-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
as the Fedora 19 schedule[1] states the Final change freeze is almost
upon us. The last stable push will be done as late as possible on June
17 in the US, after that point only Final freeze exceptions will be
accepted[2] and allowed into Fedor
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 9:09 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> This argument falls over by the fact that the fedora builders are all rhel 6
> except for the arm ones that are running fedora 18. it is true you can not
> use rhel 5
That is precisely the kind of situation I encountered in the past..
I'm a
This argument falls over by the fact that the fedora builders are all rhel 6
except for the arm ones that are running fedora 18. it is true you can not use
rhel 5
Corey Quinn wrote:
>On Jun 14, 2013, at 10:22 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>>
>> Ah, I see.
>>
>> IMHO, you should use mock anytime y
On Friday 14 June 2013 17:45:51 Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Dom, 2013-06-09 at 13:02 +0300, Oron Peled wrote:
> > As soon as dpkg-1.16.x hits f18.
>
> dpkg-1.16.10-4.fc18 hits f18 (status stable)
> Now alien is waiting for debhelper
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/debhelper-9.20120909-1.fc18
However all future 64-bit ARM (AArch64) systems will use GRUB2.
Sent from my Android phone using TouchDown (www.nitrodesk.com)
-Original Message-
From: Jeffrey Bastian [jbast...@redhat.com]
Received: Friday, 14 Jun 2013, 17:31
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Subject: Re: Which platform
On Fri, 14 Jun 2013 16:31:38 -0500
Jeffrey Bastian wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 02:48:42PM -0400, Eric H. Christensen wrote:
> > I'm working on text in the Fedora Security Guide discussing GRUB.
> > There is a sentence that reads "[Fedora] ships with the GRUB boot
> > loader on the x86 platfo
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 02:48:42PM -0400, Eric H. Christensen wrote:
> I'm working on text in the Fedora Security Guide discussing GRUB.
> There is a sentence that reads "[Fedora] ships with the GRUB boot
> loader on the x86 platform." and I am curious as to how true that is.
> Do we not use GRUB o
Eric H. Christensen (spa...@fedoraproject.org) said:
> I'm working on text in the Fedora Security Guide discussing GRUB. There
> is a sentence that reads "[Fedora] ships with the GRUB boot loader on the
> x86 platform." and I am curious as to how true that is. Do we not use
> GRUB on any other p
commit d4df4e0904ee61c42cb0bc509679de0a9fe70e64
Author: Emmanuel Seyman
Date: Fri Jun 14 22:56:30 2013 +0200
Initial import.
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Future.spec | 53 +
sources |1 +
3 files changed, 55 insertions(
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
I'm working on text in the Fedora Security Guide discussing GRUB. There is a
sentence that reads "[Fedora] ships with the GRUB boot loader on the x86
platform." and I am curious as to how true that is. Do we not use GRUB on any
other platform?
On Fri, 14 Jun 2013 10:34:12 -0700
Corey Quinn wrote:
> …except for the bit where this breaks in many cases if you're running
> mock on EL6 and trying to build for Fedora-recent, which was Nico's
> point.
Many cases ?
Note that all our builders are RHEL6, building packages for Fedora in
mock.
On Jun 14, 2013, at 10:22 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> Ah, I see.
>
> IMHO, you should use mock anytime you build any packages, and if you do
> that, the platform you run mock on largely doesn't matter (with a few
> rare corner cases).
>
…except for the bit where this breaks in many cases if y
On Fri, 14 Jun 2013 10:14:25 -0700
Corey Quinn wrote:
>
> On Jun 14, 2013, at 9:59 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 13 Jun 2013 19:50:05 -0400
> > Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> >
> >> It's exceptionally difficult and unreliable for RHEL or CentOS to
> >> build packages for current or recent
On Jun 14, 2013, at 9:59 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Jun 2013 19:50:05 -0400
> Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>
>> It's exceptionally difficult and unreliable for RHEL or CentOS to
>> build packages for current or recent releases with "mock" or other
>> chroot cage tool kits. Too many non-ba
On Thu, 13 Jun 2013 19:50:05 -0400
Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> It's exceptionally difficult and unreliable for RHEL or CentOS to
> build packages for current or recent releases with "mock" or other
> chroot cage tool kits. Too many non-backwards compatible changes in
> RPM and yum.
Hum? rpm and y
On Dom, 2013-06-09 at 13:02 +0300, Oron Peled wrote:
> > > debconf
>
>
>
> Went to give it some karma, found an irritating bug.
>
> Now it is fixed and pushed to rawhide, f19, f18 (waiting for karma
>
> on the last two)
>
debconf-1.5.49-3.fc18, status stable
>
> > > po-debconf
>
>
>
> N
Compose started at Fri Jun 14 09:15:02 UTC 2013
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[avgtime]
avgtime-0-0.5.git20120724.fc19.x86_64 requires
libphobos-ldc.so.60()(64bit)
[derelict]
derelict-ogg-3-13.20130516gitd8aa11d.fc19.i686 require
On 06/10/2013 01:21 PM, Honza Horak wrote:
On 06/08/2013 04:38 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2013-06-07 at 21:53 +0200, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
That was simple...
sudo systemctl enable mysqld.service
ln -s '/usr/lib/systemd/system/mysqld.service'
'/etc/systemd/system/multi-user.target.wa
On 14/06/13 10:06, Christopher Meng wrote:
> I've noticed this bug many days ago. Is it related to this version?
>
I assume you filed a bug, right?
Please don't spam 3! mailing lists, one list should be sufficient; bonus
points for including your bz#.
--
Matthias Runge
--
devel mailing list
de
On Thu, 2013-06-13 at 23:48 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Just a heads up for F19 / F20 users - rsyslog-7.4.0-1 is a bad update,
> many users (inc. me on two systems) are seeing it
> spamming /var/log/messages with old logs and sucking up 100% CPU time.
> You might not notice immediately if you'r
On Fri, 2013-06-14 at 16:06 +0800, Christopher Meng wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've noticed this bug many days ago. Is it related to this version?
>
> I had a 60GB /var/log/messages folder..
Yes; it's really a systemd bug, but downgrading rsyslog will stop the
most egregious symptom. I think 7.4.0 wen
Hi,
I've noticed this bug many days ago. Is it related to this version?
I had a 60GB /var/log/messages folder..
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=973713
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
On Thu, 2013-06-13 at 23:48 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Just a heads up for F19 / F20 users - rsyslog-7.4.0-1 is a bad update,
> many users (inc. me on two systems) are seeing it
> spamming /var/log/messages with old logs and sucking up 100% CPU time.
> You might not notice immediately if you'r
24 matches
Mail list logo
