vlc is not part of fedora, cause of patent related stuff, not a legal
expert, but I dont think fedora cant contain somethng there links to these
kind of applications
If you create a new kind of application metadata, would it not be a good
idea to start using the information we allready have in the
Hi, checking whatrequires ffmpeg-libs and x264-libs, and can't install
on F20 vm is :
mythtv
acoustid-fingerprinter
bino
bombono-dvd
chromaprint-tools
dvbcut
ffmpegthumbnailer
ffmpegthumbs
gstreamer1-libav
k3b-extras-freeworld
kmediafactory
lightspark
mlt
mpd
qmmp-plugins-freeworld
xbmc
xine-lib
On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 12:38:25PM -0400, Lars Kellogg-Stedman wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 06:14:30PM +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > A version-less library is less than ideal, however. How stable is the
> > API/ABI?
>
> Yeah, that's my feeling, too, but that's what the upstream Makefile
# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting
# Date: 2013-09-30
# Time: 15:00 UTC
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto)
# Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net
Greetings testers!
It's meeting time again on Monday! We have a few follow-up items from
last week, and we'll be looking
Hi, I need help with an error of clang in mock.
I have this package review:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1012169
That builds OK in mock in a x86_64 machine.
A scratch build in koji fails for x86_64 (and probably others)
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5992058
Susi Lehtola wrote:
> On Sun, 29 Sep 2013 01:04:31 +0200
> Kevin Kofler wrote:
>> Susi Lehtola wrote:
>> > If you link to -lblas, you're shooting yourself in the leg in the first
>> > place, since that's the reference implementation on current Fedoras.
>>
>> In fact, I noticed that, and that's a
On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 12:32 AM, Haïkel Guémar wrote:
> Le 29/09/2013 05:44, Dave Johansen a écrit :
>
> I just noticed that the boost141 package had been previously available
> in Fedora, but it has since been removed (
> https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5291 ). I'm not familiar with th
On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 10:56 PM, Robin Lee wrote:
> Upstream Tracker is a convenient place for checking API/ABI changes:
> For Boost: http://upstream-tracker.org/versions/boost.html
>
Wow, that's a great resource and I didn't even know about it.
Thanks,
Dave
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fe
Hi,
On 09/28/2013 08:17 PM, jonsm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 3:55 PM, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi All,
I'm very happy to announce the second release (r2) of my Fedora 19 ARM
remix images for Allwinner A10, A10s, A13 and A20 based devices. This
release is based on the official Fed
On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 06:14:30PM +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> Doesn't look too bad ;) judging based on very brief look at the spec file,
> but it violates the Static Library Packaging Guidelines, and I wonder
> who "owns" %{_datadir}/re?
I've removed the static library and made the package a
On Sun, 29 Sep 2013 11:59:43 -0400, Lars Kellogg-Stedman wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I've just submitted my first package review request to Fedora
> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1013363), which is for
> "libre" (http://www.creytiv.com/re.html). This is a dependency for
> "baresi
Hello everyone,
I've just submitted my first package review request to Fedora
(https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1013363), which is for
"libre" (http://www.creytiv.com/re.html). This is a dependency for
"baresip" (http://www.creytiv.com/baresip.html), which is a barebones
SIP client tha
On Sun, 29 Sep 2013 11:25:27 +0300
Susi Lehtola wrote:
> On Sun, 29 Sep 2013 01:05:23 +0200
> Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > Susi Lehtola wrote:
> > > Again, you should file a bug to the FPC about this.
> >
> > Is this really the FPC's responsibility? I'd expect this to be the
> > maintainer's, and f
On Sun, 29 Sep 2013 01:05:23 +0200
Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Susi Lehtola wrote:
> > Again, you should file a bug to the FPC about this.
>
> Is this really the FPC's responsibility? I'd expect this to be the
> maintainer's, and for escalation FESCO's.
FPC maintains packaging guidelines. If you thin
On Sun, 29 Sep 2013 01:04:31 +0200
Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Susi Lehtola wrote:
> > If you link to -lblas, you're shooting yourself in the leg in the first
> > place, since that's the reference implementation on current Fedoras.
>
> In fact, I noticed that, and that's a serious packaging bug.
>
> I
Le 29/09/2013 05:44, Dave Johansen a écrit :
> I just noticed that the boost141 package had been previously available
> in Fedora, but it has since been removed (
> https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5291 ). I'm not familiar with
> the recent changes in Boost, but is the API stable enough to s
16 matches
Mail list logo
