On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 3:32 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
>> gpgv --homedir /tmp --keyring %{SOURCE2} --status-fd=1 %{SOURCE1}
>> %{SOURCE0} | grep -q '^\[GNUPG:\] GOODSIG'
>
> Does this allow anyone on the same machine with access to /tmp to
> confuse/take over gpgv?
That's just an exa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
El Thu, 10 Oct 2013 05:35:18 -0400 (EDT)
Bohuslav Kabrda escribió:
> - Original Message -
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > On Wed, 09 Oct 2013 14:07:12 +0200
> > Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> >
> > > ** Request Koji
On Thu, 2013-10-10 at 00:02 +0200, Rolf Fokkens wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> The Fedora SSD Cache is this sunday October 13th 2013. This Fedora Test
> Day will focus on bcache based SSD Caching in Fedora 20.
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2013-10-13_SSD_Cache
>
> If you're interested in tr
The lightweight tag 'perl-IO-Socket-SSL-1.95.5-1.fc21' was created pointing to:
ead7056... Update to 1.955
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-
The lightweight tag 'perl-IO-Socket-SSL-1.95.5-1.fc20' was created pointing to:
ead7056... Update to 1.955
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-
Hi Matt,
I believe this is the easiest way to setup your build host:
sudo yum group install "Fedora Packager"
sudo yum install fedora-review
I personally use rpmbuild and then mock before submitting the packages.
Best Regards,
Dridi
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 4:31 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 10:22:57AM -0400, Konstantin Ryabitsev wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 6:01 PM, Brian C. Lane wrote:
> > In parted we have a signed upstream package and a detached signature. In
> > the pkg git we have the signer's public key and in %prep it runs gpg.
> >
> > Source0: ftp:
On Fri, 2013-10-11 at 16:47 +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> That's quite the assumption and based on that I assume the next step
> planned is to kill the server list and just mobiles the people
> interested here right.
I suggest assuming good faith instead.
- ajax
--
devel mailing l
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
537
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-5620/bugzilla-3.4.14-2.el6
51
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2013-11274/ssmtp-2.61-21.el6
12
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDO
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 05:41:28PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> Because there's no active server sub-community. The people interested in
> server work are working within the general Fedora development community,
> which means devel@ is the appropriate list to reach them.
I also posted to deve
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 04:47:34PM +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> On 10/11/2013 04:41 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> >Because there's no active server sub-community. The people interested in
> >server work are working within the general Fedora development community,
> >which means devel@ is
On 10/11/2013 04:41 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 04:33:24PM +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
>On 10/11/2013 04:27 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> >>>Was there any attempt to reach out to the relevant sub-community was
> >>>there a mail or discussion held on the server li
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1017482
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #2 from Fedo
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 04:33:24PM +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> On 10/11/2013 04:27 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> >>>Was there any attempt to reach out to the relevant sub-community was
> >>>there a mail or discussion held on the server list even if only to
> >>>see who where active on it
On 10/11/2013 04:27 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
>Was there any attempt to reach out to the relevant sub-community was
>there a mail or discussion held on the server list even if only to
>see who where active on it?
Given that the last mail to the server list was over 18 months ago, the
answer is
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 04:19:00PM +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> On 10/11/2013 03:59 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> >community representatives on FESCo and the board discussed it. All of
> >this happened in public. Which community do you feel was given no
> >opportunity to represent their o
On 10/11/2013 03:59 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 03:53:39PM +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
Did someone even bother to reach out to the community and ask them
how they would like to move forward?
( Not that I recall any thread doing just that )
It was discussed at F
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 03:53:39PM +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> Did someone even bother to reach out to the community and ask them
> how they would like to move forward?
> ( Not that I recall any thread doing just that )
It was discussed at Flock. It was discussed on this mailing list.
On 10/11/2013 01:58 PM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
The fact that we don't have a
successful server SIG/spin was seen as a problem that needs to be
fixed, not as a reason to continue avoiding server uses.
Interesting when and how was that conclusion reached?
Yeah sure the server sub-community got qu
On Fri, 11.10.13 00:17, David Strauss (da...@davidstrauss.net) wrote:
> We run New Relic extensively (at least a few hundred instances) for
> our customers. Here's the native systemd service unit we use. I'm sure
> we'd tweak it if we revisited it now, but it certainly works.
>
> [Unit]
> Descrip
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 03:58:41PM +0200, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> No, the intent was very much to change what the resulting desktop
> prioritizes. Quite a few FESCo members would be rather disappointed
> if the new Workstation ended up just an unchanged GNOME[1].
? The intent was very much for t
On Fri, 2013-10-11 at 15:58 +0200, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 4:20 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > But the current spins will become even more second-class citizens than they
> > are right now, whereas 2 spins of dubious value to our real-world users
> > (Server and Cloud) get fea
Hello,
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 4:20 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> But the current spins will become even more second-class citizens than they
> are right now, whereas 2 spins of dubious value to our real-world users
> (Server and Cloud) get featured instead. (How many people will really use
> those?)
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 9:55 AM, Konstantin Ryabitsev
wrote:
>> Or does the check fail only if the key had already expired when the
>> signature was made?
>
> Looks like gpg verify doesn't take that into consideration.
PS: And, FYI, for a very good reason -- it is very simple for an
attacker to c
commit 6f37b270fb4db537cb1ce1c7694d8112eb796fe5
Author: Paul Howarth
Date: Fri Oct 11 15:00:37 2013 +0100
Update to 0.041
- New upstream release 0.041
- Remove duplicate test dependency on File::Spec that triggers a CPAN.pm
bug
perl-Path-Tiny.spec |8 +---
sources
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Path-Tiny:
7cf9727a2eaf06b33a39df357140a981 Path-Tiny-0.041.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 7:02 AM, Björn Persson
wrote:
> Konstantin Ryabitsev wrote:
>>gpg --verify (and gpgv) will return 0 even if the key is revoked or
>>expired, so you can't really rely on exit code alone. The following is
>>the right approach:
>>
>>gpgv --homedir /tmp --keyring %{SOURCE2} --s
Hi all,
I'm reading a blog called bad concurrency, and I didn't expect a post
on Fedora[1] yesterday.
Since I'm not really into eye-candy (running xfce since fc16, started
with Fedora on a gnome fc15), I've never really tried to tweak my
desktop that much (I do a few things though).
What really
On Sun, 2013-09-08 at 11:01 +1000, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> On Sat, 2013-09-07 at 10:24 +0200, Alexandre Moine wrote:
> > Hi all,
>
> Hi,
>
> >
> > I want to become a co-maintener of freemedforms and freediams with
> > Ankur
> > Sinha, under the SIG medical. I'm not a sponsored fedora packager, so
>
On Fri, 2013-10-11 at 04:42 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Jerry James wrote:
> > On Aug 13, update FEDORA-2013-14530 acquired enough karma to be
> > autopushed to stable. It went stable on Aug 15.
> >
> > The first update, FEDORA-2013-14567, stayed in limbo for awhile until
> > positive karma was
Compose started at Fri Oct 11 09:15:02 UTC 2013
Broken deps for armhfp
--
[blueman]
blueman-1.23-7.fc20.armv7hl requires obex-data-server >= 0:0.4.3
blueman-1.23-7.fc20.armv7hl requires gvfs-obexftp
[bwm-ng]
bwm-ng-0.6
Mamoru TASAKA wrote:
>
>> On 10/11/2013 09:26 AM, Mamoru TASAKA wrote:
>> > (Currently my reply seems to create new thread...)
>> Are you replying from a SmartPhone or other Android-Device?
>>
>> I have been observing this issue for quite a while and when ever
>> asking senders about their equipem
Konstantin Ryabitsev wrote:
>gpg --verify (and gpgv) will return 0 even if the key is revoked or
>expired, so you can't really rely on exit code alone. The following is
>the right approach:
>
>gpgv --homedir /tmp --keyring %{SOURCE2} --status-fd=1 %{SOURCE1}
>%{SOURCE0} | grep -q '^\[GNUPG:\] GOODS
On 10/11/2013 07:17 AM, David Strauss wrote:
We run New Relic extensively (at least a few hundred instances) for
our customers. Here's the native systemd service unit we use. I'm sure
we'd tweak it if we revisited it now, but it certainly works.
[Unit]
Description=New Relic Global Daemon
[Servi
> On 10/11/2013 09:26 AM, Mamoru TASAKA wrote:
> > (Currently my reply seems to create new thread...)
> Are you replying from a SmartPhone or other Android-Device?
>
> I have been observing this issue for quite a while and when ever asking
> senders about their equipement they replied "Android-S
On 10/11/2013 09:26 AM, Mamoru TASAKA wrote:
(Currently my reply seems to create new thread...)
Are you replying from a SmartPhone or other Android-Device?
I have been observing this issue for quite a while and when ever asking
senders about their equipement they replied "Android-SmartPhone".
> On Oct 11, 2013 1:55 PM, "Mamoru TASAKA" wrote:
> >
> > > Since I hit this, I'd imagine other people might.
> > > If your package has:
> > >
> > > BuildArch: noarch
> > >
> > > It will set %{_target_cpu} to "noarch".
> > >
> > > If you also use %ifarch in that spec file, you might be expecting i
On Sun, Oct 6, 2013 at 6:13 AM, Rave it wrote:
> A view in the spec file shows me that there is a lot of new things for me,
> ie. systemd.
> So i may need some assistents.
Please feel free to email the systemd mailing list [1] or ask for help
in our IRC channel, which is #systemd on Freenode. We
We run New Relic extensively (at least a few hundred instances) for
our customers. Here's the native systemd service unit we use. I'm sure
we'd tweak it if we revisited it now, but it certainly works.
[Unit]
Description=New Relic Global Daemon
[Service]
ExecStart=/usr/bin/newrelic-daemon -c
/etc/
39 matches
Mail list logo
