Re: Firewall blocking desktop features

> Application should request the ports to be opened and the firewalld > layer should then confirm with the user stating which ports and > which app requested said ports. The app can't lie if the firewall > layer is the one asking for confirmation. But a malicious app can pretend to be another one

Re: fedmsg for voting?

On Sep 11, 2013 6:02 PM, "Matthew Miller" wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 02:10:05AM +0200, Björn Persson wrote: > > Since this discussion is now about national elections, which must be > > taken much more seriously than polls on release names: Can you propose > > a mechanism that allows the vo

filelists vs primary repodata size - provides/requires creep?

I remember once upon a time folks being concerned about file requires forcing the download of the filelist metadata because was so big. This is still an issue, however I note that for current x86_64 rawhide: 27M Sep 11 06:11 *-filelists.sqlite.bz2 18M Sep 11 06:12 *-primary.sqlite.bz2 (intere

Re: Scala package owner unresponsive

If it's more convenient to import a SRPM (of course it is!), I've made one available at http://freevariable.com/scala - Original Message - > From: "Will Benton" > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" > > Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2013 9:32:39 PM > Subject: Re: Scala pac

Re: Scala package owner unresponsive

I have made a spec file for Scala 2.10.1 that successfully builds under mock on F19; it is available here: https://github.com/willb/scala-packaging I had to make a new patch to account for interface changes in JLine 2.7, disable optimization (due to a known bug in the Scala optimizer), and d

Re: Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2013-09-11)

On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 03:42:31AM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: > > Based on the bugs presented in the ticket, despite the loose use of FQDN, > > this appeared to be about putting \n in /etc/issue (after the initial idea > > of calling agetty --long-hostname was discarded). The agetty man page

Re: Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2013-09-11)

On Wed, 11.09.13 20:54, Matthew Miller (mat...@fedoraproject.org) wrote: > > How is that fqdn determined? Simply the result of gethostname()? Or is > > this the result of "hostname --fqdn"? (the former just reads a string > > from the kernel, which is fine; the latter involves DNS resolving that >

Re: fedmsg for voting?

On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 02:10:05AM +0200, Björn Persson wrote: > Since this discussion is now about national elections, which must be > taken much more seriously than polls on release names: Can you propose > a mechanism that allows the voter to verify his vote at a later time, > but does not allow

Re: Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2013-09-11)

On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 02:18:23AM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: > Are you suggesting it should pass that switch? If so, I'd prefer if this > would become the agetty upstream default. Have you tried asking Karel > for that? Why did you involve FESCO? This went to FESCo because the bashrc mainta

Re: Protection from merge commits

On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 06:35:54PM -0400, Sam Varshavchik wrote: > Pete Zaitcev writes: > > >Dear All: > > > >I found that I pushed a merge node into Fedora git (fortunately it was > >only on f19 branch, not in Rawhide): > > > >commit 51eec48c20ba57054f17ba29f23e6a0aa36df9a4 > >Merge: ac36771 f921

Re: Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2013-09-11)

On Wed, 11.09.13 23:30, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson (johan...@gmail.com) wrote: > >>* #1161 fqdn should be clearly display at login and command prompt > >> (mmaslano, 18:11:07) > >> * AGREED: fqdn should be clearly display on login prompt, but not on > >> commandline prompt (+7,-0,0) (mmaslano,

Re: F20 KDE session login options

On Thu, 2013-09-12 at 00:13 +0100, Ian Malone wrote: > > 1. This is the case for the KDE live CD install too. > 2. Where the custom session might be coming from (wondering if > something specific to this spin or the KDE spins in gene Looks like https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1004902

Re: fedmsg for voting?

Bill Nottingham wrote: >Ralf Corsepius (rc040...@freenet.de) said: >> >- a record of who voted for what has been kept since this feature >> >was implemented: fedorahosted.org/elections/ticket/30 >> > in 2009. All election >> >software that recorded thi

Re: Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2013-09-11)

On 09/11/2013 10:59 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote: On Wed, 11.09.13 21:17, Marcela Mašláňová (mmasl...@redhat.com) wrote: * #1161 fqdn should be clearly display at login and command prompt (mmaslano, 18:11:07) * AGREED: fqdn should be clearly display on login prompt, but not on comman

F20 KDE session login options

Hi, Looking at the installed login session options from SDDM on F20 Alpha TC5 for Fedora Jam x86_64 there is a session listed 'custom' alongside failsafe, KDE and KDE failsafe. This option doesn't log in to anything and kicks the user back to the login screen, it also seems to be the default sessi

Re: Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2013-09-11)

On Wed, 11.09.13 21:17, Marcela Mašláňová (mmasl...@redhat.com) wrote: > * #1161 fqdn should be clearly display at login and command prompt > (mmaslano, 18:11:07) > * AGREED: fqdn should be clearly display on login prompt, but not on > commandline prompt (+7,-0,0) (mmaslano, 18:17:19) Wh

Re: Protection from merge commits

Pete Zaitcev writes: Dear All: I found that I pushed a merge node into Fedora git (fortunately it was only on f19 branch, not in Rawhide): commit 51eec48c20ba57054f17ba29f23e6a0aa36df9a4 Merge: ac36771 f9213a5 Author: Pete Zaitcev Date: Wed Aug 7 12:14:15 2013 -0600 Merge branch 'f19'

Re: Firewall blocking desktop features

Am 10.09.2013 23:38, schrieb Heiko Adams: > Am 10.09.2013 23:11, schrieb Reindl Harald: > >>> AFAIR the samba client port is also blocked by default which makes it >>> impossible to share files with windows machines >> >> what is a samba *client* port? > It's port 137 and 138 UDP mhh - and why

Re: Firewall blocking desktop features

Am 11.09.2013 04:17, schrieb Ankur Sinha: > On Wed, 2013-09-11 at 00:01 +0200, Alec Leamas wrote: >> Nobody questions this. Thie issue in this thread is if we could find >> ways to make it simpler to enable these services. > > Last I checked, the bugs already spoke about giving utilities the >

Re: Firewall blocking desktop features

Am 11.09.2013 12:02, schrieb Nicolas Mailhot: > Le Mer 11 septembre 2013 11:23, Alec Leamas a écrit : >> On 2013-09-11 11:11, Heiko Adams wrote: >>> Am 11.09.2013 10:41, schrieb Ankur Sinha: - These software inform and take permission from the user before opening ports in the firewal

Re: Firewall blocking desktop features

Am 11.09.2013 00:01, schrieb Alec Leamas: > On 2013-09-10 23:11, Reindl Harald wrote: >> >> Am 10.09.2013 22:58, schrieb Heiko Adams: >>> Am 10.09.2013 22:07, schrieb Peter Oliver: Empathy's "People Nearby" feature doesn't work out of the box because the required ports are blocked by de

unacceptable maintainer attitudes -> Re: *please* unpush firefox-23.0.1-4.fc18 from updates-testing

Am 08.09.2013 19:20, schrieb Michael Schwendt: > On Sun, 8 Sep 2013 17:32:55 +0200, Tomasz Torcz wrote: > >> On Sun, Sep 08, 2013 at 12:11:05PM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote: >>> no idea why the FF maintainer does not try to install his own >>> package for days or at least replace it with a clean b

Protection from merge commits

Dear All: I found that I pushed a merge node into Fedora git (fortunately it was only on f19 branch, not in Rawhide): commit 51eec48c20ba57054f17ba29f23e6a0aa36df9a4 Merge: ac36771 f9213a5 Author: Pete Zaitcev Date: Wed Aug 7 12:14:15 2013 -0600 Merge branch 'f19' of ssh://pkgs.fedoraproj

Re: SSSD 1.11 and AD homeDirectory

On Wed, 2013-09-11 at 15:26 -0500, Jeffrey Ollie wrote: > On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 3:07 PM, Simo Sorce wrote: > > > > Almost certainly you do not want a home directory backed by a cifs > > filesystem, however if you really do I suggest you configure autofs and > > cifs with multi-user mounts on you

Re: Firewall blocking desktop features

On Wed, 2013-09-11 at 23:18 +0200, Mateusz Marzantowicz wrote: > On 11.09.2013 17:24, Daniel J Walsh wrote: > > On 09/11/2013 09:18 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: > > > > > >> Am 11.09.2013 15:05, schrieb Daniel J Walsh: > >>> On 09/11/2013 08:56 AM, Alec Leamas wrote: > Although this would work f

Re: Packages requiring Xorg "BackingStore" "true"

Well, yes, but it ought to work regardless of the xorg.conf setting, because that setting has been effectively hardwired to true for about six years now. I rewrote the backing store implementation to use Composite internally, which is always available, so we just blindly ignore the config setti

Re: Firewall blocking desktop features

On 11.09.2013 17:24, Daniel J Walsh wrote: > On 09/11/2013 09:18 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: > > >> Am 11.09.2013 15:05, schrieb Daniel J Walsh: >>> On 09/11/2013 08:56 AM, Alec Leamas wrote: Although this would work for both our wifes I'd hate it myself. There need to be some way in the

Re: does mc really require perl*?

On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 08:25:59AM +0200, Dan Horák wrote: > On Mon, 09 Sep 2013 20:27:09 -0400 > Felix Miata wrote: > > > I did a TC5 minimal install last night, which omitted mc, my most > > used cmdline tool. So: > > > > # yum install mc > > ... installing for dependencies: > > gpm-libs (whic

Fedora ARM weekly Status Meeting Minutes 2013-09-11

Thanks to those that were able to join us for the status meeting today, for those unable the minutes are posted below: Minutes: http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2013-09-11/fedora-meeting-1.2013-09-11-20.00.html Minutes (text): http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1

Fedora Working Groups: Call for Self-Nominations

Introduction Based on discussions at and around Flock, the Fedora Project Board has approved a proposal for a big change in the way we put Fedora together. Rather than presenting one Fedora with multiple slightly-different install options, future Fedora will be designed, developed, a

Re: does mc really require perl*?

Miroslav Suchý (msu...@redhat.com) said: > On 09/11/2013 01:24 PM, Matěj Cepl wrote: > >Debian apt* programs have either option to always follow/not-follow > >these soft-dependencies, or they will just select for installation all > >packages on which the selected package(s) Depends and then nicely

Re: fedmsg for voting?

Ralf Corsepius (rc040...@freenet.de) said: > >- a record of who voted for what has been kept since this feature was > >implemented: fedorahosted.org/elections/ticket/30 > > in 2009. All election > >software that recorded this information has kept the i

Re: SSSD 1.11 and AD homeDirectory

On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 3:07 PM, Simo Sorce wrote: > > Almost certainly you do not want a home directory backed by a cifs > filesystem, however if you really do I suggest you configure autofs and > cifs with multi-user mounts on your machine. It's not a question of "want", I'm trying to integrate

Re: SSSD 1.11 and AD homeDirectory

On Wed, 2013-09-11 at 14:19 -0500, Jeffrey Ollie wrote: > I'm messing around a bit with the new AD support in SSSD 1.11. I've > gotten authentication working against our AD at work, but I'd like to > be able to mount the user's "home folder" (in our environment, it gets > mapped to the P: drive if

Re: Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2013-09-11)

HI On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 3:17 PM, Marcela Mašláňová wrote: Can you just paste the content as the body instead of attachments in the future? Attachments are harder to deal with for mobile devices. Thanks! Rahul -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject

Re: fedmsg for voting?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 El Tue, 10 Sep 2013 18:32:00 -0400 Matthew Miller escribió: > On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 05:13:03PM -0500, inode0 wrote: > > How shallow are Fedora contributors if a badge is what it takes to > > tip them over from being non-voters to being voters? If do

Re: Schedule for Wednesday's FESCo Meeting (2013-09-11)

On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 8:07 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: > On 09/11/2013 05:37 PM, drago01 wrote: >> >> Lets not discuss the word "support" again we have had enough threads of >> that. >> And yes we have other desktop environments in the project but we do >> not promote them equally >> beca

Re: Proposal: AppData files in all application packages?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 El Wed, 11 Sep 2013 14:35:34 -0400 Matthias Clasen escribió: > On Wed, 2013-09-11 at 12:46 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > > > > Any questions, either grab me on irc 'hughsie' or reply to this > > > email. Be sure to read [1] as a lot of common questi

[perl-Module-Metadata/f20] (2 commits) ...Update to 1.000018

Summary of changes: c12d050... Update to 1.17 (*) 7e4bd58... Update to 1.18 (*) (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.

Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2013-09-11)

=== #fedora-meeting: FESCO (2013-09-11) === Meeting started by mmaslano at 18:00:15 UTC. The full logs are available at http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2013-09-11/fesco.2013-09-11-18.00.log.html . Meeting summary

[perl-Module-Metadata] Created tag perl-Module-Metadata-1.000018-1.fc21

The lightweight tag 'perl-Module-Metadata-1.18-1.fc21' was created pointing to: 7e4bd58... Update to 1.18 -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listin

[perl-Module-Metadata] Created tag perl-Module-Metadata-1.000018-1.fc20

The lightweight tag 'perl-Module-Metadata-1.18-1.fc20' was created pointing to: 7e4bd58... Update to 1.18 -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listin

[perl-Module-Metadata] Update to 1.000018

commit 7e4bd583256d802641bad5e1481c478a0eaf31e6 Author: Paul Howarth Date: Wed Sep 11 19:41:13 2013 +0100 Update to 1.18 - New upstream release 1.18 - Re-release of de-tainting fix without unstated non-core test dependencies - Drop BR: perl(Test::Fatal) perl-Mo

Re: Schedule for Wednesday's FESCo Meeting (2013-09-11)

On 09/11/2013 05:57 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: You want to limit the project to three "official default products" I don't want to limit the project in that way. I think these three products are reasonable starting points. I do not and from my perspective we should only be focusing on what I

SSSD 1.11 and AD homeDirectory

I'm messing around a bit with the new AD support in SSSD 1.11. I've gotten authentication working against our AD at work, but I'd like to be able to mount the user's "home folder" (in our environment, it gets mapped to the P: drive if you're logging into a Windows system that is part of the domain

Fedora 20-Alpha RC1 AMIS

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 hi all, RC1 images have been uploaded to EC2 and are available at ami-136a237a : us-east-1 image for i386 ami-116b2278 : us-east-1 image for x86_64 additionally if your looking to the AMI's they have been added to files in the release tree http://dl

Re: Schedule for Wednesday's FESCo Meeting (2013-09-11)

On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 05:22:54PM +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: > What I see us going forward with is the core/baseOS "FedoraOS" that > the community delivers at large while the sub community they > themselves set the direction, their target audience and deliver > "their" product on top of

Re: Proposal: AppData files in all application packages?

On Wed, 2013-09-11 at 12:46 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > > Any questions, either grab me on irc 'hughsie' or reply to this email. > > Be sure to read [1] as a lot of common questions are answered there. > > I have one question, if the data is shipped in the packages how is it > supposed to get

Re: does mc really require perl*?

On 2013-09-11, 15:56 GMT, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > mc is also missing a dependency on dpkg! Not really. If some esteemed Perl hacker here would be willing to spent some time on /usr/libexec/mc/extfs.d/dpkg+ I think it could be possible to get it into shape. Deb archives are nothing than else

File Module-Metadata-1.000018.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by pghmcfc

A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Module-Metadata: 36174dd21bf9168e513c7351ef2b9f2b Module-Metadata-1.18.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproje

[OffTopic] Backup of messages from Google Groups group?

Hi, I know that I am off topic here, but I guess somebody here may tried to deal with this issue. I would like to create a group on gmane.org for jbr...@googlegroups.com list and if possible import all its messages there (because, among reasons, it is obvious that gmane.org is much more user f

Re: Schedule for Wednesday's FESCo Meeting (2013-09-11)

On 09/11/2013 05:37 PM, drago01 wrote: Lets not discuss the word "support" again we have had enough threads of that. And yes we have other desktop environments in the project but we do not promote them equally because we don't have the resources to "support" them on equal terms. You mean Red Ha

Re: Fedora 20-Alpha RC1 AMIS

On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 01:00:10PM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > RC1 images have been uploaded to EC2 and are available at > ami-136a237a : us-east-1 image for i386 > ami-116b2278 : us-east-1 image for x86_64 Awesome. Thanks again. > additionally if your looking to the AMI's they have been adde

EPEL Fedora 6 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing: Age URL 507 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-5620/bugzilla-3.4.14-2.el6 26 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2013-11198/filezilla-3.7.3-1.el6 21 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/

Re: [389-devel] 389-devel Digest, Vol 99, Issue 6

389-devel-requ...@lists.fedoraproject.org wrote: Send 389-devel mailing list submissions to 389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel or, via email, send a message with su

Re: Proposal: AppData files in all application packages?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, 6 Sep 2013 10:33:42 +0100 Richard Hughes wrote: > Hi all. I'm the developer for PackageKit and gnome-software, the > latter being the new software center we're hopefully including as a > technical preview in Fedora 20. > > Any questions, e

Re: Problem getting package to compile on EL6

On Tue, 10 Sep 2013 16:48:37 -0600 Orion Poplawski wrote: > > That's interesting - I don't see a segfault. It would seem that the > > first find error comes from the strip phase (line 196 of > > find-debuginfo.sh), and the second from the symlink phase (line > > 262). > > > > You need to set RPM_

Re: Packages requiring Xorg "BackingStore" "true"

On Wed, 2013-09-11 at 12:32 +0200, Alexander Larsson wrote: > On ons, 2013-09-11 at 12:16 +0200, Sandro Mani wrote: > > Hello, > > > > Some time ago I've packaged Xfoil, Avl and Xrotor (which are popular > > codes for foil/fluid-dynamics related computations), but I never ended > > up posting a

[Bug 982131] Regular expression in regular expression code block corrupts back-reference

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982131 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #3 from Fedor

Re: Schedule for Wednesday's FESCo Meeting (2013-09-11)

On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 6:27 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: > On 09/11/2013 02:41 PM, drago01 wrote: >> >> This would be a complete chaos from a users POV. We cannot equally >> support 10 different workstation or server products. Claiming >> otherwise is dishonest against our users. > > > ? >

[perl-Perl-OSType/f20] Update to 1.005

Summary of changes: 48e91b9... Update to 1.005 (*) (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mai

Re: Firewall blocking desktop features

Am 11.09.2013 15:05, schrieb Daniel J Walsh: > On 09/11/2013 08:56 AM, Alec Leamas wrote: >> Although this would work for both our wifes I'd hate it myself. There need >> to be some way in the interface to understand what's *really* going on >> here, the ports opened, triggers etc. But not unles

[Bug 970567] perl-5.18: t/op/coreamp.t sometimes fails

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=970567 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #3 from Fedor

[Bug 988805] IPC::Open3 keeps zombies after failed execve()

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=988805 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #3 from Fedor

[Bug 989486] perl-5.18: Dereferencing undefined glob value as a code reference causes segfault

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=989486 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #3 from Fedor

[Bug 978233] perl-5.18: Regex \8 and \9 after literals no longer work

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=978233 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #5 from Fedor

Re: Schedule for Wednesday's FESCo Meeting (2013-09-11)

On 09/11/2013 04:18 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: At this point, what I'd_really_ like is your help in making this work going forward. From what you've said, I don't think we're really all that far out of alignment, and maybe we can bring that together. There is alot of alignment in how I see us g

[Test-Announce] Fedora 20 Alpha Release Candidate 1 (RC1) Available Now!

NOTE: The 32- and 64-bit DVDs, the 64-bit Desktop Live, the 32-bit MATE and Security Spins, and the 64-bit LXDE and MATE Spins are over their respective size targets. As per the Fedora 20 schedule [1], Fedora 20 Alpha Release Candidate 1 (RC1) is now available for testing. Content information, inc

Fedora ARM Weekly Status Meeting 2013-09-11

Good day all, Please join us today (Wednesday, September 11th) at 4PM EDT (8PM UTC) for the Fedora ARM weekly status meeting in #fedora-meeting-1 on Freenode. On the agenda so far.. 1) Kernel Status Update 2) Aarch64 - Status Update - Koji 3) Fedora 20 Alpha RC1 4) Weekly Status Me

Re: Firewall blocking desktop features

On 09/10/2013 10:07 PM, Peter Oliver wrote: Empathy's "People Nearby" feature doesn't work out of the box because the required ports are blocked by default by the firewall (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844308). It's a similar story with Gnome's "Media Sharing" feature, and I'm sur

[perl-Perl-OSType] Update to 1.005

commit 48e91b9c20012474f17f227be17c08042499e682 Author: Paul Howarth Date: Wed Sep 11 16:54:20 2013 +0100 Update to 1.005 - New upstream release 1.005 - Ensured no non-core test dependencies - Various non-functional changes to files and metadata included with th

Re: Schedule for Wednesday's FESCo Meeting (2013-09-11)

On 09/11/2013 02:41 PM, drago01 wrote: This would be a complete chaos from a users POV. We cannot equally support 10 different workstation or server products. Claiming otherwise is dishonest against our users. ? For the first we dont support anything we only provide best effort secondly we al

[perl-Module-Metadata] Created tag perl-Module-Metadata-1.000017-1.fc21

The lightweight tag 'perl-Module-Metadata-1.17-1.fc21' was created pointing to: c12d050... Update to 1.17 -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listin

Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2013-09-12 16:00 UTC)

Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC meeting Thursday at 2013-09-12 16:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on irc.freenode.net. Local time information (via. rktime): 2013-09-12 09:00 Thu US/Pacific PDT 2013-09-12 12:00 Thu US/Eastern EDT 2013-09-12 1

Re: fedmsg for voting?

On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 10:06 AM, Eric H. Christensen wrote: > On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 03:50:58PM -0500, inode0 wrote: >> No. In what election where the votes cast are secret is the fact of >> voting public? I can't recall ever participating in such an election >> but maybe my head is full of mud

Re: Schedule for Wednesday's FESCo Meeting (2013-09-11)

On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 01:13:04PM +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: > I would like to ask FESCO and other to hold of any work on the > "ring" proposal so I can build and present to the community and we > can have the community vote on both those proposal as an way forward > for the project for

Re: Firewall blocking desktop features

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 09/11/2013 09:18 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: > > > Am 11.09.2013 15:05, schrieb Daniel J Walsh: >> On 09/11/2013 08:56 AM, Alec Leamas wrote: >>> Although this would work for both our wifes I'd hate it myself. There >>> need to be some way in the in

Re: are you annoyed by frequent password prompts?

On Sep 11, 2013 7:10 AM, "drago01" wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 2:53 PM, Daniel J Walsh wrote: > > Random crap from the internet not a good idea. > > Since firefox can out and crab stuff to install, and I would never no. > > No one is that insane ;) This is all about signed packages. Note

Re: fedmsg for voting?

On 09/11/2013 05:00 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: On Sep 10, 2013 8:20 PM, "Ralf Corsepius" mailto:rc040...@freenet.de>> wrote: > > On 09/11/2013 12:00 AM, Matthew Miller wrote: >> I think the benefit of encouraging more participation through voting is a >> reasonable tradeoff for this particu

[perl-Test-Warnings/f20] Update to 0.009

Summary of changes: 49cd1ff... Update to 0.009 (*) (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mai

Re: fedmsg for voting?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 03:50:58PM -0500, inode0 wrote: > On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 3:38 PM, Matthew Miller > wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 03:24:28PM -0500, inode0 wrote: > >> > What is under question is that it publishes a message for each set

Re: does mc really require perl*?

On 09/11/2013 04:39 PM, Michael Cronenworth wrote: Is there a bug opened for this enhancement? I know it has been talked about for years, but nothing has come out of mailing list discussions. A quick BZ search turned up nothing. You are correct! To my surprise. But this can be easily fixed: h

File Module-Metadata-1.000017.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by pghmcfc

A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Module-Metadata: 191b97e1640f8de856fc4e88efb4ea2e Module-Metadata-1.17.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproje

Re: fedmsg for voting?

On Sep 10, 2013 8:20 PM, "Ralf Corsepius" wrote: > > On 09/11/2013 12:00 AM, Matthew Miller wrote: >> I think the benefit of encouraging more participation through voting is a >> reasonable tradeoff for this particular bit of information (voted in a >> particular election, possibly chosing no can

Re: does mc really require perl*?

Once upon a time, Miroslav Suchý said: > On 09/11/2013 04:39 PM, Michael Cronenworth wrote: > >Is there a bug opened for this enhancement? > > > >I know it has been talked about for years, but nothing has come out of > >mailing list discussions. A quick BZ search > >turned up nothing. > > You ar

Re: does mc really require perl*?

On 09/11/2013 01:24 PM, Matěj Cepl wrote: Debian apt* programs have either option to always follow/not-follow these soft-dependencies, or they will just select for installation all packages on which the selected package(s) Depends and then nicely ask user whether she wants to install also suggest

Re: Schedule for Wednesday's FESCo Meeting (2013-09-11)

On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 3:13 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: > On 09/11/2013 08:23 AM, Marcela Mašláňová wrote: >> >> >> #topic #1170 Working Group call for Volunteers >> .fesco 1170 >> https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1170 > > > Given that Matthew wanted me to come up with a concrete, pos

Re: does mc really require perl*?

Miroslav Suchý wrote: On 09/11/2013 02:18 PM, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote: IIRC Mandriva had patches which added Suggests/Recommends to RPM over 5 years ago. Suse as well. Is there a bug opened for this enhancement? I know it has been talked about for years, but nothing has come out of mailing

Re: does mc really require perl*?

On 09/11/2013 02:18 PM, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote: IIRC Mandriva had patches which added Suggests/Recommends to RPM over 5 years ago. Suse as well. -- Miroslav Suchy, RHCE, RHCDS Red Hat, Software Engineer, #brno, #devexp, #fedora-buildsys -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org ht

Re: Firewall blocking desktop features

On 09/11/2013 10:59 AM, Ankur Sinha wrote: - The software*must* inform the user and take permission before opening ports. Hmm, can you use this feature?: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2013-July/186797.html I.e. you will write script, which will ask admin and open the port. A

Re: Firewall blocking desktop features

On 09/11/2013 06:30 AM, Alec Leamas wrote: On 2013-09-11 12:02, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: Le Mer 11 septembre 2013 11:23, Alec Leamas a écrit : On 2013-09-11 11:11, Heiko Adams wrote: Am 11.09.2013 10:41, schrieb Ankur Sinha: - These software inform and take permission from the user before openi

Re: Firewall blocking desktop features

On 2013-09-11 15:41, Ralf Corsepius wrote: On 09/11/2013 03:32 PM, Alec Leamas wrote: On 2013-09-11 15:20, Ralf Corsepius wrote: On 09/11/2013 02:46 PM, Daniel J Walsh wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Asking her "Do you want to make security changes to share directory /home/phyllis

Re: are you annoyed by frequent password prompts?

On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 2:53 PM, Daniel J Walsh wrote: > Random crap from the internet not a good idea. > Since firefox can out and crab stuff to install, and I would never no. No one is that insane ;) This is all about signed packages. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https:

Re: Firewall blocking desktop features

On 09/11/2013 03:32 PM, Alec Leamas wrote: On 2013-09-11 15:20, Ralf Corsepius wrote: On 09/11/2013 02:46 PM, Daniel J Walsh wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Asking her "Do you want to make security changes to share directory /home/phyllis/Share?" Or Do you want to make security c

Re: Firewall blocking desktop features

On 2013-09-11 15:20, Ralf Corsepius wrote: On 09/11/2013 02:46 PM, Daniel J Walsh wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 09/11/2013 06:35 AM, Heiko Adams wrote: Am 11.09.2013 12:30, schrieb Alec Leamas: That said, I see your point. Seems to boil down to that only the applic

Re: Firewall blocking desktop features

On 09/11/2013 02:46 PM, Daniel J Walsh wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 09/11/2013 06:35 AM, Heiko Adams wrote: Am 11.09.2013 12:30, schrieb Alec Leamas: That said, I see your point. Seems to boil down to that only the application knows which port(s) to open and why,

Re: Schedule for Wednesday's FESCo Meeting (2013-09-11)

On 09/11/2013 08:23 AM, Marcela Mašláňová wrote: #topic #1170 Working Group call for Volunteers .fesco 1170 https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1170 Given that Matthew wanted me to come up with a concrete, positive proposals [¹] surrounding Fedora as a platform, as essentially an tool for

[perl-App-cpanminus] 1.7001 bump

commit d2a2c75da6740174f8819a0cf1bea2be9e5115f2 Author: Petr Písař Date: Wed Sep 11 14:58:54 2013 +0200 1.7001 bump .gitignore |1 + perl-App-cpanminus.spec | 45 ++--- sources |2 +- 3 files changed, 20 insert

Re: Firewall blocking desktop features

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 09/11/2013 08:56 AM, Alec Leamas wrote: > On 2013-09-11 14:46, Daniel J Walsh wrote: >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 >> >> On 09/11/2013 06:35 AM, Heiko Adams wrote: >>> Am 11.09.2013 12:30, schrieb Alec Leamas: That said, I s

Re: Firewall blocking desktop features

On 2013-09-11 14:46, Daniel J Walsh wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 09/11/2013 06:35 AM, Heiko Adams wrote: Am 11.09.2013 12:30, schrieb Alec Leamas: That said, I see your point. Seems to boil down to that only the application knows which port(s) to open and why, wher

  1   2   >