RE: Re: 64-bit stat (or not) in 32-bit Fedora binaries

2013-02-19 Thread Mamoru Tasaka
> On Tue, 19 Feb 2013 20:13:23 +0900, Mamoru TASAKA wrote: > > > Well, cifs-mounted filesystem already returns such large inode, and > > xscreensaver > > already suffered from this issue. > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xscreensaver/+bug/609451/comments/11 > > About your recent com

Updated nss in Rawhide to nss-3.14.3

2013-02-19 Thread Elio Maldonado
Hi all, This is a patch release primarily to address CVE-2013-1620 For details please see the upstream release notes are at https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/NSS/NSS_3.14.3_release_notes Cheers, Elio -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mail

Re: 64-bit stat (or not) in 32-bit Fedora binaries

2013-02-19 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Tue, 19 Feb 2013 20:13:23 +0900, Mamoru TASAKA wrote: > Well, cifs-mounted filesystem already returns such large inode, and > xscreensaver > already suffered from this issue. > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xscreensaver/+bug/609451/comments/11 About your recent comment there on AC

Re: Abrt (was Re: Most buggy packages)

2013-02-19 Thread Dave Jones
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 10:10:38PM +0100, Jiri Moskovcak wrote: > >>So if you want to hack this into a tool for use on kernel bugs, go for > >>it. > >...and please integrate with abrt! Let's have it all working together :) > > - I am all for it, the abrt server is exactly the place where the

Schedule for Wednesday's FESCo Meeting (2013-02-20)

2013-02-19 Thread Miloslav Trmač
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting Wednesday at 18:00UTC (1:00pm EST, 19:00 CET) in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net. Links to all tickets below can be found at: https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/report/9 = Followups = #topic #988 F19 Feature: System Conf

Re: 64-bit stat (or not) in 32-bit Fedora binaries

2013-02-19 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Mon, 18 Feb 2013 19:37:05 -0500, Sam Varshavchik wrote: > Eric Sandeen writes: > > > and it's not just weird obscure packages: > > > > # ./summarize-stat.pl `rpm -ql sendmail` > > This is not accurate. -ql will also list directories, and summarize-stat.pl > then proceeds to chew on every fi

Re: Mass closing EOL bugs should not close bugs with pending updates

2013-02-19 Thread John5342
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 2:26 PM, Christoph Wickert wrote: > Am Montag, den 18.02.2013, 23:34 + schrieb John5342: >> On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 10:52 PM, Christoph Wickert >> wrote: >> > Despite of the question whether it's right or wrong it's a manual >> > process and we cannot rely it really ha

Re: Submitting new package

2013-02-19 Thread Derek Pressnall
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 3:01 PM, Paul Wouters wrote: > On Tue, 19 Feb 2013, Derek Pressnall wrote: Is this the proper list to ask? Thanks. > > Yes it is! > > Paul Cool. First off, I'd like for someone to review my project in general terms, while I'm working on the RPM, to validate that it wou

Re: Abrt (was Re: Most buggy packages)

2013-02-19 Thread Jiri Moskovcak
On 02/19/2013 10:06 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: On 19/02/13 10:38 AM, David Malcolm wrote: On Tue, 2013-02-19 at 11:43 -0500, Dave Jones wrote: On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 07:13:27AM -0500, David Malcolm wrote: > I have a script that automates some of the workload of reassigning the > component

Re: Abrt (was Re: Most buggy packages)

2013-02-19 Thread Adam Williamson
On 19/02/13 10:38 AM, David Malcolm wrote: On Tue, 2013-02-19 at 11:43 -0500, Dave Jones wrote: On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 07:13:27AM -0500, David Malcolm wrote: > I have a script that automates some of the workload of reassigning the > component back to where the bug really is, but it current

Re: Submitting new package

2013-02-19 Thread Paul Wouters
On Tue, 19 Feb 2013, Derek Pressnall wrote: Hello, I'm looking at submitting my first package to Fedora, for a backup system I recently contributed as open source. I've read through most of the packaging guidelines (and have been doing RPM packages in a corporate environment for a few years), b

Submitting new package

2013-02-19 Thread Derek Pressnall
Hello, I'm looking at submitting my first package to Fedora, for a backup system I recently contributed as open source. I've read through most of the packaging guidelines (and have been doing RPM packages in a corporate environment for a few years), but have a few Fedora-specific questions. Is th

[pkgdb] perl-ExtUtils-Typemaps (un)retirement

2013-02-19 Thread Fedora PackageDB
Package perl-ExtUtils-Typemaps in Fedora devel has been retired by churchyard To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-ExtUtils-Typemaps -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de..

[perl-ExtUtils-Typemaps] The content of this package is provided by binary package perl-ExtUtils-ParseXS (from perl source pa

2013-02-19 Thread Miro Hrončok
commit 5688d5a3e5d2192413c51ac8e46c274425b52722 Author: Miro Hrončok Date: Tue Feb 19 20:52:01 2013 +0100 The content of this package is provided by binary package perl-ExtUtils-ParseXS (from perl source package) dead.package |1 + 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) ---

Re: Xboard update

2013-02-19 Thread Rahul Sundaram
Hi > On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 1:10 PM, Eduardo Jorge > wrote: > >> Fedora has one spin of games, then the packages of games >> must also be brought up to date, I thin especially about xboard, an >> interesting games of chess with artificial intelligenc and that is has an >> obsole

Orphaning gnome-media, gmyth, EOL'ing gnome-lirc-properties

2013-02-19 Thread Bastien Nocera
Heya, gnome-media is unmaintained upstream, and the only interesting thing left in that package is the sound recorder, for which I'm sure there are better alternatives (both in terms of UI and maintainership). gmyth is also unmaintained upstream as far as I know. I haven't used it in a long while

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: Cinnamon as Default Desktop

2013-02-19 Thread Rahul Sundaram
Hi On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 11:43 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote: > > LOL… Any bug report about one of GNOME's intentional "improvements" gets > instantly closed as INVALID, NOTABUG or WONTFIX (or as a duplicate of an > existing bug in one of these states). > This is of course a false generalization. S

Re: Xboard update

2013-02-19 Thread Rahul Sundaram
Hi On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 1:10 PM, Eduardo Jorge wrote: > Fedora has one spin of games, then the packages of games > must also be brought up to date, I thin especially about xboard, an > interesting games of chess with artificial intelligenc and that is has an > obsolete version

Re: Abrt (was Re: Most buggy packages)

2013-02-19 Thread David Malcolm
On Tue, 2013-02-19 at 11:43 -0500, Dave Jones wrote: > On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 07:13:27AM -0500, David Malcolm wrote: > > > I have a script that automates some of the workload of reassigning the > > component back to where the bug really is, but it currently requires > > some manual interventi

Re: Should MariaDB touch my.cnf in %post?

2013-02-19 Thread Przemek Klosowski
On 02/17/2013 02:42 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: "which fool has written" was not and is not offending in EVERY situation in real life the question to the quote you stripped would have been clearly "Welcher Trottel hat dann die Feature-Page geschrieben" in my native language, even if my boss himsel

Re: 64-bit stat (or not) in 32-bit Fedora binaries

2013-02-19 Thread Kevin Kofler
Petr Pisar wrote: > Is %configure spec macro the right place to define FILE_OFFSET_BITS? I'd suggest throwing it into %{_optflags}. FWIW, all KDE software is already built with -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64, FindKDE4Internal.cmake forces it (unless off_t is already 64-bit by default). (Of course, this

Re: Mass closing EOL bugs should not close bugs with pending updates

2013-02-19 Thread Kevin Kofler
Christoph Wickert wrote: > Maybe it is a corner case, but what you describe is a corner case of the > corner case. How many updates get actually withdrawn? 1%, 2%, 5%? At distro EOL, all of them… Way too many updates get stuck in updates- testing and do not make it out to stable in time for the EO

[offlist] Re: Should MariaDB touch my.cnf in %post?

2013-02-19 Thread Andrew Rist
On 2/19/2013 2:08 AM, Sergei Golubchik wrote: P.S. Frankly speaking, I didn't realize I was replying to an Oracle employee :) Thanks for poining it out! OK - that's funny... A. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: Cinnamon as Default Desktop

2013-02-19 Thread Kevin Kofler
Mathieu Bridon wrote: > That's called "reporting a bug", and (as far as I'm concerned) it > actually works, especially when you're specific. You should try it: > https://bugzilla.gnome.org LOL… Any bug report about one of GNOME's intentional "improvements" gets instantly closed as INVALID, N

Re: Abrt (was Re: Most buggy packages)

2013-02-19 Thread Dave Jones
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 07:13:27AM -0500, David Malcolm wrote: > I have a script that automates some of the workload of reassigning the > component back to where the bug really is, but it currently requires > some manual intervention: > http://fedorapeople.org/cgit/dmalcolm/public_git/triage.

Re: 64-bit stat (or not) in 32-bit Fedora binaries

2013-02-19 Thread Eric Sandeen
On 2/19/13 9:22 AM, Eric Sandeen wrote: > On 2/19/13 4:46 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: >> On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 03:33:33PM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote: >>> XFS recently defaulted to allowing > 32 bit inode numbers, and btrfs >>> can let inode numbers creep past 2^32 as well. >>> >>> While most app

Re: 64-bit stat (or not) in 32-bit Fedora binaries

2013-02-19 Thread Florian Weimer
On 02/19/2013 05:09 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: You can't use ino_t and off_t in public header files because of that _FILE_OFFSET_BITS dependency. At least in such header files, using explicit 64-bit types (uint64_t, presumably) is the way to go. You can use it in public header files just fine,

Re: 64-bit stat (or not) in 32-bit Fedora binaries

2013-02-19 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 05:04:43PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: > On 02/19/2013 04:32 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > >On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 09:22:55AM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote: > >>>(3) For my code that uses st_ino, I need to ensure this is never > >>>assigned to a 32 bit integer (eg. 'int', 'int32_

Re: 64-bit stat (or not) in 32-bit Fedora binaries

2013-02-19 Thread Florian Weimer
On 02/19/2013 04:32 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 09:22:55AM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote: (3) For my code that uses st_ino, I need to ensure this is never assigned to a 32 bit integer (eg. 'int', 'int32_t', 'long' on 32 bit, etc.)? To be safe I'd use it in an u64 type, I guess

Re: About cron files and rpmlint

2013-02-19 Thread Sergio Belkin
Thanks guys 2013/2/19 Miroslav Suchý > On 02/19/2013 03:43 PM, Sergio Belkin wrote: > >> Hi, rpmlint complains about cron files, is that a bug? >> >> For example: >> >> tmpwatch.x86_64: E: executable-marked-as-config-**file >> /etc/cron.daily/tmpwatch >> Executables must not be marked as config

Re: 64-bit stat (or not) in 32-bit Fedora binaries

2013-02-19 Thread Eric Sandeen
On 2/19/13 9:32 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 09:22:55AM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote: >>> (3) For my code that uses st_ino, I need to ensure this is never >>> assigned to a 32 bit integer (eg. 'int', 'int32_t', 'long' on 32 bit, etc.)? >> >> To be safe I'd use it in an u64 type,

[perl-Devel-PatchPerl] update to 0.78

2013-02-19 Thread Iain Arnell
commit 3e13179037b8dd298a88da159d362c1d78953e5a Author: Iain Arnell Date: Tue Feb 19 08:37:02 2013 -0700 update to 0.78 .gitignore|1 + perl-Devel-PatchPerl.spec |7 +-- sources |2 +- 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) --- d

File Devel-PatchPerl-0.78.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by iarnell

2013-02-19 Thread Iain Arnell
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Devel-PatchPerl: 3b94806ad28da14e8c6d19e1a4ebbb22 Devel-PatchPerl-0.78.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.o

Re: 64-bit stat (or not) in 32-bit Fedora binaries

2013-02-19 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 09:22:55AM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote: > > (3) For my code that uses st_ino, I need to ensure this is never > > assigned to a 32 bit integer (eg. 'int', 'int32_t', 'long' on 32 bit, etc.)? > > To be safe I'd use it in an u64 type, I guess. The *internal* kernel stat > struc

Re: About cron files and rpmlint

2013-02-19 Thread Miroslav Suchý
On 02/19/2013 03:43 PM, Sergio Belkin wrote: Hi, rpmlint complains about cron files, is that a bug? For example: tmpwatch.x86_64: E: executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/cron.daily/tmpwatch Executables must not be marked as config files because that may prevent upgrades from working correctly.

Re: About cron files and rpmlint

2013-02-19 Thread Matthew Miller
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 11:43:53AM -0300, Sergio Belkin wrote: > Hi, rpmlint complains about cron files, is that a bug? > For example: > tmpwatch.x86_64: E: executable-marked-as-config-file > /etc/cron.daily/tmpwatch > Executables must not be marked as config files because that may prevent > upgrad

Re: tcl;tk update

2013-02-19 Thread Xose Vazquez Perez
On 02/19/2013 12:25 AM, Eduardo Jorge wrote: > I guess tck;tk 8.6 is a very nice update to Fedora 19. Already reported: http://bugzilla.redhat.com/889201 -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: 64-bit stat (or not) in 32-bit Fedora binaries

2013-02-19 Thread Eric Sandeen
On 2/19/13 4:46 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 03:33:33PM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote: >> XFS recently defaulted to allowing > 32 bit inode numbers, and btrfs >> can let inode numbers creep past 2^32 as well. >> >> While most applications don't care one bit about st_ino retur

Re: Mass closing EOL bugs should not close bugs with pending updates

2013-02-19 Thread Tadej Janež
On Tue, 2013-02-19 at 03:52 -0500, Jaroslav Reznik wrote: > As Adam pointed out - Bugzilla is not a best tool. The script I was > given is neither a state of the art. Definitely it could be > enhanced - semi-atomic operations to avoid conflicts, more clever > work with BZ states. But more complex

Re: 64-bit stat (or not) in 32-bit Fedora binaries

2013-02-19 Thread Eric Sandeen
On 2/19/13 6:48 AM, Petr Pisar wrote: > On 2013-02-18, Eric Sandeen wrote: >> >> Anyway, if you want to check your package(s) and maybe make them >> 64-bit-stat safe, the perl script above might help. It's more than >> just -DFILE_OFFSET_BITS=64, since you'll need to be sure not to >> overflow an

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: Apache OpenOffice

2013-02-19 Thread Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
On 02/19/2013 07:50 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: It will be clarified. The concern there started with the assumption that "yum install OpenOffice.org" would install something else. It doesn't, of course. So the following discussion is largely irrelevant, but again we will be following the FES

Re: Frequent dbus(?) crashes with Samsung 840 Pro SSD

2013-02-19 Thread Digimer
On 02/19/2013 01:49 AM, Chris Murphy wrote: On Feb 18, 2013, at 10:13 PM, Digimer wrote: what's "offline data collection"? http://smartmontools.sourceforge.net/man/smartctl.8.html Read in particular the paragraph containing the word unfortunate. 0x0009 2 19 Transition from d

[perl-local-lib] update to 1.008007

2013-02-19 Thread Iain Arnell
commit 4e7dc97b084c041b7fa324b88cea6e1063ab7647 Author: Iain Arnell Date: Tue Feb 19 07:49:29 2013 -0700 update to 1.008007 .gitignore |1 + perl-local-lib.spec |7 +-- sources |2 +- 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/.g

About cron files and rpmlint

2013-02-19 Thread Sergio Belkin
Hi, rpmlint complains about cron files, is that a bug? For example: tmpwatch.x86_64: E: executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/cron.daily/tmpwatch Executables must not be marked as config files because that may prevent upgrades from working correctly. If you need to be able to customize an executa

File local-lib-1.008007.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by iarnell

2013-02-19 Thread Iain Arnell
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-local-lib: 6a22da47099fafd664a9fd7c7b24805c local-lib-1.008007.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailm

Re: 64-bit stat (or not) in 32-bit Fedora binaries

2013-02-19 Thread Petr Pisar
On 2013-02-19, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 12:33:07PM +, Petr Pisar wrote: >> EOVERFLOW >> (stat()) path refers to a file whose size cannot be represented >> in the type off_t. This can occur when an application compiled >> on a 32-bit platform with

Re: Mass closing EOL bugs should not close bugs with pending updates

2013-02-19 Thread Christoph Wickert
Am Montag, den 18.02.2013, 23:34 + schrieb John5342: > On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 10:52 PM, Christoph Wickert > wrote: > > Despite of the question whether it's right or wrong it's a manual > > process and we cannot rely it really happens. On the other hand changing > > the script to not close any

Proposed F19 Feature: Resource Management Tools

2013-02-19 Thread Jaroslav Reznik
This Feature has been submitted *before* Feature Submission Deadline and it required input/changes from the owner or it was queued. = Features/ResourceManagementTools = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/ResourceManagementTools Feature owner(s): Daniel Berrange This feature will provide a

Re: Mass Rebuild for Fedora 19

2013-02-19 Thread Dennis Gilmore
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 El Fri, 8 Feb 2013 03:40:09 -0600 Dennis Gilmore escribió: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > it was requested in https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1004 that > we do a mass rebuild for Fedora 19 for > http://fedoraproject.org/w

Re: 64-bit stat (or not) in 32-bit Fedora binaries

2013-02-19 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 12:33:07PM +, Petr Pisar wrote: > EOVERFLOW > (stat()) path refers to a file whose size cannot be represented > in the type off_t. This can occur when an application compiled > on a 32-bit platform without -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 calls stat() >

Re: 64-bit stat (or not) in 32-bit Fedora binaries

2013-02-19 Thread Petr Pisar
On 2013-02-18, Eric Sandeen wrote: > > Anyway, if you want to check your package(s) and maybe make them > 64-bit-stat safe, the perl script above might help. It's more than > just -DFILE_OFFSET_BITS=64, since you'll need to be sure not to > overflow any large values you get back from stat64 etc.

Re: 64-bit stat (or not) in 32-bit Fedora binaries

2013-02-19 Thread Petr Pisar
On 2013-02-19, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 03:33:33PM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote: > (1) Just ensuring the code is compiled with -DFILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 is > sufficient to ensure the 32 bit stat will never be called, right? > I think so. > (2) If my code never mentions st_ino,

Re: 64-bit stat (or not) in 32-bit Fedora binaries

2013-02-19 Thread Mamoru TASAKA
Eric Sandeen wrote, at 02/19/2013 06:33 AM +9:00: XFS recently defaulted to allowing > 32 bit inode numbers, and btrfs can let inode numbers creep past 2^32 as well. While most applications don't care one bit about st_ino returned from a stat() call, the sad fact is that you'll get EOVERFLOW fro

Re: Should MariaDB touch my.cnf in %post?

2013-02-19 Thread Sergei Golubchik
Hi, Adam! On Feb 19, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > > A lot of new features - yes, undoubtely. > > Performance improvements - questionable. > > This link shows a very different picture: > > http://blog.mariadb.org/sysbench-oltp-mysql-5-6-vs-mariadb-10-0/ > > I'm not sure we need Oracle and Maria to

Re: Most buggy packages

2013-02-19 Thread Christopher Meng
I've hit gnomeshell problem for 13 times and rtythmbox for 7 times. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: 64-bit stat (or not) in 32-bit Fedora binaries

2013-02-19 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 03:33:33PM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote: > XFS recently defaulted to allowing > 32 bit inode numbers, and btrfs > can let inode numbers creep past 2^32 as well. > > While most applications don't care one bit about st_ino returned > from a stat() call, the sad fact is that you'l

Re: headsup for llvm-3.2

2013-02-19 Thread Jens Petersen
Ok, llvm-3.2 is now in F19 Rawhide. [1] Mesa, gambas3, and OpenGTL have been rebuilt, which should take care of libllvm dependencies, except for "pure" which no longer seems [2] to build with libedit [3]. :-| Jens [1] http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5031762 [2] http://koji.fe

Re: Should MariaDB touch my.cnf in %post?

2013-02-19 Thread Adam Williamson
On 18/02/13 09:01 PM, Sergei Golubchik wrote: Hi, Andrew! On Feb 18, Andrew Rist wrote: No, it's not crippleware - it's the world's most popular open source database software. A world's most popular open source database software can be crippleware too. Wikipedia defines crippleware as " De

Re: Mass closing EOL bugs should not close bugs with pending updates

2013-02-19 Thread Jaroslav Reznik
- Original Message - > On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 10:52 PM, Christoph Wickert > wrote: > > Despite of the question whether it's right or wrong it's a manual > > process and we cannot rely it really happens. On the other hand > > changing > > the script to not close any bugs which are ON_QA is

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: Apache OpenOffice

2013-02-19 Thread James Hogarth
> > Regards, > Andrea. Thanks kindly for the update! -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel