-rw--- 1 root root 18M 22. Mär 17:06
initramfs-0-rescue-74e76163c28448fba68b8667eb7b5d92.img
-rw--- 1 root root 5,2M 7. Apr 00:34
initramfs-3.9.0-0.rc5.git1.301.fc19.x86_64.img
is this the result of http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/DracutHostOnly
wasting space on virtual mac
I think after migrating to cgit there comes a lot if errors like this.
Sent from Subor Gameplayer
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Sat, 6 Apr 2013 19:09:49 -0400
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> > This report generated by Fedora Release Engineering, using
> > http://git.fedorahosted.org/git/?p=releng;a=blob;f=scripts/check-upgrade-paths.py;hb=HEAD
> >
>
> Where is the script really located?
http://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/relen
On Sat, 06 Apr 2013 20:30:25 +0400
Eugene Pivnev wrote:
> I can't find lightd, package in Fedora - just lightdm greeters:
> http://img687.imageshack.us/img687/679/screenshotac1e1cb8.png
> I'm wrong?
You are search in pkgdb's 'applications' area. The other parts of
lightdm aren't an application (
Hi
On Sat, Apr 6, 2013 at 1:28 PM, Eugene Pivnev wrote:
> The problem is that "
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers";
> propose check new package by this db.
> And new contributors (as I am) put down application or library name and
> push Enter.
> Naturally.
> This report generated by Fedora Release Engineering, using
> http://git.fedorahosted.org/git/?p=releng;a=blob;f=scripts/check-upgrade-paths.py;hb=HEAD
>
Where is the script really located?
Rahul
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinf
On 06/04/13 01:47, build...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
> Broken upgrade path report for tags f19 -> f20:
> [...]
> kalev:
> vala:
> f19 > f20 (vala-0.20.0-1.fc19 vala-0.19.0-1.fc19)
Vala build dies with:
+ /usr/bin/emacs -batch --no-init-file --no-site-file --eval '(progn (setq
load-pa
On Sat, 06 Apr 2013 16:54:45 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> just a quick headsup that I'm undeprecating libsidplay and fbg.
>
> libsidplay, review request:
> 949165 - Review Request: libsidplay - SID chip music module playing library
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=94916
[Sorry for the late reply; catching up on old bookmarked posts.]
On Thu, 07 Mar, 2013 at 03:26:15 GMT, Adam Williamson wrote:
> To avoid going through the whole discussion we had last week _again_ -
> as fedpkg is primarily a tool intended for and used by Fedora packagers,
> it defaults to tryin
On Wed, 20 Feb, 2013 at 16:21:26 GMT, Tom Tromey wrote:
> FWIW we're adding direct support for this to gdb.
> You'll be able to supply backtrace filters with your project just as you
> currently can provide value and type pretty-printers.
Are there docs for this anywhere?
--Ben
--
devel mailing
06.04.2013 20:57, John5342 пишет:
On Sat, Apr 6, 2013 at 5:30 PM, Eugene Pivnev wrote:
I can't find lightd, package in Fedora - just lightdm greeters:
http://img687.imageshack.us/img687/679/screenshotac1e1cb8.png
I'm wrong?
When you search for "Applications" (the default) the results only show
On Sat, Apr 6, 2013 at 5:30 PM, Eugene Pivnev wrote:
> I can't find lightd, package in Fedora - just lightdm greeters:
> http://img687.imageshack.us/img687/679/screenshotac1e1cb8.png
> I'm wrong?
When you search for "Applications" (the default) the results only show
certain user visible packages
Am 06.04.2013 18:30, schrieb Eugene Pivnev:
> I can't find lightd, package in Fedora - just lightdm greeters:
> http://img687.imageshack.us/img687/679/screenshotac1e1cb8.png
> I'm wrong?
I'm afraid, yes:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/search?match=glob&type=package&terms=lightdm*
--
Mit freun
I can't find lightd, package in Fedora - just lightdm greeters:
http://img687.imageshack.us/img687/679/screenshotac1e1cb8.png
I'm wrong?
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
I'm looking for review swaps for next new packages:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=929256
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=929425
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=947049
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=949154
These are qt-based c++ applications.
Fed
Hi all,
just a quick headsup that I'm undeprecating libsidplay and fbg.
libsidplay, review request:
949165 - Review Request: libsidplay - SID chip music module playing library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=949165
Rationale for undeprecating: .sid files are cool and libsidplay is n
Compose started at Sat Apr 6 09:15:13 UTC 2013
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[aeolus-conductor]
aeolus-conductor-0.10.6-2.fc19.noarch requires ruby(abi) = 0:1.9.1
[alexandria]
alexandria-0.6.9-4.fc19.noarch requires ruby(abi) >=
Compose started at Sat Apr 6 08:15:17 UTC 2013
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[TurboGears2]
TurboGears2-2.1.4-5.fc19.noarch requires python-webob <= 0:1.1.1
[aeolus-conductor]
aeolus-conductor-0.10.6-2.fc19.noarch requires ruby(ab
On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 01:55:06PM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Yes, I am exaggerating here, but does it make sense to have package
> python3-3.3? Why we don't have python3-1.0? Where is the version 1.0
> of python 3? Why we duplicating the version? Non of these question
> makes you think that we ar
19 matches
Mail list logo
