A requisite for joining GSoC project under fedora team as mentoring organization

2013-04-20 Thread ajay kulkarni
Hi, I'm AjayKumar N Kulkarni. I'd like to participate in GSoC and I'd like to submit my proposal to fedora team for review. I'm awaiting your response. As soon as I get back response from you, I'll submit the proposal Thanking you, AjayKumar N Kulkarni -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedorapro

Re: looking for co-maintainer / new owner

2013-04-20 Thread Dan Mashal
On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 7:25 AM, Nathanael Noblet wrote: > > On Apr 20, 2013, at 12:32 AM, Dan Mashal wrote: >> As a Blackberry owner of the 9930 and the Z10 I will be happy to help. > > Perfect, ACLs approved. I started to update to the 0.18.4 release from 0.18.3 > However they changed some of t

Re: Trimming (or obsoleting) %changelog?

2013-04-20 Thread Adam Williamson
On 20/04/13 10:41 AM, Alex G. wrote: On 04/20/2013 10:39 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: On 19/04/13 09:44 PM, Alex G. wrote: I respectfully disagree with the assertion that the discussion is circular. Sorry, not within this thread - but any discussion vaguely in this area inevitably winds up with

Re: Trimming (or obsoleting) %changelog?

2013-04-20 Thread Alex G.
On 04/20/2013 10:39 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On 19/04/13 09:44 PM, Alex G. wrote: >> I respectfully disagree with the assertion that the discussion is >> circular. > > Sorry, not within this thread - but any discussion vaguely in this area > inevitably winds up with someone suggesting that RPM

gradle problem in f{19,20}

2013-04-20 Thread gil
hi groovy 2.x series (and other libraries) require gradle for build, but with gradle there is a problem I tried to solve without success in f19 and f20 (in f18 work fine :( ). (the same happen when rebuild gradle in non bootstrap mode) gradle --debug jar javadoc -g /builddir/build/BUILD/hibe

Re: Trimming (or obsoleting) %changelog?

2013-04-20 Thread Adam Williamson
On 19/04/13 09:44 PM, Alex G. wrote: On 04/19/2013 09:44 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: On 19/04/13 06:16 PM, Alex G. wrote: On 04/15/2013 05:30 AM, Richard Hughes wrote: Is there any guidance as when to trim %changelog down to size? Some packages have thousands of lines of spec file dating back o

FirewallD - terminology

2013-04-20 Thread poma
Bonjour, I noticed an inconsistency in terminology that can confuse a grandma so she doesn't know with whose fleece to knit. :) *Persistent*(firewalld) vs *Permanent*(firewall-cmd). poma -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/deve

Re: looking for co-maintainer / new owner

2013-04-20 Thread Nathanael Noblet
On Apr 20, 2013, at 12:32 AM, Dan Mashal wrote: > As a Blackberry owner of the 9930 and the Z10 I will be happy to help. Perfect, ACLs approved. I started to update to the 0.18.4 release from 0.18.3 However they changed some of the udev rules and I wanted to make sure I knew why before I fixed

Re: Trimming (or obsoleting) %changelog?

2013-04-20 Thread Peter Robinson
On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 12:47 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 12:51:05PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: >> On 19/04/13 10:18 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: >> >> >Last time, we've had this kind of discussions, people were claiming they >> >were querying changelogs from _binary_ rpms

OSSD Motivations

2013-04-20 Thread Mohamed Lamine Aknouche
Hi Don't know if this is a bit off topic, but I am in real need of you. Thing is, I am a frequent user of open source software, and I am often amazed by the efforts people make in order to provide me with products and services for free. I am now conducting research for a masters' thesis trying to

rawhide report: 20130420 changes

2013-04-20 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
Compose started at Sat Apr 20 08:15:31 UTC 2013 Broken deps for x86_64 -- [3Depict] 3Depict-0.0.12-4.fc20.x86_64 requires libmgl.so.5()(64bit) [aeolus-conductor] aeolus-conductor-0.10.6-2.fc19.noarch requires ruby(abi) = 0:1.9

Re: Login to Koji

2013-04-20 Thread Frank Murphy
On Fri, 19 Apr 2013 19:51:37 +0200 Thomas Moschny wrote: ;) > > Agreed in principle. On the other hand, all these possible solutions > require something running on my side permanently :( > > -- Thomas http://blogtrottr.com/about/ then use your email filters. -- Regards, Frank http//www.frank

Re: %doc path

2013-04-20 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Sun, 14 Apr 2013 15:03:32 +0200, drago01 wrote: > On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 2:25 PM, Eugene Pivnev wrote: > > Sorry for stupid question - help me to find something like "doc must be in > > %{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version}/ but not in %{_docdir}/%{name}/" in > > guidelines. > > Or there is no such li