Re: Getting rid of systemd-sysv-convert?

2013-06-21 Thread Rahul Sundaram
On 06/21/2013 06:48 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 22.06.2013 00:39, schrieb Jared K. Smith: Your logical fallacy here is that the distribution works just like you do. I've seen you argue time and time again in the mailing lists that because *you* do things a certain way, that the *distribution

Re: Getting rid of systemd-sysv-convert?

2013-06-21 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 22.06.2013 00:39, schrieb Jared K. Smith: > Your logical fallacy here is that the distribution works just like you do. > I've seen you argue time and time again > in the mailing lists that because *you* do things a certain way, that the > *distribution* should work that way. Or > that if y

Re: Getting rid of systemd-sysv-convert?

2013-06-21 Thread Jared K. Smith
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 5:40 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: > in my life i make descisions and follow them straight > If you're one person, it's fairly easy to make a decision and follow it straight through to completion. If you're a Linux distribution, it's a bit harder to make radical shifts -- and

Re: Getting rid of systemd-sysv-convert?

2013-06-21 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 21.06.2013 23:52, schrieb drago01: > On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 11:40 PM, Reindl Harald > wrote: >> Am 21.06.2013 17:54, schrieb Brendan Long: >>> On 06/20/2013 05:11 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: /etc/init.d/ should be empty, with wrappers or not, on a distribution switching to systemd -

Re: Getting rid of systemd-sysv-convert?

2013-06-21 Thread drago01
On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 12:08 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: > > > Am 21.06.2013 23:52, schrieb drago01: >> On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 11:40 PM, Reindl Harald >> wrote: >>> Am 21.06.2013 17:54, schrieb Brendan Long: On 06/20/2013 05:11 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: > /etc/init.d/ should be empty, wit

Re: Getting rid of systemd-sysv-convert?

2013-06-21 Thread drago01
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 11:40 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: > > > Am 21.06.2013 17:54, schrieb Brendan Long: >> On 06/20/2013 05:11 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: >>> /etc/init.d/ should be empty, with wrappers or not, on a >>> distribution switching to systemd - period >> >> Why? > > *why not* > > is fedora

Re: Getting rid of systemd-sysv-convert?

2013-06-21 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 21.06.2013 17:54, schrieb Brendan Long: > On 06/20/2013 05:11 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: >> /etc/init.d/ should be empty, with wrappers or not, on a >> distribution switching to systemd - period > > Why? *why not* is fedora now using systemd or sysv-init? in my life i make descisions and foll

Fedora 19 Final blocker status: fix and karma requests

2013-06-21 Thread Adam Williamson
Hey folks, time for another F19 Final status update! We're looking relatively hopeful at this point, but still some work to be done. Outstanding blockers We need fixes for: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=924162 - "A software selection with dependency errors is

Retiring Prelude IDS

2013-06-21 Thread Steve Grubb
Hello, I am going to retire the Prelude Intrusion Detections System in F20. Upstream has been dead for over 3 years. The only packages that I know that link against it is pads, audit, and suricata. I own all 3 of those packages, so this should mostly be a FYI for everyone here. -Steve -- deve

Re: Minimal install diff from F16 to F19 (TC6)

2013-06-21 Thread Dan Williams
On Fri, 2013-06-21 at 13:17 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: > On 06/20/2013 09:13 PM, Dan Williams wrote: > > nmcli doesn't work unless NM is running, since it talks to NM to do > > stuff, so it would be incompatible with NM setting things up and > > quitting. > > It could spawn NetworkManager as a s

Re: Minimal install diff from F16 to F19 (TC6)

2013-06-21 Thread Dan Williams
On Fri, 2013-06-21 at 13:42 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: > On 06/20/2013 08:01 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > Mind if I ask why you think this way about NetworkManager? The NM > > currently shipping in Fedora 19 has full support for managing static > > NICs, as well as bonding, bridging and VLAN

Re: Getting rid of systemd-sysv-convert?

2013-06-21 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Thu, 20.06.13 15:18, Lennart Poettering (mzerq...@0pointer.de) wrote: > So, anyone still insists on keeping this around? If not I will file a > bug against FPC to drop any mention of the tool and remove it from the > systemd RPMs, and everything will get smaller and simpler and unicorns > and b

Re: Getting rid of systemd-sysv-convert?

2013-06-21 Thread Brendan Long
On 06/20/2013 05:11 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: > /etc/init.d/ should be empty, with wrappers or not, on a > distribution switching to systemd - period Why? signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mai

Re: FYI: F20 Feature: Migrate to Bluez5

2013-06-21 Thread drago01
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 5:29 PM, Bastien Nocera wrote: > On Fri, 2013-06-21 at 17:16 +0200, Kalev Lember wrote: >> 2013-05-06 11:13, Peter Robinson skrev: >> > On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 8:35 AM, Bastien Nocera wrote: >> >> Heya, >> >> >> >> In Fedora 20, we'll be using BlueZ 5.x to manage Bluetooth

Re: Heads up - drop unnecessary calls to libgcrypt when gnutls is used

2013-06-21 Thread Florian Weimer
On 06/21/2013 05:33 PM, Tomas Mraz wrote: Due to the gnutls now using nettle as the crypto backend instead of libgcrypt, it is not necessary anymore to call libgcrypt initialization in applications and libraries that call gnutls and link to libgcrypt. Can you drop the libpthread dependency from

[Bug 791078] perl-Config-IniFiles should require IO::Scalar

2013-06-21 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=791078 Paul Howarth changed: What|Removed |Added CC||p...@city-fan.org --- Comment #14 from Pa

[Bug 791078] perl-Config-IniFiles should require IO::Scalar

2013-06-21 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=791078 Konstantin Ryabitsev changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mri...@gmail.com --- Comment #13

Re: [Fedora QA] #388: Page not found after login to Propose

2013-06-21 Thread Fedora QA
#388: Page not found after login to Propose ---+- Reporter: kparal| Owner: mkrizek Type: defect| Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Component: Blocker

File System-Command-1.100.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by iarnell

2013-06-21 Thread Iain Arnell
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-System-Command: 4174aa91b6f032b97549ba9aec5dc714 System-Command-1.100.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.or

Heads up - drop unnecessary calls to libgcrypt when gnutls is used

2013-06-21 Thread Tomas Mraz
Due to the gnutls now using nettle as the crypto backend instead of libgcrypt, it is not necessary anymore to call libgcrypt initialization in applications and libraries that call gnutls and link to libgcrypt. If your application also uses libgcrypt on your own you can also consider moving it to u

Re: FYI: F20 Feature: Migrate to Bluez5

2013-06-21 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Fri, 2013-06-21 at 17:16 +0200, Kalev Lember wrote: > 2013-05-06 11:13, Peter Robinson skrev: > > On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 8:35 AM, Bastien Nocera wrote: > >> Heya, > >> > >> In Fedora 20, we'll be using BlueZ 5.x to manage Bluetooth devices. > >> > >> Bluez5 uses a D-Bus API that's not compatibl

Re: Minimal install diff from F16 to F19 (TC6)

2013-06-21 Thread Bill Nottingham
Pavel Simerda (psime...@redhat.com) said: > > From: "Chris Adams" > > I prefer the "modern" secondaries vs. the old-style eth0:123, although I > > have run into vendor software (such as the Plesk web hosting control > > panel) that can't handle it. I expect if that was the "one true way" in > >

Re: FYI: F20 Feature: Migrate to Bluez5

2013-06-21 Thread Kalev Lember
2013-05-06 11:13, Peter Robinson skrev: > On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 8:35 AM, Bastien Nocera wrote: >> Heya, >> >> In Fedora 20, we'll be using BlueZ 5.x to manage Bluetooth devices. >> >> Bluez5 uses a D-Bus API that's not compatible with Bluez4[1] and as >> such, management applications and a number

Re: Minimal install diff from F16 to F19 (TC6)

2013-06-21 Thread Chris Adams
Once upon a time, Florian Weimer said: > The kernel does not know anything about interfaces which do not > exist, possibly lacks information about interfaces which are not up, > and has no concept whatsoever of DNS, DHCP (at least after boot) or > OpenVPN or settings. The idea of NM being able to

Re: Minimal install diff from F16 to F19 (TC6)

2013-06-21 Thread Florian Weimer
On 06/21/2013 03:01 PM, Chris Adams wrote: Once upon a time, Florian Weimer said: On the other hand, having NetworkManager available all the time enables things like management tools to use its API to query system status, instead of guessing it from kernel information and heuristic analysis of

Re: Minimal install diff from F16 to F19 (TC6)

2013-06-21 Thread Chris Adams
Once upon a time, Florian Weimer said: > On the other hand, having NetworkManager available all the time > enables things like management tools to use its API to query system > status, instead of guessing it from kernel information and heuristic > analysis of some files under /etc. Current networ

F-19 Branched report: 20130621 changes

2013-06-21 Thread Fedora Branched Report
Compose started at Fri Jun 21 09:15:02 UTC 2013 Broken deps for x86_64 -- [avgtime] avgtime-0-0.5.git20120724.fc19.x86_64 requires libphobos-ldc.so.60()(64bit) [derelict] derelict-ogg-3-13.20130516gitd8aa11d.fc19.i686 require

Re: Revisor: still F13 repository!!!

2013-06-21 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 14:06:53 +0100, Vincenzo Virgilio wrote: Installing revisor, it doesn't have anaconda in its dependency. There is still the bug of creating anconda-runtime directory in /usr/lib and the link to anaconda executable. These are well known problems, it's ok, but reposit

Revisor: still F13 repository!!!

2013-06-21 Thread Vincenzo Virgilio
Hi! This week i started working on a new project with Fedora 19beta. Installing revisor, it doesn't have anaconda in its dependency. There is still the bug of creating anconda-runtime directory in /usr/lib and the link to anaconda executable. These are well known problems, it's ok, but reposit

Re: A need for build triggers & automatic rebuilds

2013-06-21 Thread Florian Weimer
On 06/21/2013 08:28 AM, Krzysztof Daniel wrote: OSGI records that there is a file org.eclipse.jetty.http_9.0.3.v20130506.jar that holds a plugin with version 9.0.3.v20130506. That version goes at the build time in a couple of places (including metabundle). Such exact dependencies are fundament

Re: Minimal install diff from F16 to F19 (TC6)

2013-06-21 Thread Florian Weimer
On 06/20/2013 08:01 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: Mind if I ask why you think this way about NetworkManager? The NM currently shipping in Fedora 19 has full support for managing static NICs, as well as bonding, bridging and VLAN support for enterprise use-cases. NetworkManager has historically be

Re: Minimal install diff from F16 to F19 (TC6)

2013-06-21 Thread Florian Weimer
On 06/20/2013 09:13 PM, Dan Williams wrote: nmcli doesn't work unless NM is running, since it talks to NM to do stuff, so it would be incompatible with NM setting things up and quitting. It could spawn NetworkManager as a subprocess and use the peer-to-peer D-Bus protocol to talk to it. I thi

Re: Attention F19 users! DO NOT upgrade to Erlang R16B01 if prompted.

2013-06-21 Thread Peter Lemenkov
2013/6/21 Peter Lemenkov : > Hello All. > > Recent Erlang bugfix release fixed a few issues but added another > nasty one - actually almost all Erlang application will fail to start. > I'm working on it. Meanwhile please stay with R16B or downgrade to it. Fixed erlang-mochiweb: * https://admin.fe

Re: Attention F19 users! DO NOT upgrade to Erlang R16B01 if prompted.

2013-06-21 Thread Peter Lemenkov
2013/6/21 Peter Lemenkov : > Hello All. > > Recent Erlang bugfix release fixed a few issues but added another > nasty one - actually almost all Erlang application will fail to start. > I'm working on it. Meanwhile please stay with R16B or downgrade to it. Fixed couchdb: * https://admin.fedoraproj

Attention F19 users! DO NOT upgrade to Erlang R16B01 if prompted.

2013-06-21 Thread Peter Lemenkov
Hello All. Recent Erlang bugfix release fixed a few issues but added another nasty one - actually almost all Erlang application will fail to start. I'm working on it. Meanwhile please stay with R16B or downgrade to it. Here are few links for those who's curious: * http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.c

Re: headsup ghc-7.6.3 coming soon to rawhide

2013-06-21 Thread Jens Petersen
> I am planning to start pushing all the version > updates and rebuilds soon to F20 Rawhide. This is now done and in record time! (I think it is first time I managed to rebuild everything (all 220+ packages modulo xmobar) in under 24 hours.) So next rawhide report should be normal again I hope. :