I feel this is a an exciting evolution for Fedora.
At the same time of course it will be a big change,
and there could be some risk of the increased complexity
fragmenting Fedora development somewhat, but it should
FESCo to scale to support the needs of these separate
products better.
I know this
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
hi all,
RC4 images have been uploaded to EC2 and are available at:
ami-c187cca8 : us-east-1 image for i386
ami-5985ce30 : us-east-1 image for x86_64
additionally if your looking to the AMI's they have been added to files
in the release tree
http://d
NOTE: The 32- and 64-bit DVDs, the 64-bit Desktop Live, the 32-bit
Security Spin, and the 64-bit LXDE and MATE Spins are over their
respective size targets.
As per the Fedora 20 schedule [1], Fedora 20 Alpha Release Candidate 4
(RC4) is now available for testing. Content information, including
cha
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 03:29:19PM -0500, Troy Dawson wrote:
> What is a good way to track down a solution to "error: reference to
> 'uint32_t' is ambiguous"?
Sorry for the multiple mails but after looking at the source I think I
see the actual problem. So in e.g. ext/common/Utils/MessageIO.h we h
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 11:22:26PM +0200, Lars Seipel wrote:
> The latter apparently being in the boost namespace. I'd bet the code in
> question is not referring to those with their qualified names but just
> imports the std namespace as well as the boost namespace, leading to
> this conflict?
Oh
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 03:29:19PM -0500, Troy Dawson wrote:
> With original src.rpm, i386 build [2] failed with the error
> "error: reference to 'uint32_t' is ambiguous"
Well, according to the build log 'uint32_t' is in fact ambigious. It is
declared once in stdint.h as
typedef unsigned int ui
Hi,
I'm hoping that someone on this list can say "Oh, ya, this change
happened and it causes that, here's the solution." because I've spent a
month running against a brick wall.
Short summary:
rubygem-passenger won't build due to uint32_t issues. And it is
affecting x86_64 different than it
On Wed, 18 Sep 2013 14:07:08 -0400, James Antill wrote:
> Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC
> meeting Thursday at 2013-09-19 16:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on
> irc.freenode.net.
> Links to all tickets below can be found at:
>
> https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/rep
Given that it has been several weeks since I provided patches which
update the spec file for several components in accordance to the
packaging guidelines, I hereby ask for a proven packaging assistance to
walk through the remaining ones and apply those patches.
Thanks
JBG
1. https://b
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47516/0001-Ticket-47516-replication-stops-with-excessive-clock-.patch
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC
meeting Thursday at 2013-09-19 16:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on
irc.freenode.net.
Local time information (via. rktime):
2013-09-19 09:00 Thu US/Pacific PDT
2013-09-19 12:00 Thu US/Eastern EDT
2013-09-19 1
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2013-09-18)
===
Meeting started by mmaslano at 18:00:23 UTC. The full logs are available
at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2013-09-18/fesco.2013-09-18-18.00.log.html
.
Meeting summary
Summary of changes:
faf50cd... Update to latest bugfix release. (*)
23cc08d... Update to 1.99.8.3 from master
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de..
commit 23cc08d98236c8f9081d4a624f622245cce5f8b5
Merge: 5741b0e faf50cd
Author: Orion Poplawski
Date: Wed Sep 18 09:59:30 2013 -0600
Update to 1.99.8.3 from master
.gitignore |1 +
ChangeLog | 17 +
abi-compliance-checker.spec | 21
On Wed, 11 Sep 2013, Thomas Woerner wrote:
On 09/10/2013 10:07 PM, Peter Oliver wrote:
Now, if you're running a server and you install, say, Apache, I think
you expect to have to go and poke at the firewall config, but these seem
to be very desktop-focused features, and the UI provides no clue
Le 18/09/2013 18:03, Richard Hughes a écrit :
> Good catch, fixed upstream, thanks:
Welcome !
I forget to say that I think this is a very useful tool !
Thanks to provide this.
Remi.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1009481
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
abi-dumper-0.99.6-1.fc20,abi-compliance-checker-1.99.8.3-1.fc20 has been
submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/abi-dumper-0.99.6-1.fc20,abi-compliance-checker
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1009481
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
abi-dumper-0.99.6-1.fc18,abi-compliance-checker-1.99.8.3-1.fc18 has been
submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/abi-dumper-0.99.6-1.fc18,abi-compliance-checker
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1009481
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System ---
abi-dumper-0.99.6-1.fc19,abi-compliance-checker-1.99.8.3-1.fc19 has been
submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/abi-dumper-0.99.6-1.fc19,abi-compliance-checker
On 18 September 2013 16:44, Remi Collet wrote:
> $ appdata-validate misc/qelectrotech.appdata.xml
> misc/qelectrotech.appdata.xml 1 problems detected:
> • tag duplicated: is duplicated
Good catch, fixed upstream, thanks:
commit fe6b330d3e1f216ea41f69d101c3448df84f9cd9
Author: Richard Hu
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1009563
Bug ID: 1009563
Summary: perl-XML-LibXML-2.0106 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-XML-LibXML
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee: jples...
Le 18/09/2013 17:23, Richard Hughes a écrit :
> I'd appreciate it if a few people could try it out
According to the commit you point me previously,
it seems summary could be translated
https://github.com/hughsie/fedora-appstream/commit/6683d10503a592ac02ec9cf9671c817b2077e82e
=> xml.write("
Summary of changes:
faf50cd... Update to latest bugfix release. (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedo
Summary of changes:
faf50cd... Update to latest bugfix release. (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedo
commit faf50cd762aa60d9472f6dc625c1a39cdcddf9ed
Author: Richard M. Shaw
Date: Wed Sep 18 10:07:27 2013 -0500
Update to latest bugfix release.
.gitignore |1 +
ChangeLog | 17 +
abi-compliance-checker.spec | 21 +---
Hi all,
A few packagers have contacted me about some kind of validation tool
for AppData[1] files. I've spent a couple of days creating and then
packaging appdata-tools which includes the appdata-validate command.
This returns non-zero if there are any syntax or style issues with the
AppData file.
On 18/09/13 20:45, Paul Howarth wrote:
> On 17/09/13 20:30, David Timms wrote:
...
> Note that old builds (source and binary RPMs, plus logs) can be found
> at: http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/packages//
Thanks Richard, Mikolaj and Paul. These were all useful and helpful
responses.
With the inf
On 17/09/13 20:30, David Timms wrote:
In trying to track down when a bug began showing up, I'd like to build
an earlier version of my package eg from 9 months ago (hence earlier
upstream release and different spec/patches). How can that be achieved
on the builder ?
Does the build system keep the
On 09/17/2013 09:30 PM, David Timms wrote:
> In trying to track down when a bug began showing up, I'd like to build
> an earlier version of my package eg from 9 months ago (hence earlier
> upstream release and different spec/patches). How can that be achieved
> on the builder ?
koji build --scratc
29 matches
Mail list logo
