Re: Installing on old systems with only PATA/IDE hard drives

2013-05-12 Thread Adam Williamson
On Sun, 2013-05-12 at 21:27 -0400, Basil Mohamed Gohar wrote: > I thought that this might be an issue with incompatible hardware, as I > was trying to install Fedora 18 on an old Dell (Celeron D processor) I'd > bought for my mother that she was no longer using. However, I got an > error when atte

Re: why do have shared libs 755 perms?

2013-05-12 Thread Panu Matilainen
On 05/10/2013 09:57 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: why have .so files of fedora-packages executeable permissions? they are not executeable, see below the difference of my personal builds with files from fedora packages (the original httpd and php packages have also 755) Historically rpm only generate

Re: Installing on old systems with only PATA/IDE hard drives

2013-05-12 Thread Felix Miata
I have multiple PATA-only systems running F18 and/or F19, but all are pre-newUI HTTP installations that have been Yum upgraded. -- "The wise are known for their understanding, and pleasant words are persuasive." Proverbs 16:21 (New Living Translation) Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409 ** a11

Re: Installing on old systems with only PATA/IDE hard drives

2013-05-12 Thread Basil Mohamed Gohar
On 05/13/2013 12:50 AM, John Reiser wrote: >> Any tips >> on what I can do to make a proper report out of this would be most >> appreciated, or just let me know if installs to PATA/EIDE systems are >> just no longer supported. > > I've got a i686 box with only PATA, and two root partitions of F19-

Re: Adding new group to comps-f19.xml.in

2013-05-12 Thread Ravindra Kumar
> The two added group are OK. grouplist is not something that actually is > used, though; they would need to either be added as mandatory/optional > groups to the desktop environments, or just brought in via the spins' > kickstart files. > Also, please attach patches - your mailer appears to have

Re: Installing on old systems with only PATA/IDE hard drives

2013-05-12 Thread John Reiser
> Any tips > on what I can do to make a proper report out of this would be most > appreciated, or just let me know if installs to PATA/EIDE systems are > just no longer supported. I've got a i686 box with only PATA, and two root partitions of F19-Alpha-i386; one via netinst+network, one via netins

Re: policyd-spf

2013-05-12 Thread Christopher Meng
Two minor bugs need to be fixed is already in the comment. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Installing on old systems with only PATA/IDE hard drives

2013-05-12 Thread Basil Mohamed Gohar
I thought that this might be an issue with incompatible hardware, as I was trying to install Fedora 18 on an old Dell (Celeron D processor) I'd bought for my mother that she was no longer using. However, I got an error when attempting to install when the process was probing the drives. I thought

Re: GNOME games stuck on v3.6.1 for Fedora 19?

2013-05-12 Thread Christopher Meng
I just tested remaining ones and they worked fine. So I left a karma and now they can be pushed to stable. Thanks for the hard work. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Mission Impossible #1: qt without gtk

2013-05-12 Thread Todd Zullinger
Eugene Pivnev wrote: 11.05.2013 23:22, Adam Williamson: qgit -> git -> libgnome_keyring ...like this one, for instance. libgnome-keyring's dependencies are pretty modest: As I found in git.spec - git's gnome-keyring suff is optional. Is it possible to move them into separate package (for gnome

Re: GNOME games stuck on v3.6.1 for Fedora 19?

2013-05-12 Thread Pierre-Yves Luyten
Le dimanche 12 mai 2013 à 23:47 +0200, Kalev Lember a écrit : > > Drumroll please! The last remaining split-up games are now imported and > built: > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-7966/gnome-robots-3.8.1-1.fc19,five-or-more-3.8.1-1.fc19,gnome-nibbles-3.8.0-1.fc19 > https://

Re: GNOME games stuck on v3.6.1 for Fedora 19?

2013-05-12 Thread Kalev Lember
On 29/04/13 18:41, Rich Mattes wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 11:49 AM, Michael Catanzaro > mailto:mike.catanz...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > Yes, except it's more than just glchess (now known as gnome-chess) that > is missing; it seems only about half of the games got updated. > > > The

Orphaning preload

2013-05-12 Thread Mohamed El Morabity
I've just orphaned preload. I picked it up some months ago, but never managed to give it the needed attention. Preload doesn't seem to be maintained anymore by the way. Feel free to claim it, if anyone wants it: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/preload -- devel mailing list devel@li

Re: Mission Impossible #1: qt without gtk

2013-05-12 Thread Eugene Pivnev
12.05.2013 17:23, Mamoru TASAKA: Eugene Pivnev wrote, at 05/12/2013 10:09 PM +9:00: 12.05.2013 13:21, Mamoru TASAKA: It seems that razorqt _really_ wants to launch xscreensaver daemon, so splitting out xscreensaver-demo from xscreensaver-base does not help here. You mean - xscreensaver daemo

Re: Mission Impossible #1: qt without gtk

2013-05-12 Thread Mamoru TASAKA
Eugene Pivnev wrote, at 05/12/2013 10:09 PM +9:00: 12.05.2013 13:21, Mamoru TASAKA: It seems that razorqt _really_ wants to launch xscreensaver daemon, so splitting out xscreensaver-demo from xscreensaver-base does not help here. You mean - xscreensaver daemon depends on glade and/or gtk2 too

Re: Mission Impossible #1: qt without gtk

2013-05-12 Thread Mamoru TASAKA
No top-post please. Eugene Pivnev wrote, at 05/12/2013 10:06 PM +9:00: Sorry, but as I found in xsceensaver-base (not xscreensaver itself!) - it contains as xsceensaver as xscreensaver demo (/usr/bin/xscreensaver-demo, glade based). And no one xscreensaver config tool. xscreensaver-demo is t

Re: Mission Impossible #1: qt without gtk

2013-05-12 Thread Eugene Pivnev
12.05.2013 13:21, Mamoru TASAKA: It seems that razorqt _really_ wants to launch xscreensaver daemon, so splitting out xscreensaver-demo from xscreensaver-base does not help here. You mean - xscreensaver daemon depends on glade and/or gtk2 too? -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.or

Re: Mission Impossible #1: qt without gtk

2013-05-12 Thread Eugene Pivnev
Sorry, but as I found in xsceensaver-base (not xscreensaver itself!) - it contains as xsceensaver as xscreensaver demo (/usr/bin/xscreensaver-demo, glade based). And no one xscreensaver config tool. 12.05.2013 13:21, Mamoru TASAKA: Rahul Sundaram wrote, at 05/12/2013 12:59 PM +9:00: On 05/11/

F-19 Branched report: 20130512 changes

2013-05-12 Thread Fedora Branched Report
Compose started at Sun May 12 09:15:02 UTC 2013 Broken deps for x86_64 -- [byzanz] byzanz-0.3-0.5.fc17.x86_64 requires libpanel-applet-4.so.0()(64bit) [deltacloud-core] deltacloud-core-1.0.5-2.fc19.noarch requires ruby(abi) =

rawhide report: 20130512 changes

2013-05-12 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
Compose started at Sun May 12 08:15:02 UTC 2013 Broken deps for x86_64 -- [claws-mail-plugins] claws-mail-plugins-geolocation-3.9.0-7.fc20.x86_64 requires claws-mail(plugin-api)(x86-64) = 0:3.9.0.122 [dragonegg] dragonegg-3.1

Re: Mission Impossible #1: qt without gtk

2013-05-12 Thread Rahul Sundaram
Hi On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 5:21 AM, Mamoru TASAKA wrote: > >>> > In this discussion xscreensaver dependency is not for xscreensaver modules > in KDE, but for razorqt{-panel}. It seems that razorqt _really_ wants to > launch xscreensaver daemon, so splitting out xscreensaver-demo from > xscreens

Re: Mission Impossible #1: qt without gtk

2013-05-12 Thread Mamoru TASAKA
Rahul Sundaram wrote, at 05/12/2013 12:59 PM +9:00: On 05/11/2013 11:19 PM, Mamoru TASAKA wrote: xscreensaver-demo, which is for configuring xscreensaver (daemon), requires gtk2. IIRC KDE can use xscreensaver modules and if so, the user has no real need of the demo command. It may be better