On Wed, 26 Jun 2013 19:30:56 -0400
David wrote:
> In Fedora 19 the Firefox version is 21.
>
> In Rawhide the Firefox version is still 20.
>
> xulrunner-22.0-2.fc20.x86_64 is available but the old Firefox will
> not allow it to update which also, it appears, does not allow the
> Thunderbird updat
In Fedora 19 the Firefox version is 21.
In Rawhide the Firefox version is still 20. xulrunner-22.0-2.fc20.x86_64
is available but the old Firefox will not allow it to update which also,
it appears, does not allow the Thunderbird update to 17.0.7 to happen.
--
David
--
devel mailing list
devel
On Wed, 2013-06-26 at 13:30 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> In case you're asking the question in the topic: you may notice there is
> now an 'RC2.1' in the TC/RC download directory.
>
> This is a respin of only the KDE live (and one non-blocking spin that's
> based on it), including this update:
Il 26/06/2013 17:39, Björn Esser ha scritto:
> # dirty hack to force immediate binding with hardenend build having
> # autocrap's libtool pass the need gcc-specs to linker.
> sed -i -e 's! \\\$compiler_flags !&\\\$CFLAGS \\\$LDFLAGS !' libtool
Weird, I didn't see any mention of this on the autocra
Am 26.06.2013 23:37, schrieb Kevin Fenzi:
> On Wed, 26 Jun 2013 23:31:47 +0200
> Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>> "-fstack-protector-strong" would *not* be enabled anywhere with
>> what i requested - it would only be *possible* to use it within
>> Fedora 18 - IMHO a big difference
>
> Please file a RFE
On Wed, 2013-06-26 at 13:50 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 12:46:05PM +, Fedora Branched Report wrote:
> > Compose started at Tue Jun 25 09:15:02 UTC 2013
> >
> > Broken deps for x86_64
> > --
> > [avgtime]
> >
On Wed, 26 Jun 2013 23:31:47 +0200
Reindl Harald wrote:
> "-fstack-protector-strong" would *not* be enabled anywhere with
> what i requested - it would only be *possible* to use it within
> Fedora 18 - IMHO a big difference
Please file a RFE bug on gcc and see what the maintainer thinks?
I don
Am 26.06.2013 23:10, schrieb Josh Boyer:
> On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 4:43 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>
>> Am 26.06.2013 21:10, schrieb Bill Nottingham:
>>> * #1128switching from "-fstack-protector" to
>>> "-fstack-protector-strong" in Fedora 20 (notting, 18:10:54)
>>> * AGREED: Will switch
On Wed, 2013-06-26 at 14:24 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-06-26 at 23:21 +0200, Marcel J.E. Mol wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 01:22:21PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2013-06-26 at 20:40 +0200, Marcel J.E. Mol wrote:> Hi there,> > I
> > > setup Fedora19-Beta (plus
On Wed, 2013-06-26 at 23:21 +0200, Marcel J.E. Mol wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 01:22:21PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Wed, 2013-06-26 at 20:40 +0200, Marcel J.E. Mol wrote:> Hi there,> > I
> > setup Fedora19-Beta (plus updates) as a XEN server and installed a> Fedora
> > 19 as a dom
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 01:22:21PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-06-26 at 20:40 +0200, Marcel J.E. Mol wrote:> Hi there,> > I
> setup Fedora19-Beta (plus updates) as a XEN server and installed a> Fedora 19
> as a domU client.
> You may want to check these bugs:
> https://bugzilla.r
These m4 scripts (used by libvirt) may also be of interest
to upstream developers:
http://libvirt.org/git/?p=libvirt.git;a=blob;f=m4/virt-compile-pie.m4;hb=HEAD
http://libvirt.org/git/?p=libvirt.git;a=blob;f=m4/virt-linker-relro.m4;hb=HEAD
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat h
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 4:43 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 26.06.2013 21:10, schrieb Bill Nottingham:
>> * #1128switching from "-fstack-protector" to
>> "-fstack-protector-strong" in Fedora 20 (notting, 18:10:54)
>> * AGREED: Will switch from "-fstack-protector" to
>> "-fstack-prote
Thank you everybody for joining today's Fedora-ARM meeting. For those
who were unable to attend the minutes are below. If you have an ARM
device that is supported by Fedora 19 please participate in RC2 testing
at the links provided. Thank you!
Minutes:
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedo
Am 26.06.2013 21:10, schrieb Bill Nottingham:
> * #1128switching from "-fstack-protector" to
> "-fstack-protector-strong" in Fedora 20 (notting, 18:10:54)
> * AGREED: Will switch from "-fstack-protector" to
> "-fstack-protector-strong" in Fedora 20. Any reversion based on poor
> b
In case you're asking the question in the topic: you may notice there is
now an 'RC2.1' in the TC/RC download directory.
This is a respin of only the KDE live (and one non-blocking spin that's
based on it), including this update:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-11724/liveusb-c
On Wed, 2013-06-26 at 20:40 +0200, Marcel J.E. Mol wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I setup Fedora19-Beta (plus updates) as a XEN server and installed a
> Fedora 19 as a domU client.
You may want to check these bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=977974
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/b
What happened to my post. It seems liek most lines are yanked together
making it unreadable.
That is not the way I posted it (using mutt)!
-Marcel
--
== Marcel J.E. MolMESA Consulting B.V.
===-ph. +31-(0)6-54724868 P.O.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Greetings, extra-patient friends:
The elections for the Fedora Board, Fedora Engineering Steering
Committee (FESCo), and Fedora Ambassadors Steering Committee (FAmSCo)
have concluded, and the results are shown below.
* * *
FESCo is electing 5 seat
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2013-06-26)
===
Meeting started by notting at 18:00:55 UTC. The full logs are available
at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2013-06-26/fesco.2013-06-26-18.00.log.html
.
Meeting summary
--
Hi there,
I setup Fedora19-Beta (plus updates) as a XEN server and installed a
Fedora 19 as a domU client.
Unfortunately the domU client failed to boot. After some investigation
it turned out to be the grub.cfg file in the client that caused XEN
pygrub to fail.
The fix is not to difficult and I
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 08:44:36 -0500,
Dennis Gilmore wrote:
no, because pungi the tool that creates the source dvd doesnt support
split media. I actually want to stop making source dvds all together.
but that will need legal approval first. note we don't actually make and
source dvds at all
Good day all,
Please join us today (Wednesday, June 26th) at 4PM EDT (8PM UTC)
for the Fedora ARM weekly status meeting in #fedora-meeting-1 on Freenode.
On the agenda so far..
0) Status of ACTION items from our previous meeting
1) Problem packages
2) Kernel Status Update
3) Aarch64 - Status
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC
meeting Thursday at 2013-06-27 16:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on
irc.freenode.net.
Local time information (via. rktime):
2013-06-27 09:00 Thu US/Pacific
2013-06-27 12:00 Thu US/Eastern
2013-06-27 16:00 Thu UTC <-
2013-06-27 17:00
Hello list!
As discussed a few days ago [1] there's a _severe_ bug in autotool's
libtool known for ages [2] preventing libs not to be build fully
hardened (partial RELRO), even if you have included `%global
_hardened_build 1` into you rpm-spec.
There was some LDFLAGS-hack [3] mentioned by me duri
On Wed, 26 Jun 2013 08:44:36 -0500
Dennis Gilmore wrote:
>
> no, because pungi the tool that creates the source dvd doesnt
> support split media. I actually want to stop making source dvds all
> together. but that will need legal approval first. note we don't
> actually make and source dvds at
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 26 Jun 2013 11:23:32 +0100
Frank Murphy wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Jun 2013 23:13:01 +0100
> Frank Murphy wrote:
>
> Apology for self-reply
>
> Any further thoughts on this.
> Can we split the SRPMS dvd ourselves over two?
> Found something Board
On Sat, 2013-06-22 at 17:07 +0200, Till Maas wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 12:09:57PM -0500, Dan Williams wrote:
>
> > > On the other hand, having NetworkManager available all the time enables
> > > things like management tools to use its API to query system status,
> > > instead of guessing
commit 0b89c9e3e3c085a53a268cf122a0ae62dbbe7324
Author: Jitka Plesnikova
Date: Wed Jun 26 16:01:10 2013 +0200
Update license and dependencies
perl-Exception-Class.spec | 12 ++--
1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Exception-Class.spec b/perl-
On Wed, 2013-06-26 at 09:52 -0300, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade wrote:
> 2013/6/26 Remi Collet :
> > Le 26/06/2013 14:36, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade a écrit :
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> It is taking a bit too long for some dependencies to be rebuilt
> >> in rawhide.
> >>
> >> Could a compat-lib
- Original Message -
> On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 8:22 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 22:17:12 -0400,
> > Josh Boyer wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> We had said that the new FESCo should attend if possible. I'm still
> >> hoping the election results are announced in time, bu
2013/6/26 Remi Collet :
> Le 26/06/2013 14:36, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade a écrit :
>> Hi,
>>
>> It is taking a bit too long for some dependencies to be rebuilt
>> in rawhide.
>>
>> Could a compat-libgd be provided please? I am receiving daily
>> mails about broken deps, already posted to
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 12:46:05PM +, Fedora Branched Report wrote:
> Compose started at Tue Jun 25 09:15:02 UTC 2013
>
> Broken deps for x86_64
> --
> [avgtime]
> avgtime-0-0.5.git20120724.fc19.x86_64 requires
> libphobos-ldc.so.6
Compose started at Wed Jun 26 09:15:02 UTC 2013
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[avgtime]
avgtime-0-0.5.git20120724.fc19.x86_64 requires
libphobos-ldc.so.60()(64bit)
[derelict]
derelict-ogg-3-13.20130516gitd8aa11d.fc19.i686 require
Le 26/06/2013 14:36, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> It is taking a bit too long for some dependencies to be rebuilt
> in rawhide.
>
> Could a compat-libgd be provided please? I am receiving daily
> mails about broken deps, already posted to $pkg-owner@ asking
> what I co
Hi,
It is taking a bit too long for some dependencies to be rebuilt
in rawhide.
Could a compat-libgd be provided please? I am receiving daily
mails about broken deps, already posted to $pkg-owner@ asking
what I could help, but still no response neither problems corrected.
Remi Collet told m
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 8:22 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 22:17:12 -0400,
> Josh Boyer wrote:
>>
>>
>> We had said that the new FESCo should attend if possible. I'm still
>> hoping the election results are announced in time, but we should
>> probably add an agenda item
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 22:17:12 -0400,
Josh Boyer wrote:
We had said that the new FESCo should attend if possible. I'm still
hoping the election results are announced in time, but we should
probably add an agenda item for this.
They were available for a short period right (an hour or two)
Hi community,
can anybody make the review request of libtiff3 compatibility package?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=978345
Thanks in advance
--
Best regards / S pozdravem
Petr Hracek
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listin
Compose started at Wed Jun 26 08:15:03 UTC 2013
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[0ad]
0ad-0.0.13-3.fc20.x86_64 requires libenet-1.3.8.so()(64bit)
[chmsee]
chmsee-2.0-5.git0acc572a.fc20.x86_64 requires libxpcom.so()(64bit)
[cxf]
On Mon, 24 Jun 2013 23:13:01 +0100
Frank Murphy wrote:
Apology for self-reply
Any further thoughts on this.
Can we split the SRPMS dvd ourselves over two?
Found something Boardy from 2008:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.advisory-board/4277
--
Regards,
Frank "When in doubt
Dne 25.6.2013 22:37, Björn Persson napsal(a):
Petr Pisar wrote:
On 2013-06-25, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Is there some common practice, where to place architecture specific
header files? From output of the following command, I can't see any
such place.
I dont't think so. SDL moves architecture spec
42 matches
Mail list logo
