Thanks to those that were able to join for the status meeting today, for those
unable the minutes
are posted below:
Minutes:
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2013-04-24/fedora-meeting-1.2013-04-24-20.00.html
Minutes (text):
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2
Hi
Upstream has been dead for a really long time (last commits were in
2011) and the software is not functional without third party patches. I
have retired this package
Rahul
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Good day all,
Please join us today (Wednesday, April 24th) at 4PM EDT (8PM UTC)
for the Fedora ARM weekly status meeting in #fedora-meeting-1 on Freenode.
On the agenda so far..
0) Status of ACTION items from our previous meeting
1) Problem packages
2) F19 ARM Alpha planning - Defining blocker
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 06:42:55PM +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> > %attr(755,root,root) /%{_lib}/*
> and the latter
> "lrwxr-xr-x" mode is not what is expected for symlinks.
I'm guessing because the %attr has been applied to the symlink.
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat
On 04/24/2013 05:49 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 04:35:24PM +0200, Simone Caronni wrote:
Hello,
I have a package that needs procps. While building it in EPEL, i stepped
onto a packaging problem [1] in the RHEL 6 package.
I've opened the bug, but nobody is looking at it
On 04/23/2013 07:40 PM, Florian Müllner wrote:
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 6:55 PM, Przemek Klosowski
wrote:
Since clock-applet is a default install on every Fedora, I thought this
would be widely reported
While it is installed on every (default desktop spin) Fedora system,
it is only used by the
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956010
Petr Šabata changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
C
The lightweight tag 'perl-ExtUtils-Helpers-0.019-1.fc20' was created pointing
to:
55b6b3d... Update to 0.019
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/pe
The lightweight tag 'perl-ExtUtils-Helpers-0.019-1.fc19' was created pointing
to:
55b6b3d... Update to 0.019
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/pe
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 04:35:24PM +0200, Simone Caronni wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have a package that needs procps. While building it in EPEL, i stepped
> onto a packaging problem [1] in the RHEL 6 package.
>
> I've opened the bug, but nobody is looking at it and (my guess) it will be
> probably fix
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 04:35:24PM +0200, Simone Caronni wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have a package that needs procps. While building it in EPEL, i stepped
> onto a packaging problem [1] in the RHEL 6 package.
>
> I've opened the bug, but nobody is looking at it and (my guess) it will be
> probably fix
Product: Red Hat Software Collections
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956264
--- Comment #1 from Martin Kyral ---
Verison:
perl516-perl-5.16.3-4.el6.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/to
Product: Red Hat Software Collections
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956264
Bug ID: 956264
Summary: perl scripts do not sent LOG_EMERG log messages
(Sys::Syslog)
Product: Red Hat Software Collections
Version: RHSCL-1 per
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956257
Martin Kyral changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||956264
--
You are receiv
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956263
--- Comment #1 from Martin Kyral ---
Version:
perl-5.16.3-267.el7
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956257
Martin Kyral changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||956263
--
You are receiv
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956263
Bug ID: 956263
Summary: perl scripts do not sent LOG_EMERG log messages
(Sys::Syslog)
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
Version: 7.0
Co
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956257
--- Comment #1 from Martin Kyral ---
Description of problem:
perl scripts can't send messages with the LOG_EMERG log level to syslog.
Version:
perl-5.16.3-241.fc18
Steps to Reproduce:
0 [mkyral@ ~ ]$ perl -e 'use Sys::Syslog; sy
Hello,
I have a package that needs procps. While building it in EPEL, i stepped
onto a packaging problem [1] in the RHEL 6 package.
I've opened the bug, but nobody is looking at it and (my guess) it will be
probably fixed for RHEL 6.5. Note that the bug has been tagged as "EasyFix"-
The workarou
Hi, my name is David Beveridge. my username is bevhost (Beveridge
Internet Hosting)
I have been using redhat since about version 3. After version 9, it
split into fedora core and enterprice linux, I used fedora for while
until centos came out and I've pretty much been using that ever since.
I've
On 24 April 2013 12:39, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> Feel free to clone #904818 for Fedora 17 and 18, but dont reopen #877512
> as the issue in rpm 4.11-pre was slightly different (although closely
> related)
>
Bug created; I've referenced all the others and the information you
provided here.
https
Compose started at Wed Apr 24 09:15:20 UTC 2013
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[accerciser]
accerciser-3.8.0-2.fc19.noarch requires python3-ipython-console
[aeolus-conductor]
aeolus-conductor-0.10.6-2.fc19.noarch requires ruby(abi)
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 01:43:53PM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Dne 24.4.2013 13:35, Richard W.M. Jones napsal(a):
> >On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 10:27:49AM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> >>Seems to be due to systemd-202:
> >>https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956035
> >It's a bug in glibc actuall
Dne 24.4.2013 13:35, Richard W.M. Jones napsal(a):
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 10:27:49AM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Seems to be due to systemd-202:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956035
It's a bug in glibc actually:
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15339
I found it in g
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 10:27:49AM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Seems to be due to systemd-202:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956035
It's a bug in glibc actually:
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15339
I found it in gnulib testing yesterday:
http://lists.gnu.org/arc
Compose started at Wed Apr 24 08:15:32 UTC 2013
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[aeolus-conductor]
aeolus-conductor-0.10.6-2.fc19.noarch requires ruby(abi) = 0:1.9.1
[deltacloud-core]
deltacloud-core-1.0.5-2.fc19.noarch requires rub
Dne 24.4.2013 13:11, Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
Dne 24.4.2013 13:03, Harald Hoyer napsal(a):
On 04/24/2013 10:27 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 23.4.2013 14:33, Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
Hi,
Since not a long ago, I cannot build Ruby for Rawhide, while it
works just
fine for F19. I observe following 4
Dne 24.4.2013 13:03, Harald Hoyer napsal(a):
On 04/24/2013 10:27 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 23.4.2013 14:33, Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
Hi,
Since not a long ago, I cannot build Ruby for Rawhide, while it works just
fine for F19. I observe following 4 errors in its test suite:
7) Error:
test_p
Hi,
I have three pending review requests for font packages: 956120, 956127,
and 956134. I'm willing to exchange reviews for those.
These are my first font packages, so I'd prefer to review something
else in return.
Cheers,
--alec
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http
On 04/24/2013 10:27 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Dne 23.4.2013 14:33, Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
>> Hi,
>>
>> Since not a long ago, I cannot build Ruby for Rawhide, while it works just
>> fine for F19. I observe following 4 errors in its test suite:
>>
>>
>> 7) Error:
>> test_proxy_eh_ENV_no_proxy(TestNe
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472085
--- Comment #12 from Jonathan Underwood ---
BZ filed asking maintainer to branch and build for EL6, or otherwise indicate
he's happy for me to do so here: BZ #956138
But really, this is ridiculous bureacracy - if the maintainer h
On 04/24/2013 01:13 PM, Simone Caronni wrote:
On 24 April 2013 11:53, Panu Matilainen wrote:
A segfault is always a bug. This would seem to be the same as
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=877512 but I had assumed this
was only present in the pre-release versions of rpm 4.11.
Than
On 24 April 2013 11:53, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> A segfault is always a bug. This would seem to be the same as
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=877512 but I had assumed this
> was only present in the pre-release versions of rpm 4.11.
Thanks; I've tested a mock build in Fedora 17 an
On 04/24/2013 12:40 PM, Simone Caronni wrote:
Hello,
I don't know if I'm doing something wrong regarding a package which
includes file capabilities support or if I've hit a bug.
I've added libcap-devel as BuildRequires (probably it's already part of a
base system) and replaced the %attr tags in
Hello,
I don't know if I'm doing something wrong regarding a package which
includes file capabilities support or if I've hit a bug.
I've added libcap-devel as BuildRequires (probably it's already part of a
base system) and replaced the %attr tags in the file section (to remove
setuid) with a %cap
On 04/24/2013 09:43 AM, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
> On 04/23/2013 03:27 PM, Richard Marko wrote:
>> This allows us to get accurate statistics of crashing applications while
>> not forcing every user to report to bugzilla. This is a trade-off
>> between getting accurate statistics and quality of the r
On 04/23/2013 09:53 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Apr 2013 15:45:34 -0400
> Przemek Klosowski wrote:
>
>> Well, here's an example why I think such information is highly
>> useful: currently on my system every program using 3D (openGL/Mesa)
>> crashes; that means everything: Blender, Avogadro
Dne 23.4.2013 14:33, Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
Hi,
Since not a long ago, I cannot build Ruby for Rawhide, while it works
just fine for F19. I observe following 4 errors in its test suite:
7) Error:
test_proxy_eh_ENV_no_proxy(TestNetHTTP):
Errno::ECONNREFUSED: Connection refused - getaddrinfo
On 04/23/2013 07:46 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Apr 2013 15:27:50 +0200
> Richard Marko wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'll try to explain how crash reporting currently works in Fedora.
>>
>> Typical reporting process looks like this:
>> - crash is reported to Faf server which responds with 'k
On 04/23/2013 03:27 PM, Richard Marko wrote:
This allows us to get accurate statistics of crashing applications while
not forcing every user to report to bugzilla. This is a trade-off
between getting accurate statistics and quality of the reports as
automated reports are anonymous which is also t
40 matches
Mail list logo
