On 05/18/2013 10:34 PM, P J P wrote:
If I do install from the web-page, where would it install? Is there a
way to do uninstall?? Thank you. --- Regards-Prasad
Follows
http://standards.freedesktop.org/basedir-spec/basedir-spec-latest.html.
By default, in ~.local/share/gnome-shell/extensi
Maybe it's because I'm running GNOME3 in "fallback" mode.
I can't stand the new GNOME GUI.
For instance, when I upgraded to FC18, nautilus lost its tree view. I grabbed
the nautilus source from FC17, rebuilt it, and installed it. Much better.
From: P J P
To
Hey hi,
- Original Message -
> From: Rahul Sundaram
> Subject: Re: Gnome-shell-extension-weather woes
> https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2017
> https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2516
> Perhaps you can provide the info there. However one quick route is to try
Hello Steven,
> From: Steven Boswell II
>Subject: Re: Gnome-shell-extension-weather woes
>I don't have a gnome-shell-extension-weather package installed, but I see the
>weather anyway.
How do you see weather anyway? gnome-shell shows it??
---
Regards
-Prasa
On 05/18/2013 05:09 PM, P J P wrote:
Hi,
So I thought let's get a weather extension to see current weather in my city.
Should have been easy like slicing butter, right? It turned out to be crazy
disaster!!.
Quick notes:
* This is a RPM Fusion package
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show
I don't have a gnome-shell-extension-weather package installed, but I see the
weather anyway.
My only complaint is that it's showing the sunrise/sunset time according to the
hardware-clock time (UTC) instead of my local time.
I haven't gotten around to filing a bug about that yet.
Hi,
So I thought let's get a weather extension to see current weather in my city.
Should have been easy like slicing butter, right? It turned out to be crazy
disaster!!.
0. I'm using GNOME Shell 3.4.1 on F17 (Beefy Miracle).
1. I do $ yum install gnome-shell-extension-weather.
2. It does
I just replaced the mess that was the Branched page on the wiki with a
new one based on the one I did for Rawhide a while back.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/Branched
Please edit/improve/etc.
kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedorapr
On Sat, 2013-05-18 at 13:41 -0400, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 05/18/2013 01:12 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Sat, 2013-05-18 at 06:18 -0400, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
> > Well, there may have been some signals crossed somewhere. I've been part
> > of the discussion about reducing the size of the de
On 05/18/2013 01:12 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Sat, 2013-05-18 at 06:18 -0400, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
Well, there may have been some signals crossed somewhere. I've been part
of the discussion about reducing the size of the desktop spin.
selinux-policy-devel doesn't look bad to me, the one that
On Sat, 2013-05-18 at 19:22 +0200, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
> On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 10:12:52AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Sat, 2013-05-18 at 06:18 -0400, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
> > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=962081
> > >
> > > I have a request to change the name of selinux
On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 10:12:52AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Sat, 2013-05-18 at 06:18 -0400, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=962081
> >
> > I have a request to change the name of selinux-policy-devel to
> > selinux-policy-devel-support, since
> >
> >
On Sat, 2013-05-18 at 09:30 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 02:44:25PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > Thinking about it more, this really seems to be the way to go. Forcing
> > user creation in anaconda is a problem for someone who wants to do a
> > minimal install wit
On Sat, 2013-05-18 at 06:18 -0400, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=962081
>
> I have a request to change the name of selinux-policy-devel to
> selinux-policy-devel-support, since
>
> "everywhere else in the distro -devel means just header files in c and not any
Am 18.05.2013 11:17, schrieb Nicolas Mailhot:
>
> Le Sam 18 mai 2013 05:39, T.C. Hollingsworth a écrit :
>> On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 7:34 PM, Adam Williamson
>> wrote:
>>> You could transfer the install to a system which contains a dmraid
>>> array, or add a dmraid array to an existing install (
Hello all! I'm trying to learn how to submit packages to Fedora...there's a
lot to read! But I build packages locally all the time, and it seems like a
shame that they don't go any further than that. So I'm trying to take it to
the next level. (I'm already loving http://koji.fedoraproject.or
Compose started at Sat May 18 09:15:02 UTC 2013
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[byzanz]
byzanz-0.3-0.5.fc17.x86_64 requires libpanel-applet-4.so.0()(64bit)
[deltacloud-core]
deltacloud-core-rhevm-1.1.3-1.fc19.noarch requires rubyge
Compose started at Sat May 18 08:15:03 UTC 2013
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[claws-mail-plugins]
claws-mail-plugins-geolocation-3.9.0-7.fc20.x86_64 requires
claws-mail(plugin-api)(x86-64) = 0:3.9.0.122
[dragonegg]
dragonegg-3.1
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/18/2013 06:37 AM, David Strauss wrote:
> I agree with Tomasz. "-devel" has always means "files and data necessary to
> support use as a build dependency" to me. That's a superset of C header
> files.
>
Well if you were building policy in out spe
Le Sam 18 mai 2013 12:35, Tomasz Torcz a écrit :
> That seems like a perfect description for what -devel is. For normal
> usage
> selinux-policy is required. For building and modification – -devel
> package.
Actually, if modification and building can be dissociated, it'd be nice to
keep -dev
On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 06:18:41AM -0400, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=962081
>
> I have a request to change the name of selinux-policy-devel to
> selinux-policy-devel-support, since
>
> "everywhere else i
Hi,
2013/5/18 Tomasz Torcz
> On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 06:18:41AM -0400, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=962081
> >
> > I have a request to change the name of selinux-policy-devel to
> > selinux-policy-
I agree with Tomasz. "-devel" has always means "files and data
necessary to support use as a build dependency" to me. That's a
superset of C header files.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 06:18:41AM -0400, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=962081
>
> I have a request to change the name of selinux-policy-devel to
> selinux-policy-devel-support, since
>
> "everywhere else i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=962081
I have a request to change the name of selinux-policy-devel to
selinux-policy-devel-support, since
"everywhere else in the distro -devel means just header files in c and not any
other development too
Le Sam 18 mai 2013 05:39, T.C. Hollingsworth a écrit :
> On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 7:34 PM, Adam Williamson
> wrote:
>> You could transfer the install to a system which contains a dmraid
>> array, or add a dmraid array to an existing install (I think this thread
>> has been considering only the cas
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 02:44:25PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Thinking about it more, this really seems to be the way to go. Forcing
> user creation in anaconda is a problem for someone who wants to do a
> minimal install with no user account. Doing the above would reduce the
> paths to someth
Hi all,
Now upstream has released the latest version which should all problems.
Please, consider a review help.
Thanks.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
28 matches
Mail list logo
