On Mon, Sep 02, 2013 at 12:07:27AM +0200, Till Maas wrote:
> Hi,
>
> hunspell-da caolanm
Fixed. The only "problem" with it was a wrong month in a changelog
entry...
D.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedo
# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting
# Date: 2013-09-02
# Time: 15:00 UTC
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto)
# Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net
Greetings testers!
It's meeting time again on Monday! F20 alpha freeze is currently
scheduled for this Tuesday (2013-09-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1003088
We've run into a very strange problem that only started literally in
the last few days. Koji builds in F20 and Rawhide branches are
failing.
After a mammoth debugging exercise, it appears to come down to various
programs failing (in %check) bec
On Sunday 01 September 2013 at 20:46:37, Till Maas wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 01, 2013 at 11:09:41AM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > There's been discussion over the last few releases of moving xine out of
> > the mainline Fedora release to rpmfusion but I'm not sure what happened
> > with that.
>
> FY
Hello,
I would announce, that I want to unretiring open-cobol for F20+.
This package was retiering due FTBFS issues during the last releases
of Fedora. Due my effort, I was able to fix the issues which caused
the FTBFS.
Best Regards:
Jochen Schmitt
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproj
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Convert-BinHex:
b4b45dd4649d6b97657635398a48a478 Convert-BinHex-1.122.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.or
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
497
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-5620/bugzilla-3.4.14-2.el6
16
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2013-11198/filezilla-3.7.3-1.el6
16
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/
The following Fedora EPEL 5 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
497
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-5630/bugzilla-3.2.10-5.el5
392
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-6608/Django-1.1.4-2.el5
16
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDO
On Sun, Sep 01, 2013 at 11:09:41AM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> There's been discussion over the last few releases of moving xine out of
> the mainline Fedora release to rpmfusion but I'm not sure what happened
> with that.
FYI: I rebuilt xine-libs for now to avoid long-time dependency breakage
Hi,
On Sun, Sep 01, 2013 at 07:57:43PM +0200, Jochen Schmitt wrote:
> I would ask, if there an official policy about unretiring an package.
> I have done a google search and found a ticket with the statement, that
> a review request will been not required when the package was not retired
> for
Hi,
I have an issue with one of my packages in F19.
Package: RepetierHost
Affected versions: 0.84, 0.90C-1, 0.90C-2
Test case:
1. Install and run RepetierHost
2. Load any STL file (in toolbar, use Load button) (e.g.
http://www.thingiverse.com/download:185743)
3. Drag and drop the STL with R
Hello,
I would ask, if there an official policy about unretiring an package.
The background of my question is, that a package which is maintained by me
was retiered due FTBFS issue. Now I was able to fix this issues and want
to unretiring it.
I have done a google search and found a ticket with t
On 08/31/2013 01:44 AM, Philip Prindeville wrote:
Hi Petr,
Can you please tell us what you need to resolve this bug?
I'm currently unable to do OpenWRT development because of hitting this bug.
Looking at google search results, it seems to be a known issue but looking in the
"make" project pag
Philip Prindeville wrote:
>Hi Petr,
>
>Can you please tell us what you need to resolve this bug?
>
>I'm currently unable to do OpenWRT development because of hitting this
>bug.
>
>Looking at google search results, it seems to be a known issue but
>looking in the "make" project pages on fsf.org I d
Yes.
Quoted from
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/qt5-qtbase.git/tree/qt5-qtbase.spec
"BuildRequires: pkgconfig(glesv2) pkgconfig(gl)"
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/co
Hi,
Not 100% sure this is the right mailing list, in case this is the wronte
list please direct me to the right place.
Looks like F20 is gonna get Qt 5.1.1 packages and I was wondering if you
could build qtbase enabling GLESv2 support.
This would allow building qtwayland with the official Qt 5.x
On Sat, Aug 31, 2013 at 8:36 PM, Till Maas wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 31, 2013 at 06:06:16PM +0200, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> > 2013/8/29 Till Maas
> >
> > > On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 10:53:53PM +0200, Till Maas wrote:
> > >
> > > > Package(co)maintainers
> > > >
> > >
>
Hi!
The following change has been accepted for F20:
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1145
More details: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=998543
For F20 it'll be SelfContained, but for F21 the plans are to make it
SystemWide.
I'm focussing currently on bcache, and I think bc
On 08/31/2013 01:44 AM, Philip Prindeville wrote:
Hi Petr,
Can you please tell us what you need to resolve this bug?
I'm currently unable to do OpenWRT development because of hitting this bug.
Looking at google search results, it seems to be a known issue but looking in the
"make" project pag
19 matches
Mail list logo
