Re: Django-1.5 for F19

- Original Message - > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 04/11/2013 04:27 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 07:53:28AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > >> 2) The python-django14 package should add: Obsoletes: > >> python-django < 1.5 Conflicts: py

Re: Django-1.5 for F19

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 04/11/2013 04:27 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 07:53:28AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote: >> 2) The python-django14 package should add: Obsoletes: >> python-django < 1.5 Conflicts: python-django >= 1.5 >> Adding Toshio to the

Swaping packages review

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Greetings, I have a package waiting for the review needed for Design spin (for release 20) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=913367 In return, I will do the same for the taker waiting to review own package too. Regards, - -- Luya Tshimbal

Why does _hardened_build use "-z,relro" and not "-z,relro,-z,now" ?

Hi, Why does the _hardened_build macro for the spec file use "-z,relro" and not "-z,relro,-z,now" ? Paul -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Fedora 19 Alpha RC2 UEFI Fail

On 10/04/13 05:50 PM, Brian Fagioli wrote: When I installed it on the same machine without UEFI, it booted fine. Running it now. 10.04.13, 20:47, "John Reiser" ": Fails at Grub. Missing file. En.mo.gz That message probably is just informative, and not the cause of failing to boot. The sam

Re: Django-1.5 for F19

On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 07:53:28AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > Actually, I just realized that this is NOT going to provide a clean > upgrade path. If you change the Requires: to python-django14, it means > that when upgrading an app, yum is going to attempt to install > python-django14 on

Re: Keeping old versions of packages

Am 09.04.2013 17:02, schrieb Richard Hughes: > On 9 April 2013 13:48, Reindl Harald wrote: >> if i want monthly pacthdays i use Microsoft or Oracle > > Not at all. Patchdays make perfect sense for planning > reboots/downtime/maintenance and that kind of thing. there where i need this test-mach

Re: Fedora 19 Alpha RC2 UEFI Fail

When I installed it on the same machine without UEFI, it booted fine. Running it now. 10.04.13, 20:47, "John Reiser" ": > > > Fails at Grub. Missing file. En.mo.gz > > That message probably is just informative, and not the cause of > failing to boot. The same message occurs in many successful

Re: Fedora 19 Alpha RC2 UEFI Fail

> Fails at Grub. Missing file. En.mo.gz That message probably is just informative, and not the cause of failing to boot. The same message occurs in many successful boots of current release Fedora 18. Right now the suspected culprit of failing to boot Fedora 19 is somewhere in passing control of

Fedora 19 Alpha RC2 UEFI Fail

Fails at Grub. Missing file. En.mo.gz Brian Fagioli linuxtes...@yandex.com -- Sent from Yandex.Mail for mobile: http://m.ya.ru/ymail -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Recommended memory size for F19?

On 10/04/13 08:53 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: On Wed, 10 Apr 2013 13:26:48 +0200 Joachim Backes wrote: Dear developers, I was running F18 on an old notebook with 512 MB memory (not extendable). Now, I upgraded this box to F19 with yum. The upgrade was done, but now, the box is no more operable bec

Re: Revisiting non-rawhide chain-builds

On 10/04/13 07:58 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed 10 Apr 2013 10:59:03 AM EDT, Tom Callaway wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 04/10/2013 09:08 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: Historically, chain-builds were only supported i

Re: Each Fedora release I do series of blog on New Security Feature coming in the next Fedora.

Le mercredi 10 avril 2013 à 09:11 -0400, Daniel J Walsh a écrit : > I need ideas for what to write about in Fedora 19. Could people send some to > me. > > > If you google "security features site:danwalsh.livejournal.com" you will see > a lot of the past blogs. > > Things I have covered in the

[Bug 828238] perl-MIME-Charset-1.010 is available

Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828238 Xavier Bachelot changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolut

Re: Recommended memory size for F19?

On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 06:55:59PM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > Disable /tmp on tmpfs? I have suggested this should be done automatically in RAM-limited situations (primarily for VMs): https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=858265 Well, ideally it would never have been done in the first p

Fedora ARM Weekly Status Meeting Minutes 2013-04-10

Thanks to those that were able to join for the status meeting today, for those unable the minutes are posted below: Minutes: http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2013-04-10/fedora-meeting-1.2013-04-10-20.00.html Minutes (text): http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2

Re: UEFI testing of F19 Alpha RC2 requested

On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 10:08:31AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > process), does it succeed, or do you get an error? And if it > succeeds, does the installed system boot - at least as far as grub? I tried RC1 yesterday and it installs, but it gets stuck at the "Welcome to GRUB!" text. It doesn

Looking for reasons why mod_security pkg was orphaned/retired

Hi, I'm (co-/) maintainer of mod_security, I noticed that the owner orphaned it and then retired it, obviously I can't take it over. [1] I'm kindly asking for the reasons ? I'm maintaining this package (on fedora and epel) lately so it safe to assign to me if it's possible. CCing the former and

Re: UEFI testing of F19 Alpha RC2 requested

Once upon a time, Adam Williamson said: > https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/19-Alpha-RC2/ I'll give this a test (I've got one older UEFI system that wouldn't work with F18 anyway). One question: can I just download the netinst and point it at a local development/19 mirror, or do I need

Re: MySQL and MariaDB in Fedora

On 04/10/2013 02:34 PM, Norvald Ryeng wrote: - hho...@redhat.com wrote: On 04/05/2013 08:06 PM, Norvald Ryeng wrote: - hho...@redhat.com wrote: On 03/21/2013 08:36 PM, Norvald Ryeng wrote: What is the deadline for fixing the remaining issues with MySQL and MariaDB in Fedora? We woul

Fedora ARM Weekly Status Meeting 2013-04-10

Good day all, Please join us today (Wednesday, April 10th) at 4PM EDT (8PM UTC) for the Fedora ARM weekly status meeting in #fedora-meeting-1 on Freenode. On the agenda so far.. 0) Status of ACTION items from our previous meeting 1) Problem packages 2) Aarch64 patching - minimal install packag

Re: Autoconf in rawhide broken?

> Without the fix, `perl' package declared it provides Carp module on RPM > level, which was not true on Perl code level, so while yum got satisfied > with `perl' package, none Carp module was installed into the system and > that made other Perl code using the Carp module, like autconf, unhappy. W

Re: Revisiting non-rawhide chain-builds

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed 10 Apr 2013 01:19:49 PM EDT, Mathieu Bridon wrote: > On Wednesday, April 10, 2013 09:08 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: >> Historically, chain-builds were only supported in the Rawhide >> branch because it was the only location that could auto-gene

Re: Revisiting non-rawhide chain-builds

On Wednesday, April 10, 2013 09:08 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: Historically, chain-builds were only supported in the Rawhide branch because it was the only location that could auto-generate the buildroot. However, the modern version of bodhi now supports allowing users to submit individual pack

UEFI testing of F19 Alpha RC2 requested

Hi, folks. This is a special testing request for F19 Alpha. There are known to be a couple of bugs that can cause UEFI installation to fail because there isn't enough space in the firmware NVRAM; as a fix for that somewhat-infamous bricking bug on some laptops, the current F19 kernel refuses t

Re: Recommended memory size for F19?

And obviously, you *must* have some swap space if you are trying to run with low RAM. Even as small as 100MB of swap space will help. -- -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Recommended memory size for F19?

On 04/10/2013 06:23 PM, John Reiser wrote: I was running F18 on an old notebook ... Question: which minimal memory size is recommended for F19? For graphical desktop, the installer currently warns if less than 768MB. Are these the installation memory requirements or the run-time requiremen

Re: Each Fedora release I do series of blog on New Security Feature coming in the next Fedora.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 04/10/2013 10:10 AM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: > On 04/10/2013 01:11 PM, Daniel J Walsh wrote: >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 >> >> I need ideas for what to write about in Fedora 19. Could people send >> some to me. >> >>

Re: Keeping old versions of packages

On Wed, 10 Apr 2013 12:24:58 -0400 john.flor...@dart.biz wrote: > I was thinking there had been some xz integration recently. Maybe > that was with the delta rpm support. I don't follow that though > since we have a local mirror, there's not much point in rsycing, > storing, etc. the deltas. >

Re: Keeping old versions of packages

On Wed, 10 Apr 2013 10:33:43 -0500 Chris Adams wrote: > The metadata starts in XML before being loaded into an SQLite DB file, > and the XML is in the repodata directory with the DB. However, both > are compressed, as they are large. For example, the current > updates/18/x86_64 XML is over 34M

Re: Keeping old versions of packages

On Wed, 10 Apr 2013 12:24:58 -0400 john.flor...@dart.biz wrote: > I was thinking there had been some xz integration recently. Maybe > that was with the delta rpm support. I don't follow that though > since we have a local mirror, there's not much point in rsycing, > storing, etc. the deltas. Th

Re: Keeping old versions of packages

> From: Chris Adams > The metadata starts in XML before being loaded into an SQLite DB file, > and the XML is in the repodata directory with the DB. However, both are > compressed, as they are large. For example, the current > updates/18/x86_64 XML is over 34M (5M gzip compressed), and the DB is

Re: Recommended memory size for F19?

> I was running F18 on an old notebook ... > Question: which minimal memory size is recommended for F19? For graphical desktop, the installer currently warns if less than 768MB. Many users probably will be uncomfortable with less than 1GB. Things you can try: Append " cgroup_disable=memory " to

Re: [Fedora Update] [comment] wallaby-0.16.0-3.fc19

On Wed, 10 Apr 2013 12:44:22 +0200 Vít Ondruch wrote: > Why is it 7 days? It used to by 3 days in this period of release > cycle, if I remember correctly. Was there some change? Nope. Just a mistake. ;) The pre-beta status wasn't updated everywhere, and the job that does the nagging had old co

Re: Recommended memory size for F19?

On Wed, 10 Apr 2013 13:26:48 +0200 Joachim Backes wrote: > Dear developers, > > I was running F18 on an old notebook with 512 MB memory (not > extendable). Now, I upgraded this box to F19 with yum. The upgrade was > done, but now, the box is no more operable because it is continuously > swapping

[Guidelines Change] Changes to the Packaging Guidelines

Another round of changes to the Fedora Packaging Guidelines have been made: --- A new section on packaging cron jobs has been added: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/CronFiles --- The guidelines for migrating from sysv init scripts to systemd were clarified to state that the migration

Re: Keeping old versions of packages

Once upon a time, john.flor...@dart.biz said: > Is there anything that could be done to make it unnecessary to pull the > complete metadata for every update? For example, IIRC this is all sqlite > data, but what if this was in a plain-text data dump form where something > like rsync could be u

[perl] Add proper conflicts to perl-Getopt-Long, perl-Locale-Maketext, and perl-Sys-Syslog

commit 06d9b0d83923748fc560bd37d2ddeb223ddc2b6f Author: Petr Písař Date: Wed Apr 10 17:21:41 2013 +0200 Add proper conflicts to perl-Getopt-Long, perl-Locale-Maketext, and perl-Sys-Syslog perl.spec |5 + 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/perl.spec

[perl] Fix dead lock in PerlIO after fork from thread

commit a381049bf683de48ae2db810af33a088e020cc7d Author: Petr Písař Date: Wed Apr 10 15:37:36 2013 +0200 Fix dead lock in PerlIO after fork from thread ...106212-Add-PL_perlio_mutex-to-atfork_lock.patch | 48 perl.spec |6

[perl] Fix leaking tied hashes

commit c367bfcf005b8eba873800a0a3a8c7e983a1bc30 Author: Petr Písař Date: Wed Apr 10 14:55:00 2013 +0200 Fix leaking tied hashes ...n-t-leak-deleted-iterator-when-tying-hash.patch | 60 +++ perl-5.16.3-Don-t-leak-if-hh-copying-dies.patch| 109 ...16.3-Fr

Re: Keeping old versions of packages

On 10. 4. 2013 at 10:53:25, john.flor...@dart.biz wrote: > > From: seth vidal > > > > The metadata doesn't get downloaded if it hasn't changed - the problem > > though is that the metadata DOES change often. Normally everyday. > > Is there anything that could be done to make it unnecessary to pu

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 19 Alpha Release Candidate 1 (RC1) Available Now!

2013/4/9 Adam Williamson > On 09/04/13 10:41 AM, Andreas Tunek wrote: > >> I tried the live image on two computers and could not get into GDM. Is >> this a known bug or should I report it? >> > > It's hard to tell with no more details than that, but there are no known > general showstopper bugs i

Re: Keeping old versions of packages

Mathieu Bridon (boche...@fedoraproject.org) said: > On Tuesday, April 09, 2013 11:52 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote: > >If you wanted to keep more versions on the mirrors, you have the following > >options: > > > >1) Have mash create everything, and then run a script that prunes versions > >older than

Re: Revisiting non-rawhide chain-builds

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed 10 Apr 2013 10:59:03 AM EDT, Tom Callaway wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 > > On 04/10/2013 09:08 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: >> >> Historically, chain-builds were only supported in the Rawhide >> branch because it was

Re: Keeping old versions of packages

On Wed, 10 Apr 2013 10:53:25 -0400 john.flor...@dart.biz wrote: > > From: seth vidal > > > > The metadata doesn't get downloaded if it hasn't changed - the > > problem though is that the metadata DOES change often. Normally > > everyday. > > Is there anything that could be done to make it unnec

Re: Revisiting non-rawhide chain-builds

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 04/10/2013 09:08 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > Historically, chain-builds were only supported in the Rawhide > branch because it was the only location that could auto-generate > the buildroot. > > However, the modern version of bodhi now suppor

Re: Keeping old versions of packages

> From: seth vidal > > The metadata doesn't get downloaded if it hasn't changed - the problem > though is that the metadata DOES change often. Normally everyday. Is there anything that could be done to make it unnecessary to pull the complete metadata for every update? For example, IIRC this i

Re: Autoconf in rawhide broken?

On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 2:20 AM, Pavel Raiskup wrote: > > That perl issue was fixed a while back. > > > > There's not enough info here for me to help you. > > I'm really curious what happens here also. Richard, could you specify > more info? Well it appears to be fixed now. I was pretty sure m

Re: Keeping old versions of packages

On Wed, 10 Apr 2013 08:47:38 -0500 Bruno Wolff III wrote: > On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 09:24:49 +0200, >Jan Zelený wrote: > > > >I'm not sure this solves the initial problem - downloading new > >metadata every 6 hours or so ... > > Does the metadata really need to be downloaded or just checked

Re: Keeping old versions of packages

On Wed, 10 Apr 2013 09:24:49 +0200 Jan Zelený wrote: > On 9. 4. 2013 at 12:25:56, seth vidal wrote: > > On Tue, 9 Apr 2013 11:18:54 -0500 > > > > Bruno Wolff III wrote: > > > On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 00:05:45 +0800, > > > > > >Mathieu Bridon wrote: > > > >The current behaviour would be obt

Re: How do *you* use Fedora?

Being in the middle of a career change, I use Fedora as a basic desktop with MATE. As productivity I do a lot of photo editing with GIMP and the occasional tools like custom-made ImageMagick scripts, illustration with Inkscape, DTP with a GIMP and Inkscape combo and web development with Pluma. On t

Re: Keeping old versions of packages

Am 10.04.2013 15:47, schrieb Bruno Wolff III: > On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 09:24:49 +0200, > Jan Zelený wrote: >> >> I'm not sure this solves the initial problem - downloading new metadata every >> 6 hours or so ... > > Does the metadata really need to be downloaded or just checked to see if it

[Test-Announce] 2013-04-10 @ 16:00 UTC - F19 Alpha Blocker Bug Review #6

# F19 Alpha Blocker Review meeting #6 # Date: 2013-04-10 # Time: 16:00 UTC (12:00 EDT, 09:00 PDT) # Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net Apologies on the late notice but it's time for another exciting blocker review meeting! We'll be running through the alpha blockers and freeze e

Re: Each Fedora release I do series of blog on New Security Feature coming in the next Fedora.

On 04/10/2013 01:11 PM, Daniel J Walsh wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I need ideas for what to write about in Fedora 19. Could people send some to me. If you google "security features site:danwalsh.livejournal.com" you will see a lot of the past blogs. Things I have c

[389-devel] Please review ticket 512: improve performance of vattr code

https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/512 https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/512/0001-Ticket-512-improve-performance-of-vattr-code.patch -- 389-devel mailing list 389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel

Re: Expanding the list of "Hardened Packages"

Hello all, the discussion has somewhat died down... If you have a specific proposal for a change in policy, please add it to https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1104 ; hard data that demonstrate the impact, if any, in a situation relevant to Fedora (in particular, taking into account prelink as

Re: Keeping old versions of packages

On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 09:24:49 +0200, Jan Zelený wrote: I'm not sure this solves the initial problem - downloading new metadata every 6 hours or so ... Does the metadata really need to be downloaded or just checked to see if it is current? -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject

Re: Each Fedora release I do series of blog on New Security Feature coming in the next Fedora.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 04/10/2013 09:11 AM, Daniel J Walsh wrote: > I need ideas for what to write about in Fedora 19. Could people > send some to me. > > > If you google "security features site:danwalsh.livejournal.com" > you will see a lot of the past blogs. > > Thi

Each Fedora release I do series of blog on New Security Feature coming in the next Fedora.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I need ideas for what to write about in Fedora 19. Could people send some to me. If you google "security features site:danwalsh.livejournal.com" you will see a lot of the past blogs. Things I have covered in the past in addition to SELinux advanc

Revisiting non-rawhide chain-builds

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Historically, chain-builds were only supported in the Rawhide branch because it was the only location that could auto-generate the buildroot. However, the modern version of bodhi now supports allowing users to submit individual packages to the buildr

Re: Django-1.5 for F19

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed 10 Apr 2013 07:53:28 AM EDT, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > There are two things that should probably be done to solve this: 1) > All applications should change Requires: python-django to Requires: > python-django >= 1.4 Conflicts: python-django >=

Re: MySQL and MariaDB in Fedora

- hho...@redhat.com wrote: > On 04/05/2013 08:06 PM, Norvald Ryeng wrote: > > - hho...@redhat.com wrote: > > > >> On 03/21/2013 08:36 PM, Norvald Ryeng wrote: > >>> What is the deadline for fixing the remaining issues with MySQL and > >>> MariaDB in Fedora? We would like to find a solution

F-19 Branched report: 20130410 changes

Compose started at Wed Apr 10 09:15:13 UTC 2013 Broken deps for x86_64 -- [aeolus-conductor] aeolus-conductor-0.10.6-2.fc19.noarch requires ruby(abi) = 0:1.9.1 [alexandria] alexandria-0.6.9-4.fc19.noarch requires ruby(abi) >=

Re: Django-1.5 for F19

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thu 04 Apr 2013 11:04:44 AM EDT, Matthias Runge wrote: > Hi, > > recently, we introduced python-django14 for F19, to provide a > compatibility package for those packages not working with > Django-1.5 and requiring an older Django-1.4. > > If you

Recommended memory size for F19?

Dear developers, I was running F18 on an old notebook with 512 MB memory (not extendable). Now, I upgraded this box to F19 with yum. The upgrade was done, but now, the box is no more operable because it is continuously swapping. Question: which minimal memory size is recommended for F19? Kind re

rawhide report: 20130410 changes

Compose started at Wed Apr 10 08:15:14 UTC 2013 Broken deps for x86_64 -- [aeolus-conductor] aeolus-conductor-0.10.6-2.fc19.noarch requires ruby(abi) = 0:1.9.1 [amide] amide-1.0.0-4.fc19.x86_64 requires libvolpack.so.1()(64bit

Re: Keeping old versions of packages

Dne 9.4.2013 18:14, Simo Sorce napsal(a): On Tue, 2013-04-09 at 17:16 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: Hi, Am 09.04.2013 14:27, schrieb Matthew Miller: On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 10:10:26AM +0100, Richard Hughes wrote: I'm wondering what the interest would be in keeping packages referenced in metadat

Fwd: [Fedora Update] [comment] wallaby-0.16.0-3.fc19

Why is it 7 days? It used to by 3 days in this period of release cycle, if I remember correctly. Was there some change? Vít Původní zpráva Předmět:[Fedora Update] [comment] wallaby-0.16.0-3.fc19 Datum: Tue, 09 Apr 2013 22:04:11 + Od: upda...@fedoraproject.org

Kernel functionality which replaced cpuspeed daemon thermal limits ?

Back in Fedora 16, the cpuspeed daemon RPM was removed from the repositories. To quote [1] "Fedora 16 kernel cpufreq stack now fully replaces CPUSpeed, effectively making the package obsolete." There seems to be little clear documentation though on how to make use of the cpufreq stack to d

Re: Autoconf in rawhide broken?

On 2013-04-10, Pavel Raiskup wrote: > I have a question here, Kevin (or others). What action fixed the > dependency hell for this issue? We excluded some scripts delivered in binary `perl' package

Re: How do *you* use Fedora?

Hi, I use Fedora rawhide daily as an all-purpose desktop: administrative tasks (budgets, taxes, etc), mail, web browsing (online stores, news, etc). I am pretty agnostic in what I call desktop but over the years I've slowly moved from fat clients to local web clients plugged on local 'server' app

Re: Keeping old versions of packages

On 9. 4. 2013 at 12:25:56, seth vidal wrote: > On Tue, 9 Apr 2013 11:18:54 -0500 > > Bruno Wolff III wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 00:05:45 +0800, > > > >Mathieu Bridon wrote: > > >The current behaviour would be obtained by setting it to 1, and > > >setting it to 2 would already be a p

Re: Autoconf in rawhide broken?

> That perl issue was fixed a while back. > > There's not enough info here for me to help you. I'm really curious what happens here also. Richard, could you specify more info? The 'repoquery -q --requires autoconf' correctly shows 'perl(Carp)' dependency in my rawhide mock instance. So it shoul