On 02/05/13 05:46 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Wed, May 01, 2013 at 20:26:13 -0400,
Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Bill Nottingham writes:
Anyway, here are my suggestions:
valgrind
eclipse
gimp
kdegames
I don't think gimp is that great of a choice to drop. That's a tool
that I think some of the
Hi Bill and others,
Based on the earlier discussions in the emails, I have following diff for
comps-f19.xml.in:
--- comps-f19.xml.in 2013-04-29 17:41:10.003026000 -0700
+++ comps-f19.xml.in.new 2013-05-08 20:35:57.000112000 -0700
@@ -7,6 +7,9 @@
<_description>Local X.org display server
fal
On Wed, May 08, 2013 at 12:24:43PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > > > owfs is suite of program for accessing 1-wire network, which is
> > > >simple hardware protocol. One of the program is FUSE module,
> > > >giving the access to network and devices on it through filesystem.
> > > >The "/m
On Thu, 2013-05-09 at 00:44 -0400, Felix Miata wrote:
> On 2013-05-09 00:02 (GMT-0400) Adam Williamson composed:
>
> > On Wed, 2013-05-08 at 22:36 -0400, Felix Miata wrote:
>
> >> On 2013-05-08 10:09 (GMT+0200) Pierre-Yves Chibon composed:
>
> >> > you are replying to a 4 days old email on a thr
On 2013-05-09 00:02 (GMT-0400) Adam Williamson composed:
On Wed, 2013-05-08 at 22:36 -0400, Felix Miata wrote:
On 2013-05-08 10:09 (GMT+0200) Pierre-Yves Chibon composed:
> you are replying to a 4 days old email on a thread that is no
> longer active?
A: The thread was started on a Frid
Huh! Today this problem not present..
--
Best Regards,
Igor Gnatenko
09.05.2013 8:12 пользователь "Rahul Sundaram" написал:
> Hi
>
>
> On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 12:04 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Yes, I know that, thanks. I didn't ask for a lecture, but whether this
>> was actually written
Hi
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 12:04 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
>
> Yes, I know that, thanks. I didn't ask for a lecture, but whether this
> was actually written down in the guidelines somewhere.
>
It is not written down as policy and since the tools themselves enforce
this, I don't think it has b
On Wed, 2013-05-08 at 22:59 -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 1:02 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On 08/05/13 08:13 AM, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> >>
> >> Thx. But why in oficially packages doesn't fixed?
> >
> >
> > Does anyone know if it's actually the case that the guideline
On Wed, 2013-05-08 at 22:36 -0400, Felix Miata wrote:
> On 2013-05-08 10:09 (GMT+0200) Pierre-Yves Chibon composed:
>
> > you are replying to a 4 days old email on a thread that is no
> > longer active?
>
> A: The thread was started on a Friday night.
>
> B: Some people don't get to read mail ev
On 5/8/2013 10:59 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 1:02 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> On 08/05/13 08:13 AM, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
>>>
>>> Thx. But why in oficially packages doesn't fixed?
>>
>>
>> Does anyone know if it's actually the case that the guidelines require
>> packag
On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 1:02 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On 08/05/13 08:13 AM, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
>>
>> Thx. But why in oficially packages doesn't fixed?
>
>
> Does anyone know if it's actually the case that the guidelines require
> packages be buildable without internet access? I just had a qu
On Wed, 2013-05-08 at 19:25 +0200, Michael Scherer wrote:
> Le mercredi 08 mai 2013 à 10:02 -0700, Adam Williamson a écrit :
> > On 08/05/13 08:13 AM, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> > > Thx. But why in oficially packages doesn't fixed?
> >
> > Does anyone know if it's actually the case that the guideline
On Wed, 2013-05-08 at 19:59 -0600, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
> FOUR DAYS is "no longer active" for you? Seriously?
> You want to STFU those who disagree _this hard_?
Pete,
There is no constructive discussion going on here any more. 4 days is
certainly enough time for a mailing list thread to go inacti
On 2013-05-08 10:09 (GMT+0200) Pierre-Yves Chibon composed:
you are replying to a 4 days old email on a thread that is no
longer active?
A: The thread was started on a Friday night.
B: Some people don't get to read mail every day, or more than a few or less
times a week.
A + B = perfectly
On Wed, 08 May 2013 10:09:13 +0200
Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-05-08 at 10:10 +0200, Olav Vitters wrote:
> > On Fri, May 03, 2013 at 09:03:02PM -0700, Dan Mashal wrote:
> > > Let's be realistic here. The precedence they have recently set is they
> > > make decisions and if you don't
* Dan Mashal [08/05/2013 11:47] :
>
> Who obsoleted gnome-panel? It is required by a ton of packages.
"gnome-panel and gnome-applets just got blocked [1] in koji. We still
have a number of packages depending on gnome-panel, either through
library deps or through Requires: gnome-panel, and all of
I spent a bit of time recently trying to clean up the oldest package
review tickets, making sure links are accessible and the submitted
packages actually build. At this point I think all of the tickets in
http://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/NEW.html older than May
2012 should actually be
Hi
On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 6:46 PM, Dan Mashal wrote:
>
>
> The new version of cinnamon does not depend on it. Fighting with it to
> get to compile. Thanks for your reply. There were some other packages
> though that seemed affected.. (i.e. openbox) and some gnome packages
> too.
>
Openbox has s
On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 3:26 PM, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> We did, because GNOME no longer uses gnome-panel. All those packages
> that require gnome-panel are applets, which are just as useless without
> gnome-panel. If you want to keep gnome-panel alive for some reason
> (although you already have
On Wed, 2013-05-08 at 11:47 -0700, Dan Mashal wrote:
> Umm hi,
>
> Who obsoleted gnome-panel? It is required by a ton of packages.
>
We did, because GNOME no longer uses gnome-panel. All those packages
that require gnome-panel are applets, which are just as useless without
gnome-panel. If you w
On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 1:22 PM, Tom Callaway wrote:
> It appears to be needed by only:
> byzanz - optional panel applet, update building right now.
> cinnamon-menu-editor - Not sure why this depends on gnome-panel.
> gnome-applet-sensors - probably should be blocked.
> openbox - Should disable gdm
On Wed, 2013-05-08 at 16:22 -0400, Tom Callaway wrote:
> On 05/08/2013 02:47 PM, Dan Mashal wrote:
> > Who obsoleted gnome-panel? It is required by a ton of packages.
>
> It appears to be needed by only:
> byzanz - optional panel applet, update building right now.
> cinnamon-menu-editor - Not sure
Thanks to those that were able to join for the status meeting today, for those
unable the minutes
are posted below:
Minutes:
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2013-05-08/fedora-meeting-1.2013-05-08-20.00.html
Minutes (text):
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2
> *but* please undersatdn with your argumentation a lot of maintainers
> could claim that their packages are in CORE for several reasons
> because they are expected to be used from most users
> please leave core be what core means
> and as i clearly statet that i have open-vm-tools on nearly any
On 05/08/2013 02:47 PM, Dan Mashal wrote:
> Who obsoleted gnome-panel? It is required by a ton of packages.
It appears to be needed by only:
byzanz - optional panel applet, update building right now.
cinnamon-menu-editor - Not sure why this depends on gnome-panel.
gnome-applet-sensors - probably s
> > Compose finished at Wed May 8 12:20:02 UTC 2013
First please trim unneeded stuff from a reply.
> Umm hi,
>
> Who obsoleted gnome-panel? It is required by a ton of packages.
It was announced to the list as to why, it's dead upstream and doesn't
build with the current gnome and is in fact bro
Dear Fedora Community,
since I want to contribute to Fedora to make better and to become a
member of the packager-group, I'm going to introduce myself here a bit.
I am Björn Esser and I live in Hildesheim, Germany. That's about 30 km
(20 mi) south of Hannover. I'm just an ordinary guy using Linux
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2013-05-08)
===
Meeting started by jwb at 18:06:59 UTC. The full logs are available at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2013-05-08/fesco.2013-05-08-18.06.log.html
.
Meeting summary
--
On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 5:25 AM, Fedora Branched Report
wrote:
> Compose started at Wed May 8 09:15:02 UTC 2013
>
> Broken deps for x86_64
> --
> [byzanz]
> byzanz-0.3-0.5.fc17.x86_64 requires libpanel-applet-4.so.0()(64bit)
> [cinnam
Le mercredi 08 mai 2013 à 10:02 -0700, Adam Williamson a écrit :
> On 08/05/13 08:13 AM, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> > Thx. But why in oficially packages doesn't fixed?
>
> Does anyone know if it's actually the case that the guidelines require
> packages be buildable without internet access? I just h
Good day all,
Please join us today (Wednesday, May 8th) at 4PM EDT (8PM UTC)
for the Fedora ARM weekly status meeting in #fedora-meeting-1 on Freenode.
On the agenda so far..
0) Status of ACTION items from our previous meeting
1) Problem packages
2) Kernel Status update
On 08/05/13 08:13 AM, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
Thx. But why in oficially packages doesn't fixed?
Does anyone know if it's actually the case that the guidelines require
packages be buildable without internet access? I just had a quick search
on obvious terms through
https://fedoraproject.org/wik
Am 07.05.2013 19:48, schrieb Ravindra Kumar:
> If there are strong use cases that don't require that functionality
> then probably it makes sense to not be part of core, otherwise, I think
> it makes more sense to make open-vm-tools part of @core because sooner
> or later users will end up instal
Am 07.05.2013 19:39, schrieb Ravindra Kumar:
>> and why?
>
> open-vm-tools are required for anything that requires
> co-ordination with the guest. Here are a few examples,
> clean shutdown of guest from VM management interface,
> guest consistent snapshots, collection/display of guest
> resource
Thx. But why in oficially packages doesn't fixed?
Best Regards,
Igor Gnatenko
08.05.2013 18:35 пользователь "Jerry James" написал:
> On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 10:10 PM, Igor Gnatenko
> wrote:
> > I use mock to local build packages.
> > I was build control-center in mock. But always error...
>
Confirmed: kernel-3.9.1-0.rc1.201.fc18.x86_64 from koji fix this issue :)
On 8 May 2013 16:40, Mario Ceresa wrote:
> Cool! thanks a lot!
>
>
> On 8 May 2013 16:38, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>> On 5/8/13 9:30 AM, Mario Ceresa wrote:
>>> Thanks Eric, I'll upgrade to 3.9 then.
>>>
>>> Do you know if ther
Cool! thanks a lot!
On 8 May 2013 16:38, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> On 5/8/13 9:30 AM, Mario Ceresa wrote:
>> Thanks Eric, I'll upgrade to 3.9 then.
>>
>> Do you know if there is an easy way to know when a kernel patch goes
>> upstream?
>
> You can search in the git tree:
>
> [root@host linux-2.6]#
On 5/8/13 9:30 AM, Mario Ceresa wrote:
> Thanks Eric, I'll upgrade to 3.9 then.
>
> Do you know if there is an easy way to know when a kernel patch goes upstream?
You can search in the git tree:
[root@host linux-2.6]# git log --pretty=oneline | grep "storvsc: avoid usage"
3e8f4f4065901c8dfc51407
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 10:10 PM, Igor Gnatenko
wrote:
> I use mock to local build packages.
> I was build control-center in mock. But always error...
> How I fix it ?
> GEN gnome-control-center.1
> I/O error : Attempt to load network entity
> http://docbook.sourceforge.net/release/xsl/curre
Thanks Eric, I'll upgrade to 3.9 then.
Do you know if there is an easy way to know when a kernel patch goes upstream?
Mario
On 8 May 2013 16:28, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> On 5/8/13 9:21 AM, Mario Ceresa wrote:
>> Dear all,
>> When accessing a VHDX disc with a f18 VM (hyperv) with kernel
>> 3.8.8-20
On 5/8/13 9:21 AM, Mario Ceresa wrote:
> Dear all,
> When accessing a VHDX disc with a f18 VM (hyperv) with kernel
> 3.8.8-202 x86_64 I have tons of errors like:
>
> Add. Sense: No additional sense information
> hv_storvsc vmbus_0_12: cmd 0x41 scsi status 0x2 srb status 0x6
>
> I believe it is re
Dear all,
When accessing a VHDX disc with a f18 VM (hyperv) with kernel
3.8.8-202 x86_64 I have tons of errors like:
Add. Sense: No additional sense information
hv_storvsc vmbus_0_12: cmd 0x41 scsi status 0x2 srb status 0x6
I believe it is related to WRITE_SAME don't implemented in win2012
server
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC
meeting Thursday at 2013-05-09 16:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on
irc.freenode.net.
Local time information (via. rktime):
2013-05-09 09:00 Thu US/Pacific
2013-05-09 12:00 Thu US/Eastern
2013-05-09 16:00 Thu UTC <-
2013-05-09 17:00
On Wednesday, May 8, 2013, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-05-08 at 10:10 +0200, Olav Vitters wrote:
> > On Fri, May 03, 2013 at 09:03:02PM -0700, Dan Mashal wrote:
> > > Let's be realistic here. The precedence they have recently set is they
> > > make decisions and if you don't like it "
On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 7:48 AM, Frank Bergmann wrote:
> On Wed, May 08, 2013 at 06:56:59AM -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
> >On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 6:02 AM, Frank Bergmann <[1]
> fedora-de...@tuxad.de>
> >wrote:
> > Hello,
> > I freshly subscribed this list after reading that dietlibc
On Wed, May 08, 2013 at 06:56:59AM -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
>On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 6:02 AM, Frank Bergmann <[1]fedora-de...@tuxad.de>
>wrote:
> Hello,
> I freshly subscribed this list after reading that dietlibc seems to be
> unmaintained.
>
> ([2]http://mm3test.fedora
Compose started at Wed May 8 09:15:02 UTC 2013
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[byzanz]
byzanz-0.3-0.5.fc17.x86_64 requires libpanel-applet-4.so.0()(64bit)
[cinnamon]
cinnamon-menu-editor-1.6.7-7.fc19.noarch requires gnome-panel
[d
On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 6:02 AM, Frank Bergmann wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I freshly subscribed this list after reading that dietlibc seems to be
> unmaintained.
> (
> http://mm3test.fedoraproject.org/hyperkitty/list/de...@mm3test.fedoraproject.org/thread/BP7LYYNGQA2DDTNFNS3EJXX3AGNZRNAX/
> )
>
> What's t
Hello,
I freshly subscribed this list after reading that dietlibc seems to be
unmaintained.
(http://mm3test.fedoraproject.org/hyperkitty/list/de...@mm3test.fedoraproject.org/thread/BP7LYYNGQA2DDTNFNS3EJXX3AGNZRNAX/)
What's the current status of dietlibc in Fedora and how can it be checked?
Last b
On Wed, 08.05.13 09:32, Tomasz Torcz (to...@pipebreaker.pl) wrote:
> On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 09:34:15AM +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> > On 05/07/2013 09:14 AM, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
> > >Hey list,
> > >
> > > In the course of review of owfs (#927237) I was pointed that
> > >shipping dire
On 2013-05-08 09:32, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 09:34:15AM +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
On 05/07/2013 09:14 AM, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
Hey list,
In the course of review of owfs (#927237) I was pointed that
shipping directory in /mnt is prohibited. FHS seems to agree.
On Tue, 7 May 2013 09:12:33 -0600, Jerry James wrote:
> On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 5:44 AM, Fedora Koji Build System wrote:
> > Package: m4rie-20130416-1.fc19
> > Tag: f19-updates-candidate
> > Status: complete
> > Built by: pbrobinson
> > ID: 416696
> > Started: Tue, 07 May 2013 11:35:25 UTC
> > Fini
On Wed, 2013-05-08 at 10:10 +0200, Olav Vitters wrote:
> On Fri, May 03, 2013 at 09:03:02PM -0700, Dan Mashal wrote:
> > Let's be realistic here. The precedence they have recently set is they
> > make decisions and if you don't like it "too bad".
>
> Even if that is true, what is your point?
That
On 04/14/2013 03:34 AM, Steve Grubb wrote:
-fstack-protector-all really is all. The default in Fedora is 4 bytes which
would cover cases where ints and char[] are interposed as in some networking
code. But more importantly, the defaul stack-protector only kicks in when the
object is a char arra
On Fri, May 03, 2013 at 09:03:02PM -0700, Dan Mashal wrote:
> Let's be realistic here. The precedence they have recently set is they
> make decisions and if you don't like it "too bad".
Even if that is true, what is your point?
--
Regards,
Olav
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.or
On Sat, May 04, 2013 at 12:03:39AM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> Anaconda has a pretty special place in this project. It is the
> uber-administrator of every new Fedora install. We would do better
> as a community to hash out major changes before they're made, and
> try to reach some agreement bef
On Mon, May 06, 2013 at 09:51:22AM -0400, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
> On 05/04/2013 12:30 AM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> >On Fri, May 03, 2013 at 11:24:01PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> >>Matthew, with all due respect the tone of the bug doesn't make me think
> >>that there is a lot of interest in dis
On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 09:34:15AM +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> On 05/07/2013 09:14 AM, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
> >Hey list,
> >
> > In the course of review of owfs (#927237) I was pointed that
> >shipping directory in /mnt is prohibited. FHS seems to agree.
> >
> > owfs is suite of prog
58 matches
Mail list logo
