Re: Proposal: AppData files in all application packages?

On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 05:39:29PM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > I really do not think we can integrate this into our release processes > right now. What work would need to be done in order to make it possible to integrate this into the release process? -- Matthew Garrett | mj...@srcf.ucam.or

Fedora Policy Index

Hi, Here goes a dumb question: Where is the listing of all (active) fedora policies located? I am looking specifically for the greeter (gdm/kmd/etc) policy. Thanks in advance. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code

Re: Fedora 20-Alpha RC2 AMIS

On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 04:46:17PM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > ami-1bb5fc72 : us-east-1 image for i386 This still doesn't boot. (We're working on it.) -- Matthew Miller ☁☁☁ Fedora Cloud Architect ☁☁☁ -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mai

Re: Protection from merge commits

On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 10:37:44 +0100, David Howells wrote: I presume that that would prevent valid merging between branches in the repo? For example, I have a reasonably simple package that I apply patches to in the master branch and then merge everything back into the last few Fedora vers

Re: Review swaps: xfoil, xrotor, avl

On 09/12/2013 09:36 PM, Sandro Mani wrote: Okay. So I'll take those newly updated: avl and xrotor. Thanks Antonio, let me know if I can review anything in exchange. Btw, you will notice that they are all very similar, so if you manage those two, xfoil should be just as easy ;) Sandro I ca

Re: Review swaps: xfoil, xrotor, avl

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 09/12/2013 07:37 PM, Sandro Mani wrote: > Hi, > > I've posted the following package review requests: - #1007539 - > xfoil: Subsonic Airfoil Development System - #1007540 - rotor: > Design and analysis tools for propellers and windmills - #1007541 -

[perl-MIME-Types/f20] Update to 2.04

Summary of changes: e55456b... Update to 2.04 (*) (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mail

Re: I am thinking of adding compression to libselinux

On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 07:53:30AM -0400, Daniel J Walsh wrote: > Basically looking at compressing the policy file to shrink SELinux footprint > in the minimal install/cloud image. > > Currently the policy modules (pp files) are shipped with bzip compression but > the actually policy file. > > Bu

Re: Firewall blocking desktop features

On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 1:26 AM, Oron Peled wrote: >- This means that any privileged service controlled by GUI client (e.g: > NetworkManager) is still only as secure as it's controller (e.g: > nm-applet). This is wrong. That's not how "controlling the service" works. -- devel mailing

Review swaps: xfoil, xrotor, avl

Hi, I've posted the following package review requests: - #1007539 - xfoil: Subsonic Airfoil Development System - #1007540 - rotor: Design and analysis tools for propellers and windmills - #1007541 - avl: Aerodynamic and flight-dynamic analysis of rigid aircrafts They are all fortran/C applicatio

Review swap: xflr5

Hi, One more airfoil package: #1007604 - xflr5: Analysis tool for airfoils, wings and planes C++/Qt code with simple qmake build and desktop file. Again, happy to review in exchange. Thanks, Sandro -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/lis

A fresh idea (was: fedmsg for voting?)

On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 05:30:43PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 09:55:51AM -0500, inode0 wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 7:59 AM, Ralph Bean wrote: > > > Hm, its not worth doing if we're going to make it complex like this. > > > I think we should just drop it. No

Re: Review swaps: xfoil, xrotor, avl

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 09/12/2013 09:36 PM, Sandro Mani wrote: > >> Okay. So I'll take those newly updated: avl and xrotor. >> >> >> > Thanks Antonio, let me know if I can review anything in exchange. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1002251 ;) Btw, > you

Re: Firewall blocking desktop features

On Thursday 12 September 2013 09:23:13 Colin Walters wrote: > On Thu, 2013-09-12 at 10:01 +0300, Oron Peled wrote: > > * From pid you can find the real executable (/proc/pid/cmd). > > And this is the step that's worthless: > > https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=533493 Thanks, that was

Re: Proposal: AppData files in all application packages?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 El Thu, 12 Sep 2013 16:47:13 +0200 Elad Alfassa escribió: > On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 10:28 PM, Dennis Gilmore > wrote: > > > El Wed, 11 Sep 2013 14:35:34 -0400 > > Matthias Clasen escribió: > > > On Wed, 2013-09-11 at 12:46 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wro

Re: Firewall blocking desktop features

Am 12.09.2013 08:25, schrieb Pierre-Yves Chibon: >> Application should request the ports to be opened and the firewalld >> layer should then confirm with the user stating which ports and >> which app requested said ports. The app can't lie if the firewall >> layer is the one asking for confirmati

Re: Review swaps: xfoil, xrotor, avl

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 09/12/2013 08:32 PM, Sandro Mani wrote: > > On 12.09.2013 19:45, Antonio Trande wrote: >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 >> >> On 09/12/2013 07:37 PM, Sandro Mani wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I've posted the following package review requ

Re: A fresh idea (was: fedmsg for voting?)

+1 El jue, 12-09-2013 a las 15:10 -0500, inode0 escribió: > On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 11:22 AM, Ralph Bean wrote: > > A fresh idea came up in #fedora-apps: > > > > What if we nix fedmsg for voting all together, but we supply a link in > > each election page: "Claim the badge for voting" that you ca

[Test-Announce] Fedora 20 Alpha to slip by one week

Today at Go/No-Go meeting it was decided to slip Fedora 20 Alpha release by one week due to two unresolved blocker bugs, see the blocker tracking app [1]. Otherwise we think we have pretty solid foundation for Alpha. More details in meeting minutes [2]. As a result, ALL MAJOR MILESTONES, and the

Re: I am thinking of adding compression to libselinux

Richard W.M. Jones (rjo...@redhat.com) said: > On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 09:16:13AM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 02:11:04PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: > > > (That said, our minimal image is a couple of 100mb still, iirc, so 2mb > > > is not tht much.) > > > > I

Re: fedmsg for voting?

On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 09:55:51AM -0500, inode0 wrote: > On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 7:59 AM, Ralph Bean wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 09:23:44PM -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > >> On Sep 11, 2013 6:02 PM, "Matthew Miller" wrote: > >> > What if we made this like the "I voted" stickers -- you ca

Re: numatop: %{optflags} fail the 32bit build

On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 08:46:33AM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: > This is the offending function: > > void > cpuid(unsigned int *eax, unsigned int *ebx, unsigned int *ecx, > unsigned int *edx) > { > __asm volatile > ("cpuid\n\t" > : "=a" (*eax), >"=b" (*ebx),

Fedora 20-Alpha RC2 AMIS

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 hi all, RC2 images have been uploaded to EC2 and are available at ami-1bb5fc72 : us-east-1 image for i386 ami-03c8816a : us-east-1 image for x86_64 additionally if your looking to the AMI's they have been added to files in the release tree http://d

Re: fedmsg for voting?

On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 7:59 AM, Ralph Bean wrote: > On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 09:23:44PM -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: >> On Sep 11, 2013 6:02 PM, "Matthew Miller" wrote: >> > What if we made this like the "I voted" stickers -- you can get one by >> > checking a box in the voting app? (Even if, by

Re: Firewall blocking desktop features

Am 11.09.2013 23:18, schrieb Mateusz Marzantowicz: > On 11.09.2013 17:24, Daniel J Walsh wrote: >> On 09/11/2013 09:18 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: The problem with this solution is potential conflicts in port numbers and pps that just use random ports (Which I think should just not be allo

[perl-MIME-Types] Update to 2.04

commit e55456b29e21fff5b931922da63f21646fbcca76 Author: Paul Howarth Date: Thu Sep 12 15:46:18 2013 +0100 Update to 2.04 - New upstream release 2.04: - Fix one more localize $_ in ::Types::_read_db() (CPAN RT#87856) perl-MIME-Types.spec |6 +- sources |

Re: Packages requiring Xorg "BackingStore" "true"

On 12.09.2013 16:41, Adam Jackson wrote: On Wed, 2013-09-11 at 23:27 +0200, Sandro Mani wrote: Well, yes, but it ought to work regardless of the xorg.conf setting, because that setting has been effectively hardwired to true for about six years now. I rewrote the backing store implementation to

Package name conflict with retired package

Hi, I just posted a review for avl (the Aerodynamic and flight-dynamic analysis of rigid aircrafts package) [1], and the reviewer noticed that it conflicts with the retired avl package (the AVL tree manipulation library). How should one proceed in such situations? Does the old repository need

Re: A fresh idea (was: fedmsg for voting?)

On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 11:22 AM, Ralph Bean wrote: > A fresh idea came up in #fedora-apps: > > What if we nix fedmsg for voting all together, but we supply a link in > each election page: "Claim the badge for voting" that you can click to, > well, get the badge. > > This way no tracking is done w

Re: Review swaps: xfoil, xrotor, avl

On 12.09.2013 22:05, Brendan Jones wrote: On 09/12/2013 09:36 PM, Sandro Mani wrote: Okay. So I'll take those newly updated: avl and xrotor. Thanks Antonio, let me know if I can review anything in exchange. Btw, you will notice that they are all very similar, so if you manage those two, x

Re: Packages requiring Xorg "BackingStore" "true"

On 12.09.2013 21:30, Przemek Klosowski wrote: On 09/11/2013 05:27 PM, Sandro Mani wrote: Well, yes, but it ought to work regardless of the xorg.conf setting, because that setting has been effectively hardwired to true for about six years now. I rewrote the backing store implementation to use

Re: I am thinking of adding compression to libselinux

On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 09:16:13AM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 02:11:04PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: > > (That said, our minimal image is a couple of 100mb still, iirc, so 2mb > > is not tht much.) > > It's basically down to the three big unsolved problems (ker

Re: Review swaps: xfoil, xrotor, avl

Okay. So I'll take those newly updated: avl and xrotor. Thanks Antonio, let me know if I can review anything in exchange. Btw, you will notice that they are all very similar, so if you manage those two, xfoil should be just as easy ;) Sandro -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject

Re: Packages requiring Xorg "BackingStore" "true"

On 09/11/2013 05:27 PM, Sandro Mani wrote: Well, yes, but it ought to work regardless of the xorg.conf setting, because that setting has been effectively hardwired to true for about six years now. I rewrote the backing store implementation to use Composite internally, which is always available

Re: Review swaps: xfoil, xrotor, avl

On 12.09.2013 19:45, Antonio Trande wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 09/12/2013 07:37 PM, Sandro Mani wrote: Hi, I've posted the following package review requests: - #1007539 - xfoil: Subsonic Airfoil Development System - #1007540 - rotor: Design and analysis tools for

Re: BlueZ Status in Fedora.

Current status update for MATE. 1. Creating an applet for using gnome-bluetooth inside MATE is a death project for me. The applet himself is working (thanks kalev), but using gnome-blutooth properties is a problem since 'properties' isn't a standalone application anymore and moved to control-ce

File Path-Tiny-0.033.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by pghmcfc

A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Path-Tiny: cb70291b1792998c4780eced3ca4d20a Path-Tiny-0.033.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/

Re: [linux-sunxi] Re: Announcing Fedora 19 ARM remix for Allwinner SOCs release 1, now with A20 support

Hi, On 09/12/2013 04:27 PM, hmandevt...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Hans, i tryed to use your fedora 19 remix on my Olinuxino A20 Rev.D but don't start, there is only red and green leds power on static (no blink) but i have always hdmi signal off (i verified that script is for hdmi). Have you tried h

Re: Proposal: AppData files in all application packages?

On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 10:28 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > El Wed, 11 Sep 2013 14:35:34 -0400 > Matthias Clasen escribió: > > On Wed, 2013-09-11 at 12:46 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > > > > > > Any questions, either grab me on irc 'hughsie' or reply to this > > > > email. Be sure to read [1] as

Re: fedmsg for voting?

On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 04:08:21PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 08:59:40AM -0400, Ralph Bean wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 09:23:44PM -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > > > On Sep 11, 2013 6:02 PM, "Matthew Miller" > > > wrote: > > > > What if we made this like the

Re: Packages requiring Xorg "BackingStore" "true"

On Wed, 2013-09-11 at 23:27 +0200, Sandro Mani wrote: > > Well, yes, but it ought to work regardless of the xorg.conf setting, > > because that setting has been effectively hardwired to true for about > > six years now. I rewrote the backing store implementation to use > > Composite internally, wh

Re: fedmsg for voting?

On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 08:59:40AM -0400, Ralph Bean wrote: > On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 09:23:44PM -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > > On Sep 11, 2013 6:02 PM, "Matthew Miller" wrote: > > > What if we made this like the "I voted" stickers -- you can get one by > > > checking a box in the voting app? (

Re: Scala package owner unresponsive

- Original Message - > From: "Antoine Gourlay" > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" > > Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2013 6:22:05 AM > Subject: Re: Scala package owner unresponsive > > Do you have the log output of the failing tests? I can probably dig it up, but the brea

Re: I am thinking of adding compression to libselinux

On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 03:18:58PM +0200, drago01 wrote: > > It's basically down to the three big unsolved problems (kernel modules, > > translations, docs) and then several dozen little things like this. If > > getting really small is a priority we need to solve the big problems, but > > chipping

Broken dependencies: perl-Padre

perl-Padre has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-Padre-0.90-6.fc18.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.0) On i386: perl-Padre-0.90-6.fc18.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.0) On armhfp: perl-Padre-0.90-6.fc18.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_

Broken dependencies: perl-Unix-Statgrab

perl-Unix-Statgrab has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-Unix-Statgrab-0.04-20.fc20.x86_64 requires libstatgrab.so.6()(64bit) On i386: perl-Unix-Statgrab-0.04-20.fc20.i686 requires libstatgrab.so.6 On armhfp: perl-Unix-Statgrab-0.04-20.fc20.armv7hl

Broken dependencies: perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene

perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene-1.091-19.fc20.noarch requires perl(Bio::Index::AbstractSeq) On i386: perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene-1.091-19.fc20.noarch requires perl(Bio::Index::AbstractSeq) On armhfp:

Broken dependencies: perl-MooseX-TrackDirty-Attributes

perl-MooseX-TrackDirty-Attributes has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-MooseX-TrackDirty-Attributes-2.002-2.fc19.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2) On i386: perl-MooseX-TrackDirty-Attributes-2.002-2.fc19.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2

Broken dependencies: slic3r

slic3r has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: slic3r-0.9.10b-2.fc20.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.3) On i386: slic3r-0.9.10b-2.fc20.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.3) On armhfp: slic3r-0.9.10b-2.fc20.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_

Broken dependencies: perl-Language-Expr

perl-Language-Expr has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2) On i386: perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2) On armhfp: perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.

Broken dependencies: perl-Locale-Codes

perl-Locale-Codes has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-Locale-Codes-3.27-1.fc21.noarch requires perl(Locale::Codes::Script_Retired) perl-Locale-Codes-3.27-1.fc21.noarch requires perl(Locale::Codes::Script_Codes) perl-Locale-Codes-3.27-1.fc21.noarc

Broken dependencies: perl-ParseUtil-Domain

perl-ParseUtil-Domain has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-ParseUtil-Domain-2.22-3.fc19.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2) On i386: perl-ParseUtil-Domain-2.22-3.fc19.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2) On armhfp: perl-ParseUtil-Do

Broken dependencies: perl-MIME-Lite-HTML

perl-MIME-Lite-HTML has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-MIME-Lite-HTML-1.24-4.fc18.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.0) On i386: perl-MIME-Lite-HTML-1.24-4.fc18.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.0) On armhfp: perl-MIME-Lite-HTML-1.2

Broken dependencies: perl-PDL

perl-PDL has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-PDL-2.4.10-6.fc19.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2) perl-PDL-2.4.10-6.fc19.x86_64 requires libgd.so.2()(64bit) On i386: perl-PDL-2.4.10-6.fc19.i686 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)

[perl-perl5i/f19] Initial import (perl-perl5i-2.12.0-3)

Summary of changes: 314aa24... Initial import (perl-perl5i-2.12.0-3) (*) (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin

Re: Heads up! I'm going to upgrade Wireshark up to 1.10.x in Fedora 18

Hi, On 09/12/2013 02:12 PM, Jan Kratochvil wrote: > On Thu, 12 Sep 2013 10:42:20 +0200, Peter Lemenkov wrote: >> I'm afraid that's just adds additional work for maintainers w/o any >> visible benefits. > > The benefits are the stable Fedora release does not break 3rd party > applications during i

Re: Firewall blocking desktop features

On Thu, 2013-09-12 at 10:01 +0300, Oron Peled wrote: > * From pid you can find the real executable (/proc/pid/cmd). And this is the step that's worthless: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=533493 -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/m

Re: I am thinking of adding compression to libselinux

On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 9:16 AM, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 02:11:04PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: >> (That said, our minimal image is a couple of 100mb still, iirc, so 2mb >> is not tht much.) > > It's basically down to the three big unsolved problems (kernel modules

Re: fedmsg for voting?

On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 11:14:34AM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > >What if we made this like the "I voted" stickers -- you can get one by > >checking a box in the voting app? (Even if, by the way, you cast no actual > >votes?) > And not wearing such a badge makes you a "dissident" or "terrorist"?

Re: I am thinking of adding compression to libselinux

On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 3:16 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 02:11:04PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: >> (That said, our minimal image is a couple of 100mb still, iirc, so 2mb >> is not tht much.) > > It's basically down to the three big unsolved problems (kernel modules

Re: I am thinking of adding compression to libselinux

On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 02:11:04PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: > (That said, our minimal image is a couple of 100mb still, iirc, so 2mb > is not tht much.) It's basically down to the three big unsolved problems (kernel modules, translations, docs) and then several dozen little things like

Re: numatop: %{optflags} fail the 32bit build

On 09/12/2013 02:53 PM, Florian Weimer wrote: By the way, we could generate much better code if the registers were passed as an array or struct, so that they are in consecutive memory: struct regs { unsigned eax, ebx, ecx, edx; }; void cpuid(struct regs *r) { __asm volatile ("push %

Re: fedmsg for voting?

On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 09:23:44PM -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > On Sep 11, 2013 6:02 PM, "Matthew Miller" wrote: > > What if we made this like the "I voted" stickers -- you can get one by > > checking a box in the voting app? (Even if, by the way, you cast no actual > > votes?) > > > I had thou

Re: [389-devel] 389-devel Digest, Vol 99, Issue 6

On 09/11/2013 07:41 PM, Howard Chu wrote: 389-devel-requ...@lists.fedoraproject.org wrote: Send 389-devel mailing list submissions to 389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel o

Re: numatop: %{optflags} fail the 32bit build

On 09/12/2013 02:11 PM, Dridi Boukelmoune wrote: This version should work in 32 bit mode, and only in 32 bit mode: void cpuid(unsigned int *eax, unsigned int *ebx, unsigned int *ecx, unsigned int *edx) { __asm volatile ("push %%ebx\n\t" "cpuid\n\t" "mov %%ebx, (%1)\n\

Re: numatop: %{optflags} fail the 32bit build

On 09/12/2013 02:11 PM, Dridi Boukelmoune wrote: I don't understand the last 5 lines of __asm in both functions, I've never seen this syntax before. It's gcc's extended asm syntax (Aka. "inline asm in C"): c.f. http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Extended-Asm.html ff. Ralf -- devel mailing

Re: I am thinking of adding compression to libselinux

On Thu, 12.09.13 08:16, Daniel J Walsh (dwa...@redhat.com) wrote: > > Well, you might buy smaller footprint with slower boot time, but I figure > > without trying it there's no way to know that for sure. > > > > (That said, our minimal image is a couple of 100mb still, iirc, so 2mb is > > not tha

Re: Heads up! I'm going to upgrade Wireshark up to 1.10.x in Fedora 18

On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 8:12 PM, Jan Kratochvil wrote: > > > So let's drop the Fedora releases effort and we can all just run Rawhide. > It's not a joke now in some cases. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of

Re: I am thinking of adding compression to libselinux

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 09/12/2013 08:11 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Thu, 12.09.13 07:53, Daniel J Walsh (dwa...@redhat.com) wrote: > >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 >> >> Basically looking at compressing the policy file to shrink SELinux >> footp

Re: Heads up! I'm going to upgrade Wireshark up to 1.10.x in Fedora 18

On Thu, 12 Sep 2013 10:42:20 +0200, Peter Lemenkov wrote: > I'm afraid that's just adds additional work for maintainers w/o any > visible benefits. The benefits are the stable Fedora release does not break 3rd party applications during its deployment/lifecycle. > Let's move further instead of ba

Re: I am thinking of adding compression to libselinux

On Thu, 12.09.13 07:53, Daniel J Walsh (dwa...@redhat.com) wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Basically looking at compressing the policy file to shrink SELinux footprint > in the minimal install/cloud image. > > Currently the policy modules (pp files) are shipped with

Re: numatop: %{optflags} fail the 32bit build

Hi, On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 8:46 AM, Florian Weimer wrote: > On 09/11/2013 12:31 AM, Dridi Boukelmoune wrote: > >> I have my first packaging issue on the numatop package[1]. >> >> During the review it appeared that I forgot the %{optflags}, and that >> adding them breaks the i686 build. The upstr

Re: I am thinking of adding compression to libselinux

> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Basically looking at compressing the policy file to shrink SELinux footprint > in the minimal install/cloud image. > > Currently the policy modules (pp files) are shipped with bzip compression but > the actually policy file. > > But the /etc/

[Test-Announce] F20 Alpha Testing Status: Last Minute Assistance Requested

We ended up needing a RC2 spin for alpha to fix a bug we thought was fixed for almost all machines [1] and we're now in the situation where most of the alpha validation test cases need to be run in less than 12 hours if we don't want F20 alpha to slip. Fortunately, this is alpha and there aren't n

I am thinking of adding compression to libselinux

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Basically looking at compressing the policy file to shrink SELinux footprint in the minimal install/cloud image. Currently the policy modules (pp files) are shipped with bzip compression but the actually policy file. But the /etc/selinux/targeted/pol

Re: Scala package owner unresponsive

Great news! Thanks for doing this. Do you have the log output of the failing tests? Also, the Source0 URL doesn't work (404) with the new layout of the scala-lang website, it should now be "http://www.scala-lang.org/files/archive/scala-sources-%{fullversion}.tgz"; On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 4:32 AM

Re: F20 KDE session login options

On 12 September 2013 08:34, Martin Briza wrote: > On Thu, 12 Sep 2013 02:17:48 +0200, Michael Catanzaro > wrote: > >> On Thu, 2013-09-12 at 00:13 +0100, Ian Malone wrote: >>> >>> >>> 1. This is the case for the KDE live CD install too. >>> 2. Where the custom session might be coming from (wonderi

Re: Protection from merge commits

Pete Zaitcev wrote: > Thought I was careful about them, but apparently not enough. So, does > anyone have a script that can be attached to git hooks, reliably detects > an attempt to push merge nodes, then bails the push? I presume that that would prevent valid merging between branches in the re

Re: fedmsg for voting?

On 09/12/2013 03:02 AM, Matthew Miller wrote: On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 02:10:05AM +0200, Björn Persson wrote: Since this discussion is now about national elections, which must be taken much more seriously than polls on release names: Can you propose a mechanism that allows the voter to verify his

[Bug 1007314] New: perl-IO-Socket-IP-0.23 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1007314 Bug ID: 1007314 Summary: perl-IO-Socket-IP-0.23 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-IO-Socket-IP Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: psab..

Re: fedmsg for voting?

On 09/11/2013 10:05 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote: Ralf Corsepius (rc040...@freenet.de) said: - a record of who voted for what has been kept since this feature was implemented: fedorahosted.org/elections/ticket/30 in 2009. All election software that rec

Re: Protection from merge commits

On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 04:13:43PM -0600, Pete Zaitcev wrote: > Dear All: > > I found that I pushed a merge node into Fedora git (fortunately it was > only on f19 branch, not in Rawhide): > > commit 51eec48c20ba57054f17ba29f23e6a0aa36df9a4 > Merge: ac36771 f9213a5 > Author: Pete Zaitcev > Date:

Re: Merging freediams into freemedforms

Hi Michael, I'm sorry for the *very* delayed reply. I hadn't noticed this mail come in. On Sun, 2013-08-18 at 20:41 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Sat, 17 Aug 2013 23:05:48 +1000, Ankur Sinha wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > I maintain two packages for the fedora-medical SIG that fall under

[Test-Announce] Fedora 20 Alpha Release Candidate 2 (RC2) Available Now!

NOTE: The 32- and 64-bit DVDs, the 64-bit Desktop Live, the 32-bit MATE and Security Spins, and the 64-bit LXDE and MATE Spins are over their respective size targets. As per the Fedora 20 schedule [1], Fedora 20 Alpha Release Candidate 2 (RC2) is now available for testing. Content information, inc

Re: Heads up! I'm going to upgrade Wireshark up to 1.10.x in Fedora 18

2013/9/12 Peter Hatina : > Hi Peter, > > On 09/12/2013 10:00 AM, Peter Lemenkov wrote: >> Hello All! >> >> There are *lots* of CVEs against Wireshark shipped with Fedora 18 >> (quite old 1.8.8 version). >> >> * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/965942 >> * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/972762 >> * https://

Re: Heads up! I'm going to upgrade Wireshark up to 1.10.x in Fedora 18

On 09/12/2013 10:17 AM, Peter Hatina wrote: > Hi Peter, > > On 09/12/2013 10:00 AM, Peter Lemenkov wrote: >> Hello All! >> >> There are *lots* of CVEs against Wireshark shipped with Fedora 18 >> (quite old 1.8.8 version). >> >> * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/965942 >> * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/

Re: Heads up! I'm going to upgrade Wireshark up to 1.10.x in Fedora 18

Hi Peter, On 09/12/2013 10:00 AM, Peter Lemenkov wrote: > Hello All! > > There are *lots* of CVEs against Wireshark shipped with Fedora 18 > (quite old 1.8.8 version). > > * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/965942 > * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/972762 > * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/990189 > > In o

Heads up! I'm going to upgrade Wireshark up to 1.10.x in Fedora 18

Hello All! There are *lots* of CVEs against Wireshark shipped with Fedora 18 (quite old 1.8.8 version). * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/965942 * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/972762 * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/990189 In order to fix them and not to add additional work for the maintainers I'm think

Re: Oracle considering DB6 license

On 09/12/2013 07:16 AM, Jan Staněk wrote: Hello, some time back Oracle released new version of Berkeley DB under AGPL, which is incompatible with Fedora licensing politics. However, https://forums.oracle.com/message/11184885#11184885 If you are interested in DB6, consider leaving feedback t

Re: Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2013-09-11)

On 09/12/2013 02:10 AM, Matthew Miller wrote: This was convered in the proposal, and that's why there was a bug already filed to change the agetty command line ingetty@.service. But now Jóhann has now closed them all as WONTFIX so I'm not sure what's going on. I sought after fixing a problem bu

Re: F20 KDE session login options

I had same issue after I installed it 15 days ago. I should test sddm before approved it... CC now. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: F20 KDE session login options

On Thu, 12 Sep 2013 02:17:48 +0200, Michael Catanzaro wrote: On Thu, 2013-09-12 at 00:13 +0100, Ian Malone wrote: 1. This is the case for the KDE live CD install too. 2. Where the custom session might be coming from (wondering if something specific to this spin or the KDE spins in gene It

Oracle considering DB6 license

Hello, some time back Oracle released new version of Berkeley DB under AGPL, which is incompatible with Fedora licensing politics. However, it turns out that Oracle might consider re-licensing it back: https://forums.oracle.com/message/11184885#11184885 If you are interested in DB6, consider

Re: Firewall blocking desktop features

On Thursday 12 September 2013 08:25:21 Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > Application should request the ports to be opened and the firewalld > > layer should then confirm with the user stating which ports and > > which app requested said ports. The app can't lie if the firewall > > layer is the one a