintainers,
On 01/05/2012 08:56 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
(d) Move the whole thing (back) to RPM Fusion (where it originally was, before
we started needing xine-lib for Amarok and Phonon, which both no longer
use it). It would go t
commit 22dc39acb1f3d4125618bcb967ff7d090e06af49
Author: Lubomir Rintel
Date: Thu Oct 24 11:39:54 2013 +0200
Attempt at saner SPEC file formatting
I'm doing this semi-automatically across all packages I maintain, since some
are several years old and since then several have suffe
On 23.10.2013 23:25, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 07:22:16PM +0200, Sandro Mani wrote:
Hi,
In cases where a package ships a .tmpfiles file which
manages i.e. the /var/run/ directory, what is the best way
|to make sure that the directory exists after installing the
package, w
Quoting Jiri Vanek (2013-10-21 18:45:46)
> Hi all!
>
> With
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/java-1.7.0-openjdk-1.7.0.60-2.4.3.0.fc20
> beeing stable,
> would like to make this more visible:
>
> The jdk in Fedora, being inspired in Debian, now supports headless version.
> During the
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 10:49:35PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
> So that's why I ask if it makes sense to have an fsck for GPT disks.
Sounds sensible. The "fsck" would just check the checksums of primary
& secondary tables, and if an error in either (but not both) is
detected it would restore from
python3-cairo is a separate package, it contains the latest upstream
release 1.10.0
but it looks like the License is wrong in the .spec (License: MPLv1.1 or
LGPLv2)
https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/python3-cairo/sources/spec/
pycairo is licensed under the GNU Lesser General Public License
On Thu, 24 Oct 2013 13:01:18 +0800, Christopher Meng wrote:
> Errr...
>
> I just hope if a packager is also its upstream, we can sponsor him
> quickly as well.
Well, people are different, and it may not always happen "quickly", if the
package suffers from issues and/or the Fedora specific stuff
57 matches
Mail list logo
