On vacation, 08-25 to 09-16

Just a heads-up for anyone I didn't let know yet - I'll be on vacation from tomorrow until 09-16. I'll have internet access and will be checking in to make sure Alpha work goes smoothly, but mostly I'm aiming to actually *be on vacation* as much as possible. My IRC proxy will of course be signed in

Re: Introduction

On 08/24/2013 03:56 AM, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote: What to expect from me? Mostly build failure fixes and help with ARM/AArch64. Welcome Marcin! FYI, the biggest blocker at present is QT- perhaps due to an atomics issue. It builds but most packages that use it end up hanging. This can wait

Comps Cleanup

Hi, the comps git repo currently contains comps files for EOL releases, which makes "grep" more cumbersome, because one needs to specify the current non-EOL releases to grep only in them. Also it makes the default make target take unecessarily long, because it build all comps including the EOL one

Re: F20 release name election?

On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 3:59 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > On 24 August 2013 12:35, inode0 wrote: > >> >> > If you don't want to deal with names, just don't get in the emails or >> > vote.. >> > because it isn't worth getting worked up over. >> >> No point saying that because it won't happen.

Re: F20 release name election?

On 24 August 2013 12:35, inode0 wrote: > > If you don't want to deal with names, just don't get in the emails or > vote.. > > because it isn't worth getting worked up over. > > No point saying that because it won't happen. This was just an > announcement of the vote and look where it has gone. T

Re: F20 release name election?

On 24 August 2013 16:38, drago01 wrote: > On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 5:29 PM, Mathieu Bridon > wrote: >> On Friday, August 23, 2013 08:34 PM, Josh Boyer wrote: >>> >>> On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 10:29 PM, Paul Wouters >>> wrote: On Thu, 22 Aug 2013, Chris Murphy wrote: > > On Au

Re: F20 release name election?

On Sat, 24 Aug 2013 13:35:40 -0500, inode0 wrote: > [...] This was just an announcement of the vote and look where it has > gone. It was the missing announcement that made me start this thread, after I had learnt late about the almost ended election in the German Fedora forum and nowhere else.

Re: F20 release name election?

On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 1:08 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > On 24 August 2013 10:55, inode0 wrote: >> If "None" was an option, which I think is a terrible idea, the only >> thing you could conclude from it winning is the we preferred to not >> have a release name in this election given the nam

Re: F20 release name election?

On 24 August 2013 10:55, inode0 wrote: > > If "None" was an option, which I think is a terrible idea, the only > thing you could conclude from it winning is the we preferred to not > have a release name in this election given the names on the ballot. It > would mean absolutely nothing about wheth

Re: F20 release name election?

On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 10:29 AM, Mathieu Bridon wrote: > That begs the question: what if the elected word has received a very low > score compared to the maximum possible? Doesn't matter. > That would mean that it received a very small support from our community, > and in fact that the majority

Re: F20 release name election?

On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 5:48 PM, Mathieu Bridon wrote: > On Saturday, August 24, 2013 11:38 PM, drago01 wrote: >> >> On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 5:29 PM, Mathieu Bridon >> wrote: >>> >>> On Friday, August 23, 2013 08:34 PM, Josh Boyer wrote: On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 10:29 PM, Paul Woute

Re: F20 release name election?

On Saturday, August 24, 2013 11:38 PM, drago01 wrote: On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 5:29 PM, Mathieu Bridon wrote: On Friday, August 23, 2013 08:34 PM, Josh Boyer wrote: On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 10:29 PM, Paul Wouters wrote: On Thu, 22 Aug 2013, Chris Murphy wrote: On Aug 22, 2013, at 6:12 PM,

Re: F20 release name election?

On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 5:29 PM, Mathieu Bridon wrote: > On Friday, August 23, 2013 08:34 PM, Josh Boyer wrote: >> >> On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 10:29 PM, Paul Wouters >> wrote: >>> >>> On Thu, 22 Aug 2013, Chris Murphy wrote: >>> On Aug 22, 2013, at 6:12 PM, Josh Boyer wrote: >

Re: F20 release name election?

On Friday, August 23, 2013 08:34 PM, Josh Boyer wrote: On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 10:29 PM, Paul Wouters wrote: On Thu, 22 Aug 2013, Chris Murphy wrote: On Aug 22, 2013, at 6:12 PM, Josh Boyer wrote: I'm not necessarily disagreeing, but there are essentially two camps right now. Those that

Fedora/Redhat and perfect forward secrecy

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=319901 looks like Redhat based systems are the only remaining which does not support EECDHE which is a shame these days in context of PRISM and more and more Ciphers are going to be unuseable (BEAST/CRIME weakness) ___

Re: Changes to make MySQL vs. MariaDB less confusing

Am 23.08.2013 15:06, schrieb Rich Mattes: > On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 3:40 AM, James Hogarth > wrote: > > Frankly I'm still of the opinion the Oracle distribution of the MySQL > based server should be dropped > entirely... If Oracle want 'community-mysql'

Re: Unexpanded %post in updated rpm on F19

Le samedi 24 août 2013 à 15:57 +0200, Michael Scherer a écrit : > Hi, > > I found 2 rpms ( nscd, acpid ) that were sent in updates with a bug that > didn't expand the systemd macro : > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1000713 > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1000712 > > Th

Unexpanded %post in updated rpm on F19

Hi, I found 2 rpms ( nscd, acpid ) that were sent in updates with a bug that didn't expand the systemd macro : https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1000713 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1000712 This make them unable to be removed or upgraded, at least not without a manual int

Re: Blocking unblocked retired packages

On 24 August 2013 00:18, Till Maas wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 11:25:47PM +0200, Till Maas wrote: > > > Depending on: maven2-common-poms > > antlr-maven-plugin (maintained by: spot, tradej) > > antlr-maven-plugin requires maven2-common-poms = > 1.0-50.fc20 > > Thi

Fwd: EPEL Lighttpd vulnerability still unfixed after 9 months

-- Forwarded message -- From: Anssi Johansson Date: Saturday, August 24, 2013 Subject: EPEL Lighttpd vulnerability still unfixed after 9 months To: epel-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org Hi, may I please direct some provenpackager's attention to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cg

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring long-term FTBFS packages for Fedora 20

On Mon, 19 Aug 2013, Till Maas wrote: tango-icon-theme cwickert tango-icon-theme-extras cwickert I'm working on fixing these. -- Peter Oliver -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fe

gnome-vfs2 transaction check error (multilib)

Hey Tomas and other developers! I see problem w/ latest koji f20 build of this package ( http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=445914 ): Transaction check error: file /etc/gconf/schemas/desktop_default_applications.schemas from install of gnome-vfs2-2.24.4-13.fc20.i686 conflicts wit

Re: Blocking unblocked retired packages

Oops... I think I should use krb5 Ignore all my emails... -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Introduction

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello everybody - From 1st September I will work for Red Hat on ARM and AArch64 stuff. You can find me on irc as "hrw" and I plan to work on build problems. When it comes to RPM based distributions I have to admit that I may lack some experience as I

libgssapi libgssglue / Re: Blocking unblocked retired packages

On Sat, 24 Aug 2013 16:46:23 +0800, Christopher Meng wrote: > I want to know the reason, why he retired it. Well, the dead.package file is supposed to tell, but in this case it's only ambiguous. > If there is a new package, which will replace it? A _replacement_ would need to follow the guidel

Re: Blocking unblocked retired packages

On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 05:33:15PM +0800, Christopher Meng wrote: > Till, can you unblock libgssapi? I can maintain it for serf. You first need to get it re-reviewed and then file an SCM admin request: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_SCM_admin_requests Also you should research whether libg

Orphaning of freemind and all my remaining Java packages

Hi all, I finally came to the conclusion, that I no longer want to invest time and effort in keeping all my Java packages in good shape. I don't have the time anymore to unbundle all the bundled libraries and keep a dozen downstream patches to make it work. freemind is close to a 1.0.0 release

Re: Blocking unblocked retired packages

Till, can you unblock libgssapi? I can maintain it for serf. Thanks. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring long-term FTBFS packages for Fedora 20 v2

Just got the perms of pylons. Please don't retire it. Thanks. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

[ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring long-term FTBFS packages for Fedora 20 v2

Hi, The following packages did not build for two releases and will be retired around 2013-08-26 unless someone rebuilds them or announces to actively working on fixing them. Here is a status update. There are now more packages than in the recent report, because the packages are now hopefully bett

Re: Blocking unblocked retired packages

I want to know the reason, why he retired it. If there is a new package, which will replace it? Or just retired it because of 'I have no time'? Gssapi affects serf library, and serf library affects subversion. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mai

Re: Blocking unblocked retired packages

On Sat, 24 Aug 2013 10:30:00 +0200, Till Maas wrote: > > http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/libgssglue.git/plain/dead.package > > > > is not helpful and only tells "Obsolete package", but that doesn't > > seem to refer to RPM Obsoletes: > > > > $ repoquery --whatobsoletes libgssglue > > $ >

Re: Blocking unblocked retired packages

On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 10:02:04AM +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote: > http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/libgssglue.git/plain/dead.package > > is not helpful and only tells "Obsolete package", but that doesn't > seem to refer to RPM Obsoletes: > > $ repoquery --whatobsoletes libgssglue > $ >

Re: Blocking unblocked retired packages

On Sat, 24 Aug 2013 07:20:36 +0800, Christopher Meng wrote: > I don't know what happened with libgssglue. > > This was retired for what reason? > > It affects too many... http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/libgssglue.git/plain/dead.package is not helpful and only tells "Obsolete package", but

Re: F21 schedule: what would you do with more time?

On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 09:33:59AM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: > On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 4:56 PM, Mat Booth wrote: > > Here's my favourite bugbear: https://fedorahosted.org/packagedb/ticket/243 > > > > > > I have no idea why the package retirement process needs intervention from > > rel-eng.-- >

Re: Proposal for new package group: Development:Formal Methods Tools

在 2013-8-18 AM3:31，"John C. Peterson" 写道： > > > I would like to edit comps.xml to add a new package group for the tools > that have already been packaged by the Formal Methods SIG. I just want to know if Group tag is needed or not, I never add Group tag in any specs of mine. -- devel mailing list