Just a heads up for F19 / F20 users - rsyslog-7.4.0-1 is a bad update,
many users (inc. me on two systems) are seeing it
spamming /var/log/messages with old logs and sucking up 100% CPU time.
You might not notice immediately if you're not running something that
spins its fans up. I recommend downgr
Got it, thanks.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Fri, 2013-06-14 at 10:53 +0800, Christopher Meng wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is it a problem related to isa packaging problem?
>
> Today's update got this:
>
> libsss_idmap{?_isa} = 1.10.0-8.fc20.beta2 for package:
> sssd-ad-1.10.0-8.fc20.beta2.i686
> ---> Package sssd-ipa.i686 0:1.10.0-8.fc20.beta2 wil
Hi,
Is it a problem related to isa packaging problem?
Today's update got this:
libsss_idmap{?_isa} = 1.10.0-8.fc20.beta2 for package:
sssd-ad-1.10.0-8.fc20.beta2.i686
---> Package sssd-ipa.i686 0:1.10.0-8.fc20.beta2 will be installed
--> Processing Dependency: libsss_idmap{?_isa} = 1.10.0-8.fc20
Adam Williamson wrote:
> If I were you I'd just look at any app that's still using consolehelper
> and working, and copy its configuration. Shouldn't be too hard.
Makes sense. I already have mtr-gtk installed, and it uses
consolehelper. As it happens, it exhibits the same behavior, and uses
an
On Qua, 2013-06-05 at 18:17 +0200, Emmanuel Seyman wrote:
> * Adam Jackson [05/06/2013 11:36] :
> >
> > 1) That email shouldn't be sent until the update actually hits testing
>
> There's no specific moment in time at which an update hits testing.
> It depends on which mirror you're hitting and ho
It's exceptionally difficult and unreliable for RHEL or CentOS to build
packages for current or recent releases with "mock" or other chroot cage tool
kits. Too many non-backwards compatible changes in RPM and yum.
I use mock and a recent Fedora to build packages for RHEL, especially to test
EPE
Hello,
sorry to ask again for people from the provenpackagers group but I don't
know how could I fix it.
Can someone apply the small patch pasted here in the bug [1] and issue a
pango update for Fedora 18?
[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=902861
Thanks & regards,
--Simone
--
Yo
13.06.2013 19:03, Peter Robinson:
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 2:56 PM, Eugene Pivnev wrote:
I want to create subj (VM server - minimal CentOS 6 x64 + libvirtd) but
don't know - how to do this.
Without locally installed CentOS.
Anakonda? Koji?
Completely the wrong mailing list to discuss this... ce
On Thu, 2013-06-13 at 12:54 -0400, Kamil Paral wrote:
> Please note that TC3 has changed during the day. Make sure you have the
> correct one by comparing your checksums to checksums at dl.fedoraproject.org.
>
> If you have downloaded TC3 after the announcement was sent, you should be
> safe.
I
On Thu, 2013-06-13 at 09:21 -0600, Eric Smith wrote:
> I have no idea how it's happening, but I do seem to get another pair
> of these messages to /var/log/messages every time I click on
> gsmartcontrol in the menu.
If I were you I'd just look at any app that's still using consolehelper
and workin
You should take a look at the oVirt project and the oVirt node build process
On Jun 13, 2013 9:56 AM, "Eugene Pivnev" wrote:
> I want to create subj (VM server - minimal CentOS 6 x64 + libvirtd) but
> don't know - how to do this.
> Without locally installed CentOS.
> Anakonda? Koji?
> --
> devel
On Thu, 13 Jun 2013 13:23:51 + (UTC)
Petr Pisar wrote:
> On 2013-06-12, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > So, there's nothing preventing the side tag and rebuild anytime now
> > right? 5.18.0 is out, so we could start that work in rawhide?=20
> >
> Currently 5.18.0 does not pass one test when running i
Please note that TC3 has changed during the day. Make sure you have the correct
one by comparing your checksums to checksums at dl.fedoraproject.org.
If you have downloaded TC3 after the announcement was sent, you should be safe.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.
On Thu, 2013-06-13 at 17:18 +0200, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 5:10 PM, Eric Smith
> wrote:
> > I have gsmartcontrol working with consolehelper in F17, but it fails
> > to launch in F18 and F19, and logs messages like this:
> >
> > Jun 12 19:33:30 localhost /etc/gdm/Xsession[2
Hello,
On 13 June 2013 17:00, Björn Esser wrote:
> Hi there!
>
> I have a question about this review:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=889261
>
> Is it ok to havearched BuildRequires?
>
> In my opinion they should NOT be arched, because of the reasons given in
> the comments of the
I have no idea how it's happening, but I do seem to get another pair
of these messages to /var/log/messages every time I click on
gsmartcontrol in the menu.
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 9:19 AM, Eric Smith wrote:
> I have no idea how it's happening, but I do seem to get another pair
> of these message
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 5:10 PM, Eric Smith wrote:
> I have gsmartcontrol working with consolehelper in F17, but it fails
> to launch in F18 and F19, and logs messages like this:
>
> Jun 12 19:33:30 localhost /etc/gdm/Xsession[2594]: The password you typed is
> in\
> valid.
> Jun 12 19:33:30 loca
Hi,
In latest build of PHP (version 5.5.0-0.10.RC3) I have removed the JSON
extension.
Other Linux distribution also does it
- debian (unstable, with php 5.5.0)
- mageia (chauldron, with php 5.5.0)
Obviously this very important extension cannot be removed without an
alternative, which is: php-pe
I have gsmartcontrol working with consolehelper in F17, but it fails
to launch in F18 and F19, and logs messages like this:
Jun 12 19:33:30 localhost /etc/gdm/Xsession[2594]: The password you typed is in\
valid.
Jun 12 19:33:30 localhost /etc/gdm/Xsession[2594]: Please try again.
I suspect that t
Hi Todd,
we are missing /usr/libexec/git-core/git-http-backend in the new
package. Has this been intentionally removed, or is this an accident?
Best regards
Thomas
2013/4/22 Todd Zullinger :
> This is a heads up and a request for testing of git-1.8.2.1 on el5 (if
> anyone here is still using git
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 2:56 PM, Eugene Pivnev wrote:
> I want to create subj (VM server - minimal CentOS 6 x64 + libvirtd) but
> don't know - how to do this.
> Without locally installed CentOS.
> Anakonda? Koji?
Completely the wrong mailing list to discuss this... centos has their
own lists... I
Hi there!
I have a question about this review:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=889261
Is it ok to havearched BuildRequires?
In my opinion they should NOT be arched, because of the reasons given in
the comments of the bug.
Cheers,
Björn
signature.asc
Description: This is a digita
I want to create subj (VM server - minimal CentOS 6 x64 + libvirtd) but
don't know - how to do this.
Without locally installed CentOS.
Anakonda? Koji?
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 2013-06-12, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> So, there's nothing preventing the side tag and rebuild anytime now
> right? 5.18.0 is out, so we could start that work in rawhide?=20
>
Currently 5.18.0 does not pass one test when running in mock and koji.
(It's because of the terminal usage in tested perl deb
> On Wed, 12 Jun 2013 09:12:07 +0200
> Rave it wrote:
>
> > See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=972548
> >
> > This update should fix the dependency issue.
> > mate-desktop-1.6.1-7.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable
> > repository.
> >
> > mate-vfs and mate-mime-data is ob
Compose started at Thu Jun 13 09:15:03 UTC 2013
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[avgtime]
avgtime-0-0.5.git20120724.fc19.x86_64 requires
libphobos-ldc.so.60()(64bit)
[derelict]
derelict-ogg-3-13.20130516gitd8aa11d.fc19.i686 require
On Wed, 12 Jun 2013 19:35:24 +0200, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> OTOH, if the user installs $package and after an upgrade the package
> is gone and the functionality is gone as well, the upgrade _has
> failed_, in a very real sense.
Replace $package with $feature, and you get a similar scenario where
Compose started at Thu Jun 13 08:15:03 UTC 2013
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[aries-blueprint]
aries-blueprint-0.3.1-5.fc19.noarch requires asm2
[aries-proxy]
aries-proxy-0.3-4.fc19.noarch requires asm2
[cxf]
1:cxf-rt-2.6
On Thu, 2013-06-13 at 12:18 +0200, Alec Leamas wrote:
> I think I'll go for 973868 lifeographer. Admittedly, this is the easy
> path, but to be honest I'm very new to fonts and feel like a little
> more experience would help before reviewing font packages...
I thought the font would be easier, but
On 05/30/2013 07:48 PM, Kalev Lember wrote:
2013-05-30 10:07, Petr Hracek skrev:
Ok, well.
It seems that libpng15 compatibility package is built in rawhide.
What are the next steps?
Tagged already built libpng(1.6) package?
I do not want to break rawhide completely and
I would like to avoid all
On 2013-06-13 11:40, Ankur Sinha wrote:
On Thu, 2013-06-13 at 10:29 +0200, Alec Leamas wrote:
- 956134 mnmlicons-fonts
I can take this one.
Fine!
Would you take either anka-coder fonts[1] or lifeographer[2] in return
for this one Alec?
Both are *simple* reviews :)
[1] https://bugzilla.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=973910
Massimo Paladin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|steve.tray...@cern.ch |massimo.pala...@gmail.com
--
You are
On Thu, 2013-06-13 at 10:29 +0200, Alec Leamas wrote:
> - 956134 mnmlicons-fonts
I can take this one.
Would you take either anka-coder fonts[1] or lifeographer[2] in return
for this one Alec?
Both are *simple* reviews :)
[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=949954
[2] https://bugzi
On 06/13/2013 01:59 PM, Alec Leamas wrote:
> Anyone interested in swapping reviews with my two pending requests?
>
> - 972943 lpf
I'm waiting for some build to complete, meantime, I can try this one :)
> - 956134 mnmlicons-fonts
>
> Both looks in my eyes simple. All offers welcome!
>
> --al
On 06/12/2013 03:23 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Mon, 2013-06-10 at 12:34 +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote:
Hi all,
I normally wouldn't bother with heads-ups with maintenance release
updates but this one involves more changes than the average bugfix
maintenance update, in particular to address nas
Anyone interested in swapping reviews with my two pending requests?
- 972943 lpf
- 956134 mnmlicons-fonts
Both looks in my eyes simple. All offers welcome!
--alec
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
> Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2013 10:11:08 -0700
> From: Adam Williamson
> To: Development discussions related to Fedora
>
> Subject: Re: Does anyone still use system-config-language?
> Message-ID: <1370970668.2535.124.camel@adam>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
>
> On Tue, 2013-06-11
38 matches
Mail list logo
