Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring long-term FTBFS packages for Fedora 20 v2

I've solved the bug 992800 as tqsllib FTBFS caused by openssl version. Please see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=992800 If no response still, please release his ownership. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fed

[Bug 885474] make bails with *** INTERNAL: readdir: Bad file descriptor

Hi Petr, Can you please tell us what you need to resolve this bug? I'm currently unable to do OpenWRT development because of hitting this bug. Looking at google search results, it seems to be a known issue but looking in the "make" project pages on fsf.org I don't see an upstream tracker for th

Re: Mouse focus stealing bug

On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 01:19:54PM +0200, Maros Zatko wrote: > Hello dear Fedora comunity, > > I've hit very weird bug which happen to get very urgent now. > Something (very likely GTK{2,3} but not sure at all) is stealing my > mouse focus > so that I cannot click anymore. Symptoms are in range fr

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring long-term FTBFS packages for Fedora 20 v2

On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 10:48:21PM +0200, Till Maas wrote: > The following packages are did not build for two releases and will be > retired before the Alpha Change Deadline 2013-09-03, unless someone > adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, > please do so now with a

Re: COPR

On 08/30/2013 05:39 AM, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > Hi, > I would like to get your feedback about COPR [1] > > [1] > http://miroslav.suchy.cz/blog/archives/2013/08/29/what_is_copr/index.html > > We are the beggining and there are two options of where we can go: > http://miroslav.suchy.cz/blog/archive

[perl-Qt/f20] Add some fixes from upstream git for Perl 5.18 compatibility

Summary of changes: 11aa26b... Add some fixes from upstream git for Perl 5.18 compatibilit (*) (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedorapro

Re: COPR

On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 3:39 AM, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > I would like to ask *you* what is your opinion? Koji has another advantage over OBS in that it's already in the distro. I've found that packaging Rails apps for the long term (especially for EPEL) is an absolute nightmare. Looking at OBS's

Re: Take over Seth packages

I've orphaned the following: planet - all branches pyliblzma - all branched (fcami is going to take this) yum-utils - epel5 branch only. I've also removed skvidal from all other acls on active packages. ;( kevin signature.asc Description: PGP signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fed

Re: COPR

On Fri, 2013-08-30 at 13:43 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote: > On Fri, 2013-08-30 at 11:39 +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > > Hi, > > I would like to get your feedback about COPR [1] > > > > [1] > > http://miroslav.suchy.cz/blog/archives/2013/08/29/what_is_copr/index.html > > > > We are the beggining and

Re: COPR

On Fri, 30 Aug 2013, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: Or you could just map a directory on the host into /var/lib/mock/result in the guest, using the virtio-9p filesystem feature of KVM. Basically this gives you shared filesystem, but without any TCP/networking involved. NB, works with KVM in Fedora h

Re: Take over Seth packages

On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 7:32 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > I've orphaned the following: > > pyliblzma - all branched (fcami is going to take this) Taken, thank you Kevin. François -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code o

Re: COPR

On Fri, 2013-08-30 at 11:39 +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > Hi, > I would like to get your feedback about COPR [1] > > [1] http://miroslav.suchy.cz/blog/archives/2013/08/29/what_is_copr/index.html > > We are the beggining and there are two options of where we can go: > http://miroslav.suchy.cz/blo

Re: Take over Seth packages

On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 12:32 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > I've orphaned the following: > > planet - all branches > I've picked this up, comaintainers welcome. -J > pyliblzma - all branched (fcami is going to take this) > yum-utils - epel5 branch only. > > I've also removed skvidal from all other

Re: COPR

On Fri, 30 Aug 2013 11:39:38 +0200 Miroslav Suchý wrote: > Hi, > I would like to get your feedback about COPR [1] > > [1] > http://miroslav.suchy.cz/blog/archives/2013/08/29/what_is_copr/index.html > > We are the beggining and there are two options of where we can go: > http://miroslav.suchy.cz/

[perl-Test-Kwalitee] Created tag perl-Test-Kwalitee-1.13-1.fc21

The lightweight tag 'perl-Test-Kwalitee-1.13-1.fc21' was created pointing to: f6fd2cd... Update to 1.13 -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-dev

Re: COPR

On Fri, 2013-08-30 at 09:01 -0400, Colin Walters wrote: > On Fri, 2013-08-30 at 11:39 +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > > > http://miroslav.suchy.cz/blog/archives/2013/08/30/copr_implemented_using_obs/index.html > > > > I would like to ask *you* what is your opinion? > > I think it's absolutely ess

Re: COPR

On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 11:52:05AM -0400, Colin Walters wrote: > On Fri, 2013-08-30 at 09:01 -0400, Colin Walters wrote: > > On Fri, 2013-08-30 at 11:39 +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > > > > > http://miroslav.suchy.cz/blog/archives/2013/08/30/copr_implemented_using_obs/index.html > > > > > > I wou

Re: Running a command in spec file?

On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 12:46 AM, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > On 08/30/2013 05:56 AM, Dave Johansen wrote: > >> But that doesn't work >> > > You mean that it is not executed at all? Then you probably do not have > defined macro scl. Which is probably because you do not have installed > meta-package (

Re: Self Introduction

On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 09:32:26PM -0300, Matias Kreder wrote: > I have been part of the Fedora Project for several years (mainly as an > Ambassador) and now I've decided to join the Packaging team! > I live in Buenos Aires, Argentina, I work for IBM and I only have to > pass 1 exam (RH401) to beco

I would like to become the owner of gnome-colors-icon-theme

Hi, according to [1] I should "Announce on devel which packages you would like to become the owner of." So that's it. BTW Was this really necessary? The Review request is at [2]. [1] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Orphaned_package_that_need_new_maintainers [2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_

Re: COPR

On Fri, 2013-08-30 at 11:39 +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > http://miroslav.suchy.cz/blog/archives/2013/08/30/copr_implemented_using_obs/index.html > > I would like to ask *you* what is your opinion? I think it's absolutely essential that were COPRS to be an OBS instance, it still used mock to bu

fedora-review 0.5.0 released

Codename: "Thursday Release" fedora-review devs proudly announce new release with tons of bugfixes and new features. Kudos to our latest contributors: - Pavel Raiskup (autotools checks) - Josef Stribny (update of ruby checks) Gentle reminder for PHP reviewers: you should install php-pci

abrt server report: 20130830

In last two weeks these components were crashing the most: 1. kernel seen 88743 times (58% of all reports) http://retrace.fedoraproject.org/faf/problems/1174076/ http://retrace.fedoraproject.org/faf/problems/909608/ 2. xulrunner seen 7513 times (5% of all reports) http://retrace.fed

Re: Where does loopback short circuit ?

On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 07:09:16AM -0400, Steve Clark wrote: > On 08/29/2013 04:28 PM, Neil Horman wrote: > >On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 01:06:23PM -0700, Les Howell wrote: > >>On Thu, 2013-08-29 at 18:04 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > >>>On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 10:02:27AM -0700, John Chludzinski w

[dnf] dnf-0.4.0

Hi, The new minor version of DNF got released today, for f20 and rawhide. F19 will only receive important bugfixes to the 0.3.x line from now on (Bug 1002508 [1] certainly is one of them) and I will not be announcing new builds there. The major improvement in 0.4.0 is that it now relies on l

Re: [Comps] Adding FreeIPA package group

On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 1:52 AM, Tomas Babej wrote: > Hi, > > attached is a patch for Fedora comps that adds FreeIPA package group. > > Please chime in with any feedback you might have! > > -- Comps commit done for f20 and f21. Dan -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://adm

Re: COPR

I'm not a native speaker so i assume that's a misunderstanding, when i said "pretty much", i meant "not as secure as KVM but much better than chroot". The overhead of using KVM/Xen/Whatever hypervisor is non-negligeable, container-based virtualization is a good compromise between security and perfo

Mouse focus stealing bug

Hello dear Fedora comunity, I've hit very weird bug which happen to get very urgent now. Something (very likely GTK{2,3} but not sure at all) is stealing my mouse focus so that I cannot click anymore. Symptoms are in range from being able to click once or several times AFTER switching desktop (

Re: Take over Seth packages

On 30. 8. 2013 at 12:43:17, François Cami wrote: > On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 12:23 PM, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > > On 08/30/2013 12:19 PM, François Cami wrote: > >> I'll be waiting for at least one +1 from a FESCo member. > > > > Do not wait here. > > File FESCo ticket: > > https://fedorahosted.org/f

Re: Where does loopback short circuit ?

On 08/29/2013 04:28 PM, Neil Horman wrote: On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 01:06:23PM -0700, Les Howell wrote: On Thu, 2013-08-29 at 18:04 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 10:02:27AM -0700, John Chludzinski wrote: I've had a debate with some co-workers about whether or not a me

Re: Take over Seth packages

On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 12:23 PM, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > On 08/30/2013 12:19 PM, François Cami wrote: >> >> I'll be waiting for at least one +1 from a FESCo member. > > Do not wait here. > File FESCo ticket: > https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/newticket Done. https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1

Re: Take over Seth packages

On 08/30/2013 12:19 PM, François Cami wrote: I'll be waiting for at least one +1 from a FESCo member. Do not wait here. File FESCo ticket: https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/newticket -- Miroslav Suchy, RHCE, RHCDS Red Hat, Software Engineer, #brno, #devexp, #fedora-buildsys -- devel mailing list d

Re: Take over Seth packages

Hi, On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 12:12 PM, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > > pyliblzma -- Python bindings for lzma > yum-utils -- Utilities based around the yum package manager If no one objects I'd like to take yum-utils and pyliblzma over. I'll be waiting for at least one +1 from a FESCo member. François

Take over Seth packages

Hi, Seth (who is unfortunately dead), still owns 3 packages: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/users/packages/skvidal?acls=owner planet -- Flexible RDF/RSS/Atom feed aggregator pyliblzma -- Python bindings for lzma yum-utils -- Utilities based around the yum package manager Whoever is inte

Re: COPR

On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 11:57:19AM +0200, 80 wrote: > Hi, > > if you have a grudge against our infra team, OBS is the best option. > More seriously, OBS has a major flaw: it's a pain to deploy or update and > we need to have people able to fix bugs in a rails app. > > I advise you to discuss this

Re: COPR

Hi, if you have a grudge against our infra team, OBS is the best option. More seriously, OBS has a major flaw: it's a pain to deploy or update and we need to have people able to fix bugs in a rails app. I advise you to discuss this with infra team before considering further this option. One qui

COPR

Hi, I would like to get your feedback about COPR [1] [1] http://miroslav.suchy.cz/blog/archives/2013/08/29/what_is_copr/index.html We are the beggining and there are two options of where we can go: http://miroslav.suchy.cz/blog/archives/2013/08/29/copr_and_integration_with_koji/index.html http:/

[Comps] Adding FreeIPA package group

Hi, attached is a patch for Fedora comps that adds FreeIPA package group. Please chime in with any feedback you might have! -- Tomas Babej Associate Software Engeneer | Red Hat | Identity Management RHCE | Brno Site | IRC: tbabej | freeipa.org From 272fcf907816e42bb38803de4dc0ae14a8c98676 Mon

Review swap

So, I need somehelp with getting 957339 reviewed, and is willing to make a review (possibly two simple) in return. The package might look daunting, but it's just a rename. --alec -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora C

Re: Running a command in spec file?

On 08/30/2013 05:56 AM, Dave Johansen wrote: But that doesn't work You mean that it is not executed at all? Then you probably do not have defined macro scl. Which is probably because you do not have installed meta-package (devtoolset-1.1-build) in you buildroot. Note that if you are using buil

Re: Koji build fails because source package is not found.

Op 30-08-13 09:11, Simone Caronni schreef: Hello, On 30 August 2013 09:05, Erwin Waterlander > wrote: error: File /builddir/build/SOURCES/wcd-5.2.4-src.tar.gz: No such file or directory What should I do to fix this error? I was in the assumption that

Re: Koji build fails because source package is not found.

On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 09:05:08AM +0200, Erwin Waterlander wrote: > Yesterday I updated the spec file of the "wcd" package, because > there is a new upstream version. I pushed the new wcd.spec file and > started a new build with "fedpkg build". > The build fails, because the source package is not

Re: Koji build fails because source package is not found.

Hello, On 30 August 2013 09:05, Erwin Waterlander wrote: > error: File /builddir/build/SOURCES/wcd-5.**2.4-src.tar.gz: No such file > or directory > > What should I do to fix this error? I was in the assumption that the > source package is automatically downloaded via the info in the spec file.

Koji build fails because source package is not found.

Hi, Yesterday I updated the spec file of the "wcd" package, because there is a new upstream version. I pushed the new wcd.spec file and started a new build with "fedpkg build". The build fails, because the source package is not found. See http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/1451/5871