Re: DeveloperAssistant and android development under Fedora 19

I see a package review here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=837450 -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: fpc (free pascal compiler) is now available on F20 armv7hl

Thanks! Sent from Note I -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: Introduction

Non free should go to rpmfusion. Sent from Note I -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: Are there any plans for Tcl/Tk 8.6?

Georgios Petasis wrote: > Are there any plans to update Tcl/Tk to 8.6 in fedora 20? > > Tcl/Tk 8.6 has been released in Dec 20, 2012: > > http://www.tcl.tk/software/tcltk/8.6.html Already reported, see: http://bugzilla.redhat.com/889201 -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https

Introduction

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi guys, my name is Matt. I'm obviously new to the community. My nick on irc is "syn-ack" and I'm planning on packaging the Fingerprint-GUI application for Fedora. That is, if you guys will have me, :) This application is works via the fprint libs as

Re: UML (user mode linux) for Fedora

On Thu, 8 Aug 2013, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: Le jeudi 08 août 2013 à 22:35 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones a écrit : I wonder (idly) if anyone has every tried to package UML for Fedora, and if there is anything in the packaging guidelines that would stop UML being packaged as a regular package? By

[perl-Moo] Perl 5.18 rebuild

commit 4750be26b34d91789fb5cc107122bfa3058f3302 Author: Petr Písař Date: Thu Aug 8 23:54:01 2013 +0200 Perl 5.18 rebuild perl-Moo.spec |5 - 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/perl-Moo.spec b/perl-Moo.spec index c74dc6b..21c1ea1 100644 --- a/perl-Moo

Re: ExecStart line in systemd service files.

Le jeudi 08 août 2013 à 20:55 +0100, আনন্দ কুমার সমাদ্দার Ananda Samaddar a écrit : > Hello all, > > I'm in the process of packaking kwakd for Fedora. On the user list > Rahul Sundaram mentioned that the service file should not use a > hardcoded path to the binary. So, the mail was : https://lis

Re: UML (user mode linux) for Fedora

On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 11:45:14PM +0200, Michael Scherer wrote: > Le jeudi 08 août 2013 à 22:35 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones a écrit : > > I wonder (idly) if anyone has every tried to package UML for Fedora, > > and if there is anything in the packaging guidelines that would stop > > UML being packag

Re: UML (user mode linux) for Fedora

Le jeudi 08 août 2013 à 22:35 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones a écrit : > I wonder (idly) if anyone has every tried to package UML for Fedora, > and if there is anything in the packaging guidelines that would stop > UML being packaged as a regular package? By regular package, you mean using a separate s

UML (user mode linux) for Fedora

I wonder (idly) if anyone has every tried to package UML for Fedora, and if there is anything in the packaging guidelines that would stop UML being packaged as a regular package? Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Fedora Windows cross-compiler

fpc (free pascal compiler) is now available on F20 armv7hl

Hi All, I spend mot of my time today bootstrapping fpc on ARM for F20. This is done now, and the result seems to work :) So if you've any packages which are FTBFS on F-20 due to fpc not being available, please re-submit a build for them, they should build fine now. Regards, Hans -- devel maili

Re: Doc dir related changes coming up

On 2013-08-08 17:03, Michael J Gruber wrote: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/UnversionedDocdirs > > Building an F20 (master) package on F18 does not work, then, even with > the proposed conditional %{_pkgdocdir}. Sure it does, I've done dozens of them. Can't say much more without seeing

Re: DeveloperAssistant and android development under Fedora 19

On 08/08/2013 09:50 PM, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade wrote: 2013/8/8 Petr Hracek : Hi folks, Hi, I would like to ask you what are necessary steps to develop android applications under Fedora. I suppose that Eclipse environment is needed. Any other package(s)? Is there any guide how to d

ExecStart line in systemd service files.

Hello all, I'm in the process of packaking kwakd for Fedora. On the user list Rahul Sundaram mentioned that the service file should not use a hardcoded path to the binary. Previously the ExecStart line read like this: ExecStart=/usr/bin/kwakd -p 80 After speaking to upstream and passing on Ra

Re: DeveloperAssistant and android development under Fedora 19

2013/8/8 Petr Hracek : > Hi folks, Hi, > I would like to ask you what are necessary steps to develop > android applications under Fedora. > > I suppose that Eclipse environment is needed. > Any other package(s)? > Is there any guide how to do that? > > When some working guide will be ready then

DeveloperAssistant and android development under Fedora 19

Hi folks, I would like to ask you what are necessary steps to develop android applications under Fedora. I suppose that Eclipse environment is needed. Any other package(s)? Is there any guide how to do that? When some working guide will be ready then it will be a part of DeveloperAssistant wh

Re: F20 System Wide Change: Web Assets

On 08/06/2013 05:10 PM, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote: On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 8:27 PM, Robert Marcano wrote: Do you know there are GNOME JavaScript applications? And that JavaScript is being encouraged as a language for desktop applications? So all those libraries that can be used on desktop and web

Re: F20 System Wide Change: Web Assets

On 08/06/2013 02:36 PM, Colin Walters wrote: On Mon, 2013-08-05 at 22:57 -0430, Robert Marcano wrote: Do you know there are GNOME JavaScript applications? And that JavaScript is being encouraged as a language for desktop applications? So all those libraries that can be used on desktop and web c

Re: Cannot install boost-static...

On 8 August 2013 18:00, Georgios Petasis wrote: > Στις 7/8/2013 21:39, ο/η Adam Williamson έγραψε: > >> On Wed, 2013-08-07 at 21:34 +0300, Georgios Petasis wrote: >>> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I am trying to install boost-static, but I am getting an error (fedora >>> 19 x86_64): >>> yum install boo

Are there any plans for Tcl/Tk 8.6?

Hi all, Are there any plans to update Tcl/Tk to 8.6 in fedora 20? Tcl/Tk 8.6 has been released in Dec 20, 2012: http://www.tcl.tk/software/tcltk/8.6.html Regards, George -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of C

Re: F20 System Wide Change: Web Assets

On 08/06/2013 10:46 AM, Miloslav Trmač wrote: On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 5:27 AM, Robert Marcano wrote: You make the decision by installing a js-foo package, just like you make the decision to provide a web application by installing a package for it. "You make a decision by installing a package"

Re: Self introduction

On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 06:47:18PM +0100, আনন্দ কুমার সমাদ্দার Ananda Samaddar wrote: > My contributions to Fedora won't be massive and will mostly consist of > packaging some small utilities, free fonts and themes. I'll get my > first package sorted out shortly for review pending a small query.

Self introduction

Dear Fedora Project People, Here is my short introduction! I am a long time [GNU/]Linux user. I was on Debian for nearly a decade followed by several years on Arch. I did maintain some packages in Arch's AUR. I switched to Fedora as it's mirrored at my soon-to-be university. I've ended up rea

Ugly magic device name being enforced in Fedora 19

I upgraded a laptop from F18 to F19 today. When I rebooted it after the upgrade it failed to mount the root filesystem. The disk is encrypted and /etc/crypttab looked like this: rot1 UUID=cbb96d39-a39a-4f78-b39a-19c4053f3d7a none home1 UUID=38fc5950-726a-4ff5-a106-55c85ae47a0e none That worke

Re: Cannot install boost-static...

Στις 7/8/2013 21:39, ο/η Adam Williamson έγραψε: On Wed, 2013-08-07 at 21:34 +0300, Georgios Petasis wrote: Hi all, I am trying to install boost-static, but I am getting an error (fedora 19 x86_64): yum install boost-static.i686 Loaded plugins: auto-update-debuginfo, langpacks, refresh-packa

Re: F20 System Wide Change: Perl 5.18

On 08/08/13 12:50, Petr Pisar wrote: On 2013-08-08, Paul Howarth wrote: On 08/08/13 10:01, Phil Knirsch wrote: Just like Seth's script it has a few obviously problems as for really correct build ordering you need to flip-flop between srpms/specfiles and binary rpms, but that will need a bit o

[Bug 993099] perl-Parse-ErrorString-Perl-0.19 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=993099 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version|

Re: latex not working in F20: "I can't find the format file `latex.fmt'!"

the buildrequirement is not correct, please enable manual creation again and replace all your BuildRequires on texlive* with these: BuildRequires: texlive-collection-latexrecommended BuildRequires: texlive-framed BuildRequires: texlive-moreverb it should fix the build failure. glassfish-jax-rs-a

Re: latex not working in F20: "I can't find the format file `latex.fmt'!"

it built fine with same texlive version on my local machine (x86_64). This build failed on arm plattform, It seems textlive oder perl doesn't work correct on arm. How can developer access to arm machine with f20 in order to debug the issue? thanks than Hello Than, On 8 August 2013 14:47,

Re: Review Request 40: basic RESTful API

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviewboard-tflink.rhcloud.com/r/40/ --- (Updated Aug. 8, 2013, 2:38 p.m.) Review request for blockerbugs. Cha

Re: rawhide report: 20130808 changes

On 08/08/13 15:21, punto...@libero.it wrote: Il 08/08/2013 15:29, Fedora Rawhide Report ha scritto: [gmaven] gmaven-1.4-4.fc19.noarch requires gshell hi https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-13855/gmaven-1.4-6.fc19 *bodhi

Re: rawhide report: 20130808 changes

On 8 August 2013 15:21, punto...@libero.it wrote: > Il 08/08/2013 15:29, Fedora Rawhide Report ha scritto: > > [gmaven] > gmaven-1.4-4.fc19.noarch requires gshell > > hi > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-13855/gmaven-1.4-6.fc19 > > *bodhi

Re: rawhide report: 20130808 changes

Il 08/08/2013 15:29, Fedora Rawhide Report ha scritto: [gmaven] gmaven-1.4-4.fc19.noarch requires gshell hi https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-13855/gmaven-1.4-6.fc19 *bodhi

Re: Doc dir related changes coming up

Michael J Gruber venit, vidit, dixit 08.08.2013 16:03: > Kevin Fenzi venit, vidit, dixit 07.08.2013 18:39: >> On Tue, 6 Aug 2013 17:53:22 +0200 >> Till Maas wrote: >> >>> On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 11:25:19AM +0300, Ville Skyttä wrote: >>> The special (pathless) %doc macro now installs docs to u

Re: Doc dir related changes coming up

On 8 August 2013 16:03, Michael J Gruber < michaeljgruber+fedora-li...@gmail.com> wrote: > Building an F20 (master) package on F18 does not work, then, even with > the proposed conditional %{_pkgdocdir}. Wouldn't a conditional based on > the Fedora version be a much more robust suggestion to deal

Re: Doc dir related changes coming up

Kevin Fenzi venit, vidit, dixit 07.08.2013 18:39: > On Tue, 6 Aug 2013 17:53:22 +0200 > Till Maas wrote: > >> On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 11:25:19AM +0300, Ville Skyttä wrote: >> >>> The special (pathless) %doc macro now installs docs to unversioned >>> /usr/share/doc/%{name} dir in Rawhide. Packages

Re: latex not working in F20: "I can't find the format file `latex.fmt'!"

On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 02:47:34PM +0200, Than Ngo wrote: > the buildrequirement is not correct, please replace your BR with these: > > BuildRequires: ghostscript > BuildRequires: texlive-collection-latexrecommended texlive-preprint > > It should fix the build failure. The ocaml-res scratch bui

Re: ps2pdf not finding Times-Italic font - where should it be?

On Wed, 2013-08-07 at 18:53 +0100, Paul Howarth wrote: > Error: /invalidfont in /findfont Generally ghostscript will substitute another font if it can't find what you're after. This is /invalidfont though, which I think means it tried reading the font you asked for but that font was invalid. Th

Re: latex not working in F20: "I can't find the format file `latex.fmt'!"

Hello Than, On 8 August 2013 14:47, Than Ngo wrote: > the buildrequirement is not correct, please replace your BR with these: > > BuildRequires: ghostscript > BuildRequires: texlive-collection-latexrecommended texlive-preprint > can you please check this bug? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show

Re: latex not working in F20: "I can't find the format file `latex.fmt'!"

> > One package wouldn't rebuild because latex doesn't work. I get the error: > > cd doc/res/latex && \ > latex doc.tex && \ > latex doc.tex && \ > dvips doc.dvi -o doc.ps > This is pdfTeX, Version 3.1415926-2.5-1.40.14 (TeX Live 2013) >restricted \write18 enabled. > > kpaths

Re: gdcm FTBFS: texlive broken in rawhide?

Thanks to all! Yesterday I took a couple of days of vacation and I'll rebuild my broken packages (gdcm,insight toolkit and libigtl) on monday. Best, Mario On Aug 7, 2013 4:15 PM, "Than Ngo" wrote: > ** > > the bug is fixed in new texlive, it will be available soon in rawhide. > > > > big thanks t

Re: Koji 404 errors on el6

Thanks very much! --Simone On 8 August 2013 13:48, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Thu, 8 Aug 2013 10:58:48 +0200 > Simone Caronni wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > I get the following when building for el6/ppc: > > ...snip... > > > I've already tried 2 builds and I got the same result. Full log here: > >

Re: /usr/etc?

Am 08.08.2013 10:05, schrieb Ondrej Vasik: > I already nuked /usr/etc yesterday - as FHS even disallows it (see > http://www.pathname.com/fhs/pub/fhs-2.3.html#USRLOCALLOCALHIERARCHY > Rationale note). But I still see /usr/local/etc there - and mentioned as > beneficial, so keeping it for now yes

Re: F20 System Wide Change: Perl 5.18

On 2013-08-08, Paul Howarth wrote: > On 08/08/13 10:01, Phil Knirsch wrote: >> >> Just like Seth's script it has a few obviously problems as for really >> correct build ordering you need to flip-flop between srpms/specfiles and >> binary rpms, but that will need a bit of a different approach. As i

Re: Koji 404 errors on el6

On Thu, 8 Aug 2013 10:58:48 +0200 Simone Caronni wrote: > Hello, > > I get the following when building for el6/ppc: ...snip... > I've already tried 2 builds and I got the same result. Full log here: > > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=5793165&name=root.log > > Should I just

Re: F20 System Wide Change: Perl 5.18

On 08/08/13 10:01, Phil Knirsch wrote: On 08/07/2013 10:56 AM, Marcela Mašláňová wrote: On 08/07/2013 03:01 AM, Dennis Gilmore wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, 06 Aug 2013 13:39:31 -0700 Adam Williamson wrote: On Thu, 2013-06-13 at 11:10 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:

Re: Excludearch/Exclusivearch reminder

On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 11:02:23AM +0200, Simone Caronni wrote: > On 8 August 2013 10:44, Petr Pisar wrote: > > > And the canonical RPM architecture name is what? "arm" or "armv7hl" or some > > macro like %{ix86}? > > > Yep. At the moment for my local builds I use "armv7hl" because the package

Re: Excludearch/Exclusivearch reminder

On 8 August 2013 10:44, Petr Pisar wrote: > And the canonical RPM architecture name is what? "arm" or "armv7hl" or some > macro like %{ix86}? Yep. At the moment for my local builds I use "armv7hl" because the package I build works only on armv7 with hfp; but would be good to know if there is a

Re: F20 System Wide Change: Perl 5.18

On 08/07/2013 10:56 AM, Marcela Mašláňová wrote: On 08/07/2013 03:01 AM, Dennis Gilmore wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, 06 Aug 2013 13:39:31 -0700 Adam Williamson wrote: On Thu, 2013-06-13 at 11:10 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: On Thu, 13 Jun 2013 13:23:51 + (UT

Koji 404 errors on el6

Hello, I get the following when building for el6/ppc: DEBUG util.py:264: http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/repo/rhel/rhel-ppc64-server-6/getPackage/nss-softokn-3.12.9-11.el6.ppc64.rpm: [Errno 14] PYCURL ERROR 22 - "The requested URL returned error: 404 Not Found" DEBUG util.py:264: Trying other

Re: Excludearch/Exclusivearch reminder

On 2013-08-07, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > With the recent addition of arm in our primary buildsystem, I am seeing > some packages add ExcludeArch: arm or ExclusiveArch: %{ix86} > And the canonical RPM architecture name is what? "arm" or "armv7hl" or some macro like %{ix86}? -- Petr -- devel mailing

Re: F20 System Wide Change: Perl 5.18

On 08/08/13 03:47, Adam Williamson wrote: On Thu, 2013-08-08 at 10:43 +0800, Christopher Meng wrote: Just a note, I find my package's deps have magic requires for 5.16.2(not 5.16.3), does it mean that this has not rebuilded since f19? Why? http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/5588/5735

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 20

I'll take Package fuse-zip (orphan). 2013/8/8 Christopher Meng > I will retire acheck* as it has been orphaned by Debian because dead > upstream since 2006. > -- > devel mailing list > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > Fedora Code of Conduc

Re: /usr/etc?

On Wed, 2013-08-07 at 11:35 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Ondrej Vasik (ova...@redhat.com) said: > > Now I probably see why I did that - it was in the RPM_BUILD_ROOT from > > some reason and because of the capabilities change, I needed to > > explicitly mention all directories created in RPM_BUI

Re: Problem with mass rebuild / latex2html errors

On 5 August 2013 12:14, Simone Caronni wrote: > I have a problem on the bacula-docs package in Fedora 20. Build was stuck > for 15 hours and then killed by Koji: > > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5698742 > > I was able to reproduce it locally with mock; all the "latex2html" >