Re: GNOME 3.9.91 megaupdate

2013-09-07 Thread Dan Mashal
On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 10:04 AM, Kalev Lember wrote: > On 09/02/2013 05:44 PM, Kalev Lember wrote: >> The GNOME 3.9.91 release is coming as well, with a bit unfortunate >> timing wrt. Fedora freezes. In any case, we'll handle the GNOME 3.9.91 >> builds together and file them as a single megaupdate

Re: Rawhide tree now includes install images

2013-09-07 Thread Dan Mashal
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 9:41 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > Greetings. > > After consulting with various teams, release engineering has re-enabled > rawhide composes to create install images again. These images were > dropped as part of the 'no frozen rawhide' proposal several years ago. > > This allows

Re: Retiring libeio

2013-09-07 Thread Christopher Meng
+1 -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Retiring libeio

2013-09-07 Thread T.C. Hollingsworth
I adopted libeio back when Node.js still bundled it to aid in the unbundling effort, but upstream "fixed" the bundling problem here by no longer using libeio for anything. It's now conflicting with a different eio, used by Enlightenment. Since most other distros ship the Enlightenment version as

Re: Demand of co-maintain freemedforms and freediams

2013-09-07 Thread Ankur Sinha
On Sat, 2013-09-07 at 10:24 +0200, Alexandre Moine wrote: > Hi all, Hi, > > I want to become a co-maintener of freemedforms and freediams with > Ankur > Sinha, under the SIG medical. I'm not a sponsored fedora packager, so > I > need a sponsor. I know a little bit how make and build package,but

Re: Dell XPS 13 ("Sputnik") no longer working with fedora kernels >= 3.10

2013-09-07 Thread Chuck Anderson
On Fri, Sep 06, 2013 at 12:45:03PM +0200, Łukasz Jagiełło wrote: > 2013/9/5 Dennis Jacobfeuerborn > > > Working fine here. > >> > >> #v+ > >> [root@p0x ~]# uname -a > >> Linux p0x 3.10.10-200.fc19.x86_64 #1 SMP Thu Aug 29 19:05:45 UTC 2013 > >> x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux > >> [root@p0x ~]# dm

Re: Default boot/root filesystem

2013-09-07 Thread Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
On 09/07/2013 10:35 PM, Eric Sandeen wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 9/6/13 5:48 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote: According to this: http://www.serverwatch.com/server-news/where-is-red-hat-enterprise-linux-7.html RHEL7 will use XFS for the default boot/root. I could certa

Re: Default boot/root filesystem

2013-09-07 Thread Eric Sandeen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 9/6/13 5:48 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote: > According to this: > > http://www.serverwatch.com/server-news/where-is-red-hat-enterprise-linux-7.html > > RHEL7 will use XFS for the default boot/root. > > I could certainly have been out of town, for a w

Re: Default boot/root filesystem

2013-09-07 Thread Eric Sandeen
On 9/7/13 3:47 AM, Chris Murphy wrote: > > On Sep 7, 2013, at 12:48 AM, Sam Varshavchik wrote: > >> According to this: >> >> http://www.serverwatch.com/server-news/where-is-red-hat-enterprise-linux-7.html >> >> RHEL7 will use XFS for the default boot/root. > > The article doesn't make it clear

Re: rpmbuild --buildarch equivalent?

2013-09-07 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Fri, 26 Jul 2013 12:49:01 +0200, Juerg Haefliger wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> A long time ago rpmbuild used to have an option --buildarch to > >> override the arch detection. What is its equivalent nowadays? Sorry, > >> couldn't figure it out so far. > >> > > > > --target=x86_64 > > Hmm... That b

nodejs-read-installed license change BSD to ISC

2013-09-07 Thread Jamie Nguyen
Next update across all Fedora branches plus EL6 changes the license from BSD (nodejs-read-installed-0.2.3) to ISC (nodejs-read-installed-0.2.4). Kind regards, -- Jamie Nguyen -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code

nodejs-read-package-json license change BSD to ISC

2013-09-07 Thread Jamie Nguyen
Next update across all Fedora branches plus EL6 changes the license from BSD (nodejs-read-package-json-1.1.1) to ISC (nodejs-read-package-json-1.1.3). Kind regards, -- Jamie Nguyen -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedor

Re: Rawhide tree now includes install images

2013-09-07 Thread poma
On 06.09.2013 18:34, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Fri, 06 Sep 2013 11:24:38 +0200 > poma wrote: > >> You've probably missed something in the title, so the correct one >> should be: "Rawhide tree now includes broken install images" >> Now, if someone is doing it just to fill the tree, for the sake of >

Re: COPR

2013-09-07 Thread Haïkel Guémar
Le 06/09/2013 21:38, Richard W.M. Jones a écrit : > On Fri, Sep 06, 2013 at 09:10:24PM +0200, 80 wrote: >> No, it's less secure than kvm but it still provides better isolation >> than a mere chroot. > It doesn't matter if it's more secure than a chroot, because that's > not what we're talking about

Re: Proposal: AppData files in all application packages?

2013-09-07 Thread Daniel J Walsh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 09/07/2013 06:14 AM, Richard Hughes wrote: > On 7 September 2013 11:03, Daniel J Walsh wrote: >> Why not open bugzillas with the packages with .Desktop files to do this? > > Valid question, although that would be opening ~800 bugs and I'm not sure

Re: Proposal: AppData files in all application packages?

2013-09-07 Thread Richard Hughes
On 7 September 2013 11:03, Daniel J Walsh wrote: > Why not open bugzillas with the packages with .Desktop files to do this? Valid question, although that would be opening ~800 bugs and I'm not sure that's a terribly useful thing to do. If you think it would be useful, I can look at either doing t

Re: Proposal: AppData files in all application packages?

2013-09-07 Thread Daniel J Walsh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 09/07/2013 05:30 AM, Richard Hughes wrote: > Hi all, > > A progress update: lots of upstreams have already merged AppData files (50 > and counting!) but we're still a long way from having all the default > packages on the GNOME spin with AppData fi

Re: Default boot/root filesystem

2013-09-07 Thread Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
On 09/07/2013 03:19 AM, Ken Dreyer wrote: Sure, RHEL is distinct from Fedora, and they make different decisions, etc. The original point still stands: it's puzzling that XFS may end up as the default in RHEL 7 when it has never been the default for even a single Fedora release. Entirely irrelev

Re: Proposal: AppData files in all application packages?

2013-09-07 Thread Richard Hughes
Hi all, A progress update: lots of upstreams have already merged AppData files (50 and counting!) but we're still a long way from having all the default packages on the GNOME spin with AppData files. For some of the more important packages I've setup a google document here: https://docs.google.com

Re: GNOME 3.9.91 megaupdate

2013-09-07 Thread Richard Hughes
On 6 September 2013 03:27, Kevin Kofler wrote: > +1, I don't see why Fedora should (keep) follow(ing) the GNOME schedule as > opposed to anybody else's, or simply whenever the 6 months from the previous > release happen to be over. The default Fedora desktop is GNOME. Most of the Red Hat desktop

Re: Default boot/root filesystem

2013-09-07 Thread Chris Murphy
On Sep 7, 2013, at 12:48 AM, Sam Varshavchik wrote: > According to this: > > http://www.serverwatch.com/server-news/where-is-red-hat-enterprise-linux-7.html > > RHEL7 will use XFS for the default boot/root. The article doesn't make it clear if this is XFS for both /boot and / or just /. But

Demand of co-maintain freemedforms and freediams

2013-09-07 Thread Alexandre Moine
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi all, I want to become a co-maintener of freemedforms and freediams with Ankur Sinha, under the SIG medical. I'm not a sponsored fedora packager, so I need a sponsor. I know a little bit how make and build package,but I need some other instructions

Re: Dracut HostOnly or ConfigurationOnly?

2013-09-07 Thread Till Maas
On Thu, Sep 05, 2013 at 04:51:14PM +0200, Harald Hoyer wrote: > host only means, it only works on that machine (kernel modules) with that disk > layout (including language and keymap for disk passwords). Language and keymap setting are not mentioned in the release notes section: > https://fedora