On Sat, Aug 10, 2013 at 07:41:34 +0800,
Christopher Meng wrote:
Any Koji logs available ?
Recently I have just done scratch builds. But I did find that ember's install
command and the spec file were both redundantly putting files in the
versioned doc directory in the past, and now they are
On 08/09/2013 09:33 PM, Kalev Lember wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am working on building the new cogl 1.15.4 release (and the matching
> clutter) for rawhide. This includes a libcogl soname bump, which affects
> 33 source packages.
>
> I'll handle the rebuilds and I'm hoping to finish these before
> tomorr
Any Koji logs available ?
Sent from Note I
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 18:15:17 -0500,
Bruno Wolff III wrote:
I use %doc in ember, but when doing rawhide builds it puts the files
in versioned directories. These files don't end up being included in
the rpm and the build fails because of the unpackaged files.
This seems like a case where
On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 12:22 PM, Robert Marcano
wrote:
> The directory is not called /usr/share/web-javascript, it is called
> /usr/share/javascript, and the packaging guidelines draft explicitly says
> that the intention is to avoid duplication of libraries, so it is calling to
> move all JavaScr
I use %doc in ember, but when doing rawhide builds it puts the files
in versioned directories. These files don't end up being included in
the rpm and the build fails because of the unpackaged files.
This seems like a case where a simple rebuild should just work with
the new unversioned doc dir
On Wed, Aug 07, 2013 at 10:39:53AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Aug 2013 17:53:22 +0200
> Till Maas wrote:
> > Why is it so hard to just backport this change? And if it needs to be
> > decided why does FESCO not just do it? Or who needs to decide it?
>
> Well, The redhat-rpm-config main
On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 11:45 AM, Robert Marcano
wrote:
> And I don't see a problems with those examples, because they share only
> their contents, by installing them you don't share content from other
> packages.
>
> Lets make an example of the mess this will create if I want to share a web
> appl
I realize it's been a while since F19 was released but I finally got
around to do a server install. Since there have been a few negative
reviews here of the installation process I thought it might be nice to
have a mostly positive one. Here are my observations:
VLAN setup for installing! Ya
Dear List,
I would like to orphan the cpptasks package, which is currently in use
by gluegen and gluegen2. I do not have the time to maintain the package
in its current state.
cpptasks is currently affected by a FTBFS :
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=992092
The FTBFS is due to t
Hi,
I am working on building the new cogl 1.15.4 release (and the matching
clutter) for rawhide. This includes a libcogl soname bump, which affects
33 source packages.
I'll handle the rebuilds and I'm hoping to finish these before
tomorrow's rawhide compose starts. Unfortunately the rebuilds have
On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 10:52:15AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> Does UML kernel even build on Fedora these days ? I tried to build it
> a year or so back and found that it had ben broken by GCC/LD update
> and no one upstream showed any interest in fixing it. So I rather
> considered UML to b
commit 2ac9e00b7ff2ff79b5b201cb12bc0bfcc676d2c2
Author: Paul Howarth
Date: Fri Aug 9 17:01:40 2013 +0100
update to 0.08250
.gitignore|1 +
perl-DBIx-Class-88result_set_column.patch | 11 ---
perl-DBIx-Class.spec | 20 +++
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-DBIx-Class:
4f65022a3d9480f3bb0610580dfdaf56 DBIx-Class-0.08250.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=992718
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
CC|
On Fri, 9 Aug 2013 17:52:23 +0200
Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Fri, 09.08.13 16:34, আনন্দ কুমার সমাদ্দার Ananda Samaddar
> (asamad...@myopera.com) wrote:
>
> > > I have no idea about hte package in question, but be aware that
> > > you need to pass --prefix=/usr (among other things) to configu
On Fri, 09.08.13 16:34, আনন্দ কুমার সমাদ্দার Ananda Samaddar
(asamad...@myopera.com) wrote:
> > I have no idea about hte package in question, but be aware that you
> > need to pass --prefix=/usr (among other things) to configure for all
> > packages packaged for Fedora. This is documented in more
On Fri, 9 Aug 2013 17:29:04 +0200
Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Fri, 09.08.13 16:19, আনন্দ কুমার সমাদ্দার Ananda Samaddar
> (asamad...@myopera.com) wrote:
>
> > > ExecStart= requires a full absolute path. Anything else is not
> > > allowed.
> > >
> > > Lennart
> > >
> >
> > Thanks Lennart,
>
On Fri, 09.08.13 16:19, আনন্দ কুমার সমাদ্দার Ananda Samaddar
(asamad...@myopera.com) wrote:
> > ExecStart= requires a full absolute path. Anything else is not
> > allowed.
> >
> > Lennart
> >
>
> Thanks Lennart,
>
>
> Have you any pointers towards Michael was saying about configure/make
> se
On Fri, 9 Aug 2013 17:12:31 +0200
Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Thu, 08.08.13 20:55, আনন্দ কুমার সমাদ্দার Ananda Samaddar
> (asamad...@myopera.com) wrote:
>
> > Hello all,
> >
> > I'm in the process of packaking kwakd for Fedora. On the user list
> > Rahul Sundaram mentioned that the service
On Thu, 08.08.13 20:55, আনন্দ কুমার সমাদ্দার Ananda Samaddar
(asamad...@myopera.com) wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I'm in the process of packaking kwakd for Fedora. On the user list
> Rahul Sundaram mentioned that the service file should not use a
> hardcoded path to the binary.
>
> Previously the E
On Fri, 9 Aug 2013, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
That's just utilities, not the actual binary.
Yep, since UML is basically just another special kernel build, I always
had the impression that you'd have to convince the kenrel RPM maintainers
to add another sub-RPM containing the UML build for it t
On 08/06/2013 03:52 AM, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
> Dear developers (esp the GNOME team),
>
> Vala 0.21.1 has just been released, which bumps the API level to 0.22
> from the 0.20 we're currently shipping.
>
> From prior releases, we can't quite predict whether the final 0.22
> release will b
Hans,
You are AWESOME That is all, thank you!
Pete
On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 9:34 PM, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I spend mot of my time today bootstrapping fpc on ARM for F20. This is done
> now,
> and the result seems to work :) So if you've any packages which are FTBFS
> on
> F-20 d
Hi,
I plan to rebase poppler in rawhide to poppler-0.24.0 at 19th of August.
There are several changes and 1 soname bump (libpoppler.so.37 to
libpoppler.so.43). It also adds support for Qt5.
I've prepared a scratch build of poppler-0.24.0 against which you can
test your packages. You can find the
Hi Petr,
IntelliJ is not in Fedora, it was retired [1]. And if I understand
correctly to documentation of Android Studio it won't be even needed.
Android Studio is in Early Access Preview and is licensed under Apache 2.0 [2],
IMO
you should wait for stable release for packaging into Fedora and t
On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 08:34:46AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 06:31:10PM -0400, Paul Wouters wrote:
> > On Thu, 8 Aug 2013, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >
> > >>Le jeudi 08 août 2013 à 22:35 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones a écrit :
> > >>>I wonder (idly) if anyone has eve
Hi Mat,
you mean F20, right?
Would it be possible to release that IntelliJ into F19 although it is
already released?
On the other hand I think that in Fedora we can have both.
As IntellJ as ADT Plugin.
Greetings
Petr
On 08/09/2013 11:31 AM, Mat Booth wrote:
On 9 August 2013 09:22, Krzysztof D
On 9 August 2013 09:22, Krzysztof Daniel wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> ADT is not packaged, and AFAIK nobody is working on that. I'm also not
> sure if it is suitable for Fedora (they had some restrictions in their
> terms of use, but it would require double check).
>
> However, Fedora Eclipse sho
Hello everyone,
ADT is not packaged, and AFAIK nobody is working on that. I'm also not
sure if it is suitable for Fedora (they had some restrictions in their
terms of use, but it would require double check).
However, Fedora Eclipse should work well with ADT installed via update
site - there were
Hi,
On 08/05/2013 11:03 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 10:41:18PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi all,
During the F-20 mass-rebuild a noarch package of mine
ended up being build on arm (which by itself is fine),
but it failed to build because the numerous .py files
were not
On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 06:31:10PM -0400, Paul Wouters wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Aug 2013, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> >>Le jeudi 08 août 2013 à 22:35 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones a écrit :
> >>>I wonder (idly) if anyone has every tried to package UML for Fedora,
> >>>and if there is anything in the packa
32 matches
Mail list logo
