On Sat, 2013-04-13 at 16:14 +1000, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> I'll file a ticket with the infra team.
Ticket filed:
https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/3748
--
Thanks,
Warm regards,
Ankur: "FranciscoD"
Please only print if necessary.
Looking to contribute to Fedora? Look here:
On Fri, 2013-04-12 at 17:20 -0400, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Yeah. Part of the reason I suggested this to you long back was that
> it keeps the idea of reviews as part of the conversation for this list
> but also because it was a nod of recognition for the reviewers who
> were often doing grunt work
On Apr 12, 2013 4:25 PM, "Ravindra Kumar" wrote:
>
> Thanks Toshio, "https_proxy=" helped me to go little further. I
got a different error, here is the traceback:
>
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "/usr/bin/fedora-packager-setup", line 108, in
> main()
> File "/usr/bin/fedora-
*IMPORTANT*: Same images as with 19 Alpha TC3 through RC2 are over their
size targets (all DVDs and Lives with the exception of Live KDE and Live
SoaS). Also, note that this is the first time a TC follows an RC (namely
RC2). This is due to several new unaddressed blockers. Hopefully, the
next compo
Thanks Toshio, "https_proxy=" helped me to go little further. I got a
different error, here is the traceback:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/bin/fedora-packager-setup", line 108, in
main()
File "/usr/bin/fedora-packager-setup", line 82, in main
fedora_cert.create_user_
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 11:59:21PM +0400, Alexey I. Froloff wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 12:42:25PM -0700, Ravindra Kumar wrote:
> > I keep getting network connection failures even after I specify
> > HTTP_PROXY or ALL_PROXY env vars.
> Shouldn't it be "http_proxy" and "all_proxy", in lower ca
Eugene Pivnev (ti.eug...@gmail.com) said:
> I propose to create "QtDesktop" group - for qt-only applications.
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_use_and_edit_comps.xml_for_package_groups?rd=PackageMaintainers/CompsXml#New_groups
What is the use case for 'toolkit used' as being used as the
Hi
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 4:00 PM, Rakesh Pandit wrote:
>
> [..]
> > Couldn't infrastructure team just automate this?
> >
> [..]
>
> If infrastructure team agrees to do it, script will need some adjustment.
>
Yeah. Part of the reason I suggested this to you long back was that it
keeps the id
On Fri, 2013-04-12 at 11:02 -0400, Paul Wouters wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Apr 2013, Björn Persson wrote:
>
> > Paul Wouters wrote:
> >> Why does the _hardened_build macro for the spec file use "-z,relro" and
> >> not "-z,relro,-z,now" ?
> >
> > Huh? As far as I can see _hardened_build adds -z now, not
On 12 April 2013 20:55, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 12:40 PM, Rakesh Pandit wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> During 2010-2011, I used to generate 15 day report for package reviews
>> and post it[1]. There were yearly report as well[2].
>>
>> In case anyone is interested in taking it up ag
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 12:42:25PM -0700, Ravindra Kumar wrote:
> I keep getting network connection failures even after I specify
> HTTP_PROXY or ALL_PROXY env vars.
Shouldn't it be "http_proxy" and "all_proxy", in lower case?
--
Regards,--
Sir Raorn. --- http://thousandsofhate.blogspot.co
Hi,
Has someone used fedora-packager-setup behind a proxy successfully?
I keep getting network connection failures even after I specify HTTP_PROXY or
ALL_PROXY env vars.
Google is also not giving good suggestions. Could you please suggest me any way
to work around it?
Thanks,
Ravindra
--
I propose to create "QtDesktop" group - for qt-only applications.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_use_and_edit_comps.xml_for_package_groups?rd=PackageMaintainers/CompsXml#New_groups
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 12:40 PM, Rakesh Pandit wrote:
> Hi,
>
> During 2010-2011, I used to generate 15 day report for package reviews
> and post it[1]. There were yearly report as well[2].
>
> In case anyone is interested in taking it up again, feel free to do
> so. Script is available at:
> htt
Credits goes to Tomasz Torcz that pointed me to correct macro in a
package review he is doing for me. :)
2013/4/12 Lorenzo Dalrio :
> Hi,
> i have found that code snippets contained in tmpfiles.d packaging
> guidelines [1] lead to rpmlint error
> "E: hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib/tmpfil
Hi,
i have found that code snippets contained in tmpfiles.d packaging
guidelines [1] lead to rpmlint error
"E: hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib/tmpfiles.d".
Could those snippets be updated to make use of correct macro %{_tmpfilesdir}?
[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Tmpfiles.d
Hi,
During 2010-2011, I used to generate 15 day report for package reviews
and post it[1]. There were yearly report as well[2].
In case anyone is interested in taking it up again, feel free to do
so. Script is available at:
https://fedorahosted.org/triage/browser/scripts/bzReviewReport.py
In cas
On Thu, 11 Apr 2013, Björn Persson wrote:
Paul Wouters wrote:
Why does the _hardened_build macro for the spec file use "-z,relro" and not
"-z,relro,-z,now" ?
Huh? As far as I can see _hardened_build adds -z now, not relro.
-Wl,-z,relro is supposed to be included in LDFLAGS. Or has this chang
FYI,
libreswan 3.2 will hit rawhide later today. Everyone who has openswan
installed and who update their system will automatically get migrated
to libreswan.
The configuration of openswan should be fully compatible with libreswan,
but if you run into issues, please hunt me down and complain lo
Am 12.04.2013 13:44, schrieb Josh Bressers:
> On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 12:54 PM, Reindl Harald
> wrote:
>>
>> which is exactly the goal ASLR is desigend for
>>
>
> It's designed to make certain types of attacks more difficult. It
> doesn't make them impossible, just much harder.
>
> Here is an
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 7:19 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 05:19:46PM +0200, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> > With the current setup, we get "mutating ASLR" when compiled as PIE,
>
> Surely ... you get "mutating ASLR" only when compiled as PIE
> *and* the server process restarts
Compose started at Fri Apr 12 09:15:15 UTC 2013
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[aeolus-conductor]
aeolus-conductor-0.10.6-2.fc19.noarch requires ruby(abi) = 0:1.9.1
[alexandria]
alexandria-0.6.9-4.fc19.noarch requires ruby(abi) >=
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 12:54 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> which is exactly the goal ASLR is desigend for
>
It's designed to make certain types of attacks more difficult. It
doesn't make them impossible, just much harder.
Here is an example.
When you write a security exploit, you generally have
Compose started at Fri Apr 12 08:15:37 UTC 2013
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[aeolus-conductor]
aeolus-conductor-0.10.6-2.fc19.noarch requires ruby(abi) = 0:1.9.1
[amide]
amide-1.0.0-4.fc19.x86_64 requires libvolpack.so.1()(64bit
24 matches
Mail list logo
