On 06/05/2013 03:35 PM, Joachim Backes wrote:
>>
>> Wouldn't this just be:
>>
>> % sudo yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing --downloadonly
>> x-4.1.0.0-4.beta1.fc19
>>
>> - ajax
>>
>
> No, because in the most cases I receive this email, it's not yet arrived
> in updates-testing. This is th
On 06/05/2013 09:59 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
On 06/05/2013 05:30 PM, Panu Matilainen wrote:
Thanks for noticing and reporting!
Thanks for caring.
I've got another one: In abrt-2.1.4-1.fc17.i686, the ghost files
/var/run/abrt/abrt.socket and /var/run/abrt/abrtd.pid both have inode 0
and link
On Qua, 2013-06-05 at 10:58 +0200, Joachim Backes wrote:
> as soon as you are able to.
this is a clear message .
--
Sérgio M. B.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Wed, 2013-06-05 at 10:16 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Wed, 05 Jun 2013 11:36:27 -0400
> Adam Jackson wrote:
>
> > Well, okay, that sounds like two bugs to me:
> >
> > 1) That email shouldn't be sent until the update actually hits testing
>
> It actually has landed on the master mirror. I'm
Thanks to those that were able to join for the status meeting today, for those
unable the minutes
are posted below:
Minutes:
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2013-06-05/fedora-meeting-1.2013-06-05-20.00.html
Minutes (text):
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2013
On Wed, 2013-06-05 at 11:15 -0600, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote:
>So does fedup or anything in that chain create connection files? I
> would imagine no since no one else is experiencing this issue but wanted
> to make sure.
Basically, no: all fedup does is install RPMs¹.
The only fedup-specifi
On 04.06.2013 17:44, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-06-04 at 10:26 -0400, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
>
>> For what it's worth, remote authentication is increasingly important
>> where I sit, so everything that makes it easier to set up is welcome. As
>> of now, my cheat sheet for older Fedo
On Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 04:52:14PM +0200, Simone Caronni wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have a package that builds fine in a fresh rawhide mock chroot and not in
> a koji build. Is there any difference between the two?
The other thing they don't tell you ... and it's an endless source of
"fun" ... is that
On Wed, 2013-06-05 at 21:22 +0200, Stef Walter wrote:
> > So the endgame here is that there will be no remote authentication
> > option in anaconda *nor* in firstboot.
>
> Is it really gone from firstboot?
firstboot does not exist any more. There are two replacements in F19.
'initial-setup' is
On 05.06.2013 17:38, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-06-05 at 16:55 +0200, Stef Walter wrote:
>> On 04.06.2013 15:34, Simo Sorce wrote:
>>> On Tue, 2013-06-04 at 09:02 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/03/2013 09:07 PM, Adam Wil
On 06/05/2013 05:30 PM, Panu Matilainen wrote:
Thanks for noticing and reporting!
Thanks for caring.
I've got another one: In abrt-2.1.4-1.fc17.i686, the ghost files
/var/run/abrt/abrt.socket and /var/run/abrt/abrtd.pid both have inode 0
and link count 2. But they can't be hard-linked beca
On Wed, 2013-06-05 at 18:48 +0200, Branislav Blaskovic wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> I was chosen as student for Fedora Gooey Karma project in GSOC (Google
> Summer of Code).
>
>
> My proposal [1] is available on fedoraproject wiki page where you can
> find main features of this new tool.
Welcome Branisl
On Wed, 05 Jun 2013 16:25:27 +0200, John Reiser wrote:
> On 06/05/2013 05:42 AM, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
> > Segments are irrelevant for symbols.
>
> There is a problem with objdump and MiniDebugInfo and gdb treating ElfXX_Phdr
> records as "don't care". The problem is that other parts of the debug
Hello,
Trying to figure out if I did something to cause this.
I have a machine that has been continuously updated from at least F16
till F19 via preupgrade and now fedup. I also purchased a new SSD for it
so installed F19 via the Beta DVD. I noticed one issue, on the upgraded
system NM do
Good day all,
Please join us today (Wednesday, June 5th) at 4PM EDT (8PM UTC)
for the Fedora ARM weekly status meeting in #fedora-meeting-1 on Freenode.
On the agenda so far..
0) Status of ACTION items from our previous meeting
1) Problem packages
2) Kernel Status Update
3) Aarch64 - Status U
When adding a new sub-package, what's the convention or rule regarding
the associated -devel?
E.g. for glusterfs, with its associated glusterfs-devel; when adding
glusterfs-api containing a new library, should the .so link and header
be in glusterfs-api-devel, or can they be in the glusterfs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=971096
Vincent Danen changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||p...@city-fan.org,
|
On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 9:12 AM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 3:15 PM, Dan Mashal wrote:
> No, FESCo will still do the _engineering_ work of reviewing the proposed
> changes, ensuring the impact is known and coordinated, and so on. All of
> the FESCo-accepted changes are equally
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=971094
--- Comment #1 from William Cohen ---
Created attachment 757276
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=757276&action=edit
Updated version of perl-example.stp that prints the tapset package argument
--
You are receiving this mail be
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=971094
Bug ID: 971094
Summary: Update the systemtap tapset for perl
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl
Severity: low
Priority: unspecified
Assignee: mmasl..
* Adam Jackson [05/06/2013 11:36] :
>
> 1) That email shouldn't be sent until the update actually hits testing
There's no specific moment in time at which an update hits testing.
It depends on which mirror you're hitting and how frequently it is updated.
Emmanuel
--
devel mailing list
devel@list
On Wed, 2013-06-05 at 15:35 +0200, Joachim Backes wrote:
> On 06/05/2013 02:37 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
> > Wouldn't this just be:
> >
> > % sudo yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing --downloadonly
> > x-4.1.0.0-4.beta1.fc19
> >
> > - ajax
> >
>
> No, because in the most cases I receive thi
On Wed, 2013-06-05 at 16:55 +0200, Stef Walter wrote:
> On 04.06.2013 15:34, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > On Tue, 2013-06-04 at 09:02 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> >> Hash: SHA1
> >>
> >> On 06/03/2013 09:07 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> >>> We all know what deve
On 06/05/2013 04:41 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
I looked at some file list inconsistencies in a custom tool and
discovered several odd things related to ghost files.
A few packages contain hard-linked files where some of the names have
the ghost flag set, but others haven't. Probably the most pro
On 04.06.2013 15:34, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-06-04 at 09:02 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On 06/03/2013 09:07 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>>> We all know what devel@ does best, so let's fire up the power of
>>> the bikeshedding mac
On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 14:42:44 +0200, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
> Debugging purposes use linking view. This is also why /usr/lib/debug/**.debug
> files do not have valid program headers and the same applies to MiniDebugInfo.
Thanks for the insight, Jan. I think I know how to fix the problem now.
C
On 06/05/2013 05:42 AM, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
> On Tue, 04 Jun 2013 16:19:17 +0200, Martin Milata wrote:
>> My question is, is the table supposed to
>> look like this and libunwind needs to be patched, or is it a bug?
> Segments are irrelevant for symbols.
There is a problem with objdump and Min
I noticed that TeXmacs-1.0.7.18-1.fc18 ships /usr/share/mime/types and
similar files which are usually auto-generated by shared-mime-info. Is
this a bug in TeXmacs?
geda-gschem-1:1.8.1-1.fc18, geda-symbols-1:1.8.1-1.fc18,
qelectrotech-0.30-0.4.svn1844.fc18 ship files in the
/usr/share/mime/a
On 06/05/2013 02:37 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
On Wed, 2013-06-05 at 10:58 +0200, Joachim Backes wrote:
---
Package x-4.1.0.0-4.beta1.fc19:
* should fix your issue,
* was pushed to the Fedora 19 testing repository,
* should be available a
On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 06:15:58 -0700,
Dan Mashal wrote:
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 7:30 AM, Josh Boyer wrote:
Sure. FESCo doesn't care if it's a feature or not.
That's why it's no longer called the Feature process. FESCo is an
engineering committee and has no business determining if somethi
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 7:30 AM, Josh Boyer wrote:
> Sure. FESCo doesn't care if it's a feature or not.
>
> That's why it's no longer called the Feature process. FESCo is an
> engineering committee and has no business determining if something is
> a Feature in an upcoming release of the distro.
Compose started at Wed Jun 5 09:15:02 UTC 2013
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[bochs]
bochs-2.6.1-1.fc19.x86_64 requires vgabios
[deltacloud-core]
deltacloud-core-rhevm-1.1.3-1.fc19.noarch requires rubygem(rbovirt) >=
0:0.0.18
[d
On Tue, 04 Jun 2013 16:19:17 +0200, Martin Milata wrote:
> I noticed that the MiniDebugInfo files in Fedora 19
> (F18 too) have different ELF program header tables than the
> corresponding binaries and separate debuginfo files:
MiniDebugInfo files are symbol files only, they are not intended for
e
On Wed, 2013-06-05 at 10:58 +0200, Joachim Backes wrote:
> ---
> Package x-4.1.0.0-4.beta1.fc19:
> * should fix your issue,
> * was pushed to the Fedora 19 testing repository,
> * should be available at your local mirror within two days.
Compose started at Wed Jun 5 08:15:03 UTC 2013
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[ekiga]
ekiga-4.0.1-1.fc19.x86_64 requires libedata-book-1.2.so.17()(64bit)
[evas-generic-loaders]
evas-generic-loaders-1.7.6-1.fc20.x86_64 requires lib
Dear bodhi/koji specialists,
perhaps, this is a dumb question:
sometimes after having filed a BZ, I get some email like
---
Package x-4.1.0.0-4.beta1.fc19:
* should fix your issue,
* was pushed to the Fedora 19 testing repository,
* sh
* Nicolas Chauvet [04/06/2013 22:06] :
>
> perl\* (see pkgdb)
I grabbed the following:
perl-Tk-TableMatrix
perl-Test-Refcount
perl-Socket-GetAddrInfo
perl-Net-CIDR
perl-HTML-FromText
perl-HTTP-Cache-Transparent
perl-Lingua-Preferred
perl-IO-Async
perl-Log-TraceMessages
Emmanuel
--
devel ma
37 matches
Mail list logo
