# F20 Alpha Blocker Review meeting #4
# Date: 2013-09-09
# Time: 16:00 UTC (12:00 EDT, 09:00 PDT)
# Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net
We're in F20 alpha freeze and you know what that means - monday blocker
review meetings!
We'll be running through the final blockers and freeze
# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting
# Date: 2013-09-09
# Time: 15:00 UTC
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto)
# Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net
Greetings testers!
It's meeting time again on Monday! We're in the middle of freeze with
go/no-go so the discussion will
On Sun, Sep 8, 2013 at 11:56 AM, Andre Robatino
wrote:
> NOTE: The 32- and 64-bit DVDs, the 64-bit Desktop Live, the 32-bit MATE
> and Security Spins, and the 64-bit LXDE and MATE Spins are over their
> respective size targets.
>
> As per the Fedora 20 schedule [1], Fedora 20 Alpha Test Compose 5
On Sun, 2013-09-08 at 09:41 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> There's no need to mail devel, we have a process for this:
>
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group#Become_a_co-maintainer
Thanks Kevin,
Ticket filed:
https://fedorahosted.org/packager-sponsors/ticket
NOTE: The 32- and 64-bit DVDs, the 64-bit Desktop Live, the 32-bit MATE
and Security Spins, and the 64-bit LXDE and MATE Spins are over their
respective size targets.
As per the Fedora 20 schedule [1], Fedora 20 Alpha Test Compose 5 (TC5)
is now available for testing. Content information, includin
The following Fedora EPEL 5 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
504
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-5630/bugzilla-3.2.10-5.el5
19
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2013-11276/ssmtp-2.61-21.el5
13
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDO
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
504
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-5620/bugzilla-3.4.14-2.el6
23
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2013-11198/filezilla-3.7.3-1.el6
19
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/
On Sun, 8 Sep 2013 17:32:55 +0200, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 08, 2013 at 12:11:05PM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
> > no idea why the FF maintainer does not try to install his own
> > package for days or at least replace it with a clean build
> >
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi
Am 08.09.2013 17:32, schrieb Tomasz Torcz:
> On Sun, Sep 08, 2013 at 12:11:05PM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
>> no idea why the FF maintainer does not try to install his own
>> package for days or at least replace it with a clean build
>>
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1004062
>> ht
There's no need to mail devel, we have a process for this:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group#Become_a_co-maintainer
kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailm
On Fri, 6 Sep 2013 09:51:00 -0500
PJ Welsh wrote:
> We seem to be running into an issue with the existing
> xfce4-panel-4.8.3-2.el6. We seem to have the panel kernel panic crash
> seeming related to xfce4-panel (homedir NFS + panel operation +
> andmaybe Xen = random crash) on a fully updated Cen
On Sun, Sep 08, 2013 at 12:11:05PM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
> no idea why the FF maintainer does not try to install his own
> package for days or at least replace it with a clean build
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1004062
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005094
no idea why the FF maintainer does not try to install his own
package for days or at least replace it with a clean build
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1004062
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005094
that RPM has a bug at it's own and must not segfault is
a different stor
Hi,
I've released ownership for oyranos which currently FTBFS in f20.
I will not have time to fix in the f20 time frame, so it might be blocked
or even retired if none volunteer to maintain it.
There will be a need to update elektra first, then if one in interested in
this package, libXcm and xcm
On Sat, 7 Sep 2013 18:03:48 -0700, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote:
> I adopted libeio back when Node.js still bundled it to aid in the unbundling
> effort, but upstream "fixed" the bundling problem here by no longer using
> libeio for anything.
That explains a bit more!
libeio is bundled within perl-I
15 matches
Mail list logo
