-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/01/2013 08:41 AM, Matthias Runge wrote:
> But still, currently, we're carrying provides like this: Provides:
> django = %{version}-%{release} Provides: Django =
> %{version}-%{release} and also provide python-django. The question
> remains
- Original Message -
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 02/28/2013 05:46 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> >> That seems to be a good proposal for me. Review request is
> >> here[1], based on the current python-django package. Shouldn't
> >> be an issue. For EPEL, we hav
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/28/2013 05:46 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>> That seems to be a good proposal for me. Review request is
>> here[1], based on the current python-django package. Shouldn't
>> be an issue. For EPEL, we have the Django14 package. This
>> shouldn't
On Qui, 2013-02-28 at 14:58 +0100, Rave it wrote:
> > At today's FESCo meeting there were two tickets which had the end
> > result of needing to have new maintainers and comaintainers for some
> > packages:
> >
> > == https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1028 ==
> >
> > tor package was reassign
Matthew Miller wrote:
> Historical footnote: I believe it was initially added to help squeeze the
> boot portion of Anaconda onto floppy disks. If the things you list are
> really the only things using it, I think it's time to retire it
> completely.
The package was actually imported by Enrico in
On 28/02/13 14:49, Richard Hughes wrote:
> On 28 February 2013 14:18, Jamie Nguyen wrote:
>> I've already applied the 20 patch series in git, but before pushing any
>> updates out I want to make sure things really are in good shape, and
>> will make further changes as necessary.
>
> The spec file
On Thu, 28 Feb 2013 23:37:04 +0100
Reindl Harald wrote:
> where is yum-preosto obsoleted?
> yum-presto-0.9.0-1.fc18.noarch -> machine with updates-tsting enabled
>
> enlighten me
See the Subject line and the word "Rawhide" ?
This has nothing to do with f18.
kevin
signature.asc
Description:
Am 28.02.2013 23:34, schrieb Rahul Sundaram:
> On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 5:19 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 28.02.2013 23:06, schrieb Andre Robatino:
> > I noticed that drpm support is now built into yum and that yum-presto is
> > obsoleted. I don't see anything in the yum man page o
Hi
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 5:19 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> Am 28.02.2013 23:06, schrieb Andre Robatino:
> > I noticed that drpm support is now built into yum and that yum-presto is
> > obsoleted. I don't see anything in the yum man page or the standard
> config files
> > on how to control wheth
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 11:07:13PM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> (Do we really need a second libc in Fedora?).
Historical footnote: I believe it was initially added to help squeeze the
boot portion of Anaconda onto floppy disks. If the things you list are
really the only things using it, I think it
Am 28.02.2013 23:06, schrieb Andre Robatino:
> I noticed that drpm support is now built into yum and that yum-presto is
> obsoleted. I don't see anything in the yum man page or the standard config
> files
> on how to control whether drpms are used. Can it be done without
> installing/removing the
Am 28.02.2013 22:42, schrieb Richard Vickery:
> Matthias: What do you mean by "kernel commandline"? I thought there was one
> command line for everything. Is there a
> different one for the kernel?
seriously?
http://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt
https://bbs.archlinux.o
Andre Robatino wrote:
> I noticed that drpm support is now built into yum and that yum-presto is
> obsoleted. I don't see anything in the yum man page or the standard config
> files on how to control whether drpms are used. Can it be done without
> installing/removing the deltarpm package?
I've be
I've searched but have not found any packaging documentation or development
discussion about policy files for applications. Should a package just install
it's .policy files in /usr/share/polkit-1/actions? Is there an rpm macro for
the location?
And what about naming them? Besides ending in .policy
Hi,
due to the Enrico Scholz saga, I realized that we have 4 packages in Rawhide
which BuildRequire dietlibc:
dhcp-forwarder-0:0.10-1902.fc19.src
ip-sentinel-0:0.12-1901.fc19.src
kismet-0:0.0.2011.03.R2-1603.fc18.src
util-vserver-0:0.30.215+svn2929-1603.fc18.src
There are 2 things that strike m
I noticed that drpm support is now built into yum and that yum-presto is
obsoleted. I don't see anything in the yum man page or the standard config files
on how to control whether drpms are used. Can it be done without
installing/removing the deltarpm package?
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fe
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/603
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/603/0001-Ticket-603-A-logic-error-in-str2simple.patch
Fix description: str2simple sets the strdup'ed type this way:
if ( f->f_choice == LDAP_FILTER_PRESENT ) {
f->f_type = slapi_ch_strdup( str );
Richard Vickery wrote:
> Matthias: What do you mean by "kernel commandline"? I thought there was
> one command line for everything. Is there a different one for the kernel?
Yes, all programs take command line parameters when they get run, and of
course you cannot run the kernel from a normal shel
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 13:42:56 -0800,
Richard Vickery wrote:
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 11:31 AM, Jan Dvořák wrote:
> > Do you see the same problem starting KDE instead?
>
> I will try again with something that does not use cogl and with
> disabled rc6, now that I have btrfs root with snapsh
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 11:31 AM, Jan Dvořák wrote:
> > > Do you see the same problem starting KDE instead?
> >
> > I will try again with something that does not use cogl and with
> > disabled rc6, now that I have btrfs root with snapshots.
>
> Both KDM and Xfce4 work flawlessly.
>
> I have tried
> > Do you see the same problem starting KDE instead?
>
> I will try again with something that does not use cogl and with
> disabled rc6, now that I have btrfs root with snapshots.
Both KDM and Xfce4 work flawlessly.
I have tried with i915.i915_enable_rc6=0 and there was no difference.
--
devel
Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
> - - Refactorig LLVM's build system to properly use versioned shared
> objects. I note that other distributions, and BSD, are still using
> static linking, so we appear to be the only ones attempting to package
> LLVM properly.
And FYI, this is not just a matter of g
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 9:50 PM, Shawn Iwinski wrote:
> I have started packaging the development version of Drupal 8. There is
> still plenty of work to do (please help!) and I would also like to get the
> maintainers of drupal6 and drupal7 packages involved.
I'm willing to help out a bit, as I
Hi
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 11:45 AM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> Chuck Anderson wrote:
> > Would you please change them to be versioned as
> > it states in the Packaging Guidelines?
>
> Thanks. It'll be fixed before packages make it out to the repos.
>
FYI, rpmlint does warn about this
Rahul
Please note that there are references to Fedroa 12 and Fedora 13
in the section For Testers:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_update_HOWTO#For_Testers
Perhaps these should be updated ?
I am planning on making some minor changes to the section
Build a Package For Rawhide:
https://fedoraproje
On Thu, 28 Feb 2013 09:41:21 +0100
Remi Collet wrote:
> Some packages are missing in the EPEL-6 buildroot
>
> From :
> http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/3479/5063479/root.log
>
> DEBUG util.py:264:
> http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/repo/rhel/rhel-i386-server-optional-6/getPackage/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/28/2013 11:13 AM, Matthias Runge wrote:
> On 02/28/2013 02:16 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>> On Thu 28 Feb 2013 06:58:36 AM EST, Matthias Runge wrote:
>>> Dear list,
>
>>> Django 1.5 was released about two days ago. I'd like to push a
>>> buil
Chuck Anderson wrote:
> Would you please change them to be versioned as
> it states in the Packaging Guidelines?
Thanks. It'll be fixed before packages make it out to the repos.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Hi
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 11:22 AM, Matthias Runge wrote:
> I see your point not to touch any Django-package to change the
> requirements, but also this will make things more confusing:
> Django (as F17) is 1.4.x
> python-django is 1.4.x
> python-django15 is 1.5
>
> what about Django-1.6? So I'd
Hi Shawn:
I'm willing to help, though I haven't done any real programming I'm ten
years our so, and don't know how much "help" I would actually be, but it's
an offer.
Richard
On Feb 27, 2013 6:50 PM, "Shawn Iwinski" wrote:
> I have started packaging the development version of Drupal 8. There i
You've used unversioned obsoletes, which are bad. That means at no
point in time ever again can there be any package named mediawiki-math
or mediawiki-nomath. Would you please change them to be versioned as
it states in the Packaging Guidelines?
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines
On 02/28/2013 03:57 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> You should introduce a python-django15 package instead and let dependent
> packages slowly move over. We cannot handle this within a single
> release timeframe. Every release introduces incompatibilities and
> upstream projects aren't willing to
On Thu, 28 Feb 2013 10:04:11 + David Howells wrote:
> Jan Dvořák wrote:
>
> > I am running rawhide for fun and since a few days ago a few seconds
> > after starting gdm the whole system freezes. I am sorry that I can't
> > really pinpoint the exact update as I suspend and this only manifeste
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/28/2013 02:16 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On Thu 28 Feb 2013 06:58:36 AM EST, Matthias Runge wrote:
>> Dear list,
>
>> Django 1.5 was released about two days ago. I'd like to push a
>> build to rawhide, but I assume, that will break many depe
Hi,
The mediawiki package has been updated to 1.20.2 for Rawhide and 1.19.3
for F17/F18.
The mediawiki-math/nopath packages have been merged into just
"mediawiki" (with Obsoletes). There is one package that depended on the
old packages.
mediawiki-semantic
owner: jlaska
If you have your own wiki
Compose started at Thu Feb 28 08:15:06 UTC 2013
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[HippoDraw]
HippoDraw-python-1.21.3-6.fc19.x86_64 requires
libboost_python.so.1.50.0()(64bit)
[condor]
condor-plumage-7.9.1-0.1.fc19.4.x86_64 requires
On 28 Feb 2013 14:48, "Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski" <
domi...@greysector.net> wrote:
>
> On Wednesday, 13 February 2013 at 15:26, John5342 wrote:
> > On 13 Feb 2013 09:37, "Jens Petersen" wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I spend a little time recently working on the llvm package trying
> > >
On 02/28/2013 06:55 AM, Kay Sievers wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 6:02 PM, Andy Gospodarek wrote:
>
I'd like to see kernel driver work to be sure every multi-port driver
with the same PCI b/d/b/f sets dev_id. That isn't necessarily true
today, which makes it hard to trust. bio
Hi
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 6:58 AM, Matthias Runge wrote:
> Dear list,
>
> Django 1.5 was released about two days ago. I'd like to push a build to
> rawhide, but I assume, that will break many dependent packages.
>
> The plan is, to delay the push, until other packages are fixed, or to
> push in
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 6:02 PM, Andy Gospodarek wrote:
>> > I'd like to see kernel driver work to be sure every multi-port driver
>> > with the same PCI b/d/b/f sets dev_id. That isn't necessarily true
>> > today, which makes it hard to trust. biosdevname needs this too,
>> > until such a time
On 28 February 2013 14:18, Jamie Nguyen wrote:
> I've already applied the 20 patch series in git, but before pushing any
> updates out I want to make sure things really are in good shape, and
> will make further changes as necessary.
The spec file looks much less batshit-insane now, thanks for do
On Wednesday, 13 February 2013 at 15:26, John5342 wrote:
> On 13 Feb 2013 09:37, "Jens Petersen" wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I spend a little time recently working on the llvm package trying
> > to fix a few Fedora bugs that have been open for a while...
> >
> > I also think we should really get ll
On Monday, 18 February 2013 at 12:01, Jens Petersen wrote:
> > There was talk about bringing 3.1 to F17 including some support from
> > the Mesa guys but then nothing actually happened. I would really
> > like it if I could go through F18 without having to build my own
> > private parallel installa
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 8:06 AM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 4:05 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
>
>> Greetings,
>>
>> * fedora-usermgmt (epel branches still owned by ensc)
>> * hunt
>> * ip-sentinel
>> * kismet
>> * libextractor
>>
>
> Taken.
>
> Also took dietlibc f18 and f17, a
Hello,
In the FESCo meeting yesterday (February 27th), it was decided that
Enrico Scholz would be removed as maintainer of the tor package, and
that I should become the primary maintainer.
I am going about fixing the package and bringing it back into shape with
the help of co-maintainer Paul Wout
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 02:05:11PM -0800, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> At today's FESCo meeting there were two tickets which had the end result
> of needing to have new maintainers and comaintainers for some packages:
>
> == https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1028 ==
>
> tor packag
Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> How many Django-based packages are we talking about? Should we be
> considering putting things together in a side tag before landing in
> Rawhide?
Add cobbler to the list. Cobbler was forgotten about in Fedora 17 and an
update to support Django in Fedora 17 is /still/ si
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 4:05 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> * fedora-usermgmt (epel branches still owned by ensc)
> * hunt
> * ip-sentinel
> * kismet
> * libextractor
>
Taken.
-J
--
http://cecinestpasunefromage.wordpress.com/
in yo
> At today's FESCo meeting there were two tickets which had the end
> result of needing to have new maintainers and comaintainers for some
> packages:
>
> == https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1028 ==
>
> tor package was reassigned to a new maintainer. Former maintainer
> dropped ownership o
Hello all,
although package Docky was lot of work for me (licensing patching etc) I
am no longer using it and last two releases were very unstable. There
are couple of bugzillas reported mainly because of gconf migration.
"""
Docky is an advanced shortcut bar that sits at the edges of your scree
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 2:17 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
>
> I spoke to the upstream maintainer about this the other day. I suggest
> you actually retire it properly rather than just orphan it, if
> development picks up it can be re-reviewed.
>
Makes sense. I just went ahead and retired the package
We've figured out now that putting i915.i915_enable_rc6=0 on the kernel
commandline works around the issue.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Hi all!
I'll be happy to help with vtk and vtkdata, if at any time needed.
Best,
Mario
On 28 February 2013 12:49, Paul Howarth wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Feb 2013 14:05:11 -0800
> Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
>
>> Greetings,
>>
>> At today's FESCo meeting there were two tickets which had the end
>> result
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=915708
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu 28 Feb 2013 06:58:36 AM EST, Matthias Runge wrote:
> Dear list,
>
> Django 1.5 was released about two days ago. I'd like to push a build to
> rawhide, but I assume, that will break many dependent packages.
>
> The plan is, to delay the push, unt
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=914287
Ralf Corsepius changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-App-cpanminus:
5b35b693c9af21a0a666075bfbd33e34 App-cpanminus-1.6002.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 05:02:56AM -0700, Brad Bell wrote:
> I often use the web page
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_update_HOWTO
> and have a few edits to suggest. Who would be the proper person to contact ?
It's a wiki... and as Fedora contributor, you are trusted enough:
https://
I often use the web page
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_update_HOWTO
and have a few edits to suggest. Who would be the proper person to contact ?
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Dear list,
Django 1.5 was released about two days ago. I'd like to push a build to
rawhide, but I assume, that will break many dependent packages.
The plan is, to delay the push, until other packages are fixed, or to
push in about 14 days.
I have a scratch-build build ready, one might to try, it
On Wed, 27 Feb 2013 14:05:11 -0800
Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> At today's FESCo meeting there were two tickets which had the end
> result of needing to have new maintainers and comaintainers for some
> packages:
>
> == https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1028 ==
>
> tor package w
Em Wed, 27 Feb 2013 14:05:11 -0800
Toshio Kuratomi escreveu:
> Greetings,
>
> At today's FESCo meeting there were two tickets which had the end result
> of needing to have new maintainers and comaintainers for some packages:
...
> * ivtv-firmware -- Firmware for the Hauppauge PVR 250/350/150/50
Jan Dvořák wrote:
> I am running rawhide for fun and since a few days ago a few seconds
> after starting gdm the whole system freezes. I am sorry that I can't
> really pinpoint the exact update as I suspend and this only manifested
> after a reboot.
Do you see the same problem starting KDE inste
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=916539
Bug ID: 916539
Summary: perl-Perl-Critic-Pulp-77 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Perl-Critic-Pulp
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=914316
Upstream Release Monitoring
changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|perl-Net-Twitter-4.2 is |perl-Net-T
On 27 February 2013 16:08, Karel Klic wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I am releasing ownership of my packages due to lack of time to properly
> maintain them.
>
> ant-antlr3 -- Antlr3 task for Ant
Taken ant-antlr3.
--
Mat Booth
http://fedoraproject.org/get-fedora
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedo
On 24 February 2013 10:19, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Before we branch for Fedora 19, as is custom, we will block currently
> orphaned packages and packages that have failed to build since Fedora 17.
>
> The following packages are currently orphaned, or fail to build. If
> you have a need for one of
Some packages are missing in the EPEL-6 buildroot
From : http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/3479/5063479/root.log
DEBUG util.py:264:
http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/repo/rhel/rhel-i386-server-optional-6/getPackage/php-mbstring-5.3.3-14.el6_3.i686.rpm:
[Errno 14] PYCURL ERROR 22 - "Th
68 matches
Mail list logo
