On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 11:19 PM, Michael Scherer wrote:
> The way we could do it for Fedora is to see if there is a build on koji
> ( using fedmsg ), see if that a library, see the abi has changed ( using
> some kind of filter and a database ), and so run some script that
> rebuild and bump the s
I am still willing to contribute but waiting for sponsorship. :)
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 8:39 PM, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-08-14 at 18:00 +0530, Danishka Navin wrote:
> > Here is the all the activities I have packaged
> >
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=841239
> > https
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 6:09 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Tue, 28 May 2013 16:02:17 -0400
> Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>> >> 11) automatic period rebuilds in rawhide to highlight FTBFS issues
>> >> aren't done as often anymore
>> > Can you expand on this? Not sure what you mean?
>>
>> What Matt Domsch
On 05/29/2013 07:12 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
If folks think we shouldn't make 'fedup --network 19' work now to
upgrade people to branched/prerelease, please scream. ;) Otherwise it
will be the case from now on.
Hello,
I usually upgrade my main laptop and workstation to Fedora Beta X.
This tim
Paul> "convert all info pages to proper man pages and obsolete: the info
Paul> package."
Man pages aren't really a replacement for info. Replacing info with
HTML would be more reasonable, but would be a significant step backward
in usability for Emacs users and perhaps others. This is solvable,
On Wed, 2013-05-29 at 18:20 -0700, Ravindra Kumar wrote:
> > If folks think we shouldn't make 'fedup --network 19' work now to
> > upgrade people to branched/prerelease, please scream. ;) Otherwise it
> > will be the case from now on.
>
> Probably, 'fedup --network 19' should not install alpha/be
> If folks think we shouldn't make 'fedup --network 19' work now to
> upgrade people to branched/prerelease, please scream. ;) Otherwise it
> will be the case from now on.
Probably, 'fedup --network 19' should not install alpha/beta
releases automatically, instead a switch to specifically select
On Wed, 29 May 2013 10:05:37 -0700
Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-05-29 at 18:55 +0200, Dario Lesca wrote:
> > Il giorno mer, 29/05/2013 alle 10.37 -0600, Kevin Fenzi ha scritto:
> > > On Wed, 29 May 2013 11:27:04 -0500
> > > Jeffrey Bastian wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 0
On Tue, 28 May 2013 16:02:17 -0400
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 05/28/2013 03:17 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > 5) update to new upstream versions in Rawhide - a tool could do bump
> > the spec, do scratch builds automatically of newer versions, if
> > that works ask the maintainer to apply a diff aft
On Wed, 29 May 2013 08:19:43 +0200
Michael Scherer wrote:
> AFAIK, Mageia do not do that.
> Mandriva and openSUSE both use a custom build system.
>
> But on a conceptual level, that's not hard.
Yeah, but the details get sticky. ;)
> The way we could do it for Fedora is to see if there is a bu
Paul Wouters wrote:
> Why do we even bother shipping an old obsoleted documentation format
> only RMS can actually use? In the case of sharutils, we actually have
> what appears to be proper man pages.
>
> Maybe I should add a Feature for F20 :
>
> "convert all info pages to proper man pages and
On Wed, 2013-05-29 at 16:18 -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> In F19 comps @standard group:
>
> requires="system-config-date">chrony
>
> This seems odd to me. I also only see system-config-date being brought in by
> the kde-desktop group.
commit 20529fa5ab687f042db3d484ee7738e78e844852
Author:
On Tue, 28 May 2013, Petr Pisar wrote:
I've corrected license declaration at sharutils package:
The only effective difference is the texinfo documentation is covered by
GFDL instead of GPL.
Why do we even bother shipping an old obsoleted documentation format
only RMS can actually use? In th
In F19 comps @standard group:
chrony
This seems odd to me. I also only see system-config-date being brought in by
the kde-desktop group.
--
Orion Poplawski
Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222
NWRA, Boulder/CoRA Office FAX: 303-415-9702
3380 Mitchell Lane
Thanks to those that were able to join for the status meeting today, for those
unable the minutes
are posted below:
Minutes:
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2013-05-29/fedora-meeting-1.2013-05-29-20.00.html
Minutes (text):
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/201
On Tue, 2013-05-28 at 14:18 -0400, seth vidal wrote:
> > * Why the sql schema is so denormalized (IMO, leads to both
> > bandwidth and disk overspending without speed benefits)?. For
> > example: Why provides and requires tables do not use the common
> > domain table?
>
> B/c it was designed 8y
On Wed, 2013-05-29 at 20:33 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> I did some tests and cold cache performance tests on an old Debian
> installation. Performance with cold caches is more than adequate.
> Full-text searches take about two seconds. Package installation reaches
> the confirmation prompt
# F19 Final Blocker Review meeting #1.1
# Date: 2013-05-30
# Time: 16:00 UTC (12:00 EDT, 09:00 PDT)
# Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net
We did not finish going through all of the freeze exception bugs before
the 3 hour time limit today, so we're continuing the review tomorrow.
W
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2013-05-29)
===
Meeting started by t8m at 18:01:09 UTC. The full logs are available at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2013-05-29/fesco.2013-05-29-18.01.log.html
.
Meeting summary
Le mardi 28 mai 2013 à 21:10 +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon a écrit :
> On Tue, 2013-05-28 at 14:58 -0400, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> > 3) reports on source url which don't work - havent been done in a
> > llong time afaik and needs to be automated and way to silence them in
> > known cases in a per packag
On 05/27/2013 10:24 AM, Jan Zelený wrote:
As far as I can tell, the main difference is that apt-get and apt-cache
read very few, relatively large files at the beginning, so they don't
block on disk reads early.
dpkg, on the other hand, uses a database scatter across many small files
on disk, so
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 10:17 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
>>
> I've submitted the proposal:
>
> #74 on http://flock-lmacken.rhcloud.com/proposals
>
> But holding it depends on who is present. If Nick's talk is accepted
> it might still make sense to hold an IRC-based hackfest, though, since
> we'l
Hi
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 11:13 AM, James Antill wrote:
>
> = Open Floor =
>
> For more complete details, please visit each individual ticket. The
> report of the agenda items can be found at:
>
> https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/report/12
>
I would like to add https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/tick
Good day all,
Please join us today (Wednesday, May 29th) at 4PM EDT (8PM UTC)
for the Fedora ARM weekly status meeting in #fedora-meeting-1 on Freenode.
On the agenda so far..
0) Status of ACTION items from our previous meeting
1) Problem packages
2) Kernel Status Update
3) Aarch64 Status Upd
On Wed, 2013-05-29 at 18:55 +0200, Dario Lesca wrote:
> Il giorno mer, 29/05/2013 alle 10.37 -0600, Kevin Fenzi ha scritto:
> > On Wed, 29 May 2013 11:27:04 -0500
> > Jeffrey Bastian wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 06:16:11PM +0200, Dario Lesca wrote:
> > > > > The installation repo isn'
Il giorno mer, 29/05/2013 alle 10.37 -0600, Kevin Fenzi ha scritto:
> On Wed, 29 May 2013 11:27:04 -0500
> Jeffrey Bastian wrote:
>
> > On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 06:16:11PM +0200, Dario Lesca wrote:
> > > > The installation repo isn't available.
> > > > You need to specify one with --instrepo.
> >
Hi
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 11:34 AM, Ales Kozumplik wrote:
> On 05/28/2013 07:30 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>
>> If you store the results, you would only need to get the details of the
>> bugs fixed from the last release.
>>
>
> And that is practically doable:
>
> http://akozumpl.github.io/dnf/**
On Wed, 29 May 2013 11:27:04 -0500
Jeffrey Bastian wrote:
> On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 06:16:11PM +0200, Dario Lesca wrote:
> > > The installation repo isn't available.
> > > You need to specify one with --instrepo.
> >
> > Some suggest?
>
>
> I used this command over this past weekend:
>
> fedu
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 06:16:11PM +0200, Dario Lesca wrote:
> > The installation repo isn't available.
> > You need to specify one with --instrepo.
>
> Some suggest?
I used this command over this past weekend:
fedup --network 19 --debuglog=/var/log/fedupdebug.log \
--instrepo
http://dl.fedo
Il giorno mer, 29/05/2013 alle 08.51 -0400, Stephen Gallagher ha
scritto:
> On 05/29/2013 08:48 AM, Dario Lesca wrote:
> > What is the official way to upgrade F18 to F19 (for now beta)? I
> > would do some test.. Thanks
> >
>
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FedUp#How_Can_I_Upgrade_My_System_with_
Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>On 05/29/2013 08:48 AM, Dario Lesca wrote:
>> What is the official way to upgrade F18 to F19 (for now beta)? I
>> would do some test.. Thanks
>>
>
>http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FedUp#How_Can_I_Upgrade_My_System_with_FedUp.3F
Is there any plan currently for a GUI fron
On 05/28/2013 07:30 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
If you store the results, you would only need to get the details of the
bugs fixed from the last release.
And that is practically doable:
http://akozumpl.github.io/dnf/release_notes.html
Thanks,
Ales
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC
meeting Thursday at 2013-05-30 16:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on
irc.freenode.net.
Local time information (via. rktime):
2013-05-30 09:00 Thu US/Pacific
2013-05-30 12:00 Thu US/Eastern
2013-05-30 16:00 Thu UTC <-
2013-05-30 17:00
On Tue, 2013-05-28 at 20:24 -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
> 2) As part of automated testing. The most important thing to understand
>here is that "Type=session" tests are most effectively run under
>an autologged-in VM. But it'd be mostly possible to run the current
>GNOME installed te
On Wed, 29 May 2013 11:48:14 +0100
"Richard W.M. Jones" wrote:
> On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 11:51:21AM -0400, seth vidal wrote:
> > I simply got tired of tilting at that particular windmill when
> > confronted with some particularly egregious cases (see libguestfs
> > sometime).
>
> $ rpm -qR libgu
On Wed, 29 May 2013 11:52:04 +0100
"Richard W.M. Jones" wrote:
>
> Also do we know how many mirrors support byte ranges?
>
> We could go all the way and have a relatively large uncompressed
> database stored on the mirrors, but have the client only access small
> byte ranges from it.
>
We use
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
meeting Wednesday at 18:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '-MM-DD HH:MM UTC'
Links to all tickets bel
Hello,
A serious issue with a new feature in 0.3.6 [1] made me do another build
in a quick succession today, for both rawhide and F19 [2].
Ales
[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=967732
[2] http://bit.ly/15iobuR
[3] http://akozumpl.github.io/dnf/release_notes.html#id6
--
devel ma
What is the official way to upgrade F18 to F19 (for now beta)?
I would do some test..
Thanks
--
Dario Lesca - sip:da...@solinos.it
(Inviato dal mio Linux Fedora18+Gnome3)
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/29/2013 08:48 AM, Dario Lesca wrote:
> What is the official way to upgrade F18 to F19 (for now beta)? I
> would do some test.. Thanks
>
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FedUp#How_Can_I_Upgrade_My_System_with_FedUp.3F
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=959206
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
abi-compliance-checker-1.99-1.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/abi-compliance-checker-1.99-1.fc19
--
You are receiving this mail because:
Y
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=967783
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
abi-compliance-checker-1.99-1.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/abi-compliance-checker-1.99-1.fc19
--
You are receiving this mail because:
Yo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=967783
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System ---
abi-compliance-checker-1.99-1.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/abi-compliance-checker-1.99-1.fc18
--
You are receiving this mail because:
Yo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=959206
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
abi-compliance-checker-1.99-1.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/abi-compliance-checker-1.99-1.fc17
--
You are receiving this mail because:
Yo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=959206
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
abi-compliance-checker-1.99-1.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/abi-compliance-checker-1.99-1.fc18
--
You are receiving this mail because:
Yo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=967783
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
abi-compliance-checker-1.99-1.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/abi-compliance-checker-1.99-1.fc17
--
You are receiving this mail because:
Yo
Compose started at Wed May 29 09:15:02 UTC 2013
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[airinv]
airinv-1.00.0-3.fc19.i686 requires libsoci_mysql.so.3.1
airinv-1.00.0-3.fc19.i686 requires libsoci_core.so.3.1
airinv-1.00.0-3.fc19.x86
0.19.1-1
- Update to 0.19.1
Size change: 23511 bytes
sat4j-2.3.5-1.fc20
--
* Wed May 29 2013 Krzysztof Daniel 2.3.5-1
- Update to latest upstream.
Size change: -46484 bytes
scl-utils-20130529-1.fc20
-
* Wed May 29 2013 Jan Zeleny - 20130529-1
- changed
Also do we know how many mirrors support byte ranges?
We could go all the way and have a relatively large uncompressed
database stored on the mirrors, but have the client only access small
byte ranges from it.
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjon
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 11:51:21AM -0400, seth vidal wrote:
> I simply got tired of tilting at that particular windmill when
> confronted with some particularly egregious cases (see libguestfs
> sometime).
$ rpm -qR libguestfs|grep ^/
/sbin/ldconfig
/sbin/ldconfig
/lib64/rtkaio/librt.so.1
/usr/lib
50 matches
Mail list logo
