Re: Fedora 19 Final blocker status: fix and karma requests

2013-06-22 Thread Adam Williamson
On Sat, 2013-06-22 at 22:17 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Sat, 2013-06-22 at 11:00 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote: > > On Fri, 2013-06-21 at 14:14 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > > > > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=958426 - "19 Final TC1 > > > x86_64 Desktop Live is overs

Re: Fedora 19 Final blocker status: fix and karma requests

2013-06-22 Thread Adam Williamson
On Sat, 2013-06-22 at 11:00 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote: > On Fri, 2013-06-21 at 14:14 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=958426 - "19 Final TC1 > > x86_64 Desktop Live is oversized (larger than 1 GB)" - desktop team (I > > know you're working on

Re: Fedora 19 Final blocker status: fix and karma requests

2013-06-22 Thread Adam Williamson
On Sat, 2013-06-22 at 18:51 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > On Sat, 2013-06-22 at 11:00 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote: > > I've filed an update with some 20 packages, only removing excess baggage > > from /usr/share/doc (duplicate docs, large ChangeLog files, etc). It > > touches nothing outside /

Re: Fedora 19 Final blocker status: fix and karma requests

2013-06-22 Thread Michael Catanzaro
On Sat, 2013-06-22 at 11:00 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote: > I've filed an update with some 20 packages, only removing excess baggage > from /usr/share/doc (duplicate docs, large ChangeLog files, etc). It > touches nothing outside /usr/share/doc, so should be fairly safe to let > in. That will proba

Re: Getting rid of systemd-sysv-convert?

2013-06-22 Thread Rahul Sundaram
Hi On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 10:50 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: > > > maybe i woul dnot need to repeat things dozens of times if i would > not see the same types of mistake sover and over again and this has > nothing to do with the distibution revolving around me > You seem to assume that you can ch

Re: Fedora 19 Final blocker status: fix and karma requests

2013-06-22 Thread Adam Williamson
On Sat, 2013-06-22 at 11:00 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote: > On Fri, 2013-06-21 at 14:14 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=958426 - "19 Final TC1 > > x86_64 Desktop Live is oversized (larger than 1 GB)" - desktop team (I > > know you're working on

Re: Minimal install diff from F16 to F19 (TC6)

2013-06-22 Thread Till Maas
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 12:09:57PM -0500, Dan Williams wrote: > > On the other hand, having NetworkManager available all the time enables > > things like management tools to use its API to query system status, > > instead of guessing it from kernel information and heuristic analysis of > > some

Re: Fedora 19 Final blocker status: fix and karma requests

2013-06-22 Thread Matthias Clasen
On Fri, 2013-06-21 at 14:14 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=958426 - "19 Final TC1 > x86_64 Desktop Live is oversized (larger than 1 GB)" - desktop team (I > know you're working on it) I've filed an update with some 20 packages, only removing excess

F-19 Branched report: 20130622 changes

2013-06-22 Thread Fedora Branched Report
Compose started at Sat Jun 22 09:15:02 UTC 2013 Broken deps for x86_64 -- [avgtime] avgtime-0-0.5.git20120724.fc19.x86_64 requires libphobos-ldc.so.60()(64bit) [derelict] derelict-ogg-3-13.20130516gitd8aa11d.fc19.i686 require

Re: Minimal install diff from F16 to F19 (TC6)

2013-06-22 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 01:15:37PM -0500, Chris Adams wrote: > Once upon a time, Stephen Gallagher said: > > Mind if I ask why you think this way about NetworkManager? The NM > > currently shipping in Fedora 19 has full support for managing static > > NICs, as well as bonding, bridging and VLAN su