Re: Unretiring quotatool

2013-07-06 Thread Christopher Meng
Done. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Bad file access on the rise

2013-07-06 Thread Davide Bolcioni
On Sunday, June 09, 2013 05:04:50 PM Lennart Poettering wrote: > You should not second guess the kernel, ... True ... > Then, doing these things in userspace makes these checks non-atomic. ... True ... > So, yeah, just trying to open the shm files *is the right thing to > do*. And if audit d

Re: Unretiring quotatool

2013-07-06 Thread Marcelo Barbosa
Christopher, I reviewed your package, good work, i have interesting in your package, if possible, i wish share owner with. Regards Marcelo Barbosa Fedora Project Packager/Ambassador fireman...@fedoraproject.org On Sat, Jul 6, 2013 at 4:45 AM, Christopher Meng wrote: > I’ve submitted https:

Re: Orphaning packages: PySolFC* and lybniz

2013-07-06 Thread Marcelo Barbosa - Fedora Ambassador
Stewart, I can keep these packages, how to apply ? How should I proceed ? Regards Marcelo Barbosa Fedora Project Packager Fedora Project Ambassador fireman...@fedoraproject.org http://planet.fedoraproject.org On Sat, Jul 6, 2013 at 2:24 PM, Stewart Adam wrote: > Hello, > > I no longer have

Submitted a package with wrong type

2013-07-06 Thread Danishka Navin
I have submitted a new package named sugar-srilanka package to bodhi ( fc17, fc18, and fc19) . It was submitted as bugfix instead of newpackage. Seems I can't change the settings after submission. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo

Orphaning packages: PySolFC* and lybniz

2013-07-06 Thread Stewart Adam
Hello, I no longer have the time to give these packages the attention they deserve, so I would like to announce that I am releasing ownership for: * PySolFC, PySolFC-cardsets and PySolFC-music * Lybniz PySolFC has a known issue with F19 where it does not start, and [untested] a simple chan

Re: Broken (glibc) dependencies in f19 update-repository metadata

2013-07-06 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Sat, Jul 06, 2013 at 06:35:24PM +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote: > Yes, well known. The thing here is that the actual package > dependencies are just fine, the *repository metadata* is broken on > these glibc dependencies. Rpm records all the different version > requirements from symbols, but creat

Re: Broken (glibc) dependencies in f19 update-repository metadata

2013-07-06 Thread Panu Matilainen
On 07/06/2013 06:12 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: On Sat, Jul 06, 2013 at 01:31:48PM +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote: Something is broken wrt f19 updates and updates-testing repo metadata, note the required glibc version between the rpm version in main repo vs updates-testing: [root@mursu ~]# repoquer

Re: Broken (glibc) dependencies in f19 update-repository metadata

2013-07-06 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Sat, 6 Jul 2013 17:12:46 +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Sat, Jul 06, 2013 at 01:31:48PM +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote: > > > > Something is broken wrt f19 updates and updates-testing repo > > metadata, note the required glibc version between the rpm version in > > main repo vs updates-testing

Re: Broken (glibc) dependencies in f19 update-repository metadata

2013-07-06 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Sat, Jul 06, 2013 at 01:31:48PM +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote: > > Something is broken wrt f19 updates and updates-testing repo > metadata, note the required glibc version between the rpm version in > main repo vs updates-testing: > > [root@mursu ~]# repoquery --releasever=19 > --enablerepo=upd

Re: Broken (glibc) dependencies in f19 update-repository metadata

2013-07-06 Thread Panu Matilainen
On 07/06/2013 10:55 AM, Dennis Gilmore wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sat, 06 Jul 2013 13:31:48 +0300 Panu Matilainen wrote: Something is broken wrt f19 updates and updates-testing repo metadata, note the required glibc version between the rpm version in main repo vs

Re: Broken (glibc) dependencies in f19 update-repository metadata

2013-07-06 Thread Dennis Gilmore
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sat, 06 Jul 2013 13:31:48 +0300 Panu Matilainen wrote: > > Something is broken wrt f19 updates and updates-testing repo > metadata, note the required glibc version between the rpm version in > main repo vs updates-testing: > > [root@mursu ~]# re

rawhide report: 20130706 changes

2013-07-06 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
Compose started at Sat Jul 6 08:15:02 UTC 2013 Broken deps for x86_64 -- [avgtime] avgtime-0-0.6.git20130201.fc20.x86_64 requires libphobos-ldc.so.60()(64bit) [derelict] derelict-tcod-3-20.20130626gite70c293.fc20.i686 requir

Broken (glibc) dependencies in f19 update-repository metadata

2013-07-06 Thread Panu Matilainen
Something is broken wrt f19 updates and updates-testing repo metadata, note the required glibc version between the rpm version in main repo vs updates-testing: [root@mursu ~]# repoquery --releasever=19 --enablerepo=updates-testing --requires rpm-build-4.11.0.1-2.fc19.x86_64|grep ^libc.so li

Re: Unretiring quotatool

2013-07-06 Thread Christopher Meng
I’ve submitted https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=981839 Hope someone can swap review with me. Thanks.(ง •̀_•́)ง -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel