Re: About libcurl, pthreads, ssl and SIGPIPE

2013-07-08 Thread Anish Patil
Hi, >Till the time the new fixed version - 7.31.0 - is packaged and available, >solution is for >applications to ignore SIGPIPE signal. >+    signal(SIGPIPE, SIG_IGN); >The problem is, even after ignoring SIGPIPE, I'm seeing same crashes. I think if you ignore SIGPIPE it produces EPIPE, try set

About libcurl, pthreads, ssl and SIGPIPE

2013-07-08 Thread P J P
   Hi, I'm facing a strange issue while using libcurl with pthreads to access  'https://'  addresses. The program abruptly crashes with a SIGPIPE. I'm unable to produce it for any single URL. This very issue was fixed upstream recently:    -> http://www.fpaste.org/23849/    -> http://sourcefo

Re: [Owner-change] Fedora packages ownership change

2013-07-08 Thread Vít Ondruch
Dne 8.7.2013 12:00, nob...@fedoraproject.org napsal(a): ruby-mysql [devel] was orphaned by orion A Ruby interface to MySQL https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/ruby-mysql Was this intentional? There is no replacement to this package in Fedora yet, nor it was correctly d

Re: F20 Self Contained Change: Ryu Network Operating System

2013-07-08 Thread Isaku Yamahata
On Mon, Jul 08, 2013 at 11:28:27AM +0200, Matthias Runge wrote: > On 08/07/13 10:41, Jaroslav Reznik wrote: > > = Proposed Self Contained Change: Ryu Network Operating System = > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Ryu > > > > Change owner(s): yamahata > > > > Ryu Network Operating System

Amateur (Ham) Radio license exams available at Flock 2013

2013-07-08 Thread Nick Bebout
The Fedora Amateur Radio SIG will be hosting a Ham Radio VE Session at Flock 2013 (at the College of Charleston) on Saturday, August 10, 2013 from 2:00pm-4:00pm in room ECTR 115. Please arrive promptly at 2:00pm if possible, we must be out of that room by 4:00pm, as another talk/hackfest will be s

lonote-2.2.1 license changed from 'GPLv3 and ASL 2.0' to 'ASL 2.0'

2013-07-08 Thread Robin Lee
lonote-2.2.1 license has changed from 'GPLv3 and ASL 2.0' to 'ASL 2.0'. Cheers -robin -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: GPG verification in SPECs

2013-07-08 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Mon, 8 Jul 2013 23:15:05 +0200 Till Maas wrote: > Hi, > > upstream of pam_mount pointed me to OpenSUSE's gpg-offline RPM macros > at https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/Base:System/gpg-offline > > They allow to use a keyring and detached signature as additional > source in SPECs to get b

Re: GPG verification in SPECs

2013-07-08 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Mon, Jul 08, 2013 at 11:15:05PM +0200, Till Maas wrote: > Hi, > > upstream of pam_mount pointed me to OpenSUSE's gpg-offline RPM macros at > https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/Base:System/gpg-offline > > They allow to use a keyring and detached signature as additional source > in SPECs to

GPG verification in SPECs

2013-07-08 Thread Till Maas
Hi, upstream of pam_mount pointed me to OpenSUSE's gpg-offline RPM macros at https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/Base:System/gpg-offline They allow to use a keyring and detached signature as additional source in SPECs to get both verified. Since gpg-offline's upstream is willing to create a p

Re: Should Boost even be Feature/Change? [Was: F20 Self Contained Change: Ryu Network Operating System]

2013-07-08 Thread Jaroslav Reznik
- Original Message - > Dan Mashal writes: > > > > The Feature page still belongs to the FeaturePageIncomplete category. > > > > I feel a somewhat similar way about boost and it would be nice if > > there was some more detailed descriptions here. > > Frankly, my biannual filing of Fea

Re: Should Boost even be Feature/Change? [Was: F20 Self Contained Change: Ryu Network Operating System]

2013-07-08 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Mon, Jul 08, 2013 at 16:59:40 +0200, Petr Machata wrote: So if the consensus is that Boost rebases don't need this sort of paperwork, I'll simply not do it the next time around. Boost changes should be noted. It touches a lot of packages and sometimes changes need to be made. Some help

Re: Should Boost even be Feature/Change?

2013-07-08 Thread Petr Machata
Petr Machata writes: > Dan Mashal writes: > >> > The Feature page still belongs to the FeaturePageIncomplete category. >> >> I feel a somewhat similar way about boost and it would be nice if >> there was some more detailed descriptions here. > > So if the consensus is that Boost rebases don'

Should Boost even be Feature/Change? [Was: F20 Self Contained Change: Ryu Network Operating System]

2013-07-08 Thread Petr Machata
Dan Mashal writes: > > The Feature page still belongs to the FeaturePageIncomplete category. > > I feel a somewhat similar way about boost and it would be nice if > there was some more detailed descriptions here. Frankly, my biannual filing of Feature/Change page is mostly cargo-culting. It

Re: [Owner-change] Fedora packages ownership change

2013-07-08 Thread Peter Lemenkov
Hello All. 2013/7/8 : > Change in ownership over the last 168 hours > === > > 19 packages were orphaned > - > msmtp [EL-5,devel,f17,f18,f19] was orphaned by turki > SMTP client > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/n

F20 Self Contained Change: GLIBC 2.18

2013-07-08 Thread Jaroslav Reznik
= Proposed Self Contained Change: GLIBC 2.18 = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GLIBC218 Change owner(s): Carlos O'Donell Switch GLIBC in Fedora 20 to GLIBC version 2.18. == Detailed description == GLIBC 2.18 will be released at the end of July 2013; we have started closely tracking the

[Owner-change] Fedora packages ownership change

2013-07-08 Thread nobody
Change in ownership over the last 168 hours === 19 packages were orphaned - msmtp [EL-5,devel,f17,f18,f19] was orphaned by turki SMTP client https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/msmtp mysql-connector-c++ [devel] w

Re-review of deprecated package labyrinth and review swap

2013-07-08 Thread Ankur Sinha
Hi, I would like to re-add labyrinth to Fedora. It was deprecated due to multiple FTBFS bugs, but seems to build just right with the new upstream release. I'd be happy to swap reviews with someone to get this package re-review expedited :) The rhbz is here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.c

rawhide report: 20130708 changes

2013-07-08 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
Compose started at Mon Jul 8 08:15:02 UTC 2013 Broken deps for x86_64 -- [derelict] derelict-tcod-3-20.20130626gite70c293.fc20.i686 requires tcod derelict-tcod-3-20.20130626gite70c293.fc20.x86_64 requires tcod derelic

F20 Self Contained Change: Ryu Network Operating System

2013-07-08 Thread Dan Mashal
On Monday, July 8, 2013, Matthias Runge wrote: > > > Sadly, the page still doesn't list, what is going to . I assume, > the whole thing is slightly more than just adding a new package to Fedora > > The Feature page still belongs to the FeaturePageIncomplete category. > I feel a somewhat similar

Re: F20 Self Contained Change: Ryu Network Operating System

2013-07-08 Thread Jaroslav Reznik
- Original Message - > On 08/07/13 10:41, Jaroslav Reznik wrote: > > = Proposed Self Contained Change: Ryu Network Operating System = > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Ryu > > > > Change owner(s): yamahata > > > > Ryu Network Operating System [1] > > > > This change was origina

Re: F20 Self Contained Change: Ryu Network Operating System

2013-07-08 Thread Matthias Runge
On 08/07/13 10:41, Jaroslav Reznik wrote: > = Proposed Self Contained Change: Ryu Network Operating System = > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Ryu > > Change owner(s): yamahata > > Ryu Network Operating System [1] > > This change was originally proposed for Fedora 19 but postponed to Fe

F20 Self Contained Change: Ryu Network Operating System

2013-07-08 Thread Jaroslav Reznik
= Proposed Self Contained Change: Ryu Network Operating System = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Ryu Change owner(s): yamahata Ryu Network Operating System [1] This change was originally proposed for Fedora 19 but postponed to Fedora 20 https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Ryu == D

F20 System Wide Change: Boost 1.54 Uplift

2013-07-08 Thread Jaroslav Reznik
= Proposed System Wide Change: Fedora 20 Boost 1.54 Uplift = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/F20Boost154 Change owner(s): Petr Machata , Denis Arnaud , Benjamin De Kosnik This change brings Boost 1.54.0 to Fedora 20. == Detailed description == The aim is to synchronize Fedora with the m