Re: Problems testing packages on koji

2013-02-22 Thread Eduardo Javier Echeverria Alvarado
Thanks Johannes, but I mean, really in the first case that I show in my email, the load never reaches 100% or even begins. Whichever wait time 2013/2/23 Johannes Lips > Eduardo Javier Echeverria Alvarado wrote: > >> Hi, everyone >> >> I've a problem that has kept me worried about three weeks ago

Re: Problems testing packages on koji

2013-02-22 Thread Johannes Lips
Eduardo Javier Echeverria Alvarado wrote: Hi, everyone I've a problem that has kept me worried about three weeks ago and i do not know how to solve, when I try to test any package on koji (in any instance, ppc, arm, s390, x86 ) that has a higher weight to a mega, it refuses to even begin the tas

Re: is it possible to download a spec file only using yum?

2013-02-22 Thread Sérgio Basto
On Sex, 2013-02-22 at 00:36 +0100, poma wrote: > On 02/21/13 10:39, Matthew Miller wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 07:16:08PM -0600, Ranjan Maitra wrote: > >> I was wondering if it is possible to download a spec file using yum > >> or rpm only (without downloading the rpm)? > > > > No, but the

Re: is it possible to download a spec file only using yum?

2013-02-22 Thread Orcan Ogetbil
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 8:00 PM, poma wrote: > deco grub2-2.00-16.fc19.src.rpm > 13020 blocks [backtrace cut] > Aborted > -- Hmm, the crash does not happen here. How reproducible is this? Can you debug? > > Although the extraction is successful, checksums are OK. :) > Thanks for pointing out an

Re: Orphaning PycURL

2013-02-22 Thread Jeffrey Ollie
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 3:37 PM, Kamil Dudka wrote: > > I have taken the ownership for now. Thanks! -- Jeff Ollie -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Orphaning PycURL

2013-02-22 Thread Kamil Dudka
On Friday, February 22, 2013 14:54:04 Jeffrey Ollie wrote: > On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 2:33 PM, Jon Ciesla wrote: > > Excellent! Jeffrey, will you be picking python-pycurl up again, then? > > No. While this was an easy fix that was actually in another package, > PycURL has other problems. I thin

Re: Orphaning PycURL

2013-02-22 Thread Jeffrey Ollie
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 2:33 PM, Jon Ciesla wrote: > > Excellent! Jeffrey, will you be picking python-pycurl up again, then? No. While this was an easy fix that was actually in another package, PycURL has other problems. I think that the most obvious one is handling errors encountered by libcu

Re: Orphaning PycURL

2013-02-22 Thread Jon Ciesla
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 2:29 PM, Kamil Dudka wrote: > On Friday, February 22, 2013 12:02:47 Jeffrey Ollie wrote: > > The final straw is that the package failed to build in the latest mass > > rebuild: > > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=914411 > > Thanks for heads up! This is a b

Re: Orphaning PycURL

2013-02-22 Thread Kamil Dudka
On Friday, February 22, 2013 12:02:47 Jeffrey Ollie wrote: > The final straw is that the package failed to build in the latest mass > rebuild: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=914411 Thanks for heads up! This is a bug in the latest upstream release of libcurl. I will apply the ups

Re: Orphaning PycURL

2013-02-22 Thread Jon Ciesla
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 2:21 PM, Seth Vidal wrote: > > > On Fri, 22 Feb 2013, Jon Ciesla wrote: > > >> I'm not familiar with it, nor is it in Fedora yet, but would curlish work? >> >> https://pypi.python.org/pypi/**curlish/ >> >> > > It's calling out to curl

Re: Orphaning PycURL

2013-02-22 Thread Seth Vidal
On Fri, 22 Feb 2013, Jon Ciesla wrote: I'm not familiar with it, nor is it in Fedora yet, but would curlish work? https://pypi.python.org/pypi/curlish/ It's calling out to curl via subprocess - that doesn't feel like a good idea -sv -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Orphaning PycURL

2013-02-22 Thread Jon Ciesla
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 2:19 PM, Jon Ciesla wrote: > > > On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 2:17 PM, Seth Vidal wrote: > >> >> >> On Fri, 22 Feb 2013, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: >> >> On Fri, 2013-02-22 at 12:02 -0800, Samuel Sieb wrote: >>> On 02/22/2013 10:02 AM, Jeffrey Ollie wrote: > Perso

Re: Orphaning PycURL

2013-02-22 Thread Jon Ciesla
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 2:17 PM, Seth Vidal wrote: > > > On Fri, 22 Feb 2013, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > On Fri, 2013-02-22 at 12:02 -0800, Samuel Sieb wrote: >> >>> On 02/22/2013 10:02 AM, Jeffrey Ollie wrote: >>> Personally, I'd like to see Yum move away from PycURL but if someone

Re: Orphaning PycURL

2013-02-22 Thread Seth Vidal
On Fri, 22 Feb 2013, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: On Fri, 2013-02-22 at 12:02 -0800, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 02/22/2013 10:02 AM, Jeffrey Ollie wrote: Personally, I'd like to see Yum move away from PycURL but if someone wants to take over upstream development more power to them. I use pycurl as

Re: Orphaning PycURL

2013-02-22 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Fri, 2013-02-22 at 12:02 -0800, Samuel Sieb wrote: > On 02/22/2013 10:02 AM, Jeffrey Ollie wrote: > > Personally, I'd like to see Yum move away from PycURL but if someone > > wants to take over upstream development more power to them. > > > I use pycurl as well. Do you have a suggestion for an

Re: Orphaning PycURL

2013-02-22 Thread Samuel Sieb
On 02/22/2013 10:02 AM, Jeffrey Ollie wrote: Personally, I'd like to see Yum move away from PycURL but if someone wants to take over upstream development more power to them. I use pycurl as well. Do you have a suggestion for an alternative package to use that has similar capabilities? -- deve

Re: kernel warning in btrfs

2013-02-22 Thread Zach Brown
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 10:32:29AM -0500, Neal Becker wrote: > I'm not reporting, cause kernel was tainted by virtualbox, but should I be > worried? I don't think you should be worried. I think it was a relatively harmless warning that reservations were a little sloppy. Josef says it's been fix

Re: Frequent dbus(?) crashes with Samsung 840 Pro SSD

2013-02-22 Thread Chris Murphy
On Feb 20, 2013, at 10:14 PM, Digimer wrote: > > I wanted to use the onboard FDE but didn't find docs on how to do it. Yeah small problem. They even make it difficult to figure out if it's an OPAL variety of SED. If it is, it's always encrypting, it's just unlocked by default. So figuring out

Re: Build error for naev-data in F19 mass rebuild: GenericError: upload path exists

2013-02-22 Thread Jonathan Dieter
On Fri, 2013-02-22 at 07:54 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Fri, 22 Feb 2013 11:58:18 +0200 > Jonathan Dieter wrote: > > > I just got a bug[1] that naev-data was FTBFS. After examining the > > build logs[2], I'm now confused as to what went wrong. > > > > What does this mean? > > GenericError: u

Orphaning PycURL

2013-02-22 Thread Jeffrey Ollie
Hello, I am going to be orphaning the PycURL package... Upstream is dead, the last new release was in 2008. Yet, PycURL is a critical part of Fedora as Yum uses it to download metadata and packages. The final straw is that the package failed to build in the latest mass rebuild: https://bugzill

[Bug 914275] perl-Business-CreditCard-0.32 is available

2013-02-22 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=914275 Petr Šabata changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED C

[Bug 914276] perl-Email-Valid: FTBFS in rawhide

2013-02-22 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=914276 Ralf Corsepius changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED

Re: Abrt (was Re: Most buggy packages)

2013-02-22 Thread David Malcolm
On Thu, 2013-02-21 at 22:41 +, Ian Malone wrote: > On 21 February 2013 18:24, David Malcolm wrote: > > On Wed, 2013-02-20 at 08:04 +, Ian Malone wrote: > >> On 19 February 2013 12:13, David Malcolm wrote: > > >> > >> Question: does a python segfault from a broken script indicate a > >> p

Re: Orphaning agg

2013-02-22 Thread Jon Ciesla
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 9:28 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Hi, > > I am hereby orphaning agg in all Fedora branches. (In EPEL, it is owned by > orion.) I had picked up agg long ago as a dependency of Gnash, but I handed > over Gnash to hicham months ago and so I don't have any personal interest > in >

kernel warning in btrfs

2013-02-22 Thread Neal Becker
I'm not reporting, cause kernel was tainted by virtualbox, but should I be worried? Feb 22 09:21:58 nbecker1 kernel: [76101.244542] [ cut here ] Feb 22 09:21:58 nbecker1 kernel: [76101.244582] WARNING: at fs/btrfs/inode.c:2165 btrfs_orphan_commit_root+0xf4/0x100 [btrfs](

Orphaning agg

2013-02-22 Thread Kevin Kofler
Hi, I am hereby orphaning agg in all Fedora branches. (In EPEL, it is owned by orion.) I had picked up agg long ago as a dependency of Gnash, but I handed over Gnash to hicham months ago and so I don't have any personal interest in agg anymore. And now it fails to build yet again: https://bugzi

Re: is it possible to download a spec file only using yum?

2013-02-22 Thread poma
On 02/22/13 10:19, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 12:36:43AM +0100, poma wrote: >> Shouldn't the default be an '-a'(anonymous) check out via git? > > Whoops, sorry; forgot about that. I don't think the default should change > since, since I think the most common use is active Fedo

Re: Proposed F19 Feature (exception): Kolab 3

2013-02-22 Thread Kevin Kofler
Bill Nottingham wrote: > The feature submisson deadline was never preliminary. The schedule was > not finalized until after all features were submitted. But it's clear that there was a misunderstanding there, and that all the other criteria for an exception are satisfied. Kevin Kofler -

Package EVR problems in Fedora 2013-02-22

2013-02-22 Thread buildsys
Broken upgrade path report for tags f18 -> f18-updates -> f19: cmpi-bindings: f18-updates > f19 (cmpi-bindings-0.5.2-5.fc18 cmpi-bindings-0.5.2-4.fc19) darktable: f18-updates > f19 (darktable-1.1.3-1.fc18 darktable-1.1-0.1.rc1.fc19) fedora-release-notes: f18 > f19 (fedora-release-note

Re: Build error for naev-data in F19 mass rebuild: GenericError: upload path exists

2013-02-22 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Fri, 22 Feb 2013 11:58:18 +0200 Jonathan Dieter wrote: > I just got a bug[1] that naev-data was FTBFS. After examining the > build logs[2], I'm now confused as to what went wrong. > > What does this mean? > GenericError: upload path > exists: /mnt/koji/work/tasks/9923/423/naev-data-0.5.3

[rt3/f18: 4/4] Merge cleanup.

2013-02-22 Thread corsepiu
commit 22b9bb6e4a5f704f46b194867aa73d8d7a310fed Author: Ralf Corsépius Date: Fri Feb 22 15:42:22 2013 +0100 Merge cleanup. rt3.spec |3 --- 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/rt3.spec b/rt3.spec index 9043c78..fca720a 100644 --- a/rt3.spec +++ b/rt3.spec

[rt3/f18] (4 commits) ...Merge cleanup.

2013-02-22 Thread corsepiu
Summary of changes: 92dbec4... - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_19_Mass (*) 9fc7031... Upstream update. (*) 4a2b3f0... Upstream update. (*) 22b9bb6... Merge cleanup. (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http:

perl-SQL-Translator license change

2013-02-22 Thread Iain Arnell
I've just updated perl-SQL-Translator in rawhide and f18. It comes with a license change from GPLv2 to GPL+ or Artistic (aka the same terms as Perl 5 itself). -- Iain. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: is it possible to download a spec file only using yum?

2013-02-22 Thread Thomas Moschny
If all you want is the spec file, then this probably the easiest way: $ wget http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/firefox.git/plain/firefox.spec However, this way you miss patches, and other auxiliary files. - Thomas -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.

Re: ghostscript changing license from GPLv3+ to AGPLv3+

2013-02-22 Thread Tom Callaway
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 02/22/2013 12:14 PM, Tim Waugh wrote: > On Fri, 2013-02-22 at 11:48 +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: >> Is there some exception (like for the database with the >> unspeakable name), or does this affect CUPS? Will CUPS be >> extended to allow downloadin

Re: ghostscript changing license from GPLv3+ to AGPLv3+

2013-02-22 Thread Tim Waugh
On Fri, 2013-02-22 at 11:48 +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: > Is there some exception (like for the database with the unspeakable > name), or does this affect CUPS? Will CUPS be extended to allow > downloading the Ghostscript source code? Good question: CUPS is licensed as GPLv2, which is listed o

Re: ghostscript changing license from GPLv3+ to AGPLv3+

2013-02-22 Thread Florian Weimer
On 02/22/2013 11:05 AM, Tim Waugh wrote: In Ghostscript 9.07, the license for the majority of the package is changing from GPLv3+ to AGPLv3+ (the Affero General Public License). I intend to update to 9.07 in rawhide shortly. Is there some exception (like for the database with the unspeakable

Re: ghostscript changing license from GPLv3+ to AGPLv3+

2013-02-22 Thread Tim Waugh
In Ghostscript 9.07, the license for the majority of the package is changing from GPLv3+ to AGPLv3+ (the Affero General Public License). I intend to update to 9.07 in rawhide shortly. Tim. */ [Fixed subject line to include new license shortname] signature.asc Description: This is a digitally

[Bug 914307] New: perl-PDL: FTBFS in rawhide

2013-02-22 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=914307 Bug ID: 914307 Summary: perl-PDL: FTBFS in rawhide Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-PDL Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified

[Bug 914302] New: perl-Net-Domain-TLD: FTBFS in rawhide

2013-02-22 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=914302 Bug ID: 914302 Summary: perl-Net-Domain-TLD: FTBFS in rawhide Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Net-Domain-TLD Severity: unspecified Priority:

[Bug 914303] New: perl-Net-IP-CMatch: FTBFS in rawhide

2013-02-22 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=914303 Bug ID: 914303 Summary: perl-Net-IP-CMatch: FTBFS in rawhide Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Net-IP-CMatch Severity: unspecified Priority: u

ghostscript changing license from GPLv3+

2013-02-22 Thread Tim Waugh
In Ghostscript 9.07, the license for the majority of the package is changing from GPLv3+ to AGPLv3+ (the Affero General Public License). I intend to update to 9.07 in rawhide shortly. Tim. */ signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- devel mailing list devel@lists.

[Bug 914301] New: perl-Net-Amazon-S3: FTBFS in rawhide

2013-02-22 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=914301 Bug ID: 914301 Summary: perl-Net-Amazon-S3: FTBFS in rawhide Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Net-Amazon-S3 Severity: unspecified Priority: u

[Bug 914300] New: perl-Net-Amazon-EC2: FTBFS in rawhide

2013-02-22 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=914300 Bug ID: 914300 Summary: perl-Net-Amazon-EC2: FTBFS in rawhide Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Net-Amazon-EC2 Severity: unspecified Priority:

[Bug 914293] New: perl-Lingua-EN-Inflect: FTBFS in rawhide

2013-02-22 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=914293 Bug ID: 914293 Summary: perl-Lingua-EN-Inflect: FTBFS in rawhide Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Lingua-EN-Inflect Severity: unspecified Pri

[Bug 914292] New: perl-Ima-DBI: FTBFS in rawhide

2013-02-22 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=914292 Bug ID: 914292 Summary: perl-Ima-DBI: FTBFS in rawhide Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Ima-DBI Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified

[Bug 914296] New: perl-Mail-GnuPG: FTBFS in rawhide

2013-02-22 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=914296 Bug ID: 914296 Summary: perl-Mail-GnuPG: FTBFS in rawhide Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Mail-GnuPG Severity: unspecified Priority: unspeci

Build error for naev-data in F19 mass rebuild: GenericError: upload path exists

2013-02-22 Thread Jonathan Dieter
I just got a bug[1] that naev-data was FTBFS. After examining the build logs[2], I'm now confused as to what went wrong. What does this mean? GenericError: upload path exists: /mnt/koji/work/tasks/9923/423/naev-data-0.5.3-7.fc19.noarch.rpm Jonathan [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.c

Re: Odd error message on build blender-2.66-1.fc19

2013-02-22 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 03:26:42PM -0700, Orion Poplawski wrote: > On 02/21/2013 02:47 PM, Jochen Schmitt wrote: > >Hello, > > > >I have tried to build the recent released version of blender. But > >unfotunately, > >I have got the following odd error message: > > > >+ /usr/lib/rpm/find-debuginfo.s

Re: is it possible to download a spec file only using yum?

2013-02-22 Thread Matthew Miller
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 12:36:43AM +0100, poma wrote: > Shouldn't the default be an '-a'(anonymous) check out via git? Whoops, sorry; forgot about that. I don't think the default should change since, since I think the most common use is active Fedora contributors. If you find yourself using this a