grubby - new-kernel-pkg - LANG

2013-09-21 Thread poma
SysVinit => Systemd /etc/sysconfig/keyboard KEYTABLE => KEYMAP /etc/vconsole.conf /etc/sysconfig/i18n SYSFONT => FONT .. .. LANG == LANG /etc/locale.conf /sbin/new-kernel-pkg … # add dracut i18n, keyboard and plymouth kernel args if reque

Re: [HEADSUP] Atlas changed libraries

2013-09-21 Thread Orion Poplawski
On 09/21/2013 02:13 PM, Frantisek Kluknavsky wrote: Hi, Atlas in rawhide is rebased to 3.10.1. It now builds monolithic shared libraries libsatlas.so and libtatlas.so (serial and threaded, otherwise identical) which include former lapack, blas and atlas libraries. Dependent packages need to link

Re: [HEADSUP] Atlas changed libraries

2013-09-21 Thread Jerry James
On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 2:13 PM, Frantisek Kluknavsky wrote: > Hi, > > Atlas in rawhide is rebased to 3.10.1. It now builds monolithic shared > libraries libsatlas.so and libtatlas.so (serial and threaded, otherwise > identical) which include former lapack, blas and atlas libraries. Dependent > pa

Re: thread count

2013-09-21 Thread Matthew Miller
On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 09:44:24PM +0200, Frantisek Kluknavsky wrote: > Another question. It seems that number of threads is still set at > build time, adaptive number of threads might come in the future. > Fedora right now uses the default - the number of cpu cores of > builder machine. Which numb

Re: Ananconda

2013-09-21 Thread poma
On 21.09.2013 20:30, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Sat, 21 Sep 2013 19:12:41 +0100, Phil Dobbin wrote: > >> Hi, all. >> >> I was wondering as to why Ananconda has no facility to overwrite a >> distro already present on the target machine. I've studied it & apart >> from destroying the existing pa

[HEADSUP] Atlas changed libraries

2013-09-21 Thread Frantisek Kluknavsky
Hi, Atlas in rawhide is rebased to 3.10.1. It now builds monolithic shared libraries libsatlas.so and libtatlas.so (serial and threaded, otherwise identical) which include former lapack, blas and atlas libraries. Dependent packages need to link -lsatlas or -ltatlas instead of -latlas -lcblas

thread count

2013-09-21 Thread Frantisek Kluknavsky
Another question. It seems that number of threads is still set at build time, adaptive number of threads might come in the future. Fedora right now uses the default - the number of cpu cores of builder machine. Which number is appropriate? Is it meaningful to ship such a parallel library at all

Re: Ananconda

2013-09-21 Thread Jan Kratochvil
On Sat, 21 Sep 2013 20:12:41 +0200, Phil Dobbin wrote: > I was wondering as to why Ananconda has no facility to overwrite a > distro already present on the target machine. I've studied it & > apart from destroying the existing partition with GParted there > seems to be no other way (this happens on

Re: Ananconda

2013-09-21 Thread Chris Murphy
On Sep 21, 2013, at 12:12 PM, Phil Dobbin wrote: > Hi, all. > > I was wondering as to why Ananconda has no facility to overwrite a distro > already present on the target machine. It may not be able to identify the partitions making up a distro installation. But it does have multiple ways to

Re: Ananconda

2013-09-21 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Sat, 21 Sep 2013 19:12:41 +0100, Phil Dobbin wrote: > Hi, all. > > I was wondering as to why Ananconda has no facility to overwrite a > distro already present on the target machine. I've studied it & apart > from destroying the existing partition with GParted there seems to be no > other wa

Re: does mc really require perl*?

2013-09-21 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 20.09.2013 21:13, schrieb Jakub Jelinek: > On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 08:37:50PM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote: >> well, some people would now say "i do" >> the same i can say for sure to some other pakcages on a cloud server where >> they would disagree and because everybody has different needs keep

Ananconda

2013-09-21 Thread Phil Dobbin
Hi, all. I was wondering as to why Ananconda has no facility to overwrite a distro already present on the target machine. I've studied it & apart from destroying the existing partition with GParted there seems to be no other way (this happens on 18 & 19). Most painful it is. If anybody can

Re: does mc really require perl*?

2013-09-21 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Wed, 11 Sep 2013 10:11:12 -0500, Chris Adams wrote: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1006954 > The problem is that many (most?) programs won't handle this well. For > example, how does mc handle having its perl scripts installed but > non-functional? The "missing extfs.d scri

Re: Python Package Review Swap

2013-09-21 Thread Praveen Kumar
On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 8:24 PM, Christopher Meng wrote: > I can take it. Thanks :) -- Praveen Kumar http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Kumarpraveen http://fedoraproject.org/ http://kumar-pravin.blogspot.com -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/ma

Re: Python Package Review Swap

2013-09-21 Thread Christopher Meng
I can take it. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Python Package Review Swap

2013-09-21 Thread Praveen Kumar
Hi folks, python-jenkinsapi [0] up for review. [0] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010334 -- Praveen Kumar http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Kumarpraveen http://fedoraproject.org/ http://kumar-pravin.blogspot.com -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.