Re: More unhelpful update descriptions

2013-07-04 Thread Mathieu Bridon
On Thu, 2013-07-04 at 18:55 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Thu, Jul 04, 2013 at 02:51:46PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > It would be interesting to make the default 1 or 2 for non-critpath > > and 3 for critpath... > > +1 Let's do it! Untested, but this should work: http://bochecha.fedorap

Re: New package written in Python, without python-*

2013-07-04 Thread Marcelo Barbosa - Fedora Ambassador
Bohuslav/Toshio, Thank you for opinions and informations, i belive what now this point is more clear for me. Marcelo Barbosa Fedora Project Packager Fedora Project Ambassador fireman...@fedoraproject.org http://planet.fedoraproject.org On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 1:40 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:

Re: More unhelpful update descriptions

2013-07-04 Thread Matthew Miller
On Thu, Jul 04, 2013 at 02:51:46PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > It would be interesting to make the default 1 or 2 for non-critpath > and 3 for critpath... +1 Let's do it! -- Matthew Miller ☁☁☁ Fedora Cloud Architect ☁☁☁ -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.

Re: Fedora 19 Gnome Desktop Touchscreen Usability

2013-07-04 Thread Florian Müllner
On Thu, Jul 4, 2013 at 12:04 PM, Thomas Sailer wrote: > What is happening here? How can I get the shell to accept finger input too? It is fallout from the port to XInput2, see https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=697192. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fed

Re: Fedora 19 Gnome Desktop Touchscreen Usability

2013-07-04 Thread Adam Williamson
On 2013-07-04 3:04, Thomas Sailer wrote: I can operate the full gnome desktop with a mouse, the touchpad, and a digitizer pen. I can operate all applications with fingers. However, I cannot operate the gnome shell using fingers. When I tap on for example "Activities", the battery icon or a close

Re: More unhelpful update descriptions

2013-07-04 Thread Adam Williamson
On 2013-07-04 2:56, Till Maas wrote: On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 09:39:47PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: most updates get submitted with the default +3 auto-push, even though it's perhaps not appropriate for all updates. So can we please get a sane default value then that is good for most update

Re: Circular dependencies in texlive?

2013-07-04 Thread John Reiser
> I tried to build texlive-2013-0.1.20130608_r30832.fc19.src.rpm for EPEL, the > build failed with the following error: > > error: Failed build dependencies: > harfbuzz-devel is needed by > texlive-3:2013-0.1.20130608_r30832.el6.x86_64 > graphite2-devel is needed by > texlive-3:

Re: Compile-time shared library name mismatching base name (SDL)

2013-07-04 Thread Florian Weimer
On 07/04/2013 06:14 PM, Miroslav Lichvar wrote: gpsd-libs-3.9-1.fc19.i686,/usr/lib/libgps.so.20.0,libgps.so.20 gpsd-libs-3.9-1.fc19.i686,/usr/lib/libgpsd.so.21.0,libgpsd.so.21 gpsd-libs-3.9-1.fc19.x86_64,/usr/lib64/libgps.so.20.0,libgps.so.20 gpsd-libs-3.9-1.fc19.x86_64,/usr/lib64/libgpsd.so.21.0

Re: Compile-time shared library name mismatching base name (SDL)

2013-07-04 Thread Miroslav Lichvar
On Thu, Jul 04, 2013 at 05:39:02PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: > On 07/04/2013 03:29 PM, Miroslav Lichvar wrote: > >Perhaps the best option would be to rename the symlink and replace it > >with a linker script containing just "INPUT(-lSDL-1.2)" to keep > >ldconfig happy. This is how it's done in t

Re: Who uses abi-compliance-checker?

2013-07-04 Thread Richard Shaw
Sounds like we need abi-dumper then... Anyone up for a review? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=980937 Thanks, Richard -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Who uses abi-compliance-checker?

2013-07-04 Thread Andrey Ponomarenko
Richard Shaw wrote: On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 9:40 PM, Mathieu Bridon mailto:boche...@fedoraproject.org>> wrote: On Wed, 2013-07-03 at 15:03 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote: > If anyone is curious about it, I don't mind typing up the process I go > through to make the checks. I think I'

Re: Compile-time shared library name mismatching base name (SDL)

2013-07-04 Thread Miroslav Lichvar
On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 09:36:19AM +, Petr Pisar wrote: > root@fedora-20:~ # ls -o /usr/lib64/libSDL* > lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root 20 Jul 1 10:43 /usr/lib64/libSDL-1.2.so.0 -> > libSDL-1.2.so.0.11.4 > -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root 444176 Jun 19 12:58 /usr/lib64/libSDL-1.2.so.0.11.4 > lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root

Re: Who uses abi-compliance-checker?

2013-07-04 Thread Richard Shaw
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 9:40 PM, Mathieu Bridon wrote: > On Wed, 2013-07-03 at 15:03 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote: > > If anyone is curious about it, I don't mind typing up the process I go > > through to make the checks. I think I've found a pretty good path of > least > > resistance method :) > > I'

Re: Who uses abi-compliance-checker?

2013-07-04 Thread Andrey Ponomarenko
Richard Shaw wrote: This is an extreme example, but after removing the offending headers I got this: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/34775202/compat_reports/ffmpeg/0.10.7_to_1.2.1/compat_report.html Thanks, Richard New approach (by using the abi-dumper tool) avoids such problems with

Re: Who uses abi-compliance-checker?

2013-07-04 Thread Andrey Ponomarenko
Remi Collet wrote: But I also use http://upstream-tracker.org/ Very usefull, except for not yet released version. For some libraries we check unreleased versions from the upstream source control (git, svn, etc.). See example: http://upstream-tracker.org/versions/libssh.html -- Andrey Pono

Re: Who uses abi-compliance-checker?

2013-07-04 Thread Andrey Ponomarenko
Xavier Bachelot wrote: On 07/03/2013 10:03 PM, Richard Shaw wrote: I initially got abi-compliance-checker into Fedora because one of my packages does not maintain any sort of API/ABI compatibility or even versioning for that matter. That way I could always check a new release to see if any of i

Re: Who uses abi-compliance-checker?

2013-07-04 Thread Andrey Ponomarenko
Sérgio Basto wrote: On Qua, 2013-07-03 at 15:03 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote: I initially got abi-compliance-checker into Fedora because one of my packages does not maintain any sort of API/ABI compatibility or even versioning for that matter. That way I could always check a new release to see if

Orphaning be and python-storm

2013-07-04 Thread Michel Alexandre Salim
Dear all, I'm orphaning the following packages: be, "Bugs Everywhere", a DVCS-based issue tracker python-storm, the Canonical-sponsored ORM for Python In both cases, upstream's own test harnesses tend to bring up several different failures, so whoever picks them up should probably invest some tim

rawhide report: 20130704 changes

2013-07-04 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
Compose started at Thu Jul 4 08:15:02 UTC 2013 Broken deps for x86_64 -- [avgtime] avgtime-0-0.6.git20130201.fc20.x86_64 requires libphobos-ldc.so.60()(64bit) [derelict] derelict-tcod-3-20.20130626gite70c293.fc20.i686 requir

[Bug 960011] Sending large object (many levels deep) throws error Incorrect parameter at line 1993

2013-07-04 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=960011 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Resolution|---

Re: vote for systemd: Nay (now working but still Voting Nay)

2013-07-04 Thread Jean-Marc Pigeon
Quoting Lennart Poettering : On Tue, 02.07.13 16:57, Jean-Marc Pigeon (j...@safe.ca) wrote: As expected the problem stand on a very small detail (within /etc/fstab) Note that in a systemd world fstab shouldn't really list any of the virtual file systems like procfs, sysfs, devpts, /dev/

Re: vote for systemd: Nay.

2013-07-04 Thread Jean-Marc Pigeon
FC18 template is a very standard one (a 939 MBytes tgz file) which (and this is a key factor) was proved to be fully working "as is" in an openvz container (kernel 2.6.32-042stab076.8). "as is" means that Template was never taylored to be on openvz container (template is used out of the box in o

Circular dependencies in texlive?

2013-07-04 Thread Alain Portal
Hi, I tried to build texlive-2013-0.1.20130608_r30832.fc19.src.rpm for EPEL, the build failed with the following error: error: Failed build dependencies: harfbuzz-devel is needed by texlive-3:2013-0.1.20130608_r30832.el6.x86_64 graphite2-devel is needed by texlive-3:2013-0.1.20

Fedora 19 Gnome Desktop Touchscreen Usability

2013-07-04 Thread Thomas Sailer
I can operate the full gnome desktop with a mouse, the touchpad, and a digitizer pen. I can operate all applications with fingers. However, I cannot operate the gnome shell using fingers. When I tap on for example "Activities", the battery icon or a close button in a window title bar, that item

Re: More unhelpful update descriptions

2013-07-04 Thread Till Maas
On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 09:39:47PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > most updates get submitted with the default +3 auto-push, even > though it's perhaps not appropriate for all updates. So can we please get a sane default value then that is good for most updates and can be adjusted for special cas

Re: Who uses abi-compliance-checker?

2013-07-04 Thread Petr Machata
Richard Shaw writes: > I initially got abi-compliance-checker into Fedora because one of my > packages does not maintain any sort of API/ABI compatibility or even > versioning for that matter. That way I could always check a new > release to see if any of its dependencies needed to be rebuilt. I

Re: Compile-time shared library name mismatching base name (SDL)

2013-07-04 Thread Petr Machata
Petr Pisar writes: > Is the installed libSDL.so symlink a mistage in the SDL-devel package? > > Is renaming libSDL.so to libSDL-1.2.so wise? The libSDL.so is used in > upstream and other distributions. I'm speculating here, but renaming the actual DSO like this would make it possible to install

Re: Who uses abi-compliance-checker?

2013-07-04 Thread Laurent Rineau
Le mercredi 03 juillet 2013 15:03:53 Richard Shaw a écrit : > I initially got abi-compliance-checker into Fedora because one of my > packages does not maintain any sort of API/ABI compatibility or even > versioning for that matter. That way I could always check a new release to > see if any of its