[Test-Announce] 2013-09-16 @ 15:00 UTC - Fedora QA Meeting

2013-09-15 Thread Tim Flink
# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting # Date: 2013-09-16 # Time: 15:00 UTC (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto) # Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net Greetings testers! It's meeting time again on Monday! We did end up slipping release, so we're still in freeze and have

Re: About F19 Firewall

2013-09-15 Thread P J P
   Hello Tomasz, - Original Message - > From: Tomasz Torcz > Subject: Re: About F19 Firewall >   You seem to have missed this Fedora *18* feature: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/firewalld-default >   firewall-cmd is supposed to isolate user from all this chains.    Yep, true

Re: Provenpackagers can help (was: Re: OCaml 4.01.0 coming to Fedora Rawhide this weekend)

2013-09-15 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 23:20:42 +0100, "Richard W.M. Jones" wrote: Unfortunately the package uses 'omake' so it's anyone's guess how to make it pass the right flags. I have no experience with omake. I wasn't able to do local builds because of an omake related error. Koji builds worked, s

Re: Provenpackagers can help (was: Re: OCaml 4.01.0 coming to Fedora Rawhide this weekend)

2013-09-15 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 10:48:37PM -0600, Jerry James wrote: > Fatal error: exception Assert_failure("asmcomp/emitaux.ml", 226, 4) > make[3]: *** [pa_lisp.cmx] Error 2 > > Since there is no such source file as emitaux.ml in ocaml-camlp5, I > assume that must be an ocaml source file. This is a com

Re: Provenpackagers can help (was: Re: OCaml 4.01.0 coming to Fedora Rawhide this weekend)

2013-09-15 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 01:25:39PM -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 14:04:08 +0100, > "Richard W.M. Jones" wrote: > > > >If that works, push it and build it. > > > >If there are any problems, you can either ask me or just leave that > >package. > > Can you check that ocam

Re: Full subpackage (-n type) with different version from main package

2013-09-15 Thread Richard Shaw
On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 4:58 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Sun, 15 Sep 2013 11:55:56 -0500 > Richard Shaw wrote: > > > I'm working on updating the trustedqsl package and it looks like the > > developers have decided to include a new version of tqsllib in the > > TrustedQSL main source. So besides

Re: Full subpackage (-n type) with different version from main package

2013-09-15 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Sun, 15 Sep 2013 11:55:56 -0500 Richard Shaw wrote: > I'm working on updating the trustedqsl package and it looks like the > developers have decided to include a new version of tqsllib in the > TrustedQSL main source. So besides having to Obsolete/Provide the old > package, it also has a diffe

Re: Full subpackage (-n type) with different version from main package

2013-09-15 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Sun, 15 Sep 2013 15:07:58 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote: > Ok, apparently I've been unintentionally obtuse... > > The problem isn't (directly) with %setup. I know how to do that. > > The problem is when you have a (-n type) subpackage that is of a different > version from the main source. > > Ma

Re: Full subpackage (-n type) with different version from main package

2013-09-15 Thread Richard Shaw
Ok, apparently I've been unintentionally obtuse... The problem isn't (directly) with %setup. I know how to do that. The problem is when you have a (-n type) subpackage that is of a different version from the main source. Maximum RPM tells you properly that you can include a Version: tag from ins

Re: Full subpackage (-n type) with different version from main package

2013-09-15 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Sun, 15 Sep 2013 14:04:09 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote: > > It could be that you're only confused about what %setup does. You really > > just need to tell it which build directory to enter, and that builddir > > will be entered automatically for the rest of the %prep, %build, %install > > and %che

Re: Atlas update

2013-09-15 Thread Frantisek Kluknavsky
On 09/13/2013 03:44 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote: On 09/13/2013 06:26 AM, Susi Lehtola wrote: On Fri, 13 Sep 2013 15:24:28 +0300 Susi Lehtola wrote: On Fri, 13 Sep 2013 14:16:46 +0200 Frantisek Kluknavsky wrote: Atlas currently bundles Lapack. I want to update Atlas to 3.10.1 and unbundle Lapac

Re: About F19 Firewall

2013-09-15 Thread Tomasz Torcz
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 02:52:07AM +0800, P J P wrote: >      Hi, > > I upgraded to F19 recently. And I happened to look at the output of > iptables(8) today. > >    $ iptables -nL > > It's baffling! It's crazy 4 pages long listing!! You seem to have missed this Fedora *18* feature: https://

Re: Full subpackage (-n type) with different version from main package

2013-09-15 Thread Richard Shaw
On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 1:36 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Sun, 15 Sep 2013 12:09:21 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote: > > > >> Have you tried to tweak the %setup macro with the -n option ? > > > > > > > > > Yes, I have to because the source name doesn't match the package name > > > anymore... > > > >

About F19 Firewall

2013-09-15 Thread P J P
     Hi, I upgraded to F19 recently. And I happened to look at the output of iptables(8) today.    $ iptables -nL It's baffling! It's crazy 4 pages long listing!! Why are there so many chains? Most are empty. Those which have rules, jump from one chain to another and that jumps to yet anothe

Re: Full subpackage (-n type) with different version from main package

2013-09-15 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Sun, 15 Sep 2013 12:09:21 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote: > >> Have you tried to tweak the %setup macro with the -n option ? > > > > > > Yes, I have to because the source name doesn't match the package name > > anymore... > > > > %setup -q -n %{srcname}-%{version} > > > > where srcname is defines at

Re: Provenpackagers can help (was: Re: OCaml 4.01.0 coming to Fedora Rawhide this weekend)

2013-09-15 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 14:04:08 +0100, "Richard W.M. Jones" wrote: If that works, push it and build it. If there are any problems, you can either ask me or just leave that package. Can you check that ocaml-camlimages looks OK now? -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https:

Re: Full subpackage (-n type) with different version from main package

2013-09-15 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 15.09.2013 19:07, schrieb Richard Shaw: > On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 11:58 AM, Dridi Boukelmoune > > wrote: > > Hi, > > Have you tried to tweak the %setup macro with the -n option ? > > > Yes, I have to because the source name doesn't match the pack

Re: Full subpackage (-n type) with different version from main package

2013-09-15 Thread Richard Shaw
On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 12:07 PM, Richard Shaw wrote: > On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 11:58 AM, Dridi Boukelmoune < > dridi.boukelmo...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Have you tried to tweak the %setup macro with the -n option ? > > > Yes, I have to because the source name doesn't match the package n

Re: Full subpackage (-n type) with different version from main package

2013-09-15 Thread Richard Shaw
On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 11:58 AM, Dridi Boukelmoune < dridi.boukelmo...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > Have you tried to tweak the %setup macro with the -n option ? Yes, I have to because the source name doesn't match the package name anymore... %setup -q -n %{srcname}-%{version} where srcname is

Re: Full subpackage (-n type) with different version from main package

2013-09-15 Thread Dridi Boukelmoune
Hi, Have you tried to tweak the %setup macro with the -n option ? Best Regards, Dridi On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 5:55 PM, Richard Shaw wrote: > I'm working on updating the trustedqsl package and it looks like the > developers have decided to include a new version of tqsllib in the > TrustedQSL mai

Full subpackage (-n type) with different version from main package

2013-09-15 Thread Richard Shaw
I'm working on updating the trustedqsl package and it looks like the developers have decided to include a new version of tqsllib in the TrustedQSL main source. So besides having to Obsolete/Provide the old package, it also has a different version number from the apps. Maximum RPM[1] seems to indic

Re: oyranos build loop issue

2013-09-15 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 09:49:31 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote: So I am not sure if this is an Xcm bug or an oyranos bug (or both). Searching for Xcm.h references show that it is always refered to as X11/Xcm/Xcm.h, so it looks like the bug is in oyranos as well. I'll come up with a patch t

Re: oyranos build loop issue

2013-09-15 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 20:45:03 +0800, Christopher Meng wrote: Side note: I'm maintaining oyranos. It depends on elektra 0.7 but elektra upstream just notified me update. Unfortunately oyranos doesn't support elektra 0.8+. If you think that Xcm problem is a bug, feel free to file a bug. ht

Re: oyranos build loop issue

2013-09-15 Thread Christopher Meng
Side note: I'm maintaining oyranos. It depends on elektra 0.7 but elektra upstream just notified me update. Unfortunately oyranos doesn't support elektra 0.8+. If you think that Xcm problem is a bug, feel free to file a bug. http://sourceforge.net/p/oyranos/feature-requests/13/ -- devel mailing

Re: What does it mean if two debuginfo packages create the same dwz build ID file?

2013-09-15 Thread Jan Kratochvil
On Sun, 15 Sep 2013 01:39:00 +0200, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote: > But anyway, pure content-based build-ids are IMHO misguided (since they > presume non-conflict from external coincedences), thus my salting > proposal/patch in BZ1002341. The fix is in debugedit. This means that use of dwz in non-rpm b

Re: What does it mean if two debuginfo packages create the same dwz build ID file?

2013-09-15 Thread Jan Kratochvil
On Sat, 14 Sep 2013 23:53:53 +0200, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 02:21:45PM +0200, Jan Kratochvil wrote: > > It is the dwz (=debuginfo size optimizer) option -m: > > > > -m FILE --multifile FILE > > [...] create ELF object FILE and put debugging information duplicated >